YFP 077: Making the Financial Transition from PharmD to Residency


Making the Financial Transition from PharmD to Resident

On episode 77 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast, Tim Ulbrich, founder of Your Financial Pharmacist, interviews Dr. Michael Murphy, a 2018 PharmD graduate of THE Ohio State University College of Pharmacy and current PGY1 pharmacy practice resident in ambulatory care at Ohio State. Dr. Murphy served as the APhA-ASP National President from 2017-2018. In this episode, Dr. Murphy and Tim talk about his financial transition from student to resident, what he wishes he would have known financially during pharmacy school and how being involved in professional organizations has put him on the fast track to a successful career.

About Today’s Guest

Michael Murphy, PharmD is a PGY1 Pharmacy Resident in an Ambulatory Care Setting at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy. Born in Columbus, Ohio, Michael attended Hilliard Davidson High School and then headed down the street to complete his undergraduate degree and attend pharmacy school at Ohio State. During his time at the College of Pharmacy, he found his passion in advocating for an enhanced educational experience for today’s student pharmacists and for the future of the profession. Michael focused on these passions through involvement in student organizations and has held several volunteer leadership positions where he served his peers and profession, including his term as the 2017-2018 American Pharmacists Association Academy of Student Pharmacists (APhA-ASP) National President. Michael is interested in pursuing a career in academia where he looks forward to training the next generation of pharmacists and advocating for the advancement of the profession.

Join APhA

Join APhA now to gain premier access to YFP facilitated webinars, financial articles, live events, resources, and consultations. Your membership will also allow you to receive exclusive discounts on YFP products and services. You can join APhA at a 20% discount by visiting www.pharmacist.com/join-now and using coupon code ‘AYFP18’. For more information about our financial resources, visit www.pharmacist.com/financial-education.

Summary

On this episode, Tim Ulbrich interviews Dr. Michael Murphy. Dr. Murphy went to Ohio State University and graduated from his undergraduate degree with no loans. He began taking loans out for his first year of pharmacy school and took out the maximum amount for four years.

Q: What would you have done differently then now that you know that borrowing the maximum amount isn’t the best option?

A: Dr. Murphy explains that he would have learned about budgeting, monitor your day-to-day spending and also shares the importance of not taking extra student loans out for vacations. After your first semester, you can figure out how much money you actually need instead of just continuing to borrow the maximum amount.

Q: What’s your strategy to make finances work well in marriage?

A: Dr. Murphy shares that communication, cutting costs where you need to, and working together to set fun goals helps are ways to help make your finances work well in a relationship.

Q: Did the indebtedness ever play a factor in deciding to continue your education/residency instead of getting a job right away?

A: Dr. Murphy said this definitely played a factor, but he has seen his mentors go through residency and be able to pay back their loans. He said that he looks at residency as an investment to move his career forward and knew that was the best choice for him.

Q: How are you deciding which repayment plan to choose?

A: Dr. Murphy says that originally he was very ambitious and chose the standard repayment plan for his loans. Now, he and his wife are working with a financial advisor to see what will make the most sense. They are going to switch to an income-based repayment plan and work on paying off other loans first. He has a goal of paying off his loans in 10 years.

Q: How did you make the decision to work with a financial planner?

A: Dr. Murphy said that he wasn’t familiar with student loan options, retirement or investments and thought that going to an expert was the best decision. They chose someone that other family members have used and they feel comfortable working with him.

Q: What tangible benefit do you feel like professional organizational involvement has played for you as a student but also in transitioning to residency?

A: Dr. Murphy said that it’s important to think about what brings value to the money that is being spent. APhA is always fighting for the future of the profession so pharmacy remains relevant and a successful provider. APhA provides resources to help you prepare and practice at the highest level. The relationships that have been formed, although intangible, provide so much value.

Q: After joining a professional organization, what advice do you have for students and new practitioners to further their involvement?

A: Dr. Murphy suggests to take a small positive risk like applying for a leadership position or starting a new project that you are interested in. If you are unsure of how to get more involvement, ask.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 077 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Excited to have a special guest on today’s show, Dr. Michael Murphy, past president of APhASP, current pharmacy resident at the Ohio State University, excited to talk with him about his transition from student to resident. And obviously, now I just officially began my new job at Ohio State. So excited to be here alongside another Buckeye who’s been a Buckeye for a long time. So Dr. Murphy, welcome to the show.

Michael Murphy: Hey, Tim. Super excited to be here. Thanks for having me on the show.

Tim Ulbrich: So I’ve only been at Ohio State, Michael, for a week. And man, the Ohio State culture and energy and that traditions and the legacy, it’s no joke. It’s a lot of fun. And you’ve been there awhile. What — nine years now?

Michael Murphy: Yeah, I’ve been there for nine years. And you know, I don’t think they can get rid of me. I love being a Buckeye, all of the opportunities that it provides to me, my career, and of course, getting to go to those football games, that’s fun too.

Tim Ulbrich: Absolutely. I have to up my game when it comes to Buckeye gear. I’m lacking the Buckeye gear. So as I’ve gone into work over the past week and been in other people’s offices and been there for a Buckeye Friday, I’ve realized that I’ve really got to up my game in that area. So why don’t we start by just tell us a little bit about yourself, including your decision to enter pharmacy school. Why did you want to be a pharmacist in the first place? A little bit about your journey through the PharmD and then ultimately, what led you to choose and pursue the residency training and the path that you’re doing right now?

Michael Murphy: Sure. I’d be happy to. So I am Columbus, Ohio born and raised. I grew up in Hilliard, which is a suburb of Columbus. And while in high school, I started taking some science classes. I took chemistry. And I knew immediately that I loved science. Actually, this is kind of funny. I was the proud only member of the high school chemistry club.

Tim Ulbrich: Only member.

Michael Murphy: Yes. I was real popular in high school. Around the same time, I started volunteering at the Ohio State Wexner Medical Center. I had volunteered, I would take patients from their rooms to their cars when it was time for them to go home. And I just loved seeing these patients on their best day because they were finally getting to go home. So I knew in high school that I loved science, I loved health care, and I was trying to find this way that I could tie those two ideas together. And around the end of high school, my grandfather ended up passing away. And he had been a pharmacist in the Cleveland, Ohio area for about 50 years. And it’s kind of funny how I just learned more about him throughout the process of, you know, him passing away and learned more about the impact that he had made on his community and his profession. And I’ll never forget going to his funeral and seeing all these community members come out that I had never really heard about before, but he’d made a huge impact in their life as this local community pharmacist. And I knew right there that that was the profession for me. I wanted to be a pharmacist so I could make as big of a difference in my community as my grandfather had. So I knew from 16 that I was going to be this pharmacist. And I went to Ohio State with that in mind and stuck around for eight years, and here I am.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I love that story, Michael. I remember when you were in your national presidency of APhASP, talking a lot about finding your legacy and finding that place that you have in the profession. And hearing you link that back to the inspiration from your grandfather is such a cool story. And so you go into Ohio State — and for those that don’t know and while it’s changing right now, Ohio State is a 4+4 program, so you do four years of undergrad and you do four years of pharmacy school. Obviously, you mentioned that you’re in year nine with your residency. So when I hear eight years, I think, holy cow, we’re starting to think about student loans. This is obviously a financial podcast. So talk me through the financial journey. Did you have loans coming out of undergrad in a pharmacy school? And how did that transition work?

Michael Murphy: So I was really lucky in undergrad. My parents were able to help me significantly with my undergraduate tuition, so I did not have loans coming out of undergrad. But going into pharmacy school, I went through the first year of applying for the FAFSA and seeing that transition. It was pretty significant. And I immediately started to feel that burden, just knowing that this money was not mine. But I should be spending it. It was a weird transition. But now, going through pharmacy school, I took out the max that I could for those four years. And I definitely — there are some things that I wish I had done differently, now looking back. I’m glad for my experience, it was a very positive experience during the pharmacy school. But there was definitely things I could have done differently to help myself now that I’m in this financial situation that I am today.

Tim Ulbrich: So let’s talk about that for a minute because I think you brought up an important point that is very, very common that obviously the trend I think is typically to take out the maximum amount of student loans. I did, and I didn’t really think about it in the way I now reflect back on it, right? Which is just part of lessons learned. So obviously, that being one thing you might do. What advice would you have back for your P1 self, looking and saying, OK, I came out of undergrad, I’ve got no student loans thanks to the help of my parents. Now I’m entering into pharmacy school and kind of starting to escalate that indebtedness because of the borrowing the full amount. What would you have done differently in terms of borrowing that money or budgeting through that phase? And what are some things you wish that you would have known during that time?

Michael Murphy: Well, one, I would have introduced P1 Michael to the word “budget.” I think that would be one thing. I watched my money somewhat. But I wasn’t too concerned when it came to little things like going out for dinner or getting lunch, cups of coffee, the normal things that every student needs to do. And when I was thinking about some advice that I could give to a first-year student pharmacist, I would say definitely don’t do what some of my friends did, which they took their extra student loans and they went on these extravagant vacations. Never do that. But also watch your day-to-day because looking back now, that is some of the times that I spent the most money because I would say, “Oh, I’m too busy to go to the grocery store on the weekend. I have to study.” So I would end up having to go out for dinner multiple times a week and go out for lunch. And that stuff adds up quick. So watching the day-to-day can be a significant change in what you can do to help with some of this financial burden. And then after that first semester, you can figure out how much money do you really need? You probably don’t need that full amount. You can budget for yourself to make financial smart decisions now so you’re not regretting them in four years.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, absolutely. And I think a couple things there that really stand out to me, Michael. Obviously, the concept of the budgeting piece, of course. But also just the reality of the nickel-and-diming of those expenses, right? And I think we all feel this now. I mean, I’m thinking of the last time I just logged onto my Huntington checking account, and none of those charges look extravagant, but something here, something there, something there, and obviously, those add up over time. And then I hope for the students that are listening to the podcast, you know, they heard that message of reevaluating how much you really need because we’ve been preaching before on this show at anybody who will listen that when you’re borrowing money in school, obviously that is accruing interest. And then that’s going to capitalize when you graduate and you get to the point of active repayment, which you’re just coming up on now and we’ll talk about here in a minute. And so I think it’s for those that have gone through this situation, and you’re looking at yourself in a situation like Michael and somebody who has around the average indebtedness or myself, somebody who had a little bit more, that certainly you want to learn from the lessons and the actions that you took. But obviously, there’s only so much value in beating yourself up. But for those students who are listening, try to figure out what could I do differently right now? And how could I pivot to be able to make some different decisions? So let me transition this a little bit — my understanding, you got married during pharmacy school to your wife, Robin. Is that correct?

Michael Murphy: Yeah, we got married right after my P1 year. So we actually got married about four days after my first year of pharmacy school. And that was a rough transition in itself because the idea is you’re planning about a year to a year and a half before the wedding. And starting pharmacy school and that transition, things just got put off initially to winter break. And then winter break, we were like busy with holidays and seeing family, and things got put off again. And then all of a sudden, we were scrambling. But everything turned out perfectly, as it always does.

Tim Ulbrich: And one of the questions that I always like to ask any couple or anybody on the show that’s working together with somebody else — and obviously, your situation being unique that you got married during school and you’re adding somebody else’s financial picture into the mix. But for you and Robin, what works well for the two of you? I mean, when you’re hitting all cylinders with your finances and you’re doing this well — we all know that that’s not all the time or we’d be lying, right? — but when it’s working well for the two of you, what is the strategy to make that happen?

Michael Murphy: So I think the most important thing is communication. Working with your significant other to set goals that work for both of you so that you can help cut costs where you really don’t need to be spending money. So I’ll use the example of eating out. That’s an easy way to make a pretty quick transition to you just going to the grocery store, preparing ahead of time, setting yourself up for success so you’re not going out to lunch multiple times a week. But also working together on setting fun goals. So part of financial planning, at least for me, is not just about cutting back but using your extra funds in a responsible and valuable way for your own experiences. And I think that’s pretty important. So you’re not just cutting back, but you’re really using those extra funds for something that means a lot to you. So if that’s for me and Robin, that’s going out and exploring a local craft brewery or going to a local restaurant and doing the things that we love to do or taking a quick day trip or for Robin, who is a dairy farmer, going out and seeing some of her favorite cows and maybe putting in a bid at an auction for a cow.

Tim Ulbrich: That’s awesome. I remember — correct me if I’m wrong — but when you were explaining to me before you recorded of what Robin’s doing, you mentioned something like the dairy farm equivalent of like APhA from an association standpoint. Is that right?

Michael Murphy: Yeah. So she works on her parents’ dairy farm a couple days a week. But she also works for the American Guernsey Association, which is what I liken to the APhA for dairy farmers.

Tim Ulbrich: That’s awesome. I love that. So let’s talk about this transition. So you go through eight years of school, undergrad, PharmD, you come out with roughly the average indebtedness, a little bit less than that. And one of the questions I often get — and my previous job was working with students, thinking about how this financial piece plays into the career decisions that they make. And I can comfortably say I felt like it was rare five, six, seven years ago that many people were thinking about this financial piece in a significant way of impacting the decision they made on residency or no residency. But that seems to be changing a little bit as the indebtedness continues to grow. And so my question for you is did the indebtedness — obviously you decided to pursue residency — but did the indebtedness ever play a factor that you thought, eh, maybe I will or maybe I won’t do this because of that dollar amount and the debt you had, versus just going out and getting a job and starting earning an income?

Michael Murphy: Hmm. That’s a good question. I mean, it was definitely a factor. I didn’t put too much weight into it because I’ve seen so many of my mentors go through residency and take that year of investment in their future and into their careers. And they’re able to still pay off their student loans, and it’s not significantly contributing to any problems that they see in the future. But it was definitely a factor. And I guess it depends on the way that I think about residency. Some people think that, oh, you’re taking a pay cut for that year. I think of it as me paying for this experience. And for me, I want to make sure that if I’m paying the difference between what I’m making as a resident and what I would be making as a starting salaried pharmacist, that that experience is worth it for me for my growth and for a springboard for my future career. So I felt like that investment made sense for me. It doesn’t make sense for everyone, but it made sense for me and for my career goals. Now, the idea of not being able to start paying off my student loans as quickly and as hard as I would like to, that’s definitely been something that I’ve been thinking about a lot lately, especially as now I received my first notice from Nelnet, the company that is managing my student loans, saying that my first paycheck is due to them.

Tim Ulbrich: On your birthday, right? Happy birthday.

Michael Murphy: Yeah, it’s due on my birthday, which is just —

Tim Ulbrich: That’s cruel. That’s just cruel.

Michael Murphy: But I’ve seen some of my friends now that started just right off in the community, and they’re able to put more of their monthly salary to their student loans. And you know, it’s just a difference in what we’re able to contribute at this time.

Tim Ulbrich: Michael, one thing I love that you said that just hit me — and I’m going to use this as I talk to student pharmacists, and I wish I would have this mindset — is looking at the residency training year as something you’re paying for — and I love how you said basically, the difference. So if you take a pharmacist is making $100,000, just for an even number, and you’re being paid as a resident whatever, $40,000 is an even number, that you’re making that investment of essentially — one way of looking at it is saying, “I’m taking a pay cut.” The other way of looking at it is say, “I’m investing $60,000 toward this component that’s going to advance my career and the skills and the development of myself.” And I think that’s huge as a mindset shift, right? I mean, if you think of it that way, all of a sudden, it changes probably how you’re getting the most value out of that experience and from your preceptors and the mentorship and all of that. So I love that. And I hope that you’ll continue to shop that message to anybody that will listen because I think that can be such a game-changer for people to make sure they’re getting the most of that year, to look at that year as an investment. So you make this transition into residency and now, as you mentioned, here you are. Here you are in essentially November at the time of recording this, and you get that happy message that hey, grace period is up. And I always joke on the show, I feel like the grace period is anything but gracious because the interest is still accruing, but you don’t have to make payments. All of a sudden you have to make a payment, nonetheless on your birthday. How are you going about making the decision of which repayment option you’re going to choose? Because so many people get hung up, as we’ve talked about before on this podcast, making that decision. So how did you and Robin work through as you’ve had this time in the grace period to say, OK, once I go into active repayment, this is the best game plan for us?

Michael Murphy: So for me, when I initially went through exit cousneling, I was a little bit too ambitious and thought that, oh, I’m going to be making x amount of dollars per month, I will definitely be able to contribute much more than I actually can. So I picked, initially, one of the standard repayment models, which with my student loans is over $1,000 per month, which is just too significant for what I can currently pay on a resident salary. So I’m now going through the process of working with Robin and working with our financial advisor, which is one of the first things that I did once graduating. I can’t advocate that enough to students is to find a financial advisor, start getting advice early on. But working with our financial advisor to find out which repayment plan would make the most sense for me, especially this first year in residency. And we decided an income-based repayment model would be the one that makes the most sense for us because right now, we can spend some time focusing on some of our other debt, like Robin’s car loan, like Robin’s student loans that are a little bit smaller. And then we can be paying off some amount to my student loans as well. And then eventually, we will be able to bring all of these payments together and be putting our full force towards my student loans. The idea that was shared with me is this idea of a snowball that you’re slowly building up steam over time and as the snowball rolls down the hill, it builds and builds and builds, and eventually, you’re putting your full force towards this one student loan.

Tim Ulbrich: I like that. And so what I heard there is essentially, you had jumped out of the gates and said, “OK. I want to do the standard repayment, the 10-year repayment.” The reality of that, of course, is a big payment if we’re looking at let’s say $150,000-160,000 of student loans, resident salary. So then you took a step back and said, OK. For you and Robin, what are the other financial goals you’re trying to achieve, what other debts are you trying to pay off? How much income do we have in our monthly budget that we’re working with? And then obviously, that led you down the path of one of the income-driven plans. And it sounds like you’re still kind of working through which one of those. Is it PAYE? REPAYE? Is it one of the IBR plans? The old IBR? The new IBR? But I know for many — and I’m guessing this is the thought for you as well — that that is a floor, but then obviously, as time goes on, you can of course make extra payments if you decide to in the income-driven plans. Is that the thought you have?
Michael Murphy: Yeah. Unfortunately, I am still very ambitious. And I think that my biggest goal would be to have these paid off in 10 years. And I know that’s probably unrealistic, but I believe in stretch goals.

Tim Ulbrich: Yes.
Michael Murphy: If you shoot for the stars, you may not get to the stars, but you’ll probably get a lot farther than you would have if you’d aimed low. So I figure I’m going to aim for 10 years, get everything paid off, and if it ends up being 12, hey, at least it’s better than 20.

Tim Ulbrich: So Michael, my prediction — just knowing you and working with other people — my prediction is it’s going to be 5 or less for you. And I think that’s why I think that’s going to happen is as I’m sure you’ve talked with other people, I know I experienced this myself, once you start catching the fire of actually seeing that snowball rolling down the hill and getting some momentum, you just get fired up about making it happen quicker, and it impacts how you make other decisions. So certainly no guarantees, but we’ll touch base and kind of follow the journey. But that’s my prediction here is 5 years or less. But I like what you said there about the timeline. So you did mention, which is interesting because not many new graduates choose to work with a financial planner or financial advisor. And I know many new grads, myself included when I graduated, struggle with evaluating the benefits of what that planner can provide versus obviously the investment in doing that and engaging that relationship. So how did you and Robin make the decision that for you, it was best to pull the trigger to invest in and purchase in terms of the value of working with a financial planner?

Michael Murphy: So for me, I mean, this is going to be showing a little bit about myself, I guess it came down to my naivete. I wasn’t too familiar with some of these different student loan options that I could choose between and also just this idea of investing in my future and in a retirement plan and trying to set up some of our investments. I’d always heard this idea that you need to start early, but that’s kind of where the advice ended. I didn’t really know where to go from there to start early. So I figured that I should probably reach out to someone that has more experience than me, just like how our patients come to us for advice on their medications, I figured I should probably go to the expert for advice on what to do to set myself up for success. So that’s the reason that Robin and I reached out to someone that had worked with members of our family before to help them plan for their finances. It was someone that we knew and trusted and we knew that we would feel comfortable with. And we reached out to them, and our first visit was very positive. They talked us through what the next six months are going to look like and what we can do to help start paying off our student loans and at the same time, start investing in our retirement and 40 years down the line and what we want our future to be. And I thought that was interesting because initially, I was just going to think about my student loans. But if we start investing now, we’re going to see significantly more benefits later on than if we waited. So I thought all of that advice was really impressive. And it gave me a lot of confidence that I made the right choice to reach out to someone for help.

Tim Ulbrich: I really appreciate your maturity for you and Robin. I feel like — as probably other new grads can relate — I felt like coming out of school at 24, and even though I had $200,000+ of debt, I felt like I liked the topic enough and want to learn about it that I’ve got this myself. And the piece I forgot and it took me awhile to realize is that so much of this, especially for new practitioners, is so complicated with all these moving pieces and parts. But also, so much of this is so behavioral that even if you have the knowledge and especially I think in a situation with a spouse to have a third party help work through a financial plan can be incredibly powerful and keep you accountable in that plan, even if you have the right knowledge. Ultimately, so much of this topic can be behavioral. And Tim Baker and Tim Church just talked about recently about the behavioral biases that come with investing. And so we have been advocating over and over again on this show about the benefits — and while it may not be for everyone — what you should look for, questions you should ask to make sure you’re working with somebody that has your best interests in mind. YourFinancialPharmacist.com/financial-planner, we’ve got lots of information that will help you hopefully find and ask the right questions to be working with somebody that we think will help you holistically and comprehensively work on your financial plan and not just focus in on one piece. And I like what you said there, Michael about obviously, it’s just much bigger than just one part, whether that be student loans, investing or any part of the plan. So finally, I want to shift gears and talk about your involvement in professional organizations because obviously, you had a very notable role as the national president of APhASP and for those that don’t know, again, correct me if I’m wrong, Michael, APhASP I believe is 22,000+ members strong. Does that sound about right?

Michael Murphy: So depending on the year, we usually hang out around 30,000 members.

Tim Ulbrich: OK. I’m underestimating. So incredible number of student members, all colleges across the country. Obviously, a very highly sought-after position. And in my opinion, the office of the president of APhASP is a reflection of really the cream of the crop of students across the country that are seeking this position. So first of all, congratulations and kudos on getting selected for that position. I know I got to see you kind of work throughout that year and had a chance to have you on campus at NeoMed and visit with our students, which I know you provided them a lot of inspiration. And so one of the first questions I want to ask you is, what tangible benefit — and I’m sure there’s more than one here — but what tangible benefits do you feel like professional organization involvement has played for you, both as a student, but also in this transition because I know I hear from many new practitioners, they struggle with the tangible benefit of the membership. And they’re purely looking at maybe the cost of joining and can’t necessarily see how that’s going to play a role in their professional development or other areas. So what did that mean for you as a student and mean for you as you’ve made this transition into residency?

Michael Murphy: So for me, now I think that is a very important question because we need to think about what brings value to the money that we’re spending. I think that’s what is so important about this podcast is thinking about what we are spending our money on and making sure that it is all of value. And one of those valuable experiences that I always know that I will spend money is my membership to APhA. And that’s because it brings value to me when I was a student, it brings value to me as a new practitioner, and it’s going to bring value to me throughout my time as a pharmacist. And that’s because APhA is constantly fighting for the future of the profession to make sure that the pharmacist will always be a relevant and accessible healthcare provider. So for me as a new practitioner, some of the tangible benefits that I have been able to get are resources. So it can be overwhelming all of a sudden going from this shift, from student where you have this safety net to the pharmacist. And it can be scary of all of a sudden thinking that, whoa, I am the last line of defense. I need to make sure that I am as skilled, confident, as possible so that I can take the best care for my patients. And I think that APhA, through their practice division, provides a great level of resources so that you can practice at the highest level of your potential. Additionally, I know that some of the resources that you can gain through attending their conferences are out of this world. I just went to the MP Day of Life for the first time in July in Washington, D.C., and I learned about this woman’s health initiative out of Indiana, and we listened to a woman’s health pharmacist and learned about some of the different resources that they use in their practice to ensure that they’re using the best oral contraceptives for their patients. And I took that resource and I use it just about every day in clinic, where I’m getting questions from different physicians, asking which oral contraceptive do I pick? There’s so many different ones with different ideas. Which one should I use? And it’s nice having this resource that I was able to get because I attended an APhA conference. And then I mean, the tangible benefits, I can go on and on. But for me, some of the greatest value is in the intangible — the relationships that I’ve been able to form with my friends going back from 5-6 years ago when I first started getting involved in APhA to the relationships that I’m forming every day with different APhA members. And one of the things that is nice about APhA is not just health systems pharmacists or community pharmacists or managed care pharmacists. It’s everyone. And you can really find different ways that you can get to know pharmacists from across the spectrum so that you can find out ways that you can help them, and they can find ways to give back and help you in your career.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, that’s great stuff. I couldn’t agree more. And I had the opportunity to serve as our chapter advisor of APhASP at Neomed and, you know, what I always heard over and over again is there’s a hesitancy from some students to jump in. But once they jumped in, they got involved in the meetings, they attended a national meeting, maybe a mid-year meeting, they got involved in advocacy — once they saw it, you know, and it became real to them, obviously they caught fire. And that was so much fun to watch. And the follow-up question I have for you is I think we have many students and practitioners that are listening that are thinking, OK, maybe I’ve joined an organization before, but I didn’t go anywhere beyond that. And so they didn’t necessarily see the value in continuing that membership. So outside of, of course, making that initial decision to join, what advice would you have for students or new practitioners to then further get involved so they can really experience the value of their involvement?

Michael Murphy: So I think one of the best things that you can do is to take a small positive risk. And if that risk is you saying that you’re interested in running for a leadership position, let’s say one of the new practitioner network standing committee applications that are going to be due on Dec. 1. Take that small positive risk. If you want to get more involved, you can do it. Take that risk. If you’re a student pharmacist, and you’re saying that “I want to make a difference in my community,” start a new patient care project that follows your passion in your community and reach out to your chapter executive committee to find ways that you can get involved and make a difference out in the community. There are so many ways that you can get involved, but what you need to do is ask. Reach out to your local leaders or to your leaders within the new practitioner network, and find out ways that you personally can get involved. I just heard a interesting quote from one of my preceptors the other day. And I think it’s just perfect. And the quote was, “A hungry person with a closed mouth never gets fed.” So the idea is if you don’t ask for food, you’re not going to get fed. You’re not going to get fed with what you need. But if you reach out, you ask for what you need, then you will see results immediately. So reach out to your local leaders, reach out to the new practitioner network, the new practitioner advisory committee, and they can give you the resources that you need to get involved more, get that full value from your membership.

Tim Ulbrich: I love that. It reminds me of one of my favorite books I read a couple years ago called “Start” by Jon Acuff, and it’s that idea of taking that idea, taking that risk and that next step and inevitably, any time you do that, the next door opens and it keeps going from there. And I think it’s just part of that mindset that you spoke of earlier. OK, we’re going to finish up the show and have some fun. We’re going to put Dr. Murphy on the hot seat. I’m going to give four questions in a rapid-fire format. Quick question, quick answer. So first question I have for you, Dr. Murphy, the greatest opportunity you feel like we have as a profession right now here in 2018?

Michael Murphy: I think our greatest opportunity as a profession is to realize the impact that we can have out in our community. I believe that the future of pharmacy is in the community and is a mixture between the community pharmacist and an ambulatory care pharmacist, working almost as a primary care pharmacist. But we need to advocate for ourselves to our patients and our legislators so that we can make a difference in providing preventative care for our pharmacists.

Tim Ulbrich: What do you think is the greatest threat that is facing our profession right now?

Michael Murphy: The greatest threat, that is a good question. For me, I think the greatest threat is feeling content, feeling like this is as great as it can be. I always know that any situation can be better if we have an innovative stage of mind and we realize that through hard work today, we can see positive results in the future. We just need to get to work today. So I think our biggest threat is just feeling content. But I know that we can overcome that if we get to work today, and we will see results tomorrow.

Tim Ulbrich: What’s one step that those are listening can take to help advance the profession of pharmacy?

Michael Murphy: Reach out to another healthcare professional or to your patient and ask them to write a letter to their local legislator about the impact that pharmacists can make in their lives. And this will show that pharmacists don’t just make an impact, and pharmacists aren’t just fighting for themselves, but other members of the healthcare team and their patients can see the impact of pharmacist-provided care. And that will help advance pharmacy on a state level and the national level.

Tim Ulbrich: Awesome. My last question is I know you’re a learner. So what are you reading these days, either for fun or even to help develop yourself further?

Michael Murphy: Sure. So one of the books that I’m reading right now, and I feel like I’ve been reading this for awhile because residency sure is busy is the biography of Harvey Milk. And he was the first openly gay city legislator of a major city in San Francisco back in the ‘70s. And it’s really interesting reading about how this person fought against all the odds. He fought against all these people that were saying that he didn’t deserve to be a leader, but he knew in himself that he was a leader. And he didn’t listen to those people that were trying to tell him the type of person that he needed to be. He listened to himself. He listened to that voice inside that was saying that he should go out and make a difference in his community. So I love reading biographies because I love reading about how great people became great. And it reminds me of this idea that I once heard from one of my favorite professors — that if I read about how great people become great, maybe someday I can be great. And that’s what I strive for every day.

Tim Ulbrich: I love that, Dr. Murphy, and thank you so much for coming on the show today and for being an inspiration for me and many others as well and, of course, for your commitment to the profession of pharmacy. I really do appreciate it and think many listeners are going to get great value from today’s episode.

Michael Murphy: Thanks for having me, Tim. It was a ton of fun.

Tim Ulbrich: So before we wrap up today’s episode of the podcast, I want to again thank our sponsor, American Pharmacists Association.

Sponsor: Founded in 1852, APhA is the largest association of pharmacists in the US with more than 62,000 practicing pharmacists, pharmaceutical scientists, student pharmacists, and pharmacy technicians as member. Join APhA now to gain premier access to YFP facilitated webinars, financial articles, live events, resources, and consultations. Your membership will also allow you to receive exclusive discounts on YFP products and services. You can join APhA at a 20% discount by visiting pharmacist.com/join-now and using coupon code ‘AYFP18’. For more information about the financial resources we offer in partnership with APhA, visit www.pharmacist.com/yfp

Tim Ulbrich: And one last thing if you could do us a favor, if you like what you heard on this week’s episode, please make sure to subscribe to in iTunes or wherever you listen to your podcasts. Also, make sure to head on over to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/ where you will find a wide array of resources designed specifically for you, the pharmacy professional, to help you on the path towards achieving financial freedom. Have a great rest of your week!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

Join the YFP Community!

YFP 075: DIY, Robo or Hire a Planner?


 

DIY, Robo or Hire a Planner?

On episode 75 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast, Tim Ulbrich, found of YFP, and Tim Baker, YFP team member and owner of Script Financial, continue YFP’s month-long series on investing by talking about the pros and cons of a DIY approach to investing compared to utilizing a robo advisor or hiring a financial planner.

Summary

On this episode, Tim Ulbrich and Tim Baker dive into a discussion of three strategies of investing: DIY, robo and hiring a financial planner. The DIY (do it yourself) route of investing means that you, instead of your employer or planner, will be in charge of all aspects of your retirement or investment. You’ll determine how much to defer into retirement accounts, what to invest in, make adjustments, and figure out to how to distribute funds at retirement, among other tasks. This route is becoming more popular most likely due to the fact that there are resources available and many advisors require their clients to have a lot of money to work with them. Pros of the DIY strategy are that there is a potential savings (if you are doing it well, etc.) and a feeling of empowerment. Cons are that there is a lack of accountability, that someone isn’t there checking or bringing awareness to potential financial behavioral biases you may have, and if you aren’t well-versed in the information, you could end up paying more.

Using an advisor is a strategy that lies between the DIY and financial planner routes. With this strategy, technology is used which allows you to simply click a link, answer a few questions, and fund taxable accounts. The pros of this strategy are that you don’t have to go through thousands of funds, the funds are automatically rebalanced over time, and the cost lands between .25-.5% on what’s invested. Cons are that there is no human interaction and that this only focuses on one part of your financial plan.

Hiring a planner means working with someone to act as the middle point between you and your investments. Pros to this strategy are the human aspect, the potential of having a comprehensive financial plan, the ability to create a diversified portfolio, and having someone act as a safeguard between you and your investments. Cons of hiring a financial planner are that the industry is structured so many planners are incentivized to grow your assets, may have a conflict of interest due to making more money off of your investments, and that a planner may not help you with credit card or student loan debt.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 075, excited to be here alongside Tim Baker as we continue our month-long series on investing. We’re nearing the end. We’ve got next week coming up, we’re going to do an investing Q&A. But first and foremost, happy Thanksgiving, Tim Baker, to you and to the YFP community. So excited to be here.

Tim Baker: Yeah, happy Thanksgiving, Tim, to you and yours. And excited to get this episode going.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, we hope everyone’s having a great day, enjoying with family. We hope that you’re not nerding out on personal finance podcasts while you should be spending quality time with family. But if you are listening, please know that we appreciate it and that we’re certainly grateful for the community that has developed here over the past year. So we’ve been going along this month on investing. We’ve covered a lot of different topics and information, everything from behavioral aspects to investing, prioritization of investing, what to look for in your different investment accounts, the fees and so forth. And next week, we’re going to wrap it up with an investing Q&A. But here, we’re talking about the strategy of investing. Is this something you do yourself? Is this something you look at engaging with a robo advisor? We’ll talk about what that means. Or is this something you look at hiring a financial planner? Maybe for many people listening, there may be a different answer depending on the status of what you’re working on and what your preference is. So we’re going to reference some previous episodes throughout this episode, so let me throw them out here in advance. Episodes 015, 016 and 017, we talked at length, Tim Baker and I did, about what to look for in a financial planner, the benefits, different types of planners that are out there. In 054, we talked about why fee-only financial planning matters. And in 055, we talked about why you should care about how a financial planner charges. All of that feeds into the conversation here about DIY, robo or hiring a financial planner. So in terms of the structure and format of what we’re going to do, with each of these three buckets, we’re going to talk about what we’re referring to in a DIY approach, in a robo approach, in a financial planner approach. We’ll talk about the pros and potential pitfalls of each of those approaches. So Tim Baker, DIY. When we say DIY as it relates to investing, what exactly are we talking about? Whether listeners are thinking about maybe their 401k or maybe their 403b at their work environment, in the TSP, or they’re thinking about an IRA that’s outside of their work?

Tim Baker: Yeah, so the DIY, the Do It Yourself approach when it comes to investing, when we’re discussing things like the 401k, the 403b, the TSP, this is a little bit set up on a T-ball stand for you because the employer is essentially putting it in front of you and saying, hey, now that you work for us, we have contracted through an organization like a Vanguard or a Fidelity to basically have this investment account for you. So we’re going to cut you a deal, as long as you put money into it, we’ll match it. And we’re going to help you grow your retirement. So you can DIY that. And essentially, it’s a sandbox approach because you’re going to put in front of you a series of 10, 15, 20 — depending on the plan — investments that say, hey, for large cap, for U.S. large cap, you’re going to have four or five funds to pick from. From international, you might have two or three funds to pick from. From a bond, you might have some, it could be target funds. And if you’re hearing me talk about this and you’re saying, ‘What the heck is this guy talking about?’ then maybe having some help and not DIY-ing that — won’t be for you. Because the plan is defined, you’ll have basically a sandbox to work in. And essentially, what you’ll do is you’ll determine how much to defer into your retirement accounts. We’re talking your 401k, your Roth 401k, your 403b, what to actually invest it in — so a lot of people sometimes, they miss that step. So they think that once they put the money in there, it’s automatically invested. And some plans will be like that. But some plans won’t.

Tim Ulbrich: And they find out it’s just sitting there in a market fund.

Tim Baker: Right. I’ve seen that happen quite a bit. So you basically figure out how much you want to defer, what you’re going to invest it in, and over time, you have to kind of make those adjustments and do the rebalancing and things like that. And then when you go to retire, then you basically say, ‘Self, how do I distribute this in the most tax-efficient manner as possible?’ Whereas Tim, I don’t know about your dad, but my dad — well, my parents, really, they worked for the same company for 40 years, and the companies did that for them. And the pension manager would do that for them, basically would manage all those steps. So now, it’s kind of on us to figure that out. So that’s kind of the retirement side. If we’re talking outside the retirement, and we’re looking at IRAs, Individual Retirement Accounts, could be 529s, could be taxable accounts, that’s really where we’re going out into the market, essentially, and we’re looking at TD America, Vanguard, Fidelity, we’re going onto their website because we’ve heard of these companies, and we’re saying, ‘I want to open up an account on my own and basically do some investing on my own.’ So this is where you would open up a taxable account, open up a Roth IRA, and then the process is very similar except it’s just outside of the realm of what your employer is. So you’re opening up that account, you’re funding money from your paycheck. In then in that world, you’re essentially looking at a vast ocean, thousands and thousands of stocks and bonds and mutual funds and exchange traded funds, all the different things that could fit in these accounts. And you’re doing it in a way that hopefully is consistent with your beliefs about investing, if you have any, your risk tolerance, how you want to maximize or minimize, really, expenses and that type of thing. So I can tell from personal experience just the first time I ever opened up a Roth, I was at West Point. And I wanted to just dip my toe in the market. And I wanted to feel the feeling of basically buying a stock in a company.

Tim Ulbrich: Been there.

Tim Baker: And I think I bought like one share of Johnson & Johnson, and like after the transaction grew — and it’s kind of not very exciting — it was kind of exciting to see it, but I bought one share, which is the most inefficient way to do it because one share at that time was probably like $45. But then I paid like $10 —

Tim Ulbrich: The fee, yeah.

Tim Baker: Just to do the trade-in. But it was cool because at that time, I was like, well, technically, I’m part owner of this company, a .0 — add so many zeroes — 1% of Johnson & Johnson, so I would get documents that say, ‘Hey, these are when the board meetings are,’ but I really didn’t know what I was doing. And quite frankly — I know, Tim, we talked about this before — I probably had no business doing that, opening up an account like that because I didn’t really have a proper emergency fund. In the Army, a student is a little bit different, but there were so many other things that foundationally, I should have done before I even got to that point, but that’s kind of in a nutshell what the DIY approach is.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think it’s — for many of our listeners, they’re probably thinking about, OK, most of my investing — maybe not all — but most of my investing’s happening with my employer-sponsored plan, so 401k, 403b. Of course that’s not everyone listening, many people have Roth IRAs or have taxable accounts that are out there, but what I’ve seen, Tim, is depending on the employer, how complex that is or is not can be all over the place. So for example, I work for the state. And they intentionally simplify options, you know, you’ve got two options in large cap, two options in international, they’re all index funds. Fees are pretty low. And I think they’re really trying to minimize some of the behavioral components that are there. But it’s still up to me, if I were doing a DIY approach and saying, OK, this is my asset allocation, this much stock, this much bonds, this much cash or cash equivalent or REETs or whatever. And then within there, what types of stocks I want to be investing in and then am I going to rebalance or not. Now, for other people — like a target fund I’m thinking of specifically — if somebody were to choose a target fund to say, OK, I’m going to retired in the year 2075, and that’s going to then set my asset allocation. The rebalancing is kind of happening along the way.

Tim Baker: It’s automatic.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah.

Tim Baker: I would say from a target fund perspective, if you literally listen to what I just said about different types of funds like bond and international, emerging markets, small cap, large cap, and you’re like, ‘I have no idea,’ then go target fund. You probably will pay some type of premium for that service of it being rebalanced and becoming basically more aggressive to more conservative over time. But more often than not, I would rather you just pay the premium than have it sit in cash or be way too aggressive than you need be, depending on where you’re at in your life. But oftentimes, when I work with clients — and this is the opposite end of the spectrum, which is not DIY, it’s working with an advisor — I crack that nut, and I say, “Hey, client, you have 15-20 different options out there. And you’re in a target fund right now by default. I think we can do a little bit better given your situation and save on expense and things and break it out that way.” I think one of the things that you talk about (inaudible) and I’ve read a few books about the more choice that we are given, the more it causes that paralysis by analysis. And they say even like things like auto-enrolls. So we’ve talked about auto-enroll. There’s a lot of people that before auto-enroll really became a thing would work for a company for five, six, seven years, a decade, and never opt into their benefit of a 401k and the match there. Now, and this could be something the Obama administration put in, is that they’re incentivizing companies to basically auto-enroll employees. And then you essentially opt out of it if you want. And they’ve done a lot of studies in this with like Sweden and Finland, you have to opt out to not be an organ donor. And two countries that are very similar in a lot of ways, the opt-in, the percentage of people that were actually donating their organs was very low versus the opt-out. So a lot of this plays in. And we could do a whole topic, a whole episode, on behavioral finance and all the different biases that are out there. And I think that’s one of the things that maybe working with an advisor does. But it can be really confusing when you do it on DIY. It’s not impossible, obviously. But I think ultimately, my opinion — again, I’m biased because I do this for a living — is that I think it’s always good to have an objective look at your finances and say, hey, does this make sense? Is what I’m doing OK because I heard Uncle Tommy say this or my neighbor down the street said that, and I really want to know like sanity check this.

Tim Ulbrich: So obviously, as we think about the DIY approach, I think it’s fair to say that it’s becoming more popular — maybe not more popular but why is it popular in some regards. Accessing information is more readily available than it’s ever been before.

Tim Baker: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: Resources are out there. Just today, we had somebody ask in the YFP Facebook group, you know, I’ve heard of back door Roth IRAs, but what do I actually do mechanically. And we were able to quickly reference an article, get her a stepwise approach. So that information is there, readily available. I think that’s one of the reasons that it’s quite popular. What else do you think in terms of why people are going kind of that route of more of a DIY?

Tim Baker: I think it’s a little bit of an indictment of kind of my professional brethren. You know, there’s a lot of advisors out there that will say, “Hey, love to help you. But you have to have a half a million dollars before I can actually do work with you.” And the reason they do that is because they’ll charge based on assets, investable assets, which basically mean the assets they control directly, not what’s in your retirement account. So they say, “Hey, love to help you, but I can’t because I won’t essentially be paid enough.” So you have those minimum assets under management, AUM, requirements that basically for a lot of young population, just excludes them in general. I think one of the things that — and I was a little naive, no, I was a lot of naive to that is when I was looking at the profession of personal finance, kind of the whole 1% Occupy Wall Street was going on. So I think there is a distrust of large banking institutions and really financial advisors in general. And I think in a lot of ways, it’s well deserved. What a lot of people don’t know is that the majority, the overwhelming majority of financial advisors can legally put their own interests ahead of their clients, which when I kind of figured that out — and I was in that model when I discovered that the fee-based where you can earn commission fees, that blew me away. And it shouldn’t be that way. And I’m not saying that means 95% of the professionals out there are corrupted. But to me, is it should always be about the client, always be about what is in the best interests of the client, not necessarily mine. So I think that that perception is prevailing in a lot of ways. And that’s why I’m kind of fortunate when you talk about the work that we’re doing with you and Jess, it legitimizes, I think, what I’m trying to do. And I think what the fee-only world is trying to do is really say, there are services for young people that you’re not excluded. And by the way, I want to be on your team. And I want to get you to those goals that we talked about that whether it’s orca whales (?) or being able to retire at a certain time or whatever that is, that stuff jacks me up. And really, it’s the mechanisms of what the investments are and are properly insured that are just that supporting detail that I more or less have a playbook in my mind, and we just kind of plug and play depending on your situation.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think I can say as somebody who went the DIY route for 10 years, you know, after graduation and obviously in working with you and Jess and I, I think too it’s fair to say for many listening, there’s just that overwhelming transition that happens where you’ve got new career, you’ve got tons of student loan debt, you feel like you’re trying to develop budgets and take care of all these other things. And part of it I think is just that feeling of being overwhelmed and my budget’s tight, I’m trying to figure out these things, and I may see additional fees or things and not necessarily be able to articulate the benefits associated with those.

Tim Baker: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think it’s important that we just claim right off the bat what you just articulated nicely. Anytime we’re talking here about working with a planner versus not, you have to look at that under the assumption that it’s somebody who is good, who is acting ethically, who is acting, in our opinion, within a fiduciary standard because at the end of the day — we’ll get to some of the pros and cons of working with a planner — if you’re paying to work with a planner and you’re getting crappy advice, and you’re paying more in fees and things, now we’ve just put ourself up a creek and you might as well have gone the DIY route.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I would say this — and I usually say this when I speak is I think one of the differences between financial planning, financial advisors and the profession of pharmacy is that the profession of pharmacy is actually a profession. You can take a test and be a financial advisor and give advice. You can do exactly what I do. The barrier to entry is very, very low, which means that you have — and you can see this maybe in other professions, not to call any out, but maybe like real estate and things like that where you take a test and you can sell houses.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah.

Tim Baker: Sorry to all the real estate agents out there. But when you have such low barriers of entry, that basically muddies the water for a lot of hopefully professionals. And what I point to is someone that has the CFP mark, the Certified Financial Planning marks, and that are kind of following standards of ethics and all that kind of stuff. So I think that’s another reason why there’s lots of advisors out there that don’t necessarily know either what they’re doing or the other thing could be ignorance. So again, like when I was in the broker dealer world, I just didn’t know what I didn’t know. I thought I was awesome because I wasn’t selling proprietary products for maybe some of the bigger banks. So I’m like, oh, we can pick whatever products that we want from anywhere, whatever best suits you. But then I found out that there are other advisors out there that they’re not compensated based on product sales. It’s basically — the product and the advice is separated. And you know this in pharmacy, like anytime you mix the sale of product with advice, there’s conflict of interest. And you might see it with doctors and how they prescribe medications, those types of things. So to me, the model is broken from Jump Street that really, the consumer or client needs to be put first and everything else will fall into place. But I think that would, again, lead to why DIY is a popular — you know, just the savings cost and really, there are people that are thirsty. We’ve seen that from YFP. There’s people that are thirsty to learn. And it’s just something that is a huge void in our education system. We teach how to bake cakes and make ash trays in school, but we don’t teach them how to balance a checkbook or what credit card debt looks like or what student debt looks like.

Tim Ulbrich: Absolutely.

Tim Baker: So there’s a big void there, and I think people are — sometimes, we learn through pain and what we’ve gone through. And I think we can fill up a whole book of what we’ve personally done. And sometimes, it’s wisdom where we’re actually sitting down, writing through, reading “Seven Figure Pharmacist,” looking at all of the stuff that we have. You could learn a wealth of stuff on NerdWallet and Investopedia. So really, I think that’s a play as well.

Tim Ulrich: You know, one of the things I think is interesting as you were talking is — without getting too political here — when all the movement was going toward the fiduciary standard, I think it brought the public awareness and attention up a little bit that there’s not — most advisors are not acting in a fiduciary standard. And now that that really hasn’t moved forward, that may even, in some regards, lead people to think, well, now I know more about what fiduciary means, and I see that a majority of people aren’t that. That standard’s not progressing, so maybe a DIY route is where I’m going to go.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and really what Tim’s talking about here is in the last administration, basically the Department of Labor was essentially trying to push forward this standard, this fiduciary standard that said that basically the only accounts that they could touch under the Department of Labor were those basically issued by the employers. So they were saying any retirement account, 401k’s, 403b’s, and even I think IRAs, in this sense, have to be basically managed by fiduciaries that have the client’s best interests in mind. When the new administration came in, that legislation that was kind of being pushed through was squashed. So it did bring up I think some awareness that what is a fiduciary? And why aren’t all advisors fiduciaries? And there was a big push from the broker dealer world that says, hey, if we put this standard in place, then it’s going to shut out a lot of advice to kind of middle market and smaller — it’s going to shut out advice from that, which is categorically false. But it’s really around the protection of the income streams that insurance and other commissionable products generate. So I think we’ll eventually get there. It’s funny because we — I’m at different conferences, and Australia, you know, I’ve talked to advisors there that are like way ahead of us. They can’t believe that we don’t have a fiduciary standard across the board. Even their insurance products are similar. So I think we’ll eventually get there, but it could be a generation away just because of the lobbying.

Tim Ulbrich: So I think the pros of the DIY approach are obvious: potential cost savings with an asterisk — we’ll come back to that. Of course, it’s assuming that you’re doing it well and you’re controlling fees and you’re making the right decisions and so forth, you’re not being overtaken by some of the behavioral problems that can come up. Obviously, I think there’s a pro of empowerment and learning and being involved when you’ve got to figure it out, what does rebalancing mean? What does asset allocation mean? What do these funds and accounts means? So there’s a forced hand in learning. In terms of potential pitfalls, let me read you a quote from one of my favorite books, “Simple Wealth, Inevitable Wealth” by Nick Murray and get your reaction on this. He says that, “The twin premises of all do-it-yourself appeals are that most investors are smart enough, rational enough and disciplined enough always to select and maintain portfolios that are best suited to their long-term goals and that most advisors are venal and are stupid or at the very least, cost much more than they’re worth. The former premise is a fundamental misreading of basic human nature. The latter is just a self-serving mean-spirited lie.” Strong language, right? I mean, what are your thoughts?

Tim Baker: Strong language in a lot of ways. First, I had to actually look at what venal meant. So which, for you advisors out there, because I use the word fungible and gotten called on that. So venal means “showing or motivated by susceptibility to bribery.” So I think basically to summarize the quote, it’s we are perfect investors all the time. We know exactly what we need to do. We’re not emotional when it comes to this. And that advisors are stupid and basically fickle to wherever the money flows. I think that there’s probably truth and lies in both parts of that. What behavioral finance tells us and what’s becoming more and more is that a lot of our thoughts about finance is that people will — and it’s based on conventional economics — is that people will behave rationally, predictably and that emotions don’t influence people when they’re making economic choices, which is completely false.

Tim Ulbrich: We all know that. We’ve been thinking about it, right?

Tim Baker: We can outline a variety of biases, whether it’s anchoring or mental accounting or overconfidence, gambler’s fallacy, and we could maybe do a whole episode just on that. But frankly, as humans — and I do this for a living — and even sometimes for me, and especially when I’m looking at my own, we suck at it. Right now, we’re kind of in a market downturn. And I preach the long-term, I preach that over the course of the long haul, the market will take care of you. And that is a certainty. And I always joke outside of the zombie apocalypse or the Poles switching, the market will return 7-10%. It’s done it for 100 years. There’s bumps and bruises along the way, but when you’re in that moment, what I say in investing is that you should do the opposite of how you feel. So when 2008-2009 came around and we kind of are feeling a little bit of that now, you want to take your proverbial investment ball and go home. You want to get out of the market, you want to sit on the sidelines and stay in cash.

Tim Ulbrich: It should be game on, right?

Tim Baker: Right. And really, it should be opposite. If you are sitting on cash and the market is down, you should be chucking cash into your investments because essentially, it’s the one area of our financial life where we’re like, ah, I can’t believe that things are on sale and I want to get out of it. And then we kind of talked a little bit about the second part about advisors being venal and stupid. And again, I think part of that is earned in a lot of ways. But I would say by and large, I definitely operate that I think people are inherently good. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re good at their jobs or that they’re going to guide you the right way with regard to investing. And that’s why I think questions about that when you are potentially talking to a financial advisor is important, you know? And I think if people — one of the questions I ask prospective clients is if you had to make a list of all the things that you want your financial planner to have, what would that be? And the first one’s like, I want them to be trustworthy and I want them to communicate and I have access. But part of it is it could be an investment philosophy. If they tell me, I want someone to pick me the hot stocks, disqualified. I’m not your guy. I never will be your guy because I think the smartest thing I’ve ever said about investing in the stock market is that I don’t know where the stock market’s going to go. Nobody does. So again, I think that you shouldn’t be hiring a financial advisor to try to beat the market. By and large, they can’t do it. It should really be about managing the expectation, the behaviors, and specifically around this topic of investing.

Tim Ulbrich: I think one of the biggest pitfalls I see here — potential pitfalls — of the DIY approach is that lack of accountability, that risk of operating on an island. I know as I look back now on doing it myself, you may not feel it in the moment, but when there’s not somebody there to keep you in check and to call out the behavioral biases that we all are prone to, one I know for me and I’ve referred to before on the podcast is I knew that I shouldn’t be rebalancing more than I need to. I knew that once I set up my asset allocation based on risk tolerance, I should hold true. But you know, you log into your account, you see what’s going on, you start looking at things, and you say, well, maybe not so much of this or that, and you start messing around. And that’s why you hear the different studies saying the average return of the market is this, but the average person gets x, which is much less, because of our tendency to make those tweaks along the way. So I think accountability. I think the other thing too is that if you don’t have the right knowledge and so forth that you may end up paying more than the fees that are associated with a robo-planner, right? So we’ll link in the show notes, we wrote an article on the impact of fees and how fees can be a $1 million+ mistake alone if you’re not accounting for fees. And I know you helped me with a 403b account. I mean, we discovered fees north of — what? 1.5% I think?

Tim Baker: Yeah. And to kind of break this down, like one of the main suspects here is what’s called the expense ratio. So the funds that you are invested in, you know, mutual funds, exchange traded funds — not necessarily stocks — but the funds, there’s a manager that sits on top of that account and basically is buying and trading. And they pay themselves and they pay for office space and analysts and information. So basically, expense ratio is siphoning off money to keep the business profitable, in a sense. And if you have $100,000 in an investment and you have a 1% expense ratio, essentially you have $1,000 that is just evaporating every year from — and it’s not a line item anywhere, it’s just basically accounted for in the performance. And it doesn’t have to be that way because you can build a very investment portfolio for a tenth or even a twentieth of that. And my mantra’s always been, if I’m not getting the performance or it’s not safer for the same amount of performance, why am I paying 10 times, 20 times more? And that’s why we’re big proponents of some of the funds out there like Vanguard and Fidelity, they just rolled out a 0% expense ratio, and State Street and some of these ones that are very efficient for clients because again, you know, I think we’ve talked about this in a past episode is that the best indicator of performance is not star system ratings for Morningstar, it’s how you can drive expense down and keep as many hands in your investment — as many hands out of your investment pockets as — there’s platform fees and trading costs and expense ratios. Those are all things that — I mean, we have enough problems with the taxes and inflation that we need to be really protecting our gains, and a lot of that’s really keeping our expenses low when it comes to the investing part of the financial plan.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, if we’re going to hustle to put away money each and every month, like we’ve got to most out of it, right? And I think I love that’s what your mantra is keep those fees low. Obviously looking for performance as well, but I think of the statements I receive, and it has the tendency to say, well, I’m going to look at the one-year, three-year, five-year, 10-year performance. But I’m not really going to calculate what’s this 1% in total fees cost me? Or this 2%.

Tim Baker: Yeah. Well even that, like even advisors fall into this. They’ll say, hey, like I want to put my clients in 4- or 5-rated, and I only look at that. But that’s not the way to do it because typically, it’s a reversion to the mean. So what were high performing in 5-star systems, usually the script is flipped — pun intended — and those high performing, we’re buying them high and then they basically go low in terms of performance. So again, it’s just one that’s kind of the availability bias or what’s recently happened is we play on that. And it typically is the wrong move.

Tim Ulbrich: So that’s the DIY bucket. Let’s jump into the robo bucket. And you know, obvious pros and potential pitfalls. But here, we’re talking about somebody that maybe just heard this whole conversation about asset allocation and rebalancing and choosing investments and so forth and says, it would be nice to have a little bit of help around this investing piece there. And that’s really where robos come in. And obviously, there’s been I think — not a resurgence, a surgence of robo-advising, obviously, as they become more popular. I think they’ve been marketed a lot more than they were worth three or five years ago. So just briefly, what is a robo-advisor? Before we talk about the pros and cons.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so I would categorize a robo-advisor would basically sit in between DIY approach and working with a financial advisor. So typically, when you go the DIY route — and maybe we’ll put this link in the show notes, but NerdWallet has an article that says, “Best Robo-Advisors 2018 topics.” And the typical players in this are WealthFront, Betterment and those types. And essentially, what they do is they’re market disruptors in a sense that — and I remember working at my last firm, it took 38 pages to open up a Roth IRA. And essentially, what they do is you go to their website and you say, hey, if you want to open up — these are typically the kind of self-directed accounts. They’d be IRAs, Roth IRAs, taxable accounts. If you want to open up one of these, click this link, answer a few questions, and they automatically slot — and then fund it, so connect to your bank account or fund it from a different source. And you’re in a model.

Tim Ulbrich: Automatic selection there.

Tim Baker: Yeah, everything. So it’s really a method to bring technology and efficiency in a profession that needs it. So if you’re thinking, hey, I don’t want to wade through thousands and thousands of stocks and bonds and mutual funds and ETFs, and I want something that if I ask a few questions, they’ll automatically slot and rebalance over time — some of these rebalance. They’re robo, so they look at algorithms and they could rebalance daily, weekly, and you really just want to leave it alone. Then this would be typically something that you would do. Now, again, it’s going to cost you a fee to do that. So the typical ones, you’re looking anywhere from 25-50 basis points, so .25% on what you have invested to .5%. If we measure that against most advisors are probably 1%, north of 1%, just to kind of give you some perspective. But typically, you don’t have any type of human interaction. It’s go through this questionnaire, fund it, and then those dollars are invested on your behalf per an algorithm that is rebalancing over time. So again, like I’ve said this before is — and you kind of see this sometimes in pharmacy too where you’ll say, hey, I’ll never be replaced. The technology will never replace me. But robots are actually more efficient basically rebalancing than I would ever be because I’m not sitting by my computer every day. Just like you could make a case that robots are probably going to be more efficient filling scripts because of just the advances in technology. I think what robots will never be better at than me is that kind of one-on-one personal looking at the breadth of the financial picture. And I think the same is true when we’re talking about adherence and working with patients and all that kind of stuff. So they’re very synonymous in a lot of ways. But yeah, so I think the robo, I think it’s a good thing in terms of moving the needle in the market.

Tim Ulbrich: So you obviously mentioned the pro of convenience and access disrupted what was a very cumbersome, comprehensive process. I mean now, if you log onto one of those platforms you mentioned, it’s quick, it’s easy, asks you some question, you fund the account that you’re working on, and it sets up the asset allocation for you. And boom, you’re ready to go. So lower fees than a planner. So you mentioned, obviously, we’re assuming 0 or 1%ish. So here, we’re maybe .25-.5% so you can get a feel for that. I think the con you mentioned is a really good one. The lack of human element, engagement. And I think along that line, the thing I think about as the central pitfall here is that it’s focused on one part of the financial plan. You’ve been preaching since Day 1, and many of the financial planners that are out there are focused on one part of a financial plan. But what we’ve been preaching, especially for most of our audience, is that a financial plan runs all the way from debt to death. So we’re thinking about student loans, we’re thinking about budgeting and goal-setting and the right insurance. We’re thinking about end-of-life planning and home buying and kids’ college, all of these things. And when you’re looking at your month-to-month budget and your goals and what you’re trying to do, investing is one part, albeit a very important part, but it’s one part of your financial plan. And Betterment isn’t going to jump out and say, “Hey, by the way, are you thinking about your student loans and this or that?”

Tim Baker: Right.

refinance student loans

Tim Ulbrich: And I was thinking back to just our relationship over the last year of you working with Jess and I, we’re a year in. And we’ve done very little discussion yet — we’re going to get there more — but very little discussions on investing because we’ve been spending all this time on for us figuring out what’s our why and what’s our purpose, which we published in episodes 031 and 032, maybe 032 and 033. We’ll get that right in the show notes. We’ve been talking about goal-setting, we’ve set up sinking funds and budgets and making sure we have a good foundation and insurance. And now, we’re working on end-of-life estate planning. And so I think the biggest risk I see here is that — are you filling in all the holes? And are you prioritizing goals the right way if you’re only focused on that one part of the plan?

Tim Baker: Yeah, and this is something — full disclosure — that we have been offering, Script Financial, that we’re testing out. And essentially what I want to do is be able to for someone that doesn’t want to work with me directly, they can tap into a lot of the models and portfolios that I use for clients and it’s just a little bit of less service but less cost as well. And I think if you’re not in that, then you’re going to become extinct. So I think — and we’ll put a link to that in the show notes as well. If you are wanting to do more in the investment world, open an IRA or a taxable account, make sure you’re doing all the other things we’re preaching about and have those in place in terms of foundational. But then, you know, if you’re looking at just the wealth of funds out there and you have no idea where to start, we can definitely do that as well.

Tim Ulbrich: So two out of three buckets we’ve covered. We talked DIY, we talked robo, and now let’s move into hiring a financial planner. And as I mentioned in the beginning of the show, we have previous content on this that we’re going to talk about and build on a little bit. But make sure you check out episodes 015-017 that we talk through, episode 054 about what it means to be fee-only and episode 055 about why you should care how a planner charges. And before we get into the details here, I want to reference our site, YourFinancialPharmacist.com/financial-planner. Again, YourFinancialPharmacist.com/financial-planner. We’ve got lots of content in there, we’ve got a free guide about what we think you should look for in a financial planner, who may benefit most from one. And then we’ve got an extensive list of questions that we think you should be asking to make sure you’ve got somebody who’s really acting in your best interest as you’re going along the way. So whether that’s with us or somebody else, we want you to make sure that you have the right person that’s in your corner. So Tim Baker, as I was looking at some data on this, there’s a 2016 Northwestern Mutual study that only 21% of Americans hire a financial planner to assist them, despite more than 70% — and that 70% number coming from a Harris poll — indicating that they’re interested in receiving guidance. So we have a majority that says, I want it and I want guidance, but only about a fifth that are actually engaging with a planner. I mean, maybe we’ve already hit on some of this already earlier in the show, but what’s behind that?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I mean, and it could be a lot of the things that we’re talking about is sometimes I hear a lot with prospective clients is I didn’t even really know that there were people out there that focus more on younger professionals because they look at their parents’ planner and it’s kind of where their planner is patting them on the head and saying, hey, when you have some money, sonny, I’ll help you. Or I hear like a lot of these paternalistic, where it’s like “Do as I say,” you know, it’s not necessarily collaborative, which I like. But yeah, that’s shocking is that again, I think there was people, young Americans that want it but that it’s not hitting. And I think, again, I think that’s why — you know, I’m a member of the XY Planning Network, and I think when I joined the network — so it’s a group of fee-only fiduciaries, CFPs, that really want to bring financial planning to Gen X, Gen Y demographic that’s been by and large ignored. And I joined at the end of 2015, there was 200 members maybe. And there’s 700 with us now. I mean, that’s unbelievable growth. So I think it’s just there’s a void that I think is starting to be filled. And I’m encouraged by I think what I’m seeing in the industry. But I’m also discouraged by the fact that there are a lot of people out there that need help and have no idea where to go, whether it’s account minimums or — and sometimes, it’s like well my parents never had an advisor. Sometimes with money, we kind of repeat — you know, I have a lot of pharmacists say, “I’m the first person to go to college. Further, I’m the first person to get an advanced degree. The amount of money I’m making now is more than both of my parents combined.” And what often happens is that a lot of what they’ve learned about money comes from parents, and I’ve said that time and time again is what my parents taught me about money, essentially don’t have credit card debt, buy a house. And beyond that, it was wing it. Figure it out. And I think in that regard, we just don’t have good mechanisms in place. And I think I’ll call out some of the pharmacy schools and associations, I want more education around that because when you’re walking out with a potential mortgage-worth of debt, we better be damn sure that we kind of know how to approach that. And right now, I think we miss that. So when I asked a question, $160,000 of debt at a 6.5% interest rate, what’s that monthly payment? And then there’s crickets. And then they found out the payment is $1,800+, it’s like gees, that’s a lot of money.

Tim Ulbrich: I couldn’t agree more. And I think as Tim Baker gets fired up about needing more in the PharmD, I think we’re going to have to put the explicit rating on this episode. The little “E” next to the I.

Tim Baker: Yeah, oh man, I think we’re going to lose our family-friendly status.

Tim Ulbrich: So the obvious pros — we’re not going to rehash these because we’ve talked through these in the DIY and the robo is that of course, you’ve got the human aspect. You’ve got the scope of if done well, it’s comprehensive, right? So I used the example of the debt to death. You’re looking at all aspects. It’s not limited on one aspect like investing. You’re looking at your whole plan. One of the things I think is interesting, though, Tim, is there’s this continued myth that if I hire a financial planner, my outcome is going to be better because they’re going to help me choose the right stocks. And therefore, I’m going to outperform the market. And we, I think from our perspective, debunk that myth. And when we were working on the book, we were looking at research published that shows between about 1.8% and 3% better returns on average per year for those that are hiring a planner versus those that don’t. Now, I think people look at those numbers and think, oh, that’s because of them helping me choose the right investment. I think what we’re trying to make a case of, though, is if you’re saying no, it’s not because of that, then where is that positive return coming from?
Tim Baker: I think it’s really a matter of — and this could even be by accident in some ways, even in my past life in the broker dealer world is — you sit in between, from an investment perspective, you sit in between your client and their money. Most investment accounts, when the advisor is managing that for their client, there’s not two sets of hands in that. The client basically says, hey, I want you, the advisor to do that. So when the sky is falling, and the client calls — and I’ve had this here recently where the client says, hey, I really think that we should sell, typically, I do a timeout and let’s talk about it. Let’s revisit what we talked about in the investment. And although like I have the butterflies in my stomach too because my portfolio is affected, and I’m invested the same exact way that my clients are. I have to remind myself just like I have to remind the client that again, over the course of time, we adhere to, stick to our guns and adhere to the investment policy statement, the allocation that we put forth that is very diversified and low cost. It will take care of us. So I think because we don’t have the ability to get in and trade and that we’re kind of standing in between, it’s almost like a safeguard on hasty behavior. It’s kind of like what I tell clients that are just having a really bad time, just spending money on impulse or not being able to save money is anything that’s over $100, you have to have a 24-48 hour cooling off period. And if you are thinking about it in 24 or 48 hours, then maybe buy it. If you’re not, then that’s a good choice. So in the same way is this too shall pass when it comes to investments, there are brighter days ahead. And we’ve enjoyed a great, bold market, a great, hot market, and we’re going to have corrections. But by and large, sometimes it’s just the investor standing in between them and their accounts.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think you use the example of the advisor there sitting in between the investor and their accounts, I think it also goes beyond just the investment component. So as you’re working with clients and you’re asking them things about what are your hopes, dreams and goals, obviously one of those, you’re going to increase your net worth, you’re going to retire successfully, all of those things. But also if someone were to say, I really want to take some time off, 10 years into my career and do this. Or I want to make sure I’m spending more time with my family or at some point, I want to go part-time, I want to start my own business, or I want to get into real estate. Somebody who is really walking that path with you can turn back to you and say, hey, remember when we talked about this? Are we working towards doing that?

Tim Baker: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think that gets to some of the cons because when you look at the industry, as you mentioned earlier, a lot of the industry is still structured in a way that incentivizes only the growth of the assets because if you’re being paid in an Assets Under Management model, you’re not incentivized to look at me in the face and say, hey, Tim, remember when you and Jess talked about Sam going to see the orca whales. Like you’d be better off saying, Tim, go open up the IRA so I can get my 1%.

Tim Baker: Right, or even more quantifiable than just saying orca whales, which is very important, is credit card debt.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah.

Tim Baker: Or even student loan debt. I remember that question, and we answered that — I don’t know what episode it was, in one of the Ask Tim & Tim’s, and the advisor was basically saying to prolong the debt payments for the house and invest the difference. And to me, I look at that as like that is the advisor putting their interests ahead of their own. But like again, I’m seeing this more and more with new graduates, and this is something that I’m trying to crack the nut on with the offering that we have with students and residents in terms of financial planning is I’m seeing a lot of credit card debt. So if I walk into a financial advisor, typically because there’s an assumption of wealth and typically because they charge based on Assets Under Management, they don’t care to even know how to advise you on cash flowing, budgeting, debt management.

Tim Ulbrich: Do you have a will?

Tim Baker: Yeah, do you have a will? Those types of things.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah.

Tim Baker: And I think maybe even the will is a little bit more because they want to protect the assets from the estate.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, that’s true.

Tim Baker: So we’re talking about the next generation of wealth transfer and the next few years is going to be incredible, but if I’m an advisor, then I’m paid more money if you put money into an IRA versus paying down credit card debt. And again, I think again, the planners, they want to be able to help their clients I think by and large. But they’re just not incentivized to do so. And I think that’s a problem.

Tim Ulbrich: And so as we talk about the cons here, I think they’re obvious. And we’ve highlighted some of them so far is that we’ve made a point of emphasis saying if you’re going to be working with a financial planner, there’s a lot of work that needs to be done to make sure that you’re working with the right planner that has your interests in mind, you’re asking the right questions about how they’re charging, fiduciary standards, do they have the right credentials? And it’s not any one of the answers to those questions is going to give you the obvious yes, this person is the person I want to be looking to work with. And one of the resources I would point our listeners to is one of my favorite books I read, “Unshakeable,” by Tony Robbins or maybe Tony Robbins’ ghostwriting team, you know, I’m not sure. But either way, he does a great job of outlining what we’ve been talking about here of the — I think he quoted maybe somewhere around 2-3% actually remain in that fiduciary category. But when you look at the wide variety of planners that are out there, the credentials that it takes to become a planner, the scope of services, how they charge, all the things that we talk about on our financial planner page at YFP, I think it can become very overwhelming to think, why am I paying for what I’m paying with these services, right? And what’s the value that I’m going to be getting from these services.

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think one thing to mention is I hear some prospective clients say, yeah, I heard you on the podcast, I’m thinking about working with you, but I’m also thinking about working with my parents’ financial planner. And one of the questions that I implore them to ask is what do they think about student loans? Because if student loans are a huge thing, again, 95% of advisors have no idea —

Tim Ulbrich: And they weren’t a big things for our parents, probably.

Tim Baker: Right, exactly. And they haven’t been trained up. So like they’ll say, oh, they just amortize our retirement. Or I heard one prospective client said that their advisor said, oh, these are no big deal. And you know, it makes my blood boil, in a sense, that we can do so much better. And the market is changing with how our economy is changing and what our financial picture is looking like. Like again, a lot of the stuff that we spend money on and that debts that our parents didn’t have, so we have to adapt accordingly, and it can be about training advisors on stock options and all that stuff that it’s still in the curriculum, but it doesn’t fit at all.

Tim Ulbrich: So just like pretty much anything else, all three of these buckets have pros and cons, right?

Tim Baker: Sure.

Tim Ulbrich: And we have people I know who have just commented in the Facebook group and reached out to us via email, we have people that are in all three of these buckets and are dominating. So I think the take-home point here is really, do a self-evaluation of where are you at and as you’re looking at investing as one part of the financial plan, which of these do you feel like really resonates most with you? Now, for those of you that are in interested in, hey, I really think I would benefit from a financial planner, I want to work with YFP and this, again, YourFinancialPharmacist.com/financial-planner. From there, you can get lots of information on what to look for, you can schedule a call with Tim Baker, learn more about him, see if that’s a good fit or not. And so I’d encourage you to check that out, YourFinancialPharmacist.com/financial-planner. Tim Baker, it’s been fun.

Tim Baker: Yeah, good stuff.

Tim Ulbrich: Look forward to wrapping this up next week. We’re going to do the Investing Q&A month of December. And again, to our community, happy Thanksgiving. We’re certainly grateful and thankful for you and the support that you’re provided. Have a great holiday and a great rest of your week.

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

Join the YFP Community!

YFP 070: Pre-Planning for Tax Season


 

Pre-Planning for Tax Season

On Episode 70 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Baker, YFP Team Member and owner of Script Financial, talks with special guest Paul Eikenberg. Paul works alongside Tim at Script Financial and handles all of the tax planning and preparation for Script clients. On this episode, they discuss the new changes to the tax code and tips you can use for pre-planning for tax season.

Summary

In this episode, Tim and Paul discuss changes to the tax code that will affect your tax preparation for this year. There are several changes that have been made. The 1040 form is 23 lines and has new schedules. Standard deduction amounts are changing from $12,700 (couple) and $6,350 (individual) to $24,000 and $12,000, respectively. Personal and dependent exemptions are going away, meaning that those who have itemized before will probably take the standard deduction. Other changes include the amount that’s able to be deducted for medical expenses (now 7.5%), limits for local and state income taxes, child tax credit (now $2,000/child), student loan discharge due to death or disability is not taxable in the future, and the 529 is now available for primary and secondary education in addition to college. Paul also discusses how tax brackets have changed. There are the same number of brackets, however, the rates have been lowered. Paul suggests that most people will get a tax reduction between higher standard deductions and lower tax rates.

Tim and Paul then talk about the differences between tax planning and tax preparation. Tax planning involves long term strategy matching with your personal goals. Tax preparation is more mechanical where you plug in what happened financially from last year.

Paul offers tax review services through Script Financial. In a tax review, Paul uses your tax return from last year, current paycheck stubs, and payroll statements to project what your tax bill will be, assess if you are withholding enough from your check, and walk you through different options. Paul is still offering tax review services.

About Today’s Guest

Paul Eikenberg has been involved in starting and selling 4 businesses, has worked in the IT field as a franchisee and executive, as VP of Franchise Operation for a 500 unit Franchise System and is currently is serving as Vice Chairman of the Board of APG Federal Credit $ 1.4 billion asset Federal Credit Union. He has a wealth business operations and financial experience. In addition to being a licensed Maryland Tax Preparer, he is scheduled to completed the IRS’ Enrolled Agent exams by year end.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Baker: What’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 070 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Paul, thanks for joining me on today’s episode. How’s it going?

Paul Eikenberg: It’s great, Tim. Thanks for having me.

Tim Baker: Yeah, of course. So Paul, why don’t we take a step back before we kind of get into all of the exciting things that are tax. And we don’t spend enough time on taxes, which is a very important part of the financial plan. But before we kind of do a deep dive into discussing the different changes to the tax code and what our listeners can do to prep for the upcoming tax season, why don’t you tell us a little bit about yourself and how you came to be the tax guy at Script Financial?

Paul Eikenberg: Sure, I’ve had several careers now. I’ve owned two businesses. And most recently, I was working with a network service provider. When that job got eliminated, I decided that I’d go back to tax preparing and got my Maryland certification, and I’m working on the enrolled agent program with the IRS, which I’ll be completing in December. And was looking to work real hard for part of the year and not so hard the rest of year has been my life. So that’s when you and I sat down together and started talking about our financial plans, and I wasn’t ready to retire, but I wasn’t ready to go back to work full-tilt. So you and I came to an understanding that Script Financial needed a tax practice and that it was a good fit for me at the right time.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think for me, you know, I think tax is so important because it really permeates every part of the financial plan. And I think a good understanding of one’s own tax situation and how you can practically plan for your tax situation I think is super important. So like I said, I’ve really enjoyed working with you and Anne over the years, and I feel like when I think back on the first time we met, I think we talked a lot about finances, but especially with Anne, we talked a lot about just life and just experiences and things that you guys have experienced and my experience, and it was more about the human element, I think, that we connected. And it’s been a good ride so far, and I’m lucky to have you as part of the team. So yeah, thanks again for coming on the podcast today. So let’s hop right in. So Paul, last year, the new administration passed the new tax code. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed by President Trump on December 15, 2017. What has that done to the tax system from where you sit as you’re looking at preparing taxes for 2018? What are some of the big changes?

Paul Eikenberg: Oh, everybody’s still working on figuring it out. The forms, the 1040’s changing. And the IRS has released drafts of the 1040s and all their forms, but they’re still in draft form. None of it’s been finalized. But one of the big changes you’ll see is that form 1040, which was 79 lines last year, is going to be 23 lines this year, postcard-sized, which sounds great until you find out there are six new schedules to support the 1040.

Tim Baker: Right.

Paul Eikenberg: And those lines really haven’t been removed, they’ve been moved to other schedules. So from a complexity of doing your taxes, it is I expect to be every bit as complex as last year. We will have a lot more people this year will be itemizing than previous because of the changes in the standard deduction.

Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s funny because I think the rhetoric behind the tax changes were that we want people to be able to basically file their taxes on the back of a napkin. And obviously, the 1040 itself is smaller, but it looks like they just moved the information to these new schedules, which I understand are actually numeric. So if people are familiar with the tax forms, you know, you have Schedule A, which was typically for your itemized deductions, Schedule C for business income. And now we actually have Schedule 1-6, so it actually makes it a little bit more confusing, in my opinion. Obviously, we haven’t seen kind of the final product of what the forms will actually look like, but interesting that I think it’s still going to be as complex as it was before. So let’s talk about some of the meat of some of the changes that we’re seeing. So you mentioned the new standard deduction. So walk us through some of the big — what is the standard deduction compared to the itemized deduction? And how has that changed for this upcoming year?

Paul Eikenberg: Well, in 2017, the standard deduction for an individual was $6,350. For couples, you were looking at $12,700. This year, it’s going to be $12,000 for single and $24,000 for couples.

Tim Baker: So essentially, it’s doubled.

Paul Eikenberg: It would seem that way except that your personal and dependent exemptions are going away, which was $4,050 per individual.

Tim Baker: So it looks like a little bit of the same stuff with kind of just rearranging the numbers, similar to the lines in the 1040.

Paul Eikenberg: It is. You’ll have, you know, you’ll have a higher standard deduction. So a lot of people who were itemizing last year will be taking the standard deduction this year. There’s estimates all over the board as to how many people will be affected. But you know, we saw a lot of them in our practice that were maybe $2,000-3,000 over the standard deduction last year that it made sense to itemize. This year, they’ll be taking the standard deduction.

Tim Baker: So just to back up, typically, what you want to do as a taxpayer is you want to look at what the standard deduction is and then what you’re itemized deduction is and then you want to take the greater one of those. So last year, if you were single, and you had itemized deductions of $6,500, you would have took that over the standard deduction of $6,350 because it was a greater number. So Paul, quickly, what are some examples of what would constitute an itemized deduction?

Paul Eikenberg: Mortgage interest is one of the big ones. Property taxes, state taxes, charitable contributions, employee business expenses, medical expenses can be if you have a significant amount of medical expenses. In the past, it had to be the amount over 10% of your adjusted gross income. This year, it’s dropped to 7.5%. But for the most part, unless you had a major health factor, you’re not — most people aren’t getting to itemize the medical insurance, I mean medical deduction.

Tim Baker: OK.

Paul Eikenberg: Last year, one of the big changes, state and local income taxes were deductible. They’re still deductible, but there’s a $10,000 limit on the amount of state taxes that can be itemized, and that is withholding taxes and property taxes. So higher income earners, that’s going to be a reduction in what you can itemize.

Tim Baker: So that’s big for high income earners and if you live in a part of the country where your mortgage and state and local taxes are higher, so say in the San Francisco area, that’s going to obviously affect those areas more than, you know, if you live in more of a rural area. How about, Paul, how about with kind of the, you know, if you have kids — how does the tax code change if you have kids?

Paul Eikenberg: Well, the biggest change there is the child tax credit goes from $1,000 per child to $2,000 per child. And the amount that’s refundable goes from $1,100 to $1,400. So that is the biggest change. The other change is that credit was phased out at $110,000 last year for a married couple. The phase-out has been raised to $400,000 this year.

Tim Baker: Which is huge, especially for our listeners, you know, probably as a couple are making more than $110,000. Now if you make up to $400,000, you get that $2,000 tax credit. And really good point of emphasis here is a credit is actually a dollar-for-dollar reduction from your tax bill, whereas a deduction just kind of decreases the income that you’re taxed on, so it’s not necessarily a dollar-for-dollar. And I think for the child tax credit, I believe if you’re single, I think it’s you can make up to $200,000 and still get that $2,000 credit per child. So just like you were talking about, it’s changed but the personal exemptions have gone away, but you’ve increased the child tax credit. So it’s a little bit of a — I don’t want to say bait and switch, but not a huge change. OK, so what about the — in terms of like education? We’re talking like the 529, the student loans and forgiveness. Are there big changes for that? Because that would obviously be something with listeners who have kids that are trying to avoid maybe the student loan hell that they’re in, so they’re saving for 529 or, you know, if you are a borrower and you’re trying to navigate your student loans, are there any big changes to the tax code in those two areas?

Paul Eikenberg: One of the big changes is the student loan discharge due to death or disability is not going to be taxable in the future.

Tim Baker: OK.

Paul Eikenberg: The interest deduction, the phase-out earnings have been raised a little bit but not significantly. I guess the biggest change is the 529 is going to be available for use for primary and secondary education.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so from what I understand, Paul, the 529, you can actually use for kind of your grade school, middle school, high school, which was a change because the 529 was really — before, it was just locked into just college. They did, for you homeschoolers out there, there was supposed to be a benefit that was stripped out at the last minute, so unfortunately, the 529 is no longer good for homeschooling. And so you know, from what I’m hearing more about people that work with clients that use 529s, it could actually — you could use it as a pass-through. So if you’re paying for private school, make sure you’re funding a 529 because you get a state deduction in most states. But then you can also use a 529 almost like you would use a retirement account where you’re accumulating, you know, so if you have a child and they’re going to go to school in 18 years, you’re investing that money and you’re accumulating it over time so you have a bucket of money for your child in the future to apply towards college. And then to circle back, the student loan interest deduction, it remained intact. I think it goes up a little bit, but not enough to really affect a regular pharmacist. Maybe for residents out there, the 2017 phaseouts were I think $65,000-80,000, so anything above $80,000, you didn’t get a deduction. So obviously for residents, for those maybe your PGY1, PGY2 year, you’d probably get a deduction for those years. But you know, beyond that, not necessarily. But the fact that the loans are discharged due to death and disability and not taxable because of death and disability is a big win for those people that unfortunately have to deal with that situation. So I guess, Paul, before we kind of talk about what we can do to prepare for the 2018 tax season, just about I guess the brackets. You know, I think everyone would like simplicity, but with the new tax code, do the tax brackets, how did they change? Did they change? What does that look like?

Paul Eikenberg: It’s pretty much the same number of brackets, but the rates are a little lower. The base rate is still 10%, but the next bracket down from 15% to 12%. The bracket above that went from 25% to 22%. 28% to 24% and then the next bracket, 33% to 32%. The others are pretty much the same or higher. So you know, we’re looking at overall, most of us are going to get a tax reduction between the higher standard deduction and the lower tax rate should have a positive effect on most of us out there.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think, you know, the number of brackets, again, like it would be nice to pare those down. I think essentially, though, moving forward with this tax plan, I think it is going to be better from a taxpayer perspective. Most people’s taxes are going to be lower. So that’s something to consider as you plan, you know, for the future. And that’s a good segway into kind of our next discussion is, you know, the difference between tax planning and tax preparation. So Paul, for you, how would you separate those two things?

Paul Eikenberg: The preparation is just more mechanical. We’re taking what happened last year, plugging it in, selecting maybe a couple options, whether itemizing or standard deduction works best for you, should you make an IRA contribution up to April 15 that you didn’t make before the end of the year. But you know, that’s working in the past with a lot of things you can’t change. Tax planning is really taking a long-term strategy, kind of matching your personal goals with your tax strategy. So you know, if your goal is to pay off student loans now, you may not want to defer as much retirement income as somebody without that. It’s just kind of putting all those pieces together and, you know, when we look at planning, like a mid-year plan for somebody, we’re going to look at where you are now, have you had enough taxes withheld that you won’t have a surprise come April? And are you taking advantage of the HSAs? Are you definitely getting the matches in your IRA, in your retirement programs?

Tim Baker: Sure.

refinance student loans

Paul Eikenberg: You know. If you have a business, rental property, are you doing everything you can? Are you planning out your expenses for those to mitigate your taxes as much as possible?

Tim Baker: Right. Yeah, and the way I look at prep versus planning, tax prep versus tax planning is the prep I think is the very reactive in nature. You’re like, ope, this is what happened for 2018. Let’s plug in the numbers and see what pops out. And sometimes, it’s a surprise, you get a refund. And sometimes, it’s where you’re writing Uncle Sam a check. And that can’t be fun.

Paul Eikenberg: I know from preparing a lot of taxes that the most painful thing is to be doing your taxes, waiting and being surprised with a big tax bill instead of a small refund you were expecting.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so maybe the approach we take is maybe self-preservation too because it’s tough to sit across the table and say, ‘Hey, you owe a lot of taxes.’ So obviously, what we’re trying to do from a tax planning perspective is get out in front of it, be proactive, and actually, you know, don’t let really the tax situation control you. You’re controlling your — whether it’s, like you said, deferring the taxes or avoiding the taxes, whatever that looks like.

Paul Eikenberg: If you’re proactive, you have a lot more options.

Tim Baker: Yes. Yeah. And for some people, you know, we talk about having funds set aside, whether it’s for home maintenance, emergency fund, a vacation fund, a lot of people don’t have a tax bill fund that they can just write a check and say, ‘Here you go, Uncle Sam. I didn’t pay you enough over the year, so here’s a sum of money.’ So that definitely could be painful. So Paul, let’s break down. You kind of talked through it a little bit, but when you sit down and you do a tax review with a client, what does that look like? How does that play out?

Paul Eikenberg: Let’s say we’re doing one for you now. You know, what I’d want to see is the most recent paycheck stubs. You know, we’d want to look at your last year tax return, and we’d really take your payroll statement and look at where you’re earning are, what type of retirement program you’re in, what other type of health insurance — are you pre-tax, HSAs — and project all the contributions through the end of the year for earnings and withholding, withholding taxes, and pre-tax contributions. From there, kind of review the tax return from last year, look for other sorts of income, deductions, project those, and then we’d sit down for a half hour conference and kind of go over the assumptions that I make projecting your situation through the end of the year, be sure that if you had capital gains last year, rental income, any of those other type of items, that we’re working on the proper assumptions.

Tim Baker: Right.

Paul Eikenberg: You know, are there estimated taxes or anything we’re missing that you’ve already paid Uncle Sam. And from there, we kind of project what we expect your tax bill to be, what your withholding’s going to be, if nothing changes, are you going to have a refund or owe money? And then we kind of walk through your options. To me, the HSAs are a great tool. Everybody should be getting their matching retirement, whether that’s pre-tax or a Roth 401k. If your employer’s matching it, that’s something you want to be sure you’re taking advantage of. And we’d kind of walk through your options of is there anything you should be doing to mitigate the taxes? Have you had too much withheld? Should you lower it? Have you had not enough withheld? Do you need to increase it? You know, are you going to be subject to penalties if nothing changes? Maybe you need to make an estimated tax payment. So there are a lot of things we look at.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and it’s great stuff. What I really like about kind of your review is that, you know, you take the pay stub — and it’s funny because when I used to work for a company, I would get paid with a paper check, I’d rip the check off, I’d deposit it, and I’d throw the pay stub on a pile. And I’d never really look at it. But actually, there’s a lot of good information, a lot of good nuggets on the pay stub about what you’re actually paying into. And it could be your retirement fund or long-term disability or whatever that is. And what I really like about your system is, you know, you use that information to kind of set up where we’ve been throughout the year and then extrapolate that forward to where we expect you to be. And what I like is is that you generally say, ‘Hey, if nothing changes, you’re going to owe $2,000. Or you’re going to get back $2,000.’ You’re going to be basically equal. You won’t owe or get anything back.’ And then if there is an imbalance, then we kind of discuss some of the levers that we can pull. So you know, you mentioned the HSA, increasing a contribution into your 401k, whatever those things are. And I think another one that probably we could talk about is just, you know, changes to your payroll withholding, the W4 form. A lot of people, when you begin a new job, you fill out the W4, and you don’t really look at it. But that W4 form basically dictates to your employer how much tax should be withheld from your paycheck. And then if you owe more taxes than what is withheld, then that’s when you actually have to write a check to Uncle Sam. So it’s kind of important to really understand that form itself and what that does. And sometimes just changing that is one of the levers that we pull. So instead of paying at the end of the year, you just pay a little bit more throughout the course of the year. So these are I think levers that I think are important to look at and go through and be able to, again, be more proactive in your tax situation than just say, ‘Well, this is what happened last year. Cross my fingers, hopefully I don’t get any surprises,’ and go from there. So Paul, are you still doing the reviews for this year? I know we’re into October. What does that look like?

Paul Eikenberg: Yeah, we’ll probably continue doing them until the Thanksgiving holiday is the plan right now.

Tim Baker: OK. So I think, you know, for listeners out there, if you’re interested, some people, you know, really enjoy to do a great job of analyzing your own tax situation. But if you’re not one of them, and you can think of a million other things to do to spend your time, you know, we can definitely help. Paul can definitely help. I think he does a great job with my clients. So you know, if you’re interested, sign up for the Script Financial tax review, and it basically includes a lot of the things we talked about, you know, analyzing your current pay stubs, you know, doing an income projection, you know, for the rest of the year, reviewing last year’s returns to see if there’s any discrepancy. So you know, if there’s big changes like you got married, you bought a house, you had a baby, those are going to affect, you know, obviously your tax situation. And at the end of the review, really to project out kind of your year-end tax status. And with that, basically Paul delivers that in a 30-minute video conference where, again, you review all the assumptions and projections and kind of go over the steps that you need to take to kind of, you know, pull the levers and say, ‘If we want to get money, this is what we would do. If we want to not owe the government money, this is what you should do.’ And I think it’s of great value. So normally, a tax review like this, it would be priced at $99. Between now and Nov. 20, so this episode will be released on Oct. 18, so about a month, we’re running basically a promo for 20% off. So that just brings it down to $79. So if you go to YourFinancialPharmacist.com/tax and use the coupon code YFP, you’ll get that 20% off the $100 price. So it’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com/tax to get that — to sign up for the review and use the coupon code YFP for the discount. So Paul, you know, good stuff today. We kind of talked about changes to the 2018 upcoming tax year, changes to the 1040, it looks like we’ve added some numeric schedules, the standard deduction has increased, and we talked about some of the changes with, you know, with the new tax code with deductions and credits, and then really what you can do for your own tax situation to kind of get in front of the ball and make sure that you have really no surprises for, you know, this upcoming tax season. So Paul, anything else to add before we kind of sign off here for the day?

Paul Eikenberg: Yeah, one more thing to think about that we think we’re going to see a trend with this year with the standard deduction going up. In the past, people have tried to pay their property taxes on December 31, made charitable donations so that they got those in in time to be deductible in the current year. I think the trend’s going to be that a lot of the people will be doubling up on those. They’ll be looking at their tax situation and instead of making donations in 2018, they may make twice as many in 2019. And think about your property taxes as to whether it makes sense — like in Maryland, you’d pay your property taxes from July to July and you have an option of breaking it up. So it may make sense to pay more in one year and then take the standard — alternate your itemized deduction one year to the standard deduction the next year. So that is one of the things we anticipate being a good strategy for quite a few people out there.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think just a tip in kind of the direction of doing some proper planning and being as efficient with your tax situation as you can. Like I said, if the listeners are interested in working with Paul and doing a tax review, it’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com/tax and use the coupon code YFP for the 20% discount. So Paul, good stuff today. Thanks for coming on the podcast, really appreciate it. And to the listeners, thanks again for listening. And we’ll catch you next time.

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

Join the YFP Community!

YFP 068: Pros/Cons of Dave Ramsey’s Baby Steps


 

Pros/Cons of Dave Ramsey’s Baby Steps

On Episode 068 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Ulbrich, Founder of Your Financial Pharmacist, and Tim Baker, YFP Team Member and owner of Script Financial, discuss the pros and cons of Dave Ramsey’s Baby Steps and how they apply to the pharmacy professional.

Summary of Episode

Tim Ulbrich and Tim Baker discuss Dave Ramsey’s baby steps in this week’s episode by sharing their own experiences and answering questions from the YFP community. Dave Ramsey’s 7 steps include:

Step 1 = Save $1,000 for a starter emergency fund

Step 2 = Pay of all debt using the debt snowball

Step 3 = Save up 3-6 months of expenses in savings

Step 4 = Invest 15% of household income into Roth IRAs and pre-tax retirement accounts

Step 5 = Save for kids college

Step 6 = Pay off home early

Step 7 = Build wealth and give

Overall, Tim and Tim feel that Dave Ramsey’s baby steps lay out are a great framework for an individual or family to follow and then iterate to their own needs. However, these steps aren’t a financial plan and shouldn’t be used solely as one. There are so many scenarios and possible financial goals and plans that differ from person to person. For some, it might make more sense to follow the steps in a different order or to adjust the amount of savings or contribution toward retirement. Often times steps 5, 6 and 7 are happening simultaneously instead of consecutively following one another once the previous one is completed. It’s important to weigh the emotional part of your financial journey, your attitudes, and feelings toward debt and your goals, and what time frame you are working with when thinking about paying off your debt. These steps don’t include other important aspects of creating a financial plan, such as obtaining disability insurance, potentially using the avalanche method when paying off debt, or really take into consideration the amount of student loan debt a pharmacist graduates with.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Welcome to Episode 068 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Tim Baker, excited to be back together on the mic. I think it’s been awhile, right?

Tim Baker: It has been awhile. I feel like we cultivated this baby in the podcast and I’ve, like, been absent for the last few weeks. So I’m excited to be back on.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, we had a great month in the month of September doing home buying, all things home buying. Nate Hedrick, the Real Estate RPH joined us. Excited about the partnership with Nate. Excited also to jump into the topic we have today, discussing the 7 baby steps that many are familiar with, recommended by Dave Ramsey. We’re going to talk about the pros and the cons and how we think they do and don’t fit to a pharmacy professional. And we’re going to weave in throughout the show feedback from you, the YFP community, that we’ve gotten via email, the YFP Facebook group and via LinkedIn as well. So Tim, it’s my understanding you’re out at the XYPN meeting right now, correct?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I’m in St. Louis for XYPN Live. I think this is the fourth annual meeting. So XY Planning Network is a group of fee-only CFPs that are trying to bring financial planning to kind of the Gen X, Gen Y generation. So yeah, it’s been good to, you know, rub elbows with some of my colleagues and just get good ideas and bring them back to Script Financial and see how I can better serve clients. So it’s been a good week so far.

Tim Ulbrich: And you’re rocking your YFP T-shirt today? Is that right?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I’m flying the flag, Tim. So you know, we’re going to be talking to a lot of different vendors and things like that. Actually, it’s funny. I was telling you before we started recording that people, you know, my colleagues have kind of noticed what we’ve been doing on the YFP side of things and have taken interest in that. So it’s kind of cool to see that, and yeah, so definitely rocking the YFP T-shirt today.


Tim Ulbrich: Exciting time. So let’s jump into this topic. You know, when I think of the Dave Ramsey 7 Baby Steps — and we’re going to link to them in the show notes, and I’ll talk about them briefly — but for those that are not familiar, we’ll go through them quickly and link to more information. This is such an emotionally charged topic, and so when we posted this week, I said, ‘Hey, YFP Facebook group, YFP community, we’re going to do a podcast recording on the Ramsey 7 Baby Steps. What do you think the good, the bad, how does it work? What are the pros and cons? How does it apply to a pharmacist or not? And for our community personally, those that have walked through this step, what are some success stories or challenges they’ve had?’ So I think based on the response that we got in that post, we’ve got lots to talk about. So you ready to do this?

Tim Baker: Let’s do it.

Tim Ulbrich: Alright, so onto the show. Here’s what we’re going to do. I’m going to walk through briefly the 7 baby steps, so for those that haven’t heard of them before, are not familiar, I’m going to talk about them very quickly. Then, I’m going to get Tim Baker’s thoughts on his opinions at a high level. What does he think about the baby steps? Where do you they work? Where are maybe some areas that need more flexibility? And when it comes to advising his clients, where has he seen these work in both the success route but also in maybe areas that he may disagree with. Now, we’re going to weave in some comments and feedback from the YFP community throughout. So Dave Ramsey’s 7 Baby Steps. If you haven’t heard them before, here they are in order:

Step 1 is save $1,000 for what he calls a starter or a baby emergency fund. Now, we’ll come back and talk about this. We talked in Episode 026 baby stepping into your financial plan, two things to focus on first, which an emergency fund was one of those. We’ll link to that in the show notes. And we also have a blog post on why having an emergency fund matters, so if you want to learn more about this topic, we’ll link to that as well. So Step No. 1, baby emergency fund, $1,000. This is all about getting a quick win and making sure you’re starting to build some protection into your financial plan.
Step No. 2, probably the step, Tim, that causes the most debate — pay off all, all debt using the debt snowball.

Tim Baker: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: So this is referring to credit card debt, student loan debt, car debt. The only exception here to the word all is mortgage, the primary residence, which we’ll talk back and we’ll come back to this in Step No. 6. So Step No. 2 is pay off all debt except for the mortgage using the debt snowball. And we’ll talk about what that means and we’ll dig into that further.

Step No. 3 then is save up 3-6 months of expenses in an emergency fund. So we mentioned Step No.1 is save $1,000 for a starter emergency fund. Step No. 3 is to build up a full emergency fund, which is 3-6 months of expenses. Now, one that he doesn’t publish on his website but he talks often about is Baby Step 3b. And this, I think, Tim, is codeword for “Woops, I didn’t really think about a home. Where should I put it?” So it’s Baby Step 3b, which is save 10-20% down for a home. And I’ve actually heard him reference 10% in some areas, his Financial Peace University class, but also 20% on his podcast. So that’s Step No. 3 and 3b.

Then Step No. 4 as we’re working through these one by one is invest 15% of household into Roth IRAs in pre-tax retirement accounts. So invest 15% of household income into Roth IRAs and pre-tax retirement accounts.

Step No. 5 is save for kids’ college.

Step No. 6 is pay off the home early.

And Step No. 7, probably the most nebulous one, is build wealth and give.

OK, so those are the 7 Baby Steps, and I think it’s worth noting that his recommendation that I’ve heard throughout the podcast and listening to it over the past several years is that steps No. 4, 5, and 6 are actually happening together. So of course you’re not going to invest in 15% possible income into Roth IRAs and pre-tax retirement accounts and be done and check it off. That’s going to be ongoing. Saving for kids’ college is going to happen over a period of time. And paying off the home early will happen over time as well. So steps 4, 5, and 6 are happening over time. So there you have it, the 7 Baby Steps. And I can speak a little bit from personal experience. My wife and I used the 7 Baby Steps in our journey paying off $200,000 of student loan debt. And we worked through them, we made some modifications along the way, which I think is going to lend itself nicely as we get some questions and feedback from the YFP community. So Tim Baker, your thoughts and opinions at a high level on the 7 Baby Steps. Where do they work? And in your experience working with clients, what are some of the successes you’ve seen in clients using these seven baby steps? And where do you think they maybe have a little bit more downside or maybe points of contention?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think that as a framework, I like it. Now, I think that’s part of the problem with financial planning — because this is essentially like a framework of a financial plan. And I think a lot of people will throw some shade towards Ramsey because, you know, they say, well, it’s not a one-size-fits-all. And I think financial advisors will sometimes give him some backlash because of, you know, he’s too focused on the debt. And if you remember me talking through like, you know, a lot of advisors are paid based on investments. So they’re not incentivized for you to work through your credit card debt or things like that. And then I think there’s just some disagreements about like his particular investment choices. But as a framework, and I think in some of our engagement with the Facebook group and LinkedIn and things like that, there are people that are identifying, saying, ‘Hey, we’re in Step 2. We moved to Step 3, and then we had to move back,’ things like that. So it is more or less a working financial plan that people can identify with and at least benchmark off of. So I’m in favor of that, and I think it’s good to kind of get the blood up a little bit and talk about these things. But I think there are some people that maybe are a little bit more financially savvy that, you know, have their ducks in a row. And they say, ‘Well, this isn’t necessarily how I would do it.’ But for a lot of people that aren’t in that position — and I come across a lot of them, and they eventually become clients, which is a good thing. Where should I put an emergency fund? How much? Why 15%? And what’s a Roth IRA? That type of thing. And I’m not really being facetious, I think some of these things are, they’re true. So for people that go through Dave Ramsey stuff, you know, there’s an assumption, I think, afterwards that they’re going to know more or less which direction they need to go. And from a financial advisor’s standpoint, they don’t necessarily make good clients because they feel like they’re set. But I do think that there are some strengths but also limitations to me overall to the 7 steps. So for example, you know, if I look at the first one, save $1,000 for your emergency fund. You know, I do have clients that are in this position where they have, you know, hundreds of thousands of dollars of student loans, but they have $30,000 or $40,000 worth of credit card debt. So you know, we’re just trying to dig our way out of, you know, paying through the credit card debts but then, you know, having a buffer of like $1,000, that’s a huge step in that direction. So even — you know, some people might look at this like eh, this isn’t for pharmacists. I would say not so fast. There are some situations where that’s going to be true. So like the way I talk about, and I think we talked about this in Episode 026 of the podcast is, you know, let’s baby step our way into that kind of the foundational part of the financial plan, being the emergency fund. So I look at it as kind of look at it in phases. So maybe Phase 1 is $1,000. And as we work our way through some of the — and I think about more the consumer, not predatory debt, but in that where you’re 16-17% — to focus on that first and really not tend too much to the emergency fund. But as you work your way through that, Phase 2 might be to get that to $5,000 because the fact of the matter is, if you’re a single pharmacist and you have a good amount of credit card debt and student loan debt, that alone with your rent could put your emergency in the $20,000-25,000 because you’re multiplying that monthly number by 6, essentially. So for a lot of people to get to that number, they’re going to default on their credit cards before that happens.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think that’s probably the most common thing we hear from pharmacists is they look at this and say, ‘OK, Step 1 is I need a $1,000 baby emergency fund. Step 2, I have to pay off all my debt.’ And so they may be looking at who knows? $200,000 in student loan debt, $20,000 in credit card debt, a $20,000 car note. Then I need to get a full 3-6 months of an emergency fund and then I start thinking about investing. I think that’s the piece where people are like, wait a minute. I’m not going to be investing for 10 or 15 years? And we’re going to come back to that because I think that, you know, the framework, as you mentioned, obviously — and Dave would admit this — is that mathematically, this is not the most advantageous framework to operate from. It’s really a behavioral framework to help people really get the motivation and the mindset and to have some structure around the steps they’re working through. And if we have a thousand people listening to this podcast when we release it, at the end of the day, we have a thousand different financial situations. And I think that speaks to — to your point — that speaks to that this plan by itself probably should not, in my opinion, stand alone but could be paired with the work of a financial planner, could be customized. And I think that if you look at the plan in and of itself, it’s not meant to be a standalone. It doesn’t deal with issues like insurance, end of life planning, investing strategies. You know, we got some feedback from the Facebook group, which I thought was cool. Matt said that he agrees with a lot of the baby steps in terms of them being introductory and getting yourself on track. They’re a good blueprint to getting out of debt. The only problem is what to do after the steps are complete, so they’re not wealth-building steps. And so if you look at Step 7, this idea of building wealth and giving, obviously that’s not necessarily a blueprint for what you should be doing in terms of investing and saving and strategies and end-of-life planning and all those other things that come along with it. However, I will say for those that are listening — and my wife and I just experienced this firsthand — if you feel like you are extremely overwhelmed, don’t know where to start. If you and your spouse maybe where applicable are having difficulty getting on the same page, I think that these steps or it could be another stepwise approach, but having a stepwise approach that you’re working together and achieving and feeling like you’re getting momentum forward, even if that’s not necessarily the most mathematically advantage approach, you can’t speak enough to the value of getting momentum and getting those wheels going forward. Because Tim, how many people do we talk to that say, ‘I’ve been spinning my wheels for seven years, and I feel like I haven’t made much progress,’ right?

Tim Baker: Right. And we’re proponents of — I think there’s some weight to the emotional side of the — we talk about this in the student loan course over and over again. It can’t be just about the numbers. And of course, we’re talking about, you know, for a lot of people, does it make sense to look at PSLF versus not? And in this scenario, in these seven steps, PSLF I don’t think would even be entertained because if you’re trying to pay off in Step 2, the non-mortgage debts as quickly as possible, it’s not even a thing. So if you’re someone that has a lot of student loan debt, and you have the emotion behind it that, hey, you’re anxious or you’re concerned, you can’t sleep at night, these are all things that people have said to me. Then we weight that somewhat heavily because it doesn’t make sense to take a more maybe of a reactive approach, say from a Public Student Loan Forgiveness, and you want to just be more reactive to that. But I think to your point, Tim, that people get riled up about this because potentially in some situations, especially for pharmacists, you might be waiting 10+ years to start putting any money towards retirement and not, you know, capitalize on match and things like that. And I think that’s where I fundamentally disagree with this model.

Tim Ulbrich: So before we go into some of the more detailed questions, let me read off some of those that commented from the Facebook group that talk about the support of this model and I think some of the positive aspects of the success that it can lead to and the behavioral aspects of the model. And then we’ll dive a little bit deeper into maybe where tweaks could be made to this model, depending on individual situations and scenarios.

So Scott says, “The plan is great. It teaches you to focus on just a few things and do them with intensity. You also need to keep in mind that he only teaches very low-risk strategies. If you lost everything like he did, I’m sure you’d have a similar mindset.” So what Scott’s referring to there, if you haven’t heard his story before, Dave essentially — I think it was in his mid-20s — got pretty deep in real estate investing, kind of lost everything. But I do think to his point, as I think through Jess and I going through this approach, intensity is a good word, right?

Tim Baker: Yeah.

Tim Ulbrich: Because when you’re going all in on one step and you’re singularly focused — and yes, to the comments we received, yes that may be at the expense of other things — but that singular focus has to be factored in somewhere into the equation with the mathematical components as well.

Tim Baker: And I think he uses — what does he use, like gazelle-like? You want to be gazelle-like. I think that’s his term. And I see that, you know. I have clients that come in, I want to buy a house, I want to travel the world, I want to start saving for my kids’ education. There’s I want to pay for my wedding, there’s a million different things. And part of my job is to cut through some and say, OK, what’s most important? Because you can do a little of a lot of things, or you can do a lot of one or two things. Typically, the latter is a better prescription for that.

Tim Ulbrich: Dalton says, “You can’t really argue with its effectiveness. The number of people who have gotten out of debt and built wealth through his plan are incredible. He even acknowledges that the plan doesn’t necessarily make mathematical sense all the time because the benefits of compound interest and retirement savings but always follows that up with the fact that being in debt doesn’t make mathematical sense either because if personal finance was all about math, people wouldn’t spend more than they make. I think that it makes sense for pharmacists mostly if they live like a college student still after graduation. You could actually pay off your loans decently fast, as long as lifestyle creep doesn’t happen.” And then he goes on to talk a little bit more about Baby Step No. 2. So let’s jump in there because I think we had a couple questions from the group about Baby Step 2, which makes sense, right? Because pharmacists are facing average debt loads of $160,000. So Dave Ramsey, in speaking to whatever, 5 or 10 million listeners every week, obviously their average debt load is not $160,000. So that is a unique piece to our audience. And Cole asks the question, “I’d love to hear your thoughts about stopping retirement investing and losing the match while in Baby Step 2.” So talk to me about your thoughts as you’re working with clients, typical pharmacist, $160,000 of debt, maybe you’re thinking about this in the frame of these baby steps. We’ve talked before about the match being a no-brainer, let’s take it. But how do you balance this retirement and student loans or at least looking at the match component while in Baby Step 2.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so just a comment on Dave and like the student loans. Like, I think when I first started hearing some of his stuff about the student loans, like he would almost fall off his chair when like a doctor — I think for awhile, I think a fair criticism of him was that he was a little out of touch. And I’ve seen some things where he’s like almost browbeat people, and that’s not productive. But I think in more recent times, he’s come around and he understands a little bit more about the student loan picture. So that’s the first thing. I think the third thing for me personally is — and I say this when we speak to pharmacy schools and, you know, different organizations is — you know, they say the two certainties in life: death and taxes. And I would add that you should, for the most part, match your 401k or your 403b. I think that is for the majority of people the thing to do because it’s one of those things that the whole thing, it’s free money. Unless you’re in dire, dire straits from a predatory or some type of debt, I wouldn’t do it. If it’s student loan debt, absolutely. You need to be doing the match.

Tim Ulbrich: So death, taxes, and the match are three certain things in life?

Tim Baker: I think so. That’s Tim Baker’s amendment to that. So I think by and large, if you’re not doing that — because most of the time, especially because it comes out tax-free, you’re not missing it. So if you’re an employer — and most employers, it’s 3%, 5%. It’s not like you’re asking to give up 10%. Some are structured like that to get the full match, but to get the full match is typically a small percentage of your income. So that would be my thoughts there. And you know, I kind of with the invest the 15% of household income, I kind of say as a general rule of thumb, which these are, to start getting it in your brainpiece for newly minted pharmacists and new practitioners is a race to 10%. Because what often happens is that you do get the match, you get 5%, and you have the 401k inertia. I talk to you years later, and you haven’t increased it at all. So in their mind, I try to plant the seed. It’s a race to 10%, so if you couple that with the match, you know, you are in that 15% range. And that’s typically, when we do the nest egg calculations, which we did on the APhA webinar here recently, the Investment 101 and 102, the nest egg is going to show that that is, more likely than not, true to be in that range.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think this is a great example as you think through Baby Step 2 and this question that Nicole throws out there is that this is not a black and white framework, as we’ve already talked about, especially with everyone’s customized situation. So if you’ve heard Dave talk on the podcast or taken any of his courses like Financial Peace, I think he uses an average time range of debt repayment too of about 18 months or less. So again, a pharmacist with $160,000 as a graduate does not match the national average of somebody coming out from undergrad with $25,000-30,000. Now of course they have a higher income potential, but he’s then under the assumption — when you think about steps 3, 4, 5, 6 and so on — that that debt in Step 2 is going to be gone quickly. Now, if you’re somebody listening that’s got $30,000 or $40,000 of debt, maybe that’s the case. But if you’re somebody that has $200,000 of debt, you know, unless you’re hustling like Adam Patterson-style, Tim Church-style, that’s probably not going to be happening. So now, you have to have this discussion and balance and work with somebody like you as a financial planner to say, OK, what is this timeline of debt repayment? Not that we’re going to carry this on forever, but what is the debt repayment strategy? And then how do we now fit retirement savings into there. Because you and I would both agree that if somebody’s paying off their loans for 10 years, probably not contributing to retirement is not a good idea. Not probably — it’s not a good idea.

Tim Baker: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: But if somebody’s hustling for 2-3 years, that conversation is very different, especially if there’s some behavioral momentum that’s going to be happening. Now, I would agree with you 100% that that match is a given in all of those situations, it doesn’t matter whatever the debt repayment period is in my opinion. I think that that should be there.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think the other thing to take note of, call out here that I commend for him is, you know, he’s talking — again, I’ve listened to him talk to doctors that have a truckload of debt. And he’s like, “Oh, you’ve got to hustle.” Even though the make hundreds of thousands of dollars, he’s encouraging them. He’s like, you’ve got to take up, you’ve got to get extra shifts. So he’s not resting on your laurels just because you make a six-figure income. So you know, the people that we’ve highlighted, the Pattersons, the Churches, they’re trying to hustle. They’re thinking of additional ways to increase income, which I think is something that kind of falls by the wayside because we’re always talking about how can we cut our expenses? But it’s a two-sided equation. So I would say that that is something to focus on as well.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and just to wrap up this Baby Step 2 and how do you balance the loans with the investing and what’s your time period, I would say that, you know, for many listening, the answer’s going to be different. We’ve talked a lot on the podcast before and live events that we’ve done about how do you make this decision between investing and paying down loans. I don’t think we need to get in the weeds here, but this really comes down to the factors like interest rates, what is your feelings toward the debt? How is your investing style? All of these things, and for everyone listening, that answer’s going to be a little bit different, which will obviously help determine where you’re going to go with that. Tim, Tyrell asks that he says that he’d like to hear pros and cons of paying off house versus student loans if working toward PSLF or towards PSLF or other forgiveness components. So he’s talking about working for a qualifying company, pursuing Public Student Loan Forgiveness, and obviously then that changes your strategy about paying off your loans, correct?

Tim Baker: Yeah, because, you know, typically, the way to optimize that strategy is to take, you know, Step 4, which is invest 15% of Roth IRA and pre-tax retirement accounts and really cross off the Roth because the Roth is after-tax and put as much money as humanly possible into pre-tax retirement because what that effectively does is lower your adjusted gross income, which affects how much you — which is the number that calculates your payment for student loans. So the lower that your AGI is, the lower that your payment is, and the more that you potentially will be forgiven. So there’s a lot of moving pieces to that. So I would say if you’re weighing paying off a house versus student loans, to me, the picture is are we getting the $18,500 into the 401k or the 403b maybe since it’s a nonprofit. Are we maxing that out? You’re probably not afforded a pre-tax IRA deduction because pharmacists typically make too much. But are you maxing out the $3,450 or the $6,900 if you’re a family in the HSA to get that if you have a high deductible plan. Once those things are checked off, then I would say, OK, you know, what are the goals? And maybe paying off the house is that. But if that house is, you know, if the rate’s 3.25, I don’t know. I don’t know if that’s the best way to go. Some people, again, I know Leah Donnells made a comment on this, and she’s a client of mine, and her mantra is, their mantra is they want to get through the debt as quickly as possible. So they, regardless of what the mortgage or interest rate is, they want that out from underneath them. And I can’t blame them because if you think about, hey, we’re striving for financial independence, what is a greater measurement of that when you don’t have to pay the bank your rent or mortgage anymore? So Tyrell, that’s a good question. But again, there’s a lot of moving pieces and I would say focus on the pre-tax accounts and max those out before, you know, throwing more money towards the house.
Tim Ulbrich: So Tim, you know Dave’s a big advocate in Step 2 about the debt snowball. And Ryan in LinkedIn says, you know, as he’s talking about the pros and cons of this model, he says, “Why should I use the debt snowball method? It works great for those people who really benefit from the psychological impact and reward of paying off small debts. But for those who don’t benefit from it will potentially spend more money in the long run.” So give us the quick overview of the debt snowball, how that contrasts to the avalanche method. And as you’re working with clients, how do you guide or advise them in terms of which of those methods may work best for them?

Tim Baker: So the debt snowball method is basically where you write out all of your or you have all of your debts laid out: what kind of debt it is, what the interest rate, what the minimum monthly payment is, and what the balance is. And the idea is to pick the debt that has the lowest balance and pay the minimums on all the other debts. And then for the one that has the lowest balance, you want to pay as much toward that as humanly possible. So when that one falls off, when that debt is paid and dead and gone, then you roll that payment into the next lowest balance. And then when that one falls off, you roll that payment into the next lowest balance. So this is really trying to clear liabilities from the balance sheet. And the idea is that that gives you, if you focus on the lowest one, it gives you a psychological advantage, it gives you momentum, that type of thing. The avalanche method, in contrast, is where you do the same thing except the priority payment is based on the interest rate, not on the lowest balance. So you want to focus on the highest interest rate — this is typically credit card debt and that type of thing — and you pay the minimums on everything else. And then when the highest interest rate falls off, then you direct your attention to the next highest interest rate. So from a math perspective, this makes the most sense because you want to clear those debts off that you’re paying the most interest on. So that’s really the difference between those two. Now, working with clients, theoretically, I coin flip. It’s one of those things where from a math perspective, yes, it does make sense to do the avalanche. But it’s the same thing with everything else. If you’re doing this on your own, don’t get into the paralysis by analysis. Just pick one method and go. For a client that I have, you know, $30,000 of credit card debt with that’s spread out across 20 different cards, to me, it’s just about clearing the balance sheet so she can, you know, work through those effectively. So now, it’s more of an organizational thing. So in that situation, we’re employing the snowball method because it’s almost unwieldy to handle. So it just really depends on where your mind is, if you’re running the math and you’re maybe less emotional towards it, avalanche. If you’re thinking that, hey, it’d be really nice to log into your credit card account or if I plug my client portal that you can sign up for on my website, Script Financial, you can see all of your, you can link all of your accounts and see a dynamic net worth statement. If you see a list of liabilities there that’s $10,000, $12,000 deep, and you really want to log in in six months and see $6,000, then I would say probably the snowball method would be the better route to go.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think the time period is critically important here as well, right? So if you’re talking about a wide array of interest rates over a long period of time, say 10 years, obviously the math on that is going to become more advantageous toward the avalanche method. If you’re talking about I’m going to pay off whatever debt we’re referring to in a short period of time, and the interest rate’s aren’t that different, or some combination of that in a couple years, then obviously the math doesn’t matter as much. Does it still matter? Yes, of course. But you have to, again, make this determination about your own behavioral patterns and choices and how important that momentum is or is not. And as I think back to the journey that Jess and I took, that momentum for us was critical, even at the expense of paying a little bit more interest because as we were going through whatever step, let’s use Step 2 as an example, if we were going through a snowball method, if I knew we needed $2,000 more to pay off this loan to get to the next one, we were that more motivated to stay on budget or to look for additional opportunities to earn income, whatever it be, that I’m not sure for us collectively as a couple, we would have been as motivated if we would have been working that through the avalanche method. So did we spend a little bit more interest? Yes. But did we get it paid off faster? For us, I think we probably did. But again, back to the point of customization for somebody else listening, somebody else commenting, that may be a very different situation if for them, it’s very black-and-white, and they can work the system going through the interest rates. I want to encourage for a minute. Amber posted on the Facebook group that, “My spouse and I follow these baby steps, and they are great for getting out of debt. Our problem keeps showing itself on Step No. 3, which is the full 3-6 months of emergency fund. We complete it and are ready to move on, and we have somewhat. But then, wham, something happens and we are right back on No. 3. We’ve been stuck like that for several years now, but living without debt is really freeing and wonderful.” So I think again, it speaks to the power of getting out of debt. But I think is something Jess and I felt as well is that when you talk about something like paying off debt, it can be very exciting to see that balance come down. When you talk about investing, it can be very exciting. Building an emergency fund is not necessarily super exciting. And so obviously, they’ve had some things come up that have derailed them from doing that. But I think for those that are in the grind of building an emergency fund, to your point earlier about how much that could be, $15,000, $20,000, $25,000, $30,000, $35,000, that’s not super exciting. But it’s certainly a critically important step and a foundational part of a financial plan. Tim, wanted to get your thoughts on this. This I think speaks to I think maybe where you have some customization to this seven-step plan. Katie says, “After graduation, we DR’ed our way to becoming debt free.” I love that he has his own DR.

Tim Baker: Yeah, when do we get YFP’ed?

Tim Ulbrich: Seriously, YFP our financial plan, right?

Tim Baker: Can we hashtag YFP’ed? Get that trending on Twitter maybe?

Tim Ulbrich: I like that. Be a trademark, yeah. “The main tweaks we made in the beginning were splitting steps 2 and 3 equally, so equal amounts going toward the emergency fund and debt reduction until we had enough saved, and then we maxed out our own tax-preferred accounts before kids college. It’s not a perfect system, great for debt elimination, not ideal for investing, but it’s simple and gives a roadmap for those starting out. It worked well for us.” So what do you think about that idea of balancing the savings for emergency fund with paying off student loans or other debt?
Tim Baker: Yeah, I mean I think that’s exactly what the point is is like, this is a template for then people can iterate off of. And this is what I was talking about with like having, you know, Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 in terms of, you know, Phase 1, it might be get the $1,000 or $2,000. Have a emergency fund that probably covers 80% of emergencies in your situation. And then from there in Phase 2, now maybe go through and start paying off debt and apply maybe little. I think this is a perfect example of how, you know, they looked at the situation and said, well, this doesn’t work entirely for us, so we’re just going to iterate. And again, bias, you know, I think they did it well themselves working off the two of them, but this is where I think a financial planner can come in and provide a little bit of guidance and objective opinion and say, this is what I would do and these are the recommendations. So I think that’s the power of this is people look at it as a benchmark and then they can iterate off of it and apply it to their own lives.

Tim Ulbrich: Absolutely. And so just to build on this a little bit more, Mark asked and has a comment in the Facebook group, and I can speak to this one. I dealt with this last year. He says, “I’m on Baby Step 2 and I’m really concerned about this idea of not having a credit score. Has anyone used manual underwriting to buy a house? And probably because I don’t fully understand a credit score, but I’m a little concerned about not getting a job because of it.” So I think what he’s referring to is that Dave’s a big advocate for no credit cards, cut them up, get rid of them, pay off all your debt, etc. And obviously, there’s some concern about having no credit when it comes to purchasing a home. If you currently are paying a mortgage, Mark, what I learned throughout this process is that that mortgage payment will still provide you with a credit score. Now, if you don’t have a mortgage and you have no credit cards, then obviously after a period of time of having no credit cards and not making mortgage payments, your credit score will effectively be reduced to 0, which could present problems when it comes to purchasing a home. You certainly could do manual underwriting. There is lenders that are out there that do that, just give yourself some more lead time. It will probably take more time. And we didn’t experience this or get to this point, but I’ve heard — Tim, I don’t know if you’ve heard — that sometimes in a manual underwriting process, you may end up paying a little bit higher of an interest rate.

Tim Baker: Yep.

Tim Ulbrich: So something to balance and think of throughout that process. Tim, want to get your thoughts on this. Lisa says, “I definitely don’t think Step No. 4 should be No. 4.” So No. 4, again, is 15-20% into retirement savings and tax advantage accounts. She said, “It should be closer to No. 1. I have always been taught that saving for retirement as early as possible is a necessity and you should think of that 10-15% money as unusable for anything else. So whatever your net income is, write 10-15% off, and that is your new net income. It’s very easy to push that kind of saving off.” So here she says, “For me, it was more like year one post-graduation, it was Baby Step 2 was immediate, very high interest debt like credit cards.” Then she went to Step No. 4, setting up 401k. Then went to Step 1 and 3 of saving an emergency fund. And then as she went into year two post-grad, she further went into Step 4, saving enough to put max in a Roth IRA, into retirement. And then year three post-graduate, she went back into Step 2 to pay off student loans. So I think the risk that I would have with this — I certainly fundamentally agree with what you talked about before of getting that race to 10%, right? Getting that behavior set up for retirement. But doing that at the expense of any emergency fund, I think you’re putting yourself in a risky situation. Would you agree?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I would. I mean, I probably would put it as, you know, maybe 1a. So I think — you know, I was talking to a prospective client the other day, and I was asking him, you know, if something were to happen from an emergency standpoint, what would you do? And the answer is kind of like, eh, credit card or bank of mom and dad. And I think those are two habits that we probably need to wean off of and break. So I’m always — you know, it’s not the sexiest thing, although I get jacked up every time, you know, an interest rate happens. We’re both Ally proponents. Whenever you get the interest payment in your emergency fund, I think that’s cool. But I’m a big proponent of having some cash set aside for those emergencies and then get serious about at least getting the match. That’s kind of how I view it.

Tim Ulbrich: So as we wrap up this episode, Tim, I think that as we look at this framework, I think you and I would both agree that it’s meant to be exactly that. It’s meant to be a framework, it doesn’t apply to everyone’s personal situation, there’s caveats. And again, I think that speaks to the power of individualized, customized financial planning. And I would highly encourage our listeners, if you’re not a part of the YFP Facebook group, head on over, join the group, there’s great conversation going on on this topic as well as many other topics related to your personal financial plan. And that group is really all about encouraging, motivating and inspiring each other in this community of pharmacists, all committed to being on this path towards achieving financial freedom. So Tim, any last thoughts here on the Ramsey plan as we begin to wrap up the episode here?

refinance student loans

Tim Baker: Yeah, I would just say, we didn’t focus too much on 5, 6 and 7. You know, I would just say that, you know, the whole saving for kids’ college, that’s not a given for a lot of people, even pharmacists that have gone through kind of student loan hell. That doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re in a position or even there’s a want to do that. So that might be something that we can, you know, address a little bit more in the future about different strategies to do that. And I would say paying off the home early, we addressed that a little bit. It also depends, and finally, I think No. 7 is kind of like, you get to the end of this and you’re kind of released out into the wild and to build wealth and everything is good. But you know, for build wealth — for what purpose? You know, I often say that typically the way that I price my services is based on income and net worth, which is great because I’m incentivized to kind of help you grow income and help you grow net worth over time. But if we fast forward 20, 30 years, and you’re sitting on $10 million but you’re miserable because you haven’t done the things that you’ve wanted to do, then that’s not a wealthy life. So I would say build wealth, but to what end. So last year, you know, you did an episode on giving, which is part of kind of 7b in the build wealth and give. But not everyone has that same worldview, so you know, some people are, they want to give 10% right off the bat of their income, you know, even if they have debt. Some people are even if they don’t have debt, they don’t really feel inclined to give. So it’s just different. But I would say that a big one that’s probably missing from here, especially from a pharmacist’s perspective is disability insurance. If you don’t have any coverage at all from an employer, the ability to work and earn really needs to be protected. So that would be one of the things that I would probably edit from a pharmacist’s perspective. But I think it’s a great list, it’s a great template to look at and to build off of and to iterate for your own purposes. So I think this is a great episode because we had a lot of engagement on the Facebook group, and I hope it keeps going because I think people learn when we shine a light on it.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and to your point, I think we’re going to come back and do a lot more on all of these topics, but especially in 5 and 6, you know. We haven’t done a ton on college savings. And that’s an interesting one because I think especially as we think about pharmacists coming out with such high debt loads, I think there’s a tendency, myself included, to maybe put that one at a different priority than it should be because you’re compensating from your own experiences, and you don’t want to put your own children through that. So you know, 529s, ESAs, what’s the strategy? What’s the timing of that? How do you balance that with retirement, your current debt, all those other things? And then as you mentioned, even in Step 6 and the home, how you prioritize that, what’s your interest rates? What’s your other goals related to real estate? What’s your motivation? Do you care about the debt? Do you not? How do the new tax laws impact all of that? We’re going to come and talk more about that into the future. So I think there’s lots of people that are out there listening today, Tim, to this episode, that are thinking of the Ramsey plan, thinking about the framework but are finding themselves spinning their wheels with their own financial plan, lots of competing priorities coming at them, not sure in what order and how this applies to their own personal situation. And as we talked about, this plan is not intended, the Ramsey steps are not intended to be a standalone financial plan. And so I know personally, you have lots of clients who know these steps, maybe some are following them to a T, others are not. But they still value the one-on-one approach in terms of working with you and working with a financial planner. So for those that are listening that want to take that next step, get engaged with you as a financial planner to learn more, what’s the best next step they can do to do that?

Tim Baker: Yeah, Tim, it’s super easy. You can either go to the Your Financial Pharmacist website and click on the “Hire a Planner” tab at the top and then you can schedule a free call on that page. Or just go to ScriptFinancial.com and on the homepage, you’ll see a “Schedule a Free Call” button there. So those are really the two ways to find me and schedule a free call.

Tim Ulbrich: So again, that’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com. You can click on “Hire a Planner,” and then from there, you can schedule a free call with Tim Baker to discuss next steps. So Tim, great to be back on —

Tim Baker: Yes.

Tim Ulbrich: the podcast with you. Have a great time at the XYPN conference. And we’re certainly looking forward to having you back as we continue with some great content coming forward.

Tim Baker: I’m going to be YFPing this conference. Trending on Twitter.

Tim Ulbrich: Awesome. Love it. Love it. So as we wrap up today’s episode of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast, I want to take a moment to again thank our sponsor, Splash Financial.

Sponsor: If you’re looking to refinance your student loans, head on over to SplashFinancial.com/YourFinancialPharmacist, where in just a few minutes, you can check your rate. Splash’s new rates are as low as 3.25% fixed APR, which can literally save you tens of thousands of dollars over the life of your loans. Plus, YFP readers receive a $500 welcome bonus for refinancing with Splash. Again, that’s SplashFinancial.com/YourFinancialPharmacist.

Tim Ulbrich: Thank you so much for joining Tim Baker and I on this week’s episode of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Next week, Tim Church and I will be tag-teaming some updates related to student loans, including the latest on the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Also, for those graduates that are getting ready to come out of the grace period and enter active repayment, we will talk about repayment options and strategies. If you like what you heard on this week’s episode, please make sure to subscribe in iTunes or wherever you listen to your podcasts. Also, make sure to head on over to YourFinancialPharmaicst.com, where you will find a wide array of resources designed specifically for you, the pharmacy professional, to help you on the path towards achieving financial freedom. Again, thank you for joining us, and have a great rest of your week.

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 066: 10 Home Buying Lessons Learned


 

10 Home Buying Lessons Learned

On Episode 066 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Ulbrich, Founder of Your Financial Pharmacist, talks through 10 home buying lessons that he learned over the past few months as his family makes the move from Northeast Ohio to Columbus. He shares the good, the bad, and the ugly and hopes these lessons learned will help you in your home buying journey.

Summary of Episode

Tim Ulbrich shares the top ten home buying lessons he’s learned.

  1. DIY route
  2. Read, re-read and understand the fine print
  3. Set your own budget
  4. Ask lots of questions
  5. Put 20% down
  6. Shop around
  7. Consider the total cost of buying a home by including all of the fees
  8. Long-term hidden costs can make a difference
  9. Value of an emergency fund
  10. Have a great team around you

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Welcome to Episode 066 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. I’m excited to be here, and this week I’m flying solo, following up on the two-part episodes that we did in episodes 064 and 065 with Nate Hedrick, the Real Estate RPH. And he’s going to be coming back on next week in Episode 067. We’re going to be doing a rapid-fire Q&A all about home buying. So if you have questions related to home buying, make sure you get those questions answered and ask them. You can head on over to the Your Financial Pharmacist Facebook group or shoot us an email at [email protected], and we’d love to feature your question on the podcast next week in Episode 067.

So this week is all about lessons that my wife, Jess, and I have learned and in some cases, to be frank, mistakes that we’ve made during the home buying process. So we are in the thick of it right now, actually getting ready to move next weekend from northeast Ohio to Columbus, Ohio, so I’m in transition from my job at Northeast Ohio Medical University to Ohio State University. Go Buckeyes! Excited about the opportunities ahead and with this transition, of course, comes selling and buying a home. And so just a few weeks ago, when we were planning this episode, believe it or not, it started as five lessons learned. And it quickly grew to 10. And to be honest, it probably could be many more than that. But that’s just sometimes how it goes. And so this episode is about being transparent, it’s about being honest — I’m not going to hide anything from our listeners — and the reality is, even here, a topic that I feel like I know fairly well, I think this just shows that anything related to personal finance, we’re prone to making mistakes. There’s something to be learned in everything that we do. And obviously, I’m hopeful that these lessons can be passed on to you all in the community and can even help Jess and I as we go through this process again in the future.

So to be honest to the listeners, this process of home buying — and for those of you that have gone through it recently, you know that it can be exciting, it can be emotional, it can be stressful — all of which have a tendency to throw us off of our financial game. And I think when we’re talking about such a large purchase and a home buy, and obviously, the selling aspect of it as well, there’s lots of emotions that can be flying around, lots of excitement, lots of highs, lots of lows. And all of those I think are the more reason that we have to have our financial guard up when it comes to home buying and making sure we’re educated and ready to make the best decisions in this area.

And so a couple reminders that I have before we jump into some background about the move that Jess and I are going through and then I’ll jump into the 10 lessons learned. And if you listened to Episode 064 and 065, we reference that all of the month of September is about home buying. And so along with this month, we’ve developed a YFP first-time home buying quick start guide that you can download for free at YourFinancialPharmacist.com/homeguide. Again, that’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com/homeguide.

OK, so here’s the background. Jess and I have been living in northeast Ohio since 2009, actually neither of us are from this area. I grew up in Buffalo, New York — go Bills — and Jess grew up in the Toledo-Bowling Green area in Perrysburg she spent most of her life, and we’ve been in our current home in Rootstown, Ohio, for eight years. And we actually rented for one year prior to that, so we made the move directly after my year of residency. We came up to northeast Ohio, we’ve been here for nine years. Eight years, we’ve lived in our current home, and we had one year that we rented prior to doing that. Now, when we bought in 2010, we bought with an FHA loan — and you’ve heard us talk about that in episodes 064 and 065. And the main reason we did that is because we didn’t have 20% down for the home. And I’m going to talk about that as we do go through these 10 lessons that are learned. So we only put 3.5% down, which is standard with an FHA loan. At the time, we had lots of student loan debt, as you’ve heard me chronicle my journey before, had no significant emergency fund and had no clue, no idea of the process that’s involved. And ironically, as I look back on that, there was very little stress that was involved with that purchase when in fact, there probably should have been a lot of stress. Very little down, lots of student loan debt, no significant emergency fund, and having really no clue of what was going on and the papers that I was signing. Now, here we are in 2018, we’re moving to Columbus, exciting new job, going to be starting at Ohio State. I have no student loan debt, we’re able to put 20% down, we have a fully funded emergency fund, we’ve got a great retirement account and to start on that retirement. And I think we have a decent, solid understanding of the process. But to be honest, I’m finding it incredibly stressful. And I don’t know if that’s because I’m more aware of what’s going on, I’m more concerned about the places where things can go wrong, maybe I have a little bit of post-traumatic from 2010 and thinking of the things that I could have done better. Whatever the reality is, what I’m fearing right now in the moment as we’re about to close in the next week is I’m feeling a little bit stressed, a little bit anxious and obviously, there’s so many moving parts that go along with this process. And hopefully, we’re going to cover many of these in these lessons learned.

Now, the big difference here in 2018 is that we are both buying and selling. And obviously, all that comes with that and the timing of that can be incredibly stressful. So here’s the deal. At the end of the day, home buying, like any other part of your financial plan, it’s all about being intentional. Being prepared, putting it in the context of the rest of your financial plan, and giving yourself from grace when you make a mistake here or there, and learning from those mistakes and being willing to share those mistakes with others. The only difference here is this is arguably the largest purchase that you’re ever going to make.

And so here we go, 10 lessons that I’ve learned or maybe a better word here would be mistakes or maybe even things that have been reinforced for me as we went through the process back in 2010 and I’m reliving here in 2018.

No. 1, the DIY route, the Do It Yourself route, has saved us a lot of money. BUT, capital B-U-T, is that wow, it has been a lot of work and to be frank with you, I’m not sure if I would do it again. Now, what am I talking about, the DIY route? So No. 1 here, the DIY route has saved us a lot of money, but it’s been a lot of work, and I think it’s added a lot of stress along the way. So what I’m referring to is in terms of the DIY of the sale of our home. Now, the only reason we are doing a for-sale-by-owner is because we literally have somebody in our neighborhood that was interested in buying the home. And so long story short, a few months ago when we were just getting ready to think about putting our home up for sale, we have a Facebook community group that has a, somebody sent out a message and said, ‘Hey, we’ve got somebody in the neighborhood that’s been renting. They’re looking at buying. Is anybody looking at selling their home in the next year?’ Saw the message and said, ‘Well, in fact, we are.’ And so I reached out to them and said, ‘Hey, we’re looking at selling. If you’d love to see the home, we’d love to have you come over and check it out.’ They came over two days later, came back and saw the home another week later, and they said, ‘Hey, we want to buy the home.’ And so obviously at that point, I didn’t feel like we needed to have a realtor in the process to be giving up 6-7% of commissions on the home. And so ultimately, by not having a realtor in the process, that saved approximately $12,000-15,000 if we were to assume a 6-7% realtor fee on the sale price of the home, which is pretty standard. Now, that sounds great, $12,000-15,000, but as I’ve alluded to in the intro to this No. 1 DIY route saved us money, but is it’s been a lot of work, a lot of stress and a lot of ups and downs all the way. And so because we had a neighbor that was looking to buy it, it made sense, we didn’t have to go through the process. We have three young children, so going through that process of listing the home, showing the home, we’ve been through that before and we know how much work that could be. However, as I look back and as we work through the process of making sure the language in the purchase agreement or the contract was in line, looking and finding a title company that we felt comfortable with, being in constant communication between the parties, the different lending agencies, the title company, the sellers — or excuse me, the buyers that are looking at the home, you are that central glue to the process. And really, the thing that I think has got me the most is the uncertainty that can come with this process. And things have literally been in flux from the second we started working with these buyers. And nothing that necessarily is on their back, but they ended up switching lenders because they were having difficulties with one lender, which re-started the entire process, which meant that there was paperwork that had to get re-filed, and ultimately, we are now running up against potentially not having our closing dates align — fingers crossed we’ll hopefully figure that out tomorrow if that’s going to happen. And ultimately, we are so far along the process with them and we have been along the way, and it’s a great opportunity to have them involved so early, but where ultimately it’s at some regards at the whim of what’s going on in their situation, and so that can make things quite different. And now I will say if I did not feel comfortable with working a title company that we had a good connection with, being able to reach out to the Real Estate RPH, Nate Hedrick, with a question here or there, working with my financial planner and YFP team member Tim Baker, obviously all those really help support me along the way. But I think that as I look back on this journey, I’m not sure that I would do it again, although ultimately, it did save us money in the process, so what’s the lesson learned to be here? If you are somebody that is selling your home and you’re looking at the DIY route, make sure that you feel comfortable and understand all the pieces and parts of the process and not just look at what am I going to save by not having a realtor fee, but do you feel comfortable with everything that’s behind you and how might that also impact you on the buying side of things? So that’s lesson learned No. 1.

Lesson learned No. 2 is the importance of reading, re-reading and understanding the fine print. Now, this sounds like common sense, and you’re probably thinking, Tim, come on. You do this all the time, how do you not read the fine print? Now, it’s not that I didn’t read the fine print, I’m actually quite obsessive about reading the fine print. But it’s making sure that you don’t assume things along the way in the fine print and you re-read the fine print. And obviously when you’re going through this process, you’re excited about buying a home, you’re excited about selling a home, you want things to naturally work out, so you have an optimistic lens in which you’re reading things. And so I think that tendency there, at least it was for me, is to not really read to the detail and understand to the detail that you’re asking the tough, probing questions and you’re not making assumptions that somebody else is taking care of it. And so there’s lot of fine print to read. You have the purchase agreement documents, you have a loan estimate documents that will show you as you get closer to close what are all the different fees involved and what you need to bring to the table as you are selling your home, and as you’re buying your home, what you need to bring to the table at the point of close and what are all those fees that are involved and do you understand exactly what that 85-page document says. And if not, are you willing to ask the questions along the way? You know, what a couple examples that I’ve run through along the way here is actually in a home that we were looking at purchasing in Columbus, that ended up falling apart is that there was something in the contract, which come to find out is actually pretty standard in Columbus contracts, that essentially gives the sellers a three-day, 72-hour clause, almost like a seller’s remorse clause. So if for whatever reason within 72 hours the seller decides, you know what, I really don’t want to sell my home because of reason A, B or C, they can pursue that if they issue an attorney letter explaining exactly why they do not want to pursue that, and that ultimately gives them a right out of that contract or at least to have to offer a counter to that, but of course, they could offer something that is egregious and ultimately, you’re not going to be interested in anyway.

So I’m going to give you an example of this is that we were looking at a home in Columbus. And I never knew that a washer and dryer were something that would be such a big deal to a seller. So long story short, in Ohio, it’s pretty standard that your appliances are going to stay with the home, the washer, dryer, that was going to stay, that was in the contract. We were on vacation, we get a call from our real estate agent, who says, ‘Hey, you know what, the buyer — excuse me, the seller really didn’t want to give up their washer and dryer, they didn’t mean to do that. Can they pull it out of the contract?’ And without even thinking much about it, not really objectively thinking, you know what, now we’re going to have to spend money to buy a washer and dryer, wasn’t trying to be a jerk but said no problem, they can keep the washer and dryer. Just add $1,000 toward close and we’ll go out and buy a washer and dryer. Well, that apparently sent the seller off the deep end, and I guess if you love your washer and dryer, you love your washer and dryer, that’s how it is. And they decided to pursue that clause, issue an attorney letter, spent $300-something dollars to do that, and came back with a counter offer that was $20,000 above what we had originally agreed on, which obviously, we were not interested in at that point. And so the lesson there was I read the purchase agreement. I read every detail of it more than once. But I never caught that section and the detail that obviously until it plays out, I thought maybe you can’t even necessarily do that. And so making sure you’re asking questions where you’re confused, you have people around you that can help and support you, and I think what I’ve learned is that by reading the fine print and showing a commitment to your real estate agent if you’re working with one, to the title company, to the lender, the more you are reading, you’re learning, you’re asking questions, I think the more informed buyer that you are, and it keeps all parties accountable and they’re ready to answer your questions because they know they’re probably coming. So No. 2 is the importance of reading the fine print.

No. 3 is a key one. And Nate and I talked a little bit about this in episodes 064 and 065, but I want to reemphasize it here is that you as the buyer set your own budget. Do not let the bank or the lender set your own budget. And I can speak here from firsthand, going through this right now, is that it’s easy to look at a certain range and then you start looking and you think, that would really be nice or this area would be really nice, and all of a sudden, you’re creeping up. And if the lender is setting the budget for you, you’re not going to necessarily really evaluate does the purchase of this home fit within the context and the other financial priorities that I have? It’s a great example that’s right now is that when Jess and I started working with our lender, Wyndham Capital, who has been outstanding, they’ve done a great job, is that they essentially — and this is in part because I think the lending is fairly loose right now because of how good the market is versus where it was, say, 10 years ago after the crash — they pretty much said, I hear what you’re saying, I know what you want, but you can have double that. Or are you sure that you need to or want to sell your current home? Because you know what, you don’t necessarily have to from our end. And so remember, and Nate talked about something called the 28-36 rule that will be used by the lender in determining what they will allow you as a maximum, what they will allow you as a maximum, to take out or to loan. And the 28-36 rule basically says that a household should spend a maximum of 28% of its gross monthly income on total housing expenses, total housing expenses, and no more than 36% on total debt, including housing and other debt such as car loans and other debt that you have as well. So the 28-36 rule, which may be used by a bank to determine what they will allow you or what they will give you in a pre-approval, $400,000, $500,000, $300,000, isn’t necessarily what you should be purchasing in the context of your other financial goals. And this is where it’s really critical to take a step back and say, what other financial priority goals am I trying to achieve? Maybe it’s paying back student loans, maybe it’s paying off credit card debt, saving for retirement, kids’ college, whatever the other things that you’re working towards, and how can I purchase a home in a way that allows me to achieve these other goals? And what is the maximum I am willing to do in terms of that purchase, not what the bank is willing to give to me.

So just quickly, a couple rules of thumb that I really like that you may have heard of before. If you’ve listened to or read any of Dave Ramsey’s stuff, he refers to a mortgage payment — and there’s different variations I’ve heard of this — a mortgage payment — it could be the mortgage alone or it could be the mortgage and insurance, it could be the mortgage, insurance, taxes and interest, so you’ll hear different versions of this — that is no more than 25%, no more than 25%, of your take-home pay. So if your monthly take-home pay is $8,000, this rule of thumb would say that your mortgage payment, and if you want to be conservative, with taxes, with insurance, with interest, your total monthly payment would be no more than $2,000 if you had an $8,000 take-home pay. Now, what that’s trying to do is prevent you from becoming or feeling like you’re house-poor. So if you have other goals that you’re trying to work on and achieve, you know then that no more than 25% of your take-home pay is going toward your home. Therefore, you’ll be able to achieve your other goals. Now, that’s a great general rule of thumb, but some of you maybe listening have no student loan debt, others of you may have $200,000 of student loan debt plus credit card debt plus very little progress on retirement, and obviously, those two situations would be very different. And so you need to evaluate this on a case-by-case basis.

Another rule of thumb is from the book, “The Millionaire Next Door,” by Tom Stanley says that no more than 2x your household income on the purchase price of a home. So if you have a household income of say $150,000, no more than $300,000 on the purchase of your home. Again, that’s trying to get to this idea of preventing you from becoming house-poor. And I cannot emphasize right now for those of you that are looking at buying in this moment, the lending right now — and I’ve experienced this firsthand — is pretty loose, meaning that you as a pharmacist with a good income, a good, stable earning potential, I think you’re going to find that the bank is willing to give you much more home than you probably need to have and that you probably want in terms of the other goals that you’re trying to achieve. And so what I really encourage you to do is zoom out of the lens of just the monthly payment and look at the total payout of what this home is going to cost you. So as one example, if you were to have a purchase price of a home around a $350,000 with mortgage, taxes, insurance, assuming a 30-year home with about a 4.5% interest rate, it’d be about a monthly payment of $1,900 a month for 30 years. If you do the math, that $350,000 home over the course of 30 years, you’re going to pay out about $684,000. Now, it doesn’t mean it’s a bad decision. It may be a great decision, depending on the other financial goals and what you’re trying to achieve, but looking beyond just the monthly payment also helps you look at this in a different way and evaluate how does this fit in with the other goals that you’re trying to achieve.

So No. 3 here is set your own budget, it’s a great reminder. Jess and I had this reminder this year, especially as the lending is loose. Don’t let the bank set the budget for you.

No. 4 is ask lots and lots and lots of questions. And I alluded to this a little bit in No. 2, but Jess and I have experienced this firsthand is that you want to be respectfully annoying. Be respectfully annoying because I think asking questions and showing a desire to learn, as I mentioned before, keeps all parties — the title agency, the loan officers, the lenders, everyone that you’re working with — let’s them know that you have a desire to learn, let’s them know that you’re ready, you’re invested, and I think it keeps people more accountable along the way. And I’ve had several individuals in this process, everyone from the loan officer to the title agency say, ‘You know what, I can tell that you’re really interested in this, and I usually don’t get these types of questions.’ And I think ultimately, I want them to know that I’m probably going to be asking questions. I think that helps them give me a more detailed and thorough response, also helps keep them accountable to make sure that they are giving the attention due to the process that is going along the way.

And I think this is really true of anything, whether it’s a home, a car, any major purchase that you’re making, an educated buyer, I truly believe, is going to get the best value along the way. And so just a few examples that we have in the lesson learned of the value of asking lots of questions is by asking lots of questions along the way, this has allowed us to negotiate and reduce title fees that actually identified an error in a property tax calculation that got corrected — and maybe that would have probably been identified anyways, but that question really helped identify that, and obviously that led to a reduction in what will be our future monthly payment. And for us, most importantly, as those two examples I just gave you are short-term savings, is that it helped us ensure we understood the process and we know exactly what we’re paying for. So whether it’s cost at closing or whether it’s when we send in that monthly payment each and every month, I know exactly where that money is going each and every month. And I think obviously that is powerful in and of itself, but I think it’s valuable just to know going into the future when we do this again or as we’re helping guide others in the process as well, knowing where that money is going, I think obviously is going to help motivate us to eventually get this paid off and turn this liability into an asset.

OK, so No. 4 is asking lots of questions.

No. 5, I’ve hit on this many times on the podcast and in blog posts, is the importance of 20% down. Now, no judgment here. I’m speaking from making this mistake back in 2010, I alluded to that at the beginning of the episode. Jess and I put 3.5% down through an FHA loan, and to be frank with you, we were paying for that for many years — really up until probably the last year because the reality is the way the mortgage is constructed with interest, it takes so long to build up equity in a home. And so to me, there’s lots of reasons to have 20% down on a home. Instantly, you have equity in the home. So if something like 2008 were to happen and the housing market would flip, you’re not likely to be underwater on your mortgage. Or what if you go to sell unexpectedly in two years because of a job change? And maybe you thought you’d be there 10, 15 or 20, you could build up equity, but you’re not for whatever reason or something unexpected happens. Now, you may not have enough equity in the home to cover all the costs associated with selling that home. And obviously then, you’re going to need additional funds to bring to the table to cover those costs.

Other advantages of 20% down — obviously, no Private Mortgage Insurance, we’ve talked about that, PMI, which is foreclosure insurance. You don’t have restrictions that are associated with loans like an FHA loan, which is in terms of how that PMI is structured and how you’re going to pay it, more stringent inspections and appraisal processes. And I think obviously, 20% down just keeps it simple. No PMI, no restrictions on how that loan is being structured, a cleaner inspection, appraisal process, you’re not trying to buy points in the process and trying to eventually get your PMI reduced. It makes a conventional loan purchase process incredibly simple, and I think it makes you an attractive customer to the lender. That’s something I heard over and over again from the lender that we’re working with, Wyndham Capital said, ‘You know what, you’re a great buyer. And we’re glad to be working with you,’ and I think it’s because of that 20% down, they obviously feel very comfortable with that conventional loan.

Now, the other thing I think 20% down really does — and again, I’m speaking here out of a personal mistake — is that it forces you down in the expectation of the home that you’re buying. It forces you down in the expectation of the home that you’re buying. Now what do I mean by that? If Jess and I right now were to say, ‘You know, we really want to buy a $500,000 home,’ if we stayed committed to 20% down, that would mean we have to come up with $100,000 in cash to be able to go to closing at that home plus the closing costs on top of that. Now, if we don’t have $100,000 equity in our current home or we’re buying for the first time, that obviously is going to take a lot of time to build up $100,000 of cash to be able to close on that home. So I think what that does if you stay committed to 20% down, you say, you know what, maybe that’s a $250,000 home. Maybe that’s a $300,000 home. Maybe less than that or maybe slightly more than that, depending on the market that you’re living in, will allow you to potentially buy down on the home, whereas if you go into a 0% down loan or a 3.5% down loan where you have to bring very little, if any, cash to the table, obviously I think it’s much easier to buy up on home and find yourself in the situation where you feel house-poor.

refinance student loans

So 20% was the lesson learned No. 5, and I think here, this is an important point where you really have to evaluate, am I rushing to buy a home? Should I stay in a rent situation for longer? Should I buy? We have talked about this at great length, and what I would reference you to and will link to in the show notes is the New York Times has a great rent v. buy calculator that really helps you look at this in an apples-to-apples way in the best that you can to make the comparison. Because I know the trap that I fell into was well, I’m paying $1,100 a month for rent, my mortgage with taxes and with insurance is going be $1,100 a month. Why wouldn’t I buy a home and build up some equity? And the reality I learned, which is an obvious one now looking back is that I was really building very little, if any, equity because of how the loan was structured and because I had almost nothing down and I forgot to include all those other fees on top of that in terms of the maintenance and everything that comes with the home that easily is upwards of 30-50% of the mortgage payment by itself.

So before we jump into points 6-10, I want to take a quick break and just re-emphasize something we talked about in episodes 064 and 065 is that if you are looking to buy or sell a home, get started in real estate investing or have a question that you want to have answered by a licensed real estate agent that is also a pharmacist, make sure to head on over to YourFinancialPharmaicst.com/realestateRPH to get in touch with Nate Hedrick, the Real Estate RPH. Again, that’s YourFinancialPharmaicst.com/realestateRPH. And you can submit your question. We have a few details and information to fill out, and he will respond to you as soon as possible. Again, we’ll have him back on in Episode 067 for the rapid-fire Q&A on home buying.

OK, so points 1-5, we covered lessons learned. No. 6 is shop around. Shop around for title companies that you’re working with if your contract allows that, shop around for the lender that you’re going to work with, but be careful how you do it. So lesson learned No. 6, shop around, but be careful how you do it. Now, why am I saying be careful how you do it? So I made a mistake — and I alluded to this on Episode 065 — I made the mistake of saying, I’d really like to see this tool that’s out there now advertised called Lending Tree becuase if it’s a good tool to compare for lenders, rather than just depending on the local bank or a lender that I’ve worked with previously, I’d love to be able to share that with the YFP community. Now, I’m glad I tested that first because honestly, I would not recommend that you use a tool like Lending Tree because I submitted my information, and literally for about a month-long period of time, I was getting phone calls and voice messages all day long of lenders trying to get ahold of me, even long after I selected a lender. And so I think that the point here is a good one is shopping around and not just depending on one lending quote or one title company, whatever you’re working with, one real estate agent, is really shopping around will allow you to look at multiple options just like you would with any other major purchase. However, do not just focus on the price when it comes to a title company or an insurance quote that you’re getting or a commission that you’re going to pay a real estate agent or a rate that you’re going to pay a lending company on your loan. That certainly is a critically important factor, but you need to make sure you’re looking at the other components like are they easy to work with? Are they communicative? Are they responsive? Do they have a good reputation? Because I can tell you from this process over the last month, all of these individuals I’ve been in touch with, on some weeks on a daily basis. And so working with one lending agency that’s going to give you a 4.55% rate versus another that’s going to give you a 4.6% rate, but one’s not going to respond to you as much or not going to close on time, they’re going to cause you a lot of headaches, you have to really evaluate is it worth it? And obviously, if you can get the best of both worlds, that’s the place to go. And so making sure you’re shopping around for all these different areas, making sure you know what is and is not neogtiable, I think is a great lesson to be learned, certainly one that I’ve learned. But be careful how you do it in terms of getting multiple quotes.

Lesson No. 7 is make sure to consider all of the total costs and fees that are associated with buying a home — and if you’re selling a home, obviously that’s associated with the selling as well. And to be fair and to be honest, don’t be surprised by a few more that come along the way. And there was sometimes I would look at documents, and just this past week, I was looking at our loan estimate closing documents, and all this laundry list of title fees and no explanation of what they are. And they ended up being legitimate fees, but again, back to being an educated buyer, making sure you’re asking questions, making sure you’re trying to compare one of these to another if you’re looking at shopping around with two different companies, but I think what tends to happen when you’re buying a home is you hone in on the sale price of the home alone. So ooh, that home’s at $350,000, it’s within our budget. Great, that is certainly an important factor, but what about all of the other fees that are involved.

Now, if you’re just buying a home, as Nate mentioned on the previous episodes, there’s really no realtor fees that are involved because of how they’re absorbed by the seller, so that’s simplified somewhat. However, when you’re on the selling end, you obviously have the realtor fees, which can be 5-7%, roughly, of the sale of the home. And depending on the purchase agreement, you may be responsible for some of those at the buyer’s expense. And obviously, that can vary from state to state, region to region, purchase ot purchase. You’ve got the down payment on the home, you’ve got the appraisal cost, you’ve got inspection, you’ve got title fees, you’ve got prepaids at close in terms of homeowners insurance and mortgage insurance if you don’t have 20% down, and property taxes and HOA fees. You’ve got moving fees, right? So if you have to pick up and move across the state or across the country, are you going to hire a mover? Are you going to do it yourself? Are you going to have them pack? Are you not going to have them pack? And of course, you have the transitionary fees. So as you’re in the pack-up phase, you’re probably eating out more, you’re taking trips to Lowe’s to fix things on your current home before you sell if that’s the case or when you’re buying a home, when you get there to do some quick home improvements. So really set out and not just look at the purchase price and say, ‘OK, we got to 20% down or whatever our goal is.’ But look at all of the costs that are involved with the purchase along the way.

And prior to this episode, I sent a note out to our Facebook group to say, hey, what are some of the lessons that you’ve learned along the way when it comes to home buying. And I like what Wes said in terms of ‘be wary of what’s called a special assessment fee in a new neighborhood. Typically, it’s a fee being applied to each homeowner for the cost of development of the new neighborhood. Think bonds taken out by the municipality that include interest that then are being applied equally to each new homeowner for a period of time, say it’s 10 years.’ So Wes, thank you for contributing. For those of you that are not yet a part of the YFP Facebook group, we’d love to have you join. And I think that’s just an example of this laundry list of fees and miscellaneous fees and more fees that can come along the way. And I think the lesson that Jess and I learned is we are so focused on the sale price and so focused at getting that 20% down, thankfully, we had some buffer beyond our six-month emergency fund, our 3-6 months emergency fund to cover some of these other costs. But making sure you’re really looking at the entire picture of all fees that are involved. So that’s No. 7 is consider all the costs.

No. 8, the lesson learned here is the long-term “hidden costs” when buying a home that can make a difference. Now, I’m not talking about the transactional cost, I’m talking about the long-term hidden costs beyond what I just covered in lesson No. 7. So here, we’re talking beyond the sale price, beyond the transaction costs. So what I’m referring to here are things like property taxes, homeowner’s insurance, HOA fees, local income tax if that is applicable or not. And so I think here that again, another area you tend to focus, I know we tend to focus, on the sale price of a home. But in reality, from one neighborhood to another in the same city, your property taxes could be different by $2,000-3,000 a year. Well, that has a huge impact on your monthly payment. Or homeowner’s insurance that you’re going to be paying each and every month, each and every year. Or does the development have HOA fees or not? Does the city have a 1-2% local income tax or not that you’re going to be paying each and every year? These are the long-term, what I call hidden costs that — not saying you necessarily wnat to avoid these because there could be great reasons for being in an area that has these: great schools, great community, great neighborhoods, etc. — but making sure you’re aware of these and how they’re going to contribute to your monthly payment and making sure you’ll be able to stay within budget and to achieve your other financial goals.

And Brittany from the Facebook group here says that, ‘Upkeep costs of one home versus another for sure. So we have two acres and a pool. Upkeep is quite pricy.’ And I think that’s great is if you’re looking at two very different styles of home that’s on land, a home that’s not on land, a home that has a pool, a home that does not have a pool, or any other factor like that, what is going to be the upkeep differences and making sure you’re acounting for those and how that may fit into your monthly budget, obviously those factors being beyond your monthly payment.

No. 9, Jess and I have learned this firsthand, we are feeling it right now, is the value of having a solid emergency fund in place when you’re making these big purchases. So we’ve talked many times before on this podcast and the blog, 3-6 months of expenses in a long-term savings account set aside to cover a job loss or some other emergency fund, and I think it goes without saying that here, when you’re making a massive purchase, you’re in a transitionary period of time, a solid emergency fund in place gives you peace of mind that if something goes wrong on either end, if you’re buying or selling, or you have some backup there during a transition, if you have a gap of employment, as I mentioned, something goes wrong, the peace of mind here can not be traded in terms of what a solid emergency fund will bring. And so I’m a big advocate of, again, 20% down, a solid emergecny fund, neither of which Jess and I did on our first purchase, both of which we’re doing now, brings an incredible amount of peace and I think reduces anxiety during that transitionary period.

And finally, lesson learned No. 10 is the importance of having a good team around you. Now, I mentioned at the very beginning, lesson No. 1, that we’ve taken the DIY for-sale-by-owner approach because we had essentially a buyer approach us in our neighborhood. And so we don’t have the real estate agent involved in the process. However, as I alluded to, if I had to do it all over again, even with a known buyer, I would question that decision, although it’s had great value. And so here, a great team around you, I’m referring to a real estate agent that is transparent, that is acting in your best interests, that you know and that you trust; a good financial planner that knows your situation and that can keep you accountable in this process. So for Jess and I, Tim Baker is a phone call away, and I called him just a couple weeks ago because we were having some potential issues and still are potentially with closing dates to say, hey, what are the options? Help talk me through this. What am I not thinking about? What are my blind spots? And I think for such an emotional, big decision, having a financial planner on your team that can say, hey, does this fit in the context of all these other things that we talked about? Or what if we waited three more months? Or maybe it’s the right time, but what about this or that? Somebody to keep you and/or a spouse accountable through this process is incredibly important. Obviously, you have the lender, the title company, this team is one that you’re going to be communicating with regularly. And Nate alluded to this on previous episodes, making sure you have this team ready to go and knows exactly what your priorities are before you get started in the process.

So there you have it, 10 lessons learned that are reinforced or in some cases, mistakes that we’ve made through this process. And we’re not fully through it yet. So we’ve got a couple weeks. Hopefully at the end of this month, we’re going to be moving into the home in Columbus. We’re in the final processes of getting paperwork signed, closing date’s hopefully this Friday, early next week. And so stay tuned; I may have more stories to share — successes, mistakes along the way. Again, that’s what this is all about, hopefully helping you learn through the process as well and I’m hoping through these lessons, you can save yourself some headaches and do this in a better way or potentially even share some of your own stories with others as well.

So as a reminder as we wrap up here, again, along with this month-long series, we have a YFP first-time home buying quick start guide that you can download at YourFinancialPharmacist.com/homeguide. Again, that’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com/homeguide. And as we wrap up this episode of the podcast, I want to take a moment to again thank our sponsor of today’s show, Common Bond.

Sponsor: Common Bond is on a mission to provide a more transparent, simple, and affordable way to manage higher education expenses. Their approach is no big secret. Lower rates, simpler options, and a world-class experience, all built to support you throughout your student loan journey. Since its founding, Common Bond has funded over $2 billion in student loans. This is the only student loan company to offer a true one-for-one social promise. What that means is that for every loan Common Bond funds, they also fund the education of a child in the developing world through its partnership with Pencils of Promise. So right now, as a member of the YFP community, you can get a $500 cash bonus when you refinance through the link YourFinancialPharmacist.com/commonbond. Again, that’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com/commonbond.

Tim Ulbrich: Thank you so much for joining me today. I look forward to next week’s episode where we’ll bring Nate, the Real Estate RPH, back on to do a rapid-fire Q&A on home buying. Have a great rest of your week.

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 061: Rapid Fire Insurance Q&A w/ Tim, Tim & Tim


 

On Episode 061 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Ulbrich, Founder of YFP, is joined by YFP team members Tim Church & Tim Baker to field insurance questions posed by the YFP community via the YFP Facebook Group in a rapid fire format. Whether it’s life, disability or liability insurance, having the right amount, not too much and not too little of insurance protection is essential to your financial plan.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Tim and Tim, welcome. Here we go, rapid fire insurance questions. You guys ready to do this?

Tim Baker: Let’s go.

Tim Church: Let’s do it.

Tim Ulbrich: Awesome. First things first, and I’m not going to sing “Happy Birthday” on the podcast, that would be embarrassing.

Tim Church: Why not, Tim?

Tim Ulbrich: I have a terrible voice, but if you absolutely demand it, we will do it. But it is Tim Church’s birthday! And he’s here recording a podcast, so happy birthday to Tim Church. Sincerely, we mean that. We appreciate all that he brings to YFP and the community. We appreciate his dedication, and so Tim, happy birthday.

Tim Church: Oh, thank you. Appreciate it.

Tim Ulbrich: I mean, what else would you want to be doing besides answering insurance questions, right?

Tim Church: Well, it’s kind of like deja vu because it’s been like, I remember a year ago, and I think it was on my birthday, you guys conned me into jumping in on the podcast.

Tim Baker: Is this like a birthday tradition? How does Andrea let you get away with that?

Tim Church: I guess because we had to both work in the morning, so you know, I’m off the hook and kind of can make it work.

Tim Ulbrich: That’s probably her quiet time that she appreciates and lets you off to record. So let’s do this. We’re going to do rapid fire Q&A all about insurance — life, disability, professional liability, and if you remember back in Episode 056, we did something similar related to student loans. And I would also reference listeners back to episodes 044 and 045, where we talked about life and disability in much more detail than we’re going to get to tonight even though we’re going to talk about those two topics specifically. So make sure to check out those two episodes. So the format, if you haven’t joined us before in Episode 056, I’m going to do the easy work. I’m going to punt the questions. Tim Baker and Tim Church are going to do the hard work. They’re going to answer the questions. And we’re going to get some feedback from the YFP community. And these questions come directly from the YFP Facebook group. So if you’re not yet a part of the YFP Facebook group, check it out. We’d love to have you a part of that community, and we’d love to have you featured on a future episode of the show. So Tim Baker, Question No. 1 comes from Zach in the YFP Facebook group. He says, “Which life insurance option should I choose? Term life or whole life? I think the right answer is term, but I’m not positive. Also, should I purchase it individually or through work? Through work is a lot cheaper.” So Tim Baker, life in terms of term or whole life and where to get it purchased, what are your thoughts?

Tim Baker: Yeah, so I think we’ve documented pretty thoroughly, I think that we’re big proponents of term versus whole life. You know, when I work with clients, I typically say that I feel — this is my opinion, I think this is the Tim, Tim and Tim opinion is that I think that whole life is generally better for the person that is selling it to you than the person is purchasing it. And we kind of take a mantra that we, you know, you buy term and then invest the difference. So to kind of give you a sense of what the difference is is I was on Policy Genius, which is the partner that we use to help our YFP audience with their solutions, insurance solutions, and this is what I use with clients. And before we started recording, I quoted a $500,000, 30-year term policy for a healthy 30-year-old, and it’s kind of the rule of 30. It’s about $30-35. That same $500,000 policy for whole life insurance is about five times more, it’s north of $160 per month. So I think the problem with whole life is that it can be complicated, it can be confusing, it’s not necessarily transparent, although there is a cash — so the big difference is one is pure insurance, term, it covers you for a term, a length of time. The other is whole life, it covers you for your whole life. And there is both an insurance component and like a savings or an investment component. And I think that whole life is typically, you know, I think it has lots of fees and you know, it’s not as transparent as I think I would want it to be. And I’ll probably get a lot of people that disagree with me and think whole life is a good solution, but I typically that for most of our listeners and for most people out there, term is a much, much better fit. From the perspective of should you buy individually or through work, I think one of the problems that I see often is that there is this insurance inertia, same thing when you have a 401k inertia. And what I mean by that is, you know, if your employer says, “Hey, we’ll match 3%.” Then you put your 3% in to get your match, which is great, but then five years later, you’re still at 3%. The same thing can be said about insurance is that most employers will say, “Hey, we’ll insure you 1x or 3x your salary,” or whatever it is, and you can buy up a little bit. That’s typically not going to be enough, especially for pharmacists in terms of what you actually need. So although a group policy is there and is a nice little benefit, for the most part, by and large, especially when you have kids or you have a house, things like that, you’re going to need a lot more insurance outside of what the employer gives you as a baseline. Now, I am a big proponent of buying individual policies because it’s portable. You can take it with you. And if you lock in a policy at 30 years old versus when you’re 45 and leave your job or 50, the policies are going to be a lot different in terms of the premium that you’re paying. So a lot of factors there. And typically, I know Zach, you said the group is cheaper. That’s typically not been my experience. Typically, if you’re a younger professional, you are typically paying a premium for your premium to kind of account for the older population that is in your group, whereas if you’re a younger professional, you’re going to pay a little bit less of a premium because you’re younger, you’re healthier. So I know that’s kind of a lot of moving pieces to that question, but to kind of sum it up — term, buy an individual policy because it’s portable. And yeah, just go from there. And obviously, be more — you probably need more than what the employer gives you, anyway.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and Tim Baker, I wonder too if the purchase he’s referring to at work being cheaper is probably likely because it’s a much smaller amount of coverage, like you alluded to. So I know here at the university, I think we get one or maybe up to two times annual income but a max of $100,000. So you know, I’m wondering if there’s an apples to oranges comparison there where, as you mentioned, $500,000 policy or in my case, as I have documented in other episodes, $1 million policy, about $38 a month, versus $100,000-200,000 policy, obviously, the price difference per month may look very different. But the amount of coverage could also be very different. So it seems, as we talked about on Episode 044 in terms of how to determine your life insurance need, it seems to me this topic of term versus whole life is probably one of the most contested, emotional debate or whatever you want to call it, second only to the should I be paying down my debt versus investing? So lots of opinions on this topic. And one last thing I would add here is that I think for many listening to this show, we know that many of our listeners are recent graduates, new graduates, within 10 years or so of graduation. Often, we have so many competing priorities that being able to have that coverage that you need but being able to free up as much cash as possible to achieve other goals, we think is critically important, which obviously favors the term life side of the argument. OK. Good stuff. Tim Church, question from Anna in the Facebook group, “How long of a life insurance policy should I get? Is it most beneficial to get a 30-year policy?” And so she referenced that she’s currently in her 30s with young kids. What do you think?

Tim Church: Well, I think it kind of goes back to first off, are you in the term or the whole life camp? So go back to the question that you asked Tim Baker. But if you kind of agree and say, “OK. I’m in for term,” well, with term life insurance, you have to actually choose a term over which you’re covered. So you may have an amount in mind in terms of how much you want to have covered in the event of your death but over what period of time? And it’s really subjective to your specific situation, and I’m sure we’ll probably say that about 18 times on this episode as we kind of do on all insurance-related episodes. But really, the main question is is how long is it going to take you until you’re self-insured? I.e., how long is it going to be until no one is actually relying on your income or that you’ve accumulated so much wealth that no one is dependent on you making an income? And also, it could be how long do you want to work for? And how long do you expect to work for? So if you look at some of those big-cost items, so if you have kids, thinking about kids’ college, dependent on your income about future expenses, any debt that would be inherited by a spouse or family member such as a mortgage, so over what period of time are you going to need that coverage in place? So I think those are some of the questions that are really important to ask when you’re trying to figure out that term. Now, practically speaking, most insurance companies — and if you look on PolicyGenius — really, they’re going to go anywhere from 5-30 years. Thirty years is sort of like the maximum amount of time that they’re going to let you go with any policy. Now, some people get a little bit fancy. So they pick a policy for 20-30 years and then a couple years later, they layer on top of another policy to kind of get them an extra couple years or a little bit later into their retirement age. So there’s a lot of different ways you can go about it, but I think kind of a general rule of thumb is how long is it going to take you to become self-insured. And for a lot of people, that’s going to be into the retirement age.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think this question really gets to the fact that you can’t buy life insurance in a vacuum, right? So Anna’s asking the question around length of policy, she mentioned she’s in her 30s, she’s got young kids. You alluded to things about when would you be self-insured, which obviously goes to components like how are your retirement savings going? How is your debt repayment going? What other debt do you have? Do you have a mortgage? Do you not? What are your goals? All types of things, so I think that further highlights the importance of comprehensively looking at your financial plan, not just looking at insurance as one component but as really a broader conversation related to all parts of your financial plan. So Tim Baker, continuing on here, Brian, a very active member of our Facebook community, asks, “How much life insurance is suggested for a stay-at-home spouse? General rule of thumb is 10-12 times annual income, but that doesn’t really apply here.” And then Dalton follows up to say, “It’s a great question. I’ve heard about $250,000-400,000 but curious to see the team’s opinions.” What do you think, Tim Baker?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I know Brian. So shoutout to Brian and Leah in Ohio and their son Nathaniel. So yeah, I think this is a tough one because you know, there are a variety of ways to calculate life insurance. I kind of subscribe to the Keep It Simple, Stupid method, which is, you know, roughly if you go by the old adage of 10-12 times income. I think more or less, you’ll be OK. But I think with some of those kind of if you have, you know, one spouse that doesn’t work or, you know, if there are, you know, kids or you have different goals with respect to college or if there’s a special need or something like that, I think breaking it down a little bit further. So the two main avenues that you can go down are let’s call it the Financial Needs calculation, which this method basically evaluates income replacement, lump sum needs, accounting for inflation and things like that, examines recurring expenses and, you know, some variables to consider would be things like final expenses, what the outstanding debts would be that maybe not be forgiven upon death and disability. If and what you want to provide for income to survivors. So if there’s, like I said, education or special needs that we need to account for with the, like again, with the marital status is and the roles of the spouses, size of the family, that type of thing. So that’s more or less one calculation you can go through. The other one is called a Human Life Value, and this is more or less a time value money calculation that uses income throughout what would have been the remaining work life expectancy. So you essentially take out the person that you’re insuring, you basically project what their income would have been, and you kind of discount what their consumption would have been in the household. And then voila, you have your calculation. So in this case, I probably would go through both and then probably with more of an emphasis on the financial need, the first method that I calculated that said, OK, in this case, in Brian and Leah’s case, if Leah decides to go back to work more full-time than she is now when Nathaniel is grown up, like what does that look like? You know, what are your thoughts on having a part of the life insurance benefit go to completely pay off the home mortgage or go to completely fund Nathaniel’s college? So there’s a little bit of wiggle room and gray area, and ultimately, what we’re trying to kind of come up with is a number that, hey, if someone were to pass on, we can then take that money and invest it and have a level of life that makes sense. Now, just to kind of flip that switch with the stay-at-home spouse, from Brian’s perspective, obviously he’s going to be on the road, traveling, working, and things are going to change. There will be an adjustment period if that were to happen, God forbid. But, you know, as lots of families with young kids know that that both work, daycare and child care services are hugely expensive. So I think that, again, we would look at the cost of daycare from basically the age of the kids to kind of college age and then provide some type of benefit to cover that in the event that the stay-at-home spouse was, you know, to die prematurely. So there’s not — unfortunately, there’s not, you know, just like Tim said, it’s not kind of a one-size-fit-all. I think basically, sitting down and asking tough questions — because again, like a lot of my, if I say, “Hey, what do you want to allocate for final expenses?” people look at me like I have three heads. It’s just not something that we think about. So like I’ll provide some guidelines and some left and right limits in terms of that, and then we kind of just build that into the calculation and then go forth, get a quote and get a plan in place. So stay-at-home spouse is a little bit tricky. Again, not a great rule of thumb out there, but I think ultimately, there’s a — sitting down and kind of backwards planning into a number makes the most sense.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, good stuff. And a shoutout as well to Brian and Leah. Leah actually is a graduate of NEOMed. Go Walking Whales. Tim Church, also a graduate of the great university that is NEOMed, so excited to have them a part of the community. And this one hits home for me. I know Jess and I really hadn’t thought about life insurance in terms of her being a stay-at-home mom. And that came up as a topic, and all of a sudden, we were asking ourselves, what expenses would arise in the event that she were to be unexpectedly pass away? So I think this is a good topic for everyone to be thinking about. And we ended up landing on $400,000. But obviously, as you mentioned, there’s certainly not one size that fits all here. I would also reference our listeners, we have two great guides and pages on life insurance and disability insurance. So if you’re ever talking about life insurance, if you go to YourFinancialPharmacist.com/lifeinsurance, a great guide that will help you walk through and answer some of the questions that we are talking about here tonight. Tim Church, this is a loaded one regarding disability insurance, and this gave me actually flashbacks to us writing the book, when we were digging in and trying to decipher the code that is disability insurance. So Dalton asks, “I feel like I know very little about disability insurance, even less about professional liability. So it would be great to know how much is needed and what’s a reasonable amount to pay for it.” So we’re going to talk about professional liability here in a minute, but talk to us a little bit about basics of disability insurance and what our listeners should be thinking about.

Tim Church: Definitely. Well, disability insurance is really income insurance. It’s protection to guarantee yourself an income if you can’t work because of an accident or an illness. And I think a lot of people, they have this feeling, especially people that are young starting out in their careers that they’re just invincible and that nothing bad is going to happen to them. And unfortunately, that kind of thinking can lead to a bad situation, as I’ve known — specifically known cases of people who have had debilitating chronic illnesses that have limited their ability to work full-time or part-time. I’ve known people that have gotten into car accidents, who’ve had head trauma and couldn’t work for an extended period of time. So if you think all about that it takes to become a pharmacist, all the time, all the energy, that this is really probably one of the most important insurances that a pharmacist should have because it’s really a way to guarantee that you’re going to have an income for whatever period of time that you become disabled. And you know, that kind of goes into how long should you have a coverage? Should you have a short-term disability coverage? Should you have long-term? And I think that obviously, again, it’s going to be situation-dependent. But if you expect that you’re going to work until you become 60, 65, then you really should have a policy that’s in force over that time period. And so when it comes to the actual amount, you have to ask the question, well, what could you comfortably live on or what kind of lifestyle do you want? And that’s an interesting way to look at it, but that’s really what it comes down to. So if you’re someone that says, I really want to maintain my same standard of living that I’m doing right now, then you probably need to go up to the max of what insurance companies are going to allow you to have, which is about 60-70% of your gross income. And if you think about that 60-70% of your gross, that’s really pretty close to what you’re getting paid net anyway when you think about taxes and other deductions that come into play. So if you’re trying to replace basically most of the income that you’re going for, then that’s a percentage that you would kind of look at. Now, you may be someone to say that, well, if I couldn’t work, maybe I don’t need to have my same standard of living and I would be OK with a lesser amount. And certainly, that’s an example of one of the routes that you could go. Now, one of the things that you mentioned about the book, Tim Ulbrich, is just thinking about how complex these policies are. I mean, when you think about a term life insurance policy, it’s pretty straightforward. You choose a term, you choose an amount, and there you go, right? But when it comes to disability insurance, you have these basics in place, but then you have all of these other bells and whistles. So in the policies, they call them “riders.” And so it can make it very, very confusing, very complex, and it’s almost like you’re buying a car. Like they have all these upsells and things that they’re trying to get you on. Now, some of them are kind of standard in policies. But when you look at what the cost breaks down and how do they come up with a cost for you, really going to be based on some personal details: your age, your health history, the benefit period, so how long you want that coverage. Like I said, for most people, probably going to be up to retirement age. And then also something called the elimination period. And this is basically the time it takes for when you would make a claim that you are disabled until you would actually start getting payments in the mail, you’d start getting a check and getting payments. So the longer that elimination period, the cheaper your policy’s going to be. So if you say, “I have enough emergency fund or enough savings to wait until six months between making a claim,” well then, you would have an elimination period of that length. And basically, you’d be able to cover yourself until that period. And then some of the other things that kind of break down and go into that are some of those riders that we talked about, so something called own occupation, meaning that if you can’t work as a pharmacist, you’re going to get that income every single month, not if you can do any occupation or any meaningful work. So those are something that I think is really important. And then when you go into looking at the cost, again, because there’s so many variables into play, it’s hard to say, you know, what is a good amount? What’s a reasonable amount? But I will give you an example. If you look at someone who’s 25, so around the average age of someone who’s graduating as a traditional student, and they’ve got coverage until age 65, 60% of their income they’re trying to replace within a 180-day elimination period, that’s going to cost around $120-160 a month. And a lot of people may be looking at the number and say, “Wow, that’s a lot higher than life insurance and possibly even health insurance and other things.” And it is. It’s true. If you want kind of a very comprehensive type of policy, it’s going to be a little bit pricier than other things. But again, at the end of the day, you think about all the time and all the effort that you put into become a pharmacist, what are you going to do if you can’t work for a period of time? If you get in an accident, if you become disabled because of an illness, what are you going to do? So again, I think it’s so important. And one of the ways to kind of look for, shop multiple companies, again, is checking out PolicyGenius, and you can do that on our partner page. And that’s at YourFinancialPharmacist.com/insurance. Wow, that was a mouthful, Tim.

Tim Ulbrich: No, that was the Cliff Note version of disability insurance that I wish I would have heard 10 years ago. That was great. And I think, as you mentioned, very complicated topic. And I’m going to issue a call to action to our listeners because I know there are lots of people out there that need adequate life and disability insurance protection that don’t have it in place. So if you’ve heard this night — and obviously, this is just scratching the surface — head on over to the website, learn more, check out the free guides, evaluate what type of coverage you need, and then, as Tim mentioned, you can check out the PolicyGenius site to get going there and get learning more about this topic as well. So also, I’d reference Chapter 7 of the book, “Seven Figure Pharmacist.” We talk about this in great detail, and you can get that over at TheSevenFigurePharmacist.com. OK, two questions we have about professional liability insurance. So Tim Baker, the first question comes from Tyrell. He says, “Should I carry my own professional liability policy on top of whatever my workplace provides?” What do you think?

Tim Baker: Yes. So a professional liability policy is definitely something that you’re going to want. And I think given the cost of said policy, it’s really a smart move. I think they’re almost negligible in terms of what you pay for the year. Typically, if you’re a pharmacist, you want to protect yourself. Typically, the policies that are issued through employers will mainly protect the employer. So this would be to protect yourself if you’re individually named in a lawsuit or if your employer doesn’t have the proper coverage in place to protect you or if you have a second job, if you’re side hustling, or if you kind of give advice outside of your employer, these would be things that would be covered under your own policy. So they say, some of the studies show that 75% of claims against pharmacists is wrong drug, wrong dose. So some of the things that would be covered would be things like that kind of overarching professional liability, things like license protection, defense attorney, those kind of things that are super important, you know, just like Tim Church was talking about with, you know, the disability policy. This is your really protection against your ability to make a living. Pharmacists spend lots of time and money and blood, sweat and tears to get the PharmD, get on to the world, and these are, you know, these are these protection mechanisms that are in place to make sure that you are defending your income and your overall balance sheet. So you know, I know that Pharmacists Mutual, the clients that I work with will look at that or HPSO, I know has an agreement with our partner, APhA, so these are all places that I would look and make sure that, you know, you have that policy that’s portable to you that you’re paying for and provides you coverage that you need.

Tim Church: And like you said, Tim, the cost is really negligible. We’re talking for most policies, they’re going to be like $150-300 a year. So it’s really, really cheap for the coverage that you get. And it’s pretty easy to get these policies. It’s kind of an all or nothing. A lot of the other insurances we already talked about, you have to pick a lot of different variables and things that you want, but these with liability insurance, it’s pretty much all or nothing. And most coverages give you about $1 million worth of liability per claim, then somewhere around an aggregate of $3 million for as an annual limit. So I think for most part, it’s pretty much a no brainer to have.


Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, one thing I would add too to the discussion is that the role and scope of practice, depending on the state that you live in, is evolving quickly. So I think as the role of the pharmacists continues to expand — you know, here in Ohio, we obviously have an expansion of collaborative practice agreements, which means now essentially, we’re able to prescribe without using the word ‘prescribe’ in our state laws. But obviously, that’s going to add additional opportunities where that liability protection is going to be needed even more. So I think for the cost and what that provides, I think it’s critically important. And I know here in Ohio, I’m sure other states are experiencing, you know, the rules associated with the laws that the board is governing are evolving very rapidly, by the week, sometimes by the day. And so being able to stay up with those and make sure you’re practicing according to the law, I think is becoming more difficult, which validates the need for that insurance even more. Tim Church, Kristin asks — this is a good question — from the VA here, “If you work for the VA, do you need to carry professional liability insurance?” What do you think?

Tim Church: It’s interesting. I asked the same question when I first started, and I think a lot of people have this question. Well, when I looked into this a little bit more, that VA employees are federal employees, they have this extra protection through the Federal Tort Claims Act, and so when you’re functioning within your federal scope of practice, it does provide a level of immunity from personal liability damages, so if you have any malpractice or negligence, if you’re working under your scope or within your scope. So I think that you definitely get an extra layer of protection. I think where it can get fuzzy is if you’re functioning within that scope, and if there’s any way that possibly you could be told or determined that you’re not within that scope. And the other thing I would say too is there’s always going to be opportunities to work somewhere in addition to the VA or if you’re going to give verbal advice like Tim Baker mentioned. So I think that in general, if you want that extra layer of protection, it just kind of makes sense. Is it absolutely necessary? Probably not if you’re solely going to be practicing pharmacy within the VA and that’s it. But again, kind of go looking back to the cost and the benefits that you can get, I think it’s just a great buy in terms of what you get in exchange.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, just don’t get Crazy Uncle Joe any drug advice, right? Outside of work. And it’ll all be OK. So I think take-home point here, professional liability, get it done. For what it costs, it’s good protection, good coverage, thinking of that also alongside disability in your life. So Tim Baker, last question we have here from the YFP Facebook group comes from Shaveida — and I apologize in advance if I butchered your name. Let me know, we’ll get it right next time. She asks, “My employer advertises long-term care policies.” And she says she doesn’t know much about it. So talk to us briefly about long-term care. We haven’t talked much, I think if any, about it on the podcast or even on the blog. What is long-term care coverage? And who should be thinking about it?

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I would say full disclaimer, I’m not a long-term care insurance expert. I know, typically this is coverage for individuals, you know, basically as they become seniors where you pay an annual premium in return for financial assistance if you ever need help with kind of those day-to-day activities like bathing and dressing and eating meals, maybe toileting, those types of things. And most of my experience with long-term care insurance is from my last firm where a lot of our clients were more kind of approaching retirement and in retirement. You typically don’t buy these types of policies until you’re in your late 50s, early 60s. And they’ve had kind of a checkered past. So back in the ‘90s, there were probably more than 100 insurers that issued these policies. And I think today, it’s less than 20 that actually do because of a variety of underpricing policies and premium spikes and just insurers going out of business. You know, typically, what I saw in that space in my last firm is a lot of people electing to let the policies lapse because they just became too difficult to manage and really self-insure. Now, there’s a lot of risk there because, you know, I read a stat that someone retiring in 2015 will spend I think $245,000 on medical expenses kind of outside of Medicare. So it’s going to be a large part of, you know, the future of retirement planning. How do you self-insure versus long-term care insurance? So you know, like I said, most of my clients are kind of in the 25-45 range, so it’s not something that necessarily I look at day-in, day-out. I know that overall, it can kind of be expensive and difficult to price and project. But I think, again, as my client base ages, it’s just something that we have to look into and see how to really approach that part of the retirement plan.

Tim Ulbrich: Good stuff, Tim and Tim. This has been fun. We’ve got more of these coming. We’re going to do rapid-fire Q&A’s on investing, home buying, other topics. We’d love to hear from you. So again, if you’re not yet a part of the YFP Facebook group, come on over, join us, ask your questions, and we’d love to feature it on a future episode of the YFP podcast. So on behalf of the team, that’s all for today. And we look forward to joining you again next week. Have a good one.

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 060: One New Practitioner’s Lessons Learned Accruing $224,000 of Debt in 7 Years


 

On Episode 60 of Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Ulbrich, Founder of Your Financial Pharmacist, interviews Brianne Porter, a new practitioner and faculty member at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy, all about her journey of going into more than $220,000 of student loan debt, the plan she has put together to pay off this debt and the lessons she has learned along the way.

About Today’s Guest

Brianne Porter, PharmD, MS is Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy. She is primarily responsible for co-coordinating and teaching in Integrated Pharmacotherapy 1 and 2. Her research interests include community practice advancement and the scholarship of teaching and learning. In addition to her position with the college, she moonlights with a local independent pharmacy to bring those skills and experiences to the classroom. Brianne is actively engaged in APhA, serving as the Chair of the NPN Education Standing Committee, AACP, and OPA. She is passionate about community pharmacy practice and about getting students excited about and prepared for upcoming changes in community pharmacy practice.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: So Brianne, welcome to the show. Thank you so much for joining me.

Brianne Porter: Thanks for having me, Tim.

Tim Ulbrich: So excited for this recording, and I’m pumped up about your journey, and as I mentioned to you before we jumped onto the recording, we’ve done several debt-free episodes, but I think what I’m really excited about is your willingness to share your story as you’re really in the thick, in the weeds of this journey of paying off student loan debt. And you and I had a chance to meet all the way back — I think it was actually at AACP we met for the first time. Is that correct?

Brianne Porter: Yeah. It’s been a couple years.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah. So at the time, you were just starting your fellowship — and we’ll talk a little bit more about your career journey and so forth — but your fellowship at Ohio State along with your Master’s degree. And at the time, I didn’t know anything about your financial journey. So I’ve learned more along the way, I know you’ve attended a couple presentations we’ve done, we’ve talked a little bit about student loan repayment strategies and options, and what I know from your story is that you obviously had a moment of conviction, an “Aha!” moment where you said, ‘There’s got to be a better way to do this.’ And I don’t know where that “Aha!” moment came from, but I’m excited to learn that on the recording and this episode today. So before we jump in to the details of your story, I first want to say thank you for your willingness to come on the show, for your willingness to be vulnerable with our listeners, and I’m confident that your story is going to inspire action from others in the community. So in advance, thank you for that.

Brianne Porter: Sure.

Tim Ulbrich: OK, so let’s jump all the way back — if I have my facts correct — all the way back, you graduated from pharmacy school at The Ohio State University in 2014. And it’s my understanding at that point, you had no student loan debt prior to starting pharmacy school. So you graduated in 2014, but prior to starting pharmacy school, you had no student loan debt. Is that correct?

Brianne Porter: Yeah, that’s correct.

Tim Ulbrich: So how did you manage to get through undergrad debt-free? Tell us a little bit about that story.

Brianne Porter: Yeah, so I was really fortunate. I actually went to undergrad at Ohio University in Athens. And I was really fortunate to get a scholarship that not only paid full tuition for four years, but it also covered my living expenses, I got a stipend in the summer to do some experiences, go travel and do some different things, and so really, when I was an undergraduate, during my undergraduate studies, all I really had to worry about was spending money. I had a job, and I made money, and I had spending money. But really, I didn’t have to think about what college cost or anything like that. I was really living a pretty good life at that point. I was very fortunate.

Tim Ulbrich: So you’re crushing it through undergrad, you’ve got scholarships, you have no student loan debt, so I guess one of the upsides of this story is it could be worse, right, if you had undergraduate student loan debt that was accumulating. So fast forward then, you graduate with your PharmD in 2014, tell us a little bit about your total debt load at the point of graduation. And then take us through your decision, your journey, in the postgraduate training and fellowship and ultimately why you decided to defer your loans through that period.

Brianne Porter: Sure. So I feel like this is the reason I reached out to you, Tim, is because as I’m looking back on this time and thinking about decisions I was making, I’m thinking, oh my gosh, how many people probably are making those same decisions. Like, please, let me help stop you from doing this. But yeah, basically, whenever I started pharmacy school, I’m going to go back even a little further because I think this part’s kind of important for the students listening. But when I started pharmacy school, because I had that experience in undergrad, I don’t think that I was very intentional. And I know we’ve talked about intentionality before, but I was not intentional at all about thinking about how much money I needed. I’d had four years paid for, and I think because I didn’t have any responsibility for my undergraduate education that I wasn’t really thinking about what it actually cost to go to college. And I had the same mindset that everyone has, which is that I’m going to graduate, I’m going to be making $100,000+ a year, I’ll be able to pay those off in no time, it’s no big deal. So every semester, whenever I did my applications for the student loans, I would just get like an offer. Like, ‘You’ve been offered this much. Accept all, or enter a different amount.’ And I think that if one slight change would have just been instead of offering me the max amount, they would have just had a blank and said, ‘How much do you need?’ I probably would have been more intentional, right? But you know, being a student and being fairly irresponsible at the time, I basically just rationalized in my own mind, well, I know what tuition is, and I know that I need to cover living expenses, and this is the first time I’ve lived alone. I live in a city, I’ve always lived in small towns, so instead of really thinking through or trying to estimate those costs, I just thought, you know what, I’m going to need it. Pharmacy school’s going to be stressful enough as it is, I’m just going to take the max amount. I’ll be able to pay it back, no problem. So I went through that, and even through school, I mean, I worked all through school. And I, again, used that money for maybe joining organizations or spending money or whatever else I needed. I mean, I had a car break down at one point. So like, it was kind of like an emergency fund, so to speak, as a student. And I think that even throughout those four years, it never really dawned on me like what this payment would look like whenever it came in, even that $160,000, which is what I graduated with. But even thinking about that total number, it never dawned on me like, how much money is that actually going to be out of my paycheck? And how hard would I work for that paycheck, you know? I felt very comfortable with that, oddly enough. But I had $160,000 of debt, and I was very comfortable with that.

Tim Ulbrich: Mmhmm.

Brianne Porter: But then I decided very last minute, I made a rash decision to apply for residency. And I was very lucky I matched, but at that point, I hadn’t really thought through the financial aspect of that. So when I was finishing pharmacy school, I had already accepted a job with Target, and I was going to be making about $120,000 at the time a year. And so even with that $160,000, I was like, well, I’m going to make $120,000. I’ll pay it off in a few years, no problem. Which is a funny joke now. But then whenever I matched for residency, I thought, oh my gosh, I’m going to be making like a third of what I was going to be making, what I was planning to make, so now I’m going to have more expenses with travel to conferences and different things. What am I going to do? And just a side note — I think it’s kind of funny how as a resident, we think we’re so poor. I think because we compare to what the pharmacists make, but if you think about it, people raise their families on significantly less than what we make as a resident. So I wish that I would have that moment of realization back then to know that, yes, you can very easily live on this much money. And yes, you can very easily make payments on your loans with this much money. But again, I think I was really good at talking myself into deferring or talking myself into I need more money because I just didn’t have that appreciation for my undergrad. So fast forward three years, I completed a PGY1 and then a two-year fellowship and a Master’s. And luckily, the Master’s was included in the fellowship, so I really did only have one degree to pay for, which is kind of sad that I landed at $224,000 with just one degree out of three that I have. But regardless, I finished my postgraduate training in 2017 and then suddenly, I got the final statement of $224,000. And that was a little more sobering, I think. That was a lot of money.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think that speaks to, you know, a few things that really stand out to me that I hope current students pick up on. I think your initial description of the process in which you borrow money — it’s very easy, almost like it begs you to take all that you need, right? And for cost of living and other things. And I think really taking a step back and saying, to your point, if this were a blank slate, and I really did my budget and did the math, what would I actually need and how can I minimize as much as possible what I’m borrowing because at the end of the day, an unsubsidized loan — as obviously you have experienced firsthand — an unsubsidized loan, that interest is accruing all the while that you’re in school. And so the other big takeaway for me is if there’s current residents, new practitioners listening — and I know certainly you’re not alone in this, Brianne — is deferment is real in terms of the impact it can have. And for you, obviously that went from $160,000 to $224,000 because of three years of deferment. And one of the things I always encourage resident or new graduates to think about is that even if you’re unsure about exactly how things are going to shake out, if you opt in to an income-driven repayment plan, because of how they’re calculating your monthly payment looking back at the previous year tax return, you’re going to have a very, very low — likely have a very, very low monthly payment. And so better than deferring, you can go into active repayment, and then obviously, you can start to pay it from there and get ahead of the interest over time. So thank you for sharing that. So you started with $160,000 from your pharmacy degree, you end up with $224,000. And I think my follow-up question to that is, as a new practitioner with life coming at you in many different angles and priorities, things that you want to do and accomplish, how does $224,000 of student loan debt, how does that practically hinder you as a new graduate? What impact has that had on you?

Brianne Porter: Yeah. It has been — I’m not going to lie to you. It’s been pretty awful, actually. And not to say that I don’t have a lot of good things in life, I definitely have much to be grateful for. But I had no idea how much this was going to really impact not just how I felt but other people in my life, how it was going to impact the decisions that I got to make, the things I got to do with my free time. So you know, for example, because of some other poor decisions, I also had some credit card debt, and so my credit score isn’t fantastic. And then I got married, and we wanted to buy a house. And we were able to buy the house. My husband, luckily, he had his undergraduate paid for as well and went straight into a job and was saving for several years. So he was very financially stable, actually, which was very lucky for me. So we were able to get a house, but it’s like, now we have the house, we have things that happen with the house, you have to repair an AC unit or a furnace or whatever the case may be. Or you have to get new windows, and these things come up. And because of my student loan debt and my monthly payment, we’re so strapped that it’s like, we can barely pay the bills that we have. We have a little to go into our emergency fund for those sort of things with the house or other things that might come up. But we do not go on vacations, we do not spend a lot of money on anything expensive. I mean, I can’t tell you the last time I went shopping for fun. I mean, I guess probably if you’re financially responsible, you’re really not just going shopping without a budget anyway, but I just have felt very strapped, quite the opposite of what I thought in pharmacy school and residency, to be honest. And it’s a real bummer.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think what you’re describing is what Jess and I felt, what I hear from so many other graduates is this feeling of, you know, I had one thing in mind of what this income would provide in terms of, you know, the feelings of that income. And then all of a sudden, it’s like, wow, I really feel like I’m living paycheck-to-paycheck despite this income. How is this happening? And obviously, as we’ve talked about many times before on this podcast, big student loan payments, other big purchases, a home, other priorities, quickly will evaporate the income that you have in any given month. So what I really want to find out from you is I know in our conversations before — which by the way, I’m very much looking forward to becoming a coworker of yours soon at The Ohio State University — so I’m pumped up to be working with you, but I know as we’ve talked before in different venues and settings is that I can tell you have an energy and a passion and a motivation to get after this whole topic of personal finance. And obviously, through you journey, I think it’s fair to say that you kind of wandered into this and really maybe didn’t always have that passion, energy or motivation. So what was the “Aha!” moment for you where you said, “There has got to be a different way of doing it.” Was it seeing that balance of $224,000? Or was it a combination of factors and things that came together?

Brianne Porter: Yeah, that’s a great question. So there’s a lot of things to address in your question here. I think the big “Aha!” moment, honestly, was not the balance. It still hadn’t hit me because really, if you’ve never had much money in life, that balance still doesn’t really mean anything to you. $224,000 I’m like, OK, well that’s six digits. What does that really mean? OK, I’ll tell you what it means. It means when you make a little over $100,000 a year, and you get your paycheck and taxes and everything else come out, your health insurance, all the things that you don’t account for when you think about that $100,000 income. My student loan payment was one-third of my take-home pay, which is significant, I think.

Tim Ulbrich: Yes. For sure.

Brianne Porter: And what my lender did, which was kind of sneaky, is they kind of started throwing the loans back one at a time. So my first payment was like a couple hundred dollars and then a little more and then a little more. But then my final payment came in, like the final amount that it was going to add up to, the first time was $2,300. Now, that’s a lot of money. You know? So it really hurt to pay that out on the beginning of the month and be like, wow, I just lost $2,300 this month.

Tim Ulbrich: That’s when it gets real, right? When you see that number, and you’re like, OK, here’s my paycheck after taxes, here’s what’s going toward student loans, here’s the house payment. And like you said earlier, what’s left after that? I mean, I think that’s the moment where it goes from almost feeling like Monopoly money to, ‘Holy crap, this is real. And I’ve got to do something about this.’ So one of the things I know is that you’ve been a really active member of the Facebook group, the YFP Facebook group — which for those that are not on there listening, please jump over and join the conversation. There’s so much support and encouragement and helping one another, it’s been really fantastic to be a part of. But it makes me want to ask the question, like for you, what role has community played in terms of people being around you and helping you on this journey? Whether it’s your spouse, peers, coworkers, family or friends. Talk a little bit about community aspect and accountability for you on this journey.

Brianne Porter: Yeah, I think that’s a good question. To be honest with you, when this all first started to unravel or kind of maybe unfold is a better word — when it started to unfold in front of me and I really realized the impact of the decisions that I had made, I was really embarrassed because it’s like, here I am, a pharmacist, I’ve got a Master’s degree, I mean, on paper, I look like I should be very intelligent, right? So how did I make these decisions? And how did I justify them in my head? So I think that I was really embarrassed that I wasn’t more intentional up front and that I really didn’t take that responsibility to just learn more about finances. I mean, totally honest here, I still don’t know a lot about financial things, which is why I purchased your book because I wanted to learn more about that. And so that’s really what kind of, you know, drew me in, but I was really embarrassed by that. Like I didn’t talk about it to anyone, and I didn’t talk about my debt, I didn’t talk about the choices that I had made. And I certainly didn’t want to ask other people because I didn’t want to then feel obligated to share, so I felt like I was really — especially when I started getting that payment every month, that bill and making that payment, I was really feeling very isolated and kind of trapped and just feeling almost like I couldn’t breathe. You know, I really felt like I was struggling to figure out how to manage with it and how to make decisions and what to do with it. And I think that the community that really helps me the most really is the Facebook group, the Your Financial Pharmacist Facebook group, which is why I’m so active on it. And I think that the thing that is so nice is to just get on there and see that I wasn’t the only person who made these decisions, and I’m not the only person who doesn’t know what certain things are when it comes to financial things, I guess, you know, financial terms. I don’t have any background in business. I never had to take any classes like that in any of my training, and I never opted to, so I really don’t know anything about it. And that group just made me feel like I wasn’t alone. And then I think it gave me the confidence to start talking about things a little bit more openly, so that was really powerful for me, actually, that group.

Tim Ulbrich: And so I want to follow up with that and talk a little bit about how you got to the decision of what your game plan is with your student loans. You know, we’ve talked a lot about on this podcast when we’ve done speaking events, there’s so much to be said for getting it right when it comes to having the optimal loan repayment strategy. And knowing you work for technically a PSLF-qualified employer, I know you and I have talked a little bit about refinance, you have all your federal options. So just walk us through briefly, what was your process or strategy to come up with your game plan when it came with why, for you, this was the option that you were going to go forward with in terms of paying back your student loans.

Brianne Porter: I appreciate you asking that question because it was actually, as I’m sure you know from some of our conversations, a journey that I really struggled with a lot, even once I started to get educated and really understand what the different options meant because that’s the first thing, right? When you’re a student and you’re doing the exit loan counseling, for any students listening, that is not good enough on its own. You have to learn more about what’s going on because I went through that counseling, and I still really didn’t understand what all of my loans were and what the payback plan for those were and what compounded interest is. Like I really didn’t understand any of that stuff. But once I became educated, again, through the Your Financial Pharmacist community and the book “The Seven Figure Pharmacist” and really understanding what those options were, sitting them down side-by-side, I still really struggled. And I’ll tell you why. So I owe $224,000, and as you mentioned, I work for an institution that would qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness. So yeah, sure, it probably makes a lot of sense to the average person to just say, well, you’re going to pay a lot less if you do Public Service Loan Forgiveness, so why wouldn’t you do an income-based repayment plan and go for that? But I am very risk-averse, actually, so to me this idea that that could go away at any time and I would have all of these small payments that I made that are really compounding interest as I went was very unnerving. Like it was keeping me up at night thinking about, can I really do this? Could I make this leap? So for the first year out of training, my first year as faculty at Ohio State, I actually opted into the 10-year standard repayment. And I did not refinance, which was another mistake that I’ve made. I’ve made every mistake you can possibly make. Yeah, I did not refinance. And for that first year, I was making those $2,300 a month payment. And the reason that I did that was the uncertainty of PSLF but then also, I’m the kind of person that I just like to attack something and get rid of it as soon as I can. And so I really just wanted to be done with this. I wanted to try to get this done in 10 years or less and know that I paid it all, I don’t owe anyone anything, and I’ve moved on. But kind of what we were talking about earlier, how that really impacted me, we were — my husband and I just felt very, we felt very trapped. We felt like we couldn’t do anything that was fun, we created a budget, and we were living by the budget. And that was really great, we paid off credit card debt, we paid off all kinds of other debt outside of this, actually. But we still felt like, wow, this is really strapping and is really suffocating in a lot of ways. And it just feels like we’re not really going anywhere, right? Because especially at the beginning, you’re kind of not really going anywhere. So at that point I realized I needed to either refinance or just go bite the bullet and go with PSLF and hopefully everything works out and the program continues or I’m grandfathered in or whatever the case may be if things were to change. And when we looked at refinancing, we found that even with the lowest possible rate that we could get, down around 4%, with my husband co-signing and everything, it was still only a matter of $300 or $400 difference a month. And so for us, that didn’t feel like enough to justify to continue on that repayment plan. So ultimately, I decided to opt into the income-based repayment plan. I get my first bill tomorrow, and I’m really excited to see that it’s over $1,500 difference. So you know, we want to look into investing and building our emergency fund more and things like that as well, but we are excited to have a little extra in there to be able to do something fun, you know, when we get the time or when the opportunity arises, very first world problems I’m talking about here.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, but I think your story is such an important one that matches up with so much of what we preach here on this podcast and even in the YFP student loan course is that there is no one right solution that we can blanket cover everyone and say, ‘This is the best option,’ right? You said something like, you know, these could keep me up at night. And for somebody else, that may be a very different scenario. Or maybe the math looks better on a refinance. And maybe somebody isn’t as interested in investing or maybe they’re not as conservative. So all the factors come together, and I’m so glad to hear you’ve thoughtfully walked through those and obviously worked with your significant other to do those, to say, OK, collectively for us, this is the plan going forward. And that may be very different for somebody else, and certainly that’s OK. And I want to go there then, since you mentioned even before and also through that last segment there, you know, your significant other obviously has become a very important part. You guys are in this together, you’re doing it together. He came in with no debt, right? You mentioned that earlier.

Brianne Porter: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: So I think I would love to hear from you, just what you’ve learned through that experience where maybe for others that are listening, one person’s coming in with a ton of debt or all the debt, somebody else has no debt. And just some of the feelings that you’ve had around that and how collectively, you’ve come together to work it out and say, OK, yep, we came in at different starting points, but we are a team, and we’re trying to do this together. So talk us through that.

Brianne Porter: So we — obviously, he came in, like you said, with no debt. And I came in with a lot of debt, so that was our first point of kind of not really being on the same page. But then we were also raised very differently financially. And so we approached finances in general very differently. So I think I talked a little bit earlier about how I was embarrassed about my debt and how I got there. And so to be honest with you, I was not up-front with him at first. It took me years of dating to really come clean about what I owed in student loan debt. And because we weren’t married, because we weren’t paying on it, I wasn’t paying on it at the time, he really, he didn’t know. And poor guy, I waited until we were engaged to drop that bomb on him. So he was in a situation, you know, he’s like, wow, what am I going to do now?

Tim Ulbrich: He’s not out now, right?

Brianne Porter: Yeah, but he’s a good sport. So he has — you know, and I said we’re very different in how we approach finances. I’m much more the — nowadays, at least — I’m much more the let’s count every penny, let’s keep track of every penny, let’s budget every penny. You know, I want to know where all my money is going now. And I’m very intentional. I learned my lesson, but I’m very intentional now. Maybe I was too intentional. But he is a lot more laid back and he is of the mindset that it all works out. So he’s on the opposite end of the spectrum. But because of that, he was very relaxed when I shared with him my student loan debt. And he said, you know, we learn lessons. That’s what life is about. But what are we going to do moving forward? And I think that was the biggest thing is just coming clean about it and then really sitting down and coming up with a plan versus his motto, he’s very laissez faire about things, and he’s very comfortable being like, we’ll fix it out. But at that point, we both agreed, we need a plan. This is very significant. We need to plan moving forward.

Tim Ulbrich: Well and just kudos to him to embrace that and say, “Hey, this is what it is. And it’s now our problem collectively, and we’ve got to figure this out together to have a plan.” And I think that’s great advice for those that are listening that may be struggling through or maybe even people that are in that dating phase. And you know, I think my advice would be the earlier, the better. You know you can get some of these topics on the table. And I know for Jess and I, personal finance wasn’t something we talked about before we got married. And all of a sudden, you’re thrown into it, and you’re dealing with it. Now you’re coming up with the questions of should we merge our accounts and how do we budget together? What goals are we trying to achieve? You know, all of these factors come together and so obviously, the earlier the conversations, the better. So two questions I have left for you are a little bit lighter questions, but I think part of your journey here is to share with others to hopefully help them along their journey as well. So pharmacist peers that are listening or students that are still in school, what are a couple pieces of advice you would have for them in terms of, you know, how they can prevent maybe some of the mistakes that you made along the way.

Brianne Porter: For pharmacists, I guess I would say those of you who are in my shoes right now, you’re now practicing, you’re making a little bit more than a resident or a student would make, it’s just don’t be afraid to jump in. I know I’ve been at a lot of your presentations and on your webinars, Tim, and you talk about this a lot. Like the first thing is be real and look at your numbers and just get down with that. And so I think that’s, you know — I heard you say that, but I think that when you’re always thinking about what do I have and you haven’t really wrestled with the numbers yet, you haven’t been plain with yourself about what’s actually there, that looming concern about what might be there or what that looks like is sometimes twice as bad as what’s actually there. So I would say just take a look, be really honest (gap), think about what motivates you. I know you’ve also talked about motivation quite a bit. And I think that’s really what it comes down to. Like you said, there’s no right answer for anyone. But if you avoid and you don’t confront this problem, like no matter who you are or what motivates you, that for sure is not going to be a successful thing. I can tell you from experience, it’s not successful. I guess for the residents, I would say dont’ defer. Like you mentioned earlier, Tim, even that income-based — you’re a resident, your income-based payment is going to be next to nothing. There’s literally no reason not to make those payments. So I definitely would not defer during residency. And then for the students, my best piece of advice is if you’re being offered the maximum amount or fill-in-the-blank, just put your hand over the maximum amount and pretend like it’s not being offered to you and actually calculate what you need, even if you’re just making approximations and you want to just slightly overask to meet, that’s fine. But if you just automatically select, you know, taking out the max amount, you’re always going to use that. No matter what, you’re going to put that money to use, and you’re going to owe it at the end. And you, trust me when I say you cannot appreciate how much money that is right now when you’re a student. You just cannot.

Tim Ulbrich: Great wisdom there. I wish I would have heard all three of those things through my phases as a new practitioner, as a resident and as a student. So you alluded to earlier that, you know, I think for you maybe this topic is one that you haven’t necessarily had as much education previously on and maybe one that doesn’t come as naturally. But obviously, you’re committed to learning more about the topic in terms of your own professional development. So what works for you in terms of learning more about this topic? Is it books? Is it podcasts? Is it webinars? What is the strategy that you have to develop yourself in this area?

Brianne Porter: Well, obviously, Your Financial Pharmacist teaches me a lot.

Tim Ulbrich: That’s a good one, yes.

Brianne Porter: But in all seriousness, I do tend to really utilize the resources of the Your Financial Pharmacist community as my primary source. If you think about how you approach Pub Med searching — I’m going to go nerdy here for a second — but I always, you know, when you find a good article, and then you look at the other references that that article has referred to or referenced. I kind of approach this the same way. I have found this resource to be extremely valuable for me. The book has been very eye-opening as far as really putting things into perspective and being at the level for someone who doesn’t have a lot of background knowledge on the topic, that I can actually understand what’s going on. And then a lot of things that I hear on here or read in a book, kind of resourcing out from there. I think podcasts are really helpful for me because I can listen while I drive and then that’s where I do a lot of thinking versus the book where it’s easy to kind of passively read and not take it all in. But I definitely find this community to be extremely valuable and a great resource. And like I said, you can then find other resources from Your Financial Pharmacist. But it’s been my main source.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, thank you for the shout-out. And I think my encouragement to the audience would be, if it is YFP, great. I’m glad to hear that. If it’s not, find whatever resource is going to keep you motivated on this topic and keep you learning. It’s a lifelong journey of learning and making mistakes, and learning and growing and making mistakes, and learning and growing, and you repeat that cycle over and over again. So if it’s YFP, if it’s something else, making a commitment to develop yourself in this area of personal finance. So Brianne, I want to again just thank you for your vulnerability, your willingness to share your story with our listeners. And I know this topic can feel so overwhelming and weighty at times. And I think it’s easy to avoid the pain, as you mentioned, wish it all weren’t there, turn the other way. And what I love about your story is you are choosing differently. You’re choosing to embrace the pain, you’re choosing to dig in, make a commitment to turn the ship around and invest in yourself in the future. So what an incredible, and I’m hopeful we can have you back on the show to share your debt-free journey and to talk about what life is going to look like once you have all of those loans paid off. So thank you again for coming on the show.

Brianne Porter: Yeah, absolutely. Thanks for having me, Tim.

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 059: Life After Debt Free…Now What?


 

On Episode 59 of Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Baker, founder of Script Financial and YFP Team Member, interviews Adam and Brittany Patterson. On Episode 31, Adam detailed how they paid off $211,000 of student loan debt in 26 months. Adam and Brittany are 2015 graduates from Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy. Brittany is a pharmacist at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta. Adam is a pharmacist at Northeast Georgia Medical Center and Assistant Pharmacy Manager at Publix Pharmacy.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Baker: Adam and Brittany, welcome to the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. How are you guys doing today?

Brittany Patterson: Good.

Adam Patterson: Great, thanks for having us.

Brittany Patterson: Yeah, thanks for having us.

Tim Baker: So I would say, Adam, and you did a good job on Episode 031 when you were last on detailing your amazing debt-free that you did and excellent job of calling out Brittany and giving her credit to this journey of paying back debt, but I’m so happy, Brittany, to bring you on and kind of hear your side of the story. That episode, in particular, has been a huge success. It’s actually our third most downloaded episode with almost 1,600 downloads. And I think it just resonates with a lot of pharmacists out there. So kind of if you would, tell us a little bit about yourself and walk us through kind of — Brittany, I guess I’m talking to you of this debt-free story and kind of recap, you know, how it came to be, how you got through it. And let’s go from there.

Brittany Patterson: Yeah, so it’s great to be here. I know Adam talked a lot about our story. I guess he made it sound it like it was all nice and easy, but we really did have a big struggle, you know, those 2.4 years that we went through this. You know, we got that first letter, I guess six months when we got out, and it said, ‘Hey, great job finishing school, but you know, we need our money back.’ And that’s just something that we didn’t really talk about in school. And so we were texting all of our classmates, trying to figure out what they were going to do, and they didn’t know. And so we kind of bit the bullet and that’s why we just decided to refinance. Both of us came out working retail jobs, and so we refinanced, about a year into your retail, you got your job at the hospital. And that was hard because Adam was working night shift, and I was working day shift, so you know, he would be driving out of the neighborhood when I would be driving in the neighborhood. I think we would go three full days of not seeing each other. So it may sound real great, oh, only 2.4 years, but that was really — I mean, it felt very long when we were in the middle of it. It’s not as easy as it sounds. It was very hard work. But it was definitely hard work that paid off in the end. And we had that support of each other, we were on the same page with money. You know, that’s what we — when we just spoke recently to students, we told them that money is one of the biggest issues that couple fight about. And I feel like for us, that’s something that we never really have arguments about. We’re on the same page with money, and we’ve been kind of there since Day 1, knowing how we were going to refinance and everything. And so even though it’s been hard work, we’ve always been on the same page, and it’s definitely helped our marriage too throughout all of it.

Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s funny, when I was preparing for this episode, I went back and it’s one of the few times, actually, to go back as a listener. And I listened to Episode 031 again, and one of the things that Adam said was, smart decisions, hard work and sacrifices, those are really the three things that allowed us to propel you guys forward to pay off the debt. And another thing that Brittany, you mentioned was the refinance. I think you guys refinanced your rate of 6-7% over 10 years down to I think it was 4.25% over five years, kind of locking you into more of an aggressive payment process but also saving you about $65,000 in interest over the course of paying that off. So I guess for you guys, what has been since you paid off the loans, what’s been going on? Like what’s been the big driver of like where do you go from there? Like what’s been the big difference in life since the loans have been paid off?

Brittany Patterson: You know what’s funny is we were just talking about that this morning. I think we work more now than we did when we paying off loans.

Tim Baker: Really?

Adam Patterson: I can agree 100% with that.

Brittany Patterson: Yes. People are like, oh, your loans are paid off, you’re going to enjoy it so much. And I’m thinking, I think we work more now than we did then, but we’re so accustomed to it that it doesn’t seem like a big difference to us.

Adam Patterson: I think it’s about goal-driven too is setting your sights on what’s into the future and just trying to get there. But also, you have to enjoy every bit of it and take some time and have free time for yourself. But yeah, hustle’s been real. We’ve been hustling since we finished paying off loans, still keeping both jobs, Brittany’s been working a little bit extra too, and I work my full 70 and then turn around and pick up a whole other 44, 45 hours in my off week and then back around again, 70 hours again the next week. So it’s been nonstop.

Tim Baker: It’s funny though, because like I think what, you know, it’s kind of like the get-rich-quick schemes that are out there, one of the things I often say to clients and even when we’re speaking is, you know, the key here, especially if you want to retire early or if you want to get through the debt is a lot of it is just elbow grease and is just kind of putting your head down and working hard. There’s not a lot of fancy schemes or tricks. It’s about, you know, really maximizing income and being smart with, you know, budget. I know, Adam, you talked about how, you know, Mint.com was a big part of this. And Brittany, I know you are a Mint.com addict, it kind of is safe to say that.

Brittany Patterson: Yes.


Tim Baker: So and then just having that kind of 100% transparency between the two of you and really looking at it as your loans, but you know, so not much has changed. Obviously, I knew that you guys — and to kind of full disclosure here, you know, Adam mentioned he would be reaching out to me and Script Financial about working together. And you guys did in February, you kind of came on and became clients. And that’s why I have a little bit of an inside track to what’s been going on. But I was reviewing your finances, just in the time that you guys have come on, your net worth has grown exponentially. And it’s really just exciting to see because you guys obviously took a negative of the $211,000 and in two years and change, took that off the balance sheet. And now, you’re perpetuating that same type of mentality and really deploying your resources to your goals. So one of the things that you guys talked about when we did kind of the ‘find your way’ was experiences. And you guys took a vacation here recently. Where did you guys go? How was that?

Adam Patterson: We took a trip to Ireland. We went for a little under two weeks. It was breathtaking. It was amazing.

Brittany Patterson: So much fun.

Adam Patterson: Being able to cash flow pretty much everything and knowing you’re not having to worry about spending this, spending that, because you’ve worked hard, we’ve worked hard, we’ve saved for it. It’s a great payoff, treating yourself to something like that after you finish accomplishing one of those goals.

Brittany Patterson: Yeah, we didn’t have to limit ourselves on the trip, which is nice. We weren’t afraid about not being able to afford a dinner or buying a souvenir because we knew that we worked hard before we went on this trip, and we were able to, you know, buy the things that we wanted to buy. We didn’t go overboard on things, but we just knew that we didn’t have to limit ourselves while we were there, which was really nice.

Tim Baker: Well, and I know kind of when we talk about your goals, obviously experiences is a big part of that. And you know, like when I look at some of the things that we’ve done, you know, as kind of just simple, you know, we’ll get to kind of your next big goal here in a bit, but obviously vacations, so having a travel fund, you know, a savings account that you can cash flow, having a, you know, obviously a fully funded emergency fund, having your home purchase fund, which is kind of the next big thing on the horizon, I think those are just naming the accounts the goals that are out there, you know, psychology says that that alone is a big win. And you know, for me as kind of working with you guys, I know that, you know, if the next trip is Australia or New Zealand or Germany or attending a sporting event to the Panthers or Steelers or Cooperstown, whatever those things are that we kind of outline, my job is to kind of help you make sure that this is the next on the docket and we’re cash flowing those appropriately. So walk me through, you know, since the debt was paid, why did you guys — what was the genesis around, hey, we need to work with a financial planner? What was the big driving force to kind of email me and contact me and say, ‘Hey, Tim, we want to see if working together is a good fit.’?

Adam Patterson: I would say the first thing that got us talking about it is — and I tell other people this too — is we went to school to be pharmacists. We understand certain things when it comes to financial stuff, but we’re not a professional in that. So seeking out professional help, it was our No. 1 goal, whether we should have started before we paid off loans or not, that’s up in the air, but we tell people all the time, it’s never too early to find a financial planner or somebody to help you with that because that’s what their profession is. For us, it was being a pharmacist, serving patients and things like that. So seeking out a financial planner, it was our next step, our next goal simply because we wanted somebody to give us more directive, be able to help balance more things in our life.

Brittany Patterson: Yeah, and to hold us accountable. We know we do have a good income that comes in, but making sure we are putting that income towards our goals and making sure our budget is correct. Just we knew that you could help us more financially than we could help ourselves in that area.

Tim Baker: Well, and I think the other thing that I think resonates or resonated with me in the last story — I know, Brittany, like you just said, kind of confirms that is — I think one of the things that a lot of pharmacists do is they kind of drink that six-figure Kool Aid that says, hey, I come out, and I’m making x amount of dollars, I don’t really have to worry about the debt, it’ll take care of itself. And I think for you guys, and I know, you know, kind of the backdrop is Adam, you went through the Dave Ramsey — I’m not sure if both of you guys went through the Dave Ramsey stuff — but it was kind of this no-nonsense approach to paying off the debt. So talk to me, what’s the big thing right now that is kind of top of mind with where you want to take your financial plan and where we’re going? So I know the big one is the home purchase, right? So we’ve talked about this at length and what that looks like. So walk me through kind of where you guys currently are in that part of your financial plan and what you’ve learned thus far.

Adam Patterson: Right now, like you said, our next step is financially purchasing a home, working with you, setting up, figuring out what we can actually afford. I think that’s one of the biggest things and knowing that you’re not spending too much but you’re going to be comfortable. That’s something that we are working with you, getting approved, working with a bank to get approved. We have a real estate agent now, so we’re in the process of shopping for a home, whether it’s one month, two months, six months from now, we just know that we’re ready for it. And that’s what we’re doing right now is we’re continuing to work towards that goal.

Tim Baker: And I think, I think the idea was to be almost singularly focused on that, similar to what you were with the debt until you guys are moved into the house. And I know, Brittany, that’s kind of like, you want that to happen yesterday because you’re ready to make the purchase. But I think being smart about it and surrounding yourself with a team of people that have your best interests in mind. And I think sometimes that is lost in the home purchase process just because most people, most professionals are incentivized about how much you actually purchase in terms of the size of the house, but I think you guys are going about it, and I think when we went through, ‘Hey, what can we actually afford?’ it was with this discount that you guys are not going to be hustling like that for the rest of your life, you can actually afford something probably greater than you probably would be if you were kind of working consistently. But I think it’s been great working with you because I think you are very open to advice and kind of the education that surrounds a lot of these decisions. So from my end, it’s been awesome. And I think, you know, we see it a lot because I think your story resonates. So walk me through kind of what you’ve been doing speaking-wise since, you know, we’ve last had you on the podcast.

Brittany Patterson: I think — was it June, Adam?

Adam Patterson: Yeah, it was around June.

Brittany Patterson: Yeah, in June, we went to the Alabama Pharmacy Association convention, and we were invited to come speak to the students there. So there were Stanford students, and there were also Auburn students. And we went in, and we had a whole PowerPoint presentation, and it was funny because I don’t think we spoke until about 7, 8 o’clock at night.

Adam Patterson: Yeah, it was 7 or 8.

Brittany Patterson: And it was after they’d all been to the pool, they were all outside, all having fun, and I’m thinking, there’s no way they’re going to want to sit in here and listen to us talk about finances at all. And we walked in there, gave our presentation, and they ate it up. I was shocked.

Adam Patterson: It’s just — it’s crazy when we’re presenting and seeing these students’ mouths drop just because we’re providing them with this information that whether they knew about it or not, it’s just resonating with them and telling a story not in trying to convey that they have to pay off this much money in such a short period of time, but the fact that we’re giving them these resources that, you know, they’re just not provided in school. And I think Your Financial Pharmacist, I think we’ve all harped on this, is making the education relevant and putting it out there for everybody. That’s just something, it’s a passion that we’ve kind of taken up on now is wanting to speak at more events and do more things to try and share our story.

Brittany Patterson: Right, because I think it’s something that we wish we would have had too, coming out of school.

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think Adam, I think one of the things that you said was, you know, when you were looking around, kind of looked to your left and looked to your right at hey, what’s the best way to tackle the loans, there wasn’t really anything there outside of maybe like a colleague and a few opinions. So you know, I think shining a light on this and having more people kind of like just openly speak about some of the trepidations with their loans. We hear a lot of people say, ‘Hey, you know, if we would have known now what we know today, we would have made a lot better decisions,’ and I think that’s why, aside from the facts of, you know, the facts and figures around your particular case, you know, there’s no — like I said, there’s really no silver bullet. It’s just like, OK, we worked a lot, we sacrificed, and you wake up, and you’re through the loans. And now, it’s what’s next? So I think your story, you know, is amazing. But then, you know, the fact that you can stand in front of people and say, ‘A few short years ago, I was in a similar spot, this is kind of what we did,’ is really amazing. So do you guys see yourself speaking more? Did you enjoy that part of it?

Brittany Patterson: Yeah. We both really enjoy it. And we actually have another one in November coming up, and we’re speaking at the National Community Pharmacists Association in Auburn. And so we’re going to go back to Auburn and be able to speak to those students. They came up to us after, I think it was the president of NCPA from Auburn, she came up, she’s like, ‘Oh, we loved y’all so much. We really want to have y’all back. I feel like these students could really learn from y’all since this is something that we don’t hear much about in school.’

Tim Baker: Well, and I think, you know, and that’s what I’m kind of hearing more, especially from NCPA, you know, or at least people associated with, pharmacists associated with NCPA is, you know, the decision or start, you know, an independent pharmacy is so huge. You have to have your own financial house in order or at least have a plan to have it in order, so I think there’s a lot of — you know, especially with that group, you know, a lot of relevancy to say, ‘Hey, if this is something that I really want to pursue, you know, I need to make sure that, you know, this big kind of elephant in the room at least is accounted for and there’s a plan in place,’ and I think that’s a great group to be talking to. So I guess for you guys, if I’m a recent pharmacist grad, what are kind of the big takeaways — I’m a new PharmD, I’m out, I’m earning income, I have kind of the average $150,000, $160,000 in debt. What would be the kind of big takeaways for, that you would impart on me in terms of how to tackle it?

Brittany Patterson: I know no one likes to hear this, but the biggest thing that we did was we lived below our means, which I know everybody hates to hear that because you feel like you’re constricted, but we weren’t because we were so used to living like that in school. And I think that’s one of the biggest reasons we were able to pay off our loans. We weren’t buying expensive cars, we weren’t buying expensive boats. Nobody told the students. We had friends who went and bought cars and boats, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but we just didn’t want more debt on top of the debt we already had. So I think that was one of the biggest things was really watching what we were spending and not overspending.

Adam Patterson: Yeah, I would say that would probably be one of my biggest things is living below our means. Something other to add to that is, you know, work hard for what you’re given. I mean, there’s too many people that just expect or receive things, and it’s all about hard work. Like we’ve talked about before, you know, putting in the hours, trying to maximize that income. As a new grad, I mean, what else do you have to do?

Brittany Patterson: Right.

Adam Patterson: I hate to say it, but to go on top of that, while you’re working hard, you have to treat yourself every now and then. I think debt’s something that we all can get caught up, and just working nonstop but not ever reaping some of that benefit, some of that benefit is to take a vacation every once in awhile.

Brittany Patterson: Yeah, and we don’t really eat out much, and that’s something that, you know, we really appreciate when we do get to eat out. We enjoy those moments more because of the fact that we aren’t doing it all the time.

Adam Patterson: Right.
Brittany Patterson: So we don’t take those moments for granted when we are able to enjoy evenings out together, which is nice.
Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s a treat rather than the norm, right?

Brittany Patterson: Right.

Tim Baker: Exactly. Well, and maybe, you know, you grow an affinity for Mint.com and logging in every day, right, Brittany? And making sure that the spending is in line, and you’re good there, that would probably be another piece of that.

Brittany Patterson: Right, that is true.

Adam Patterson: What is it they say? Eat, sleep. And Brittany’s is eat, sleep, mint.

Brittany Patterson: Mint, unfortunately.

Adam Patterson: So I will add, you know, something we got a lot of questions about. As a new grad, don’t be afraid to reach out for help. Using your resources and everything, that’s huge coming out of school is finding the information and going off, adding to that is talking about a financial planner and stuff. You know, that question’s came up to us a lot. Should I invest in a financial planner early on? There’s nothing that hurts from investing in a financial planner early on because they’re going to be able to, you know, guide you to those resources also. So that is a big thing I would harp on coming out of school.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think to play on that, you know, in terms of extra resources, obviously, I think what we’re trying to achieve here at Your Financial Pharmacist is just with the Facebook group and the different guides, to have information and kind of a community surrounding the information to put you in a position to tackle the debt or investments or if it’s insurance questions, so you know, I know you guys talked about — to kind of bring it back to the loans is one of the big things you did is refinance. So if you are looking to refinance, you know, YourFinancialPharmacist.com/refinance, we have calculators, we have different refinance companies that will give you bonuses and we have podcast episodes that are about student loans. So there’s a lot of good information there if you’re a YFP listener that you can digest and kind of learn more about the process. And I think it’s key to continuously push the envelope in terms of what you want to do with your financial life. Well, Brittany and Adam, thank you so much for coming back on the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast and sharing your incredible story. It doesn’t sound like you guys have let off the gas at all. I know you took your trip to Ireland and took some of that time to decompress, but it sounds like with the home purchase and some of the other things you’ve got going on that, you know, you’re kind of going back to the hustle and making sure you’re making moves with your financial plan. So it’s been a pleasure working with you guys, and I can say that your story truly resonates with a lot of our listeners and just a lot of pharmacists out there that it’s truly inspiring. So keep up the good work, and we’d love to have you back for the next major milestone. So you’ve done the debt-free theme hour, maybe we’ll have you on for the millionaire theme hour when you hit that millionaire status for net worth. So again, thanks again for coming on.

Adam Patterson: Thank you so much for having us.

Brittany Patterson: Yes, we really appreciate it.

 

 

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 058: How Good is the ROI of the Pharmacy Degree?


 

On Episode 58 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, YFP Founder Tim Ulbrich interviews pharmacy thought leader Deeb Eid, host of the Pharmacy Universe Podcast, about how rising student debt loads and a tightening job market are impacting the return on investment of the pharmacy degree.

Deeb Eid, PharmD started his pharmacy journey as a pharmacy technician learning the building blocks of what both efficient and non-efficient workflow operations could look like. He gained a deep appreciation for the role and potential of the pharmacy technician and continued forward with Bachelors and Doctor of Pharmacy degrees from The University of Toledo College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences in Ohio. His talents took him to Washington D.C. to become the inaugural Executive Resident in Association Management & Leadership at the Pharmacy Technician Certification Board. While traveling the country, he was able to present, meet with, and discuss the challenging and evolving atmosphere within pharmacy with a variety of stakeholders. He now serves as an Assistant Professor and Experiential Coordinator at Ferris State College of Pharmacy in Grand Rapids, MI working to mentor and inspire students while creating new avenues and opportunities. Deeb is the Founder and Content Strategist of Pharmacy Universe which is a social platform whose vision is to socially educate and engage the world about #Pharmacy.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Deeb, welcome to the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Appreciate you joining us.

Deeb Eid: Yeah, thanks, Tim. I really appreciate you having me on.

Tim Ulbrich: So you’re in Boston for the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy meeting, AACP. So how’s Boston and how’s that meeting going?

Deeb Eid: Well, Boston’s a really cool place for anybody who hasn’t been there. I highly recommend coming and visiting. Lots of things to do, lots of things to see. And the meeting’s going awesome so far. I think there’s a lot to learn. It’s a little bit different for me, I’m used to the APhA crowd. But definitely meeting some new people, gaining some insight about what’s going on in pharmacy education, and also reconnecting with a couple old friends.

Tim Ulbrich: I’m so bummed I couldn’t go. I’ve been to that meeting several times. Great networking, great programming. I do have to say, as a Buffalo Bills fan, I’m a Patriots hater, so I’m not sad about that point about not being in Boston. I’m sure there’s lots of Patriots, Red Sox fans around. And what I want to do on this episode is, to be honest, I think we have a long overdue discussion about what’s the Return on Investment of the pharmacy degree? And last week on your show, the Pharmacy Universe podcast, which we’ll link to in the show notes, Episode 004, you and I had a discussion related to personal finance and the future, we talked about debt loads and what this means for new practitioners, but we did get off on a little bit of a tangent , which was good, about some of the evolutions of the profession and where we’re heading. And disclaimer for listeners before we jump into the weeds on the discussion is that while we’re going to make a case that the Return on Investment of the degree is down in terms of where it has been, we are certainly not dismissing the fact that pharmacists make a good income, make a good living. And the reality is as individuals, a pharmacist’s income is still well above the median household income in the U.S. So it’s all relative, but we are certainly talking here about the shifts and the changing market that we’re seeing over the last 7-10 years or so. So three parts of this show that we’re going to walk through. Part One, we’re going to talk about the impact of high debt loads and a tightening job market. Part Two, Deeb and I are going to talk about how doom and gloom really is the situation? Are we overplaying it? And in Part Three, we’re going to talk about the action because I think we have a lot of people getting fired up, a lot of people complaining, but what are we actually going to do about this going forward? So Deeb, before we jump into the national trends and start this discussion on the Return on Investment of the pharmacy degree, as a new practitioner yourself, tell us a little bit about your career story, your journey and maybe even how student loan debt has played its part in your own journey.

Deeb Eid: Yeah, Tim. So a little bit about my background and my story is I went to the University of Toledo in Ohio. Go Rockets!

Tim Ulbrich: Go Rockets, yeah.

Deeb Eid: And during my time there, I started out working in a pharmacy as a pharmacy technician pretty early on, basically right out of high school, started out that summer and started to really gain an appreciation for what happens in workflow of a community pharmacy. And it’s kind of like almost like an art, you know? You go and you work at different stores and you see things run smoothly, and then you go to a different store and you see things on a particular day, maybe run not so smoothly. And so through that process, I started gaining appreciation for the role of the pharmacy technician. Obviously went on, completed my PharmD and had a really interesting and awesome opportunity to complete an executive residency out in Washington, D.C. with the Pharmacy Technician Certification Board. And so through that experience, I was able to basically travel across the country, meet different people, see what’s going on within the profession and kind of like what you’re saying, meet new practitioners, meet people who have been in the profession for 20-40 years and hear their stories and hear what their thoughts are. And I think personal finance is actually a topic that comes up really no matter what just because of, yeah, what’s happening with student loan debt and asking people, oh, I can’t believe — and they’ll tell you, I can’t believe how much people are paying for school nowadays compared to back when I went to pharmacy school. And so my story relating to student loan debt is — and I’m not here to turn any of your listeners off — but to be honest with you, I was extremely fortunate, and I actually had my schooling — my father really actually helped pay for most of my schooling.

Tim Ulbrich: Awesome.

Deeb Eid: So I never really thought about student loan debt throughout my schooling. It wasn’t something that was a stressor to me. But what I did learn through the process is now reflecting back, how was that possible? How was my father able to in his personal life be able to support me in that way? And the other thing I think I learned was that everyone around me, this was one of the focuses of themselves, and so I needed to learn about it because, you know, people talk about it, so I want to be included in the conversation. But more recently, my significant other Kristen is also dealing with a situation now after she just graduated of looking at student loan debt. And so it’s a topic that even though I don’t have personal experience paying off student loan debts or worrying about it, it’s still something that I feel is extremely important because a bunch of people around me have it, and I want to be able to and need to be able to explain and help them and students, now that I’m an educator.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think one of the things, just building off of what you said there, is you know, while obviously you had a very fortunate situation, if we look at the data nationally, 90% of all graduates have some student loan debt with the average amount being just now over $160,000, although we’re waiting for the new data here in 2018. And what I’ve heard, and I’m guessing you’ve heard from colleagues and peers and even those you’ve essentially interacted with your podcast at Pharmacy Universe, is that this is such a big stressor and weight on their back that one of my concerns here as we talk about the ROI of the pharmacy degree is we are in desperate need of innovation in pharmacy practice. And sometimes with innovation comes risk-taking, comes entrepreneurship and trying to build some new things. And one of my concerns, and one of the things we’re trying to tackle at Your Financial Pharmacist, is that you have this massive gorilla on your back that is maybe making you risk-averse, is stressing you out, obviously, that has an impact I think profession-wide in terms of what we can do in regards to being innovative. And so I would point listeners all the way back to Episode 004 where we interviewed Dr. Joey Mattingly from the University of Maryland, another thought leader, in my opinion, and we talked about very analytically what has been the impact of student loan debt in terms of new practitioners. And we got very granular and got very specific with numbers in terms of how it’s impacting graduates and how that’s changed. So let me paint a quick picture, and I’m going to dig into the weeds here a little bit on some numbers, so for those listeners, don’t tune me out here because I think the data does not lie. And we have to understand that the situation we are in right now is not a normal situation relative to, say, five or 10 years ago in terms of where we are as a profession. So I’m going to give some data here about debt loads, salary data, and then also we’ll talk a little bit about what’s happening to the job market. So first on debt loads, very simply, 2010, the median debt load was $100,000. 2017, it was about $160,000. So we had almost a 60% increase in seven years. And so I often hear people say, well, nationally, debt loads have gone up x%. True, but if you look at pharmacy education among some other health professions, that has outpaced the national average in a very significant way. Well, the other part to look at is if debt loads have gone up, have salaries increased proportionally? Because if they have, then we can make an argument that man, this really stinks that debt loads have gone up, but salaries are taking care of it. And the answer to that is they are not. So if we look at median salary for a pharmacist in 2010, it’s about $111,000. In 2017, it’s about $124,000. So I’m always looking at what’s the debt-to-income ratio of a pharmacist? And in 2010, that debt-to-income ratio was .9. In 2017, it was 1.28. So what’s interesting is if you look at pharmacists’ salaries alone, they are not keeping up with inflation over that time period. So even if we were to remove student loan debt and interest rates and the reality that some people are not in part-time work positions, those incomes are not keeping up with inflation alone. Of course, when you add in all these other factors, that situation becomes worse. So now we ask the question, Well, if we have people that are graduating with more student loan debt, salaries are not increasing proportionally, well, how much is their likelihood to get a job? What’s the job market look like? And there, we look to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And what we see that as of 2016, there was just over 312,000 jobs in the pharmacy profession. And now, here is the statistic that is alarming to me, that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is projecting that over a 10-year period, 2016-2026, they’re projecting 17,400 jobs that would be increased during that 10-year period. But in 2017 alone, we had approximately 15,000 pharmacy graduates. So let me say that again. Over a 10-year period, they’re projecting just over 17,000 new jobs. But in one year alone, 2017, we had approximately 15,000 new pharmacists enter the market. So something has to give. Now, some people look at that and say, well yeah, of course people are going to retire, other things are going to change, but obviously that’s not going to make up for that difference. So there, we need to begin the conversation about what is the challenges, what are the challenges with the situation and what can we start to do about it? So in summary, we have higher debt loads, we have fewer availability of jobs, we have more graduates that are coming into the market. So Deeb, my question to you is from your perspective, as somebody who I look to as an innovator and a thought leader, what are the risks and challenges that you see with graduates that are coming out with rising debt loads and relatively speaking, a stagnant job market? What are your thoughts?

 

Deeb Eid: So I think first of all, some of the numbers that you provided there, again, are pretty interesting. When I take a look at the statistics and I see, like you said, the Bureau of Labor Statistics projecting that many jobs over 10 years. And you and I very well know that there’s a lot of people who are graduating from pharmacy school each year. I think some of the risks and challenges with graduates coming out having these rising debt loads is — you’re right. That’s the tough part is when you come out of school and you have this thousand-pound gorilla of student debt on your back, and you’re trying to figure out where to start off in life, right? So you have a lot of different things going on. You might be moving for a job or a position or a residency. This could be your first car buying opportunity, this could be your first home buying opportunity. There’s a lot of things that happen in those first couple years as a student who graduates, becomes a pharmacist and now looks at your paycheck and thinks, oh man, I have all this money now. And so that’s where I think it’s challenging because people are going to be stuck, to an extent, where you might get a job, you might not be happy with the job that you have or you might not be satisfied. But you know that you need that job in order to be able to pay for that car, pay for that home, pay for those student loans. And so that’s I think part of the challenge is yes, there’s going to be people retiring, so there’s going to be jobs opening up, but what I really think is interesting — and maybe we can talk about this is the opportunities that could come from people focusing their time on different areas and trying to think outside the box of what they can do to, you know, again, build a brand, build a market and figure out ways that pharmacy can be involved in healthcare in ways that are nontraditional from what we’re currently doing.

Tim Ulbrich: Absolutely. It makes me think back to Episode 053, we interviewed Tony Guerra from the Pharmacy Leaders podcast who his Episode 001, Pharmacist’s Journey from Financial Ignorance to Financial Independence, one of his suggestions that stuck with me and will stick me I think forever is this idea of as a new graduate, he took what he calls Entrepreneurial 8. So right off the bat, he took 32 hours a week — he actually tried to work 24, but they wouldn’t let him — 32 hours a week, and he said, you know, 8 hours a week, I’m going to begin to think about some of the things that I’m passionate about, pharmacy practice and how I can be entrepreneurial. Now, from the financial perspective, that to me is a brilliant idea and I think it’s great for the profession as well. Obviously, we’ll be advancing thoughts and ideas, but also, it requires somebody to be able to right off the bat say, OK, I’m not going to live up to my full income. And obviously, it starts to give you options and flexibility in the event that things change along the way. Now, student loans, if you’ve got $200,000 of student loan debt, is it going to be easy to say, ‘I’m going to take 32 hours instead of 40.’ And is that the best decision in the moment? You know, maybe yes, maybe no, depending on your personal situation. And I think that’s one of the biggest fears, if you will, that I have right now is that there’s this mentality that I’m feeling and that I felt as a new graduate of maybe you’re in your mid-20s, maybe you’re even a little bit older as a student, you’ve got over a six-figure job that’s right there, sign the paper. It’s comfortable right off the bat. Does it restrict you, though? And is it restricting what we’re able to do and evolve as a profession? And I think the reality of that business model is it’s gotten us stuck into a place of where we’re at right now. And there’s not necessarily as much room and opportunity for innovation, growth and risk-taking. And Deeb, I don’t know what you’re seeing — I know one of the things I’m hearing among our graduate is there’s this feeling, obviously in some sectors of work moreso than others, but there seems to be this feeling of I’m only a couple years out, what I had imagined this could be, it isn’t what I thought it could be. Now I’m looking up and I’ve got 35, 40 years left of work history, and I feel stuck. I mean, is that something that you’re hearing? What do you perceive to be the implications of that in terms of somebody so early in their career feeling like they’re stuck?

Deeb Eid: So I’ll tell you from a personal standpoint, I worked during my school, so while I was in pharmacy school, so I worked for about six years, so throughout the entire six years at Toledo, I was working. And I worked in a couple different — I worked in a couple different pharmacies. And to be honest with you, that statement that you made, that feeling of not really ‘I feel stuck,’ but it’s more of, ‘This isn’t really what I think I expected,’ or, ‘This isn’t really aligned with what I thought I would be doing,’ that was honestly one of the feelings that I had throughout those towards the end of those six years was I know what I’m learning in school, I understand what could be, but then there’s things that happen at work or there’s responsibilities that I’m doing at work that just doesn’t feel like I’m living up to the potential or you know, I could be doing so much more for my patients. I just am not able to or my company maybe doesn’t allow me to or the laws or regulations don’t allow me to do these things. And so that’s what I think for me, from a personal aspect, that’s where I felt I needed to do something a little bit different. Hence, why I went out and did my residency in an area that was a little nontraditional. But yeah, I mean, I talk to some of my former classmates and a couple other people out there who are newer into the profession, and it is something to think about. I’ve heard a few times here and there that, well, you know, you kind of get into this — it’s almost like a rhythm. You learned all these different things, there’s all this potential, and then it’s like your dreams and hopes are shot down.

Tim Ulbrich: Absolutely.

Deeb Eid: It’s kind of an interesting phenomena.

Tim Ulbrich: Well, and I think we know — for me, I’m very passionate about career development. It’s what I do a lot here at the university. And the reason is exactly what you’re saying. I mean, what we know and what I’ve seen in our alumni and seen in my own life is that if you’re challenged in the work environment, if you’re given autonomy, if you’re allowed to be creative in the way you think, if you’re allowed to be entrepreneurial even within an organization, that feeling of satisfaction that comes from that trickles over to many other areas of life, right? You walk home more confidently, and it can have an impact on relationships and other areas. And so one of the things that I’m passionate about, specifically for the financial piece, is trying to help people manage this financial component so that they can maybe look at an alternative job path. Maybe they can go back for additional training, back for additional schooling. Maybe they can start their own business and take a few more risks. And one other thing that really stuck out to me as I was preparing for this show — and you’re probably familiar with the 2013 study that was published in the Journal of American Pharmacists Association, JAPhA, that we’ll link to in the show notes. It was a study done by Munger, et al, which has had a lot of attention and debate. And essentially, they studied, take-home point is they studied over 300 community independent pharmacists, and their conclusion was that there was high amounts of dissatisfaction. Specifically, more than 50% of those surveyed stating that they were considering quitting their job. And I think that’s such an important point. And whether we want to debate is that representative, is that not, we know that and we have a pulse on that there is that feeling out there. And if we, as a profession, are going to move forward and be innovative and be forward-thinking and rock the boat and think about the way pharmacy’s been done, and think in the futuristic type of way and not look back at how it’s always been done, we’ve got to address this feeling that’s out there, and we cannot ignore that it’s out there. And I think one of the risks, to wrap up this first part here, one of the risks that I see — and the numbers support this — is we have a very significant decline in applicants into PharmD programs across the country. And that should be getting all of us fired up. So let me give you some data here. 2010-2011, we had approximately 107,000 applications into pharmacy school. 2016-2017, that number went down to 73,000 in that time period. All the while, the number of schools increased in a dramatic way. So in theory, we should have more applications. So we have more graduates coming out with less applications coming in. So that’s the transition then into the second part, and really what I want to discuss here for a few minutes is how doom and gloom is this situation? You know, we could stop here and say, the sky is falling. Are we over playing it? Is that reality? And to me, Deeb, it feels like that we’re at risk, as a profession, of being stagnant in the way that we do business when the market is clearly telling us the status quo is not OK. And when I say the market is telling us, I’m referring to the number of applications into pharmacy school, that’s an indicator of interest in the profession as well as what we’re seeing in the evolution of the profession. Most notably, we’ve talked recently on your podcast about the Amazon buyout of PillPack. You know, it feels to me that we’re at risk of becoming the Blockbuster in the Netflix world, right? So my question to you is how doom and gloom is the situation? Is it worth sounding the alarms? Are we too late? Or is this a trend that we can really start to reverse? What are your thoughts?
Deeb Eid: So a couple things come to mind when I think about the situation. No. 1 being what I try to do when I, from a big picture standpoint, when I look at the situation, I try to actually look outside of the profession of pharmacy. So what’s going on? What are the trends within consumer buying? What are people looking for? What is the average person on a day-to-day basis, what are they expecting out of the businesses, out of the services that they are getting from other places? So if you look at businesses like Netflix, like Amazon, like Uber, some of these ones that really, really, have come out of nowhere in the past few years but have really just become leaders across the board. So some of the things that I think about is you know, if you take a look at those organizations, what are three things that they focus on that we, as a profession of pharmacy, can learn from? And I think three things that I see is when it comes to the person on the other side of their services, No. 1 is that they help save people time. OK? So time is something that I believe any person out there would put a major premium on. If you can save somebody time in their life, that means that that’s time that they have to reinvest in something that they enjoy doing. So I think that’s a huge thing that a lot of these companies have in common. No. 2 is convenience. They’re making it more convenient for the person on the other side, right? So you want something from the store? You don’t need to go to the store. You can order it on Amazon, and it’s there the same day or the next day. You want to watch a new series? Turn on Netflix. There you go, you can watch the entire series. You don’t even have to move from the couch anymore.

Tim Ulbrich: Right. And now it’s predicting what you want to watch, right? It’s amazing.

Deeb Eid: Exactly, it’s telling you different things based on your shows. You know, you want to get somewhere quickly and again, know where you’re going and be convenient and safe, take Uber. And I know people will say, oh, there’s some stories with Uber that people have gotten hurt, but far and in between. But again, it’s that convenience. And then the third thing — so you know, you have time, you have convenience. And the third thing that I believe these places are doing is they are just, they’re listening to the consumer. They’re listening to their customers as to what they are looking for. And that’s why they keep improving their models. And so I think from a pharmacy standpoint, you know, for doom and gloom. Is the situation getting worse? Is it getting better? I think that in pharmacy, like you said, people are coming out, they have a lot of student loan debt, that’s limiting innovation, that’s limiting opportunities for people to be innovative. Sometimes, they’re getting into positions where they’re not going to be able to come in right off the bat and you know, kind of think outside the box unless they really spend time and effort outside of their jobs doing it. You have less people applying to pharmacy schools, you have a decent amount of graduates. And so I don’t want to say that we’re doomed as a profession, but I think that what we need to do is we need to start looking at the models that we’re utilizing and figure out where can we start to focus on those types of areas because the future consumer and the current consumer are somewhat different, right?

Tim Ulbrich: Yes.

Deeb Eid: So I think a lot of the people in today’s world in the future are going to expect that you can pick up your phone, hit a button, and boom, there’s a pharmacist on the screen. I want to have a conversation with somebody, I have questions about my medication, boom. A future consumer is probably going to expect they’re in their kitchen, and they’re about to have dinner, about to sit down for dinner. They can say, ‘Hey, Alexa, tell me about my medication. Am I able to take it with this type of food that I’m about to be eating? Is there any interaction?’ These are the things that are being built into society that I think the future consumer is going to expect, and that’s where I see the opportunity for, you know, people within pharmacy and graduates to be involved. It’s just not going to be in the traditional what you think of now where you’re going to get a degree, you graduate, you work in a pharmacy. I mean, those things are still going to be available, but I think that’s where the jobs and the opportunities are going to be is we’re going to have to start creating these opportunities so that we can continue to reach our patients in a way that’s convenient, that saves them time and that’s still quality.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, absolutely. And I think there’s so many good nuggets that you had there. I mean, to me, one of the things that I’m often thinking about that you highlighted there is we are at a point, I think, I believe, that we have to think about reinventing ourselves as a profession and the role of the pharmacist. We know the value, we have the data to support it, but we need to blow up preconceived notions about exactly how pharmacists have to operate and how pharmacy is done in every single setting that we operate. And I think one of the great advantages of these moments like we’re in as a profession is that with any moment like this comes unbelievable opportunity for innovation, entrepreneurship and growth. And as I used Blockbuster as a reference, Family Video is still around. I’m still trying to figure that out. I don’t understand that. But you know, with those models, there’s an opportunity to either evolve or not evolve. And so I think we can look at it one way and throw up our hands and say, ‘Ugh, this is terrible. We need to hold onto the way that pharmacy’s done, and we’re going to hold that out regardless of the things you mentioned, that time, convenience, understanding what the future consumer wants,’ or we can get together, have the uncomfortable, difficult conversations and say, ‘Let’s throw out the way it’s always been done at least in thought. Let’s brainstorm about alternative ways that it can be done. And let’s think about it from the consumer standpoint and also think about where technology, automation and other things are going.’ And I think you used some great examples there, even with Alexa is one example but just to get us thinking in a different way. So let’s move now to the call to action. What are we going to do about this? And I know we talked briefly about this in that last section, but we’ve painted a picture of the current reality we’re facing as a profession. And now the question is, so what are we going to do? What steps should we be taking? And what practical things can our listeners to begin to reverse this trend? What do you think, Deeb?

Deeb Eid: Yeah, so I think the very first thing that is, you know, low hanging fruit — and I would say this is probably something that anybody who comes across us, anyone who’s listening, no matter your situation, I think that if you can take at least one step in this direction, you’ll be definitely doing yourself a favor. Just learn about personal finance. Take advantage of, you know, things that you guys are doing here at Your Financial Pharmacist. Read a few different articles about it, learn about student loans if that’s something that you’re dealing with. Just learn about finance in general because I can’t tell you how simple it is to — you know, it’s just like learning therapeutics, it’s just like learning pharmacology. And it sounds very, you know, overwhelming, it sounds like, man, like I don’t speak this language, but it’s the same thing, right? You just have to put in time. It takes a little bit of effort, but if you do it step-by-step and utilize I think the community that you guys are building with Your Financial Pharmacist, that’s another awesome thing is you have other people out there who are going through the same things that you are and you can learn from them and you can ask questions and you can interact with them. And so that’s I think step No. 1 is really just taking it on your own onus to learn about personal finance because that, I believe, is going to save you a lot of stress in your future or wherever you’re at in your career. So I think that’s kind of one step that I see. The second step is having those conversations, like you said, those difficult conversations and coming up with these creative ways but really trying to, again, figure out in your current workplace, in your current situation, in your current life, what is something, what is one thing, what is one thing that you could be doing that could be challenging or helping to, again, look outside of pharmacy and figure out what that future person, what that future consumer might be expecting. What is one thing that you might be able to start working on that would be able to help the profession of pharmacy. So you know, that could be starting up a blog about your thoughts and your experiences and you know, how things might be different at your workplace or things that you’ve seen with your patient care or wherever you work. That could be starting up a podcast, you know, just like we’re doing here and just like I’ve done over at Pharmacy Universe and just talking to people and having the conversation, getting the word out there. That could be writing a book. I know that sounds very challenging, but you know, there’s a lot of great books out there that I’ve seen, and I think there’s not enough books out there about these topics that we’re talking about today, about how pharmacy is evolving and kind of what different opportunities that there could be out there. So those are kind of three areas that I could see. I believe personal finance is a big one, thinking about building a personal brand is probably the second one, and then the third one is connecting with the community and just figuring out how to disseminate some of your ideas and thoughts that you have — or at least learning from others that have those ideas.

Tim Ulbrich: Great stuff. And if I could add a few things to that list that are on top of my mind. You know, one for me is you’ve got to be a part of the conversation. So whether that means being active in your local, state, national organizations, you know, on this podcast, we’ve done a lot of work with the American Pharmacists Association. It could be your state pharmacy association, your local group, because to be a part of the change is different than just complaining about it, right? So pay the membership dues, get involved, be at the table. And second to that comes being a part of the change when it comes to legislation and advocacy. So if you want to see a change, I’ve seen this firsthand with the work with Ohio Pharmacists Association, it’s not as difficult or overwhelming as it may appear from the outside looking in. So engage in those areas. And then Deeb, one of the last things I want to mention here is I’ve been trying to do more self-development outside of the pharmacy space. So I felt like I kind of fell into this rut of, you know, I’m always learning from pharmacy literature, pharmacy conferences, all great, but there’s so much to learn outside of the pharmacy space, even outside of the health profession. So I’ve been listening to some podcasts and reading some books lately, watching some TED Talks. One of the things that’s catching my attention recently is some more U.S. History type of stuff. I was just listening to a podcast on FDR to Harry Truman and that evolution and struggles and challenges, one back to the American Revolution. And I think getting to think in a different way to say, here were leaders and individuals and people and times in our history that had very challenging points where they had to pivot and make a decision, and they had to rally people around them to achieve a shared vision. And so we will link to some of those in the show notes, but just getting out there and saying, I’m going to do one thing, like you mentioned. Maybe it’s getting out there and getting inspired from some TED Talks or books or podcasts or joining an organization and becoming more active. I think there’s lots that we all can do collectively as a group and a community to move forward. So what I want to do is end on a few rapid-fire, Q&A questions for you while I have you here. So I’m going to ask you questions, quick answers, and we’ll move through these one-by-one. So first question is, the trend in pharmacy applications, which is currently down, will continue over the next five years. True or false?

Deeb Eid: I think it’s true.

Tim Ulbrich: One piece of advice you’d have to a prospective pharmacy student in light of today’s conversation?

Deeb Eid: Learn about personal finance as much as you can.

Tim Ulbrich: Awesome. And finally, what is one piece of advice you would have to current students that are worried about the job market in terms of getting full-time work and the rising debt loads that they see?
Deeb Eid: I would say work on building your personal brand and make sure that you are utilizing your time so that you are one of the top candidates when you graduate and that you have options.

Tim Ulbrich: Great stuff. Deeb, thank you so much for coming on the podcast today. And for our listeners, we’ll link to the show notes, but if you’re not yet familiar with the work he’s doing over at the Pharmacy Universe, check it out. I’ve listened to the episodes you’ve published so far. I love the telehealth components, getting us to think different legislatively, trying to push the envelope, so thank you for the work that you’re doing over there and very much appreciate you taking the time to come on today’s show.

Deeb Eid: I appreciate it, Tim. And can I mention one thing? Because you had mentioned a couple of the different avenues of books and podcasts and that before I go?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, please. Please.

Deeb Eid: So there’s a book that I recently picked up — and if you’re not familiar, check out the YouTube channel, it’s called Impact Theory by Tom Bilyeu. It has some awesome interviews on there that really challenge you to think outside the box. So one of the interviews that I was watching had this particular person on here, and he wrote a book. And I actually just picked up the book here in Boston, but I’m going to recommend it. It’s called “The Third Door,” and it’s by Alex Banayan. And so basically, it’s this guy’s story about — I’ll give you a very quick summary. He says that there’s really three ways, that life is like a nightclub. There’s three ways in. There’s the first door, which is the main entrance, that’s where 99% of the people wait, hoping to get in line. They’re hoping to get into the club. There’s the second door, which is the VIP entrance. That’s where billionaires and celebrities get in. But then the one that no one tells you about, and that’s the third door. It’s where you have to jump out of the line, run down the alley, bang on the door 100 times, crack the window open, sneak through the kitchen. But he says that there’s always another way in and to be always looking for that way in. So I think that that kind of goes along with the theme that we’re talking about today.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, we definitely need a third door right now and people knocking on that door, so thank you for sharing. And I have a problem that when I hear of a book recommendation, literally within five minutes, I have to buy it. So I will be doing that right now and look forward to reading that on a vacation coming up in a couple weeks. So Deeb, again, thank you so much. And to our listeners, as always, thank you so much for joining us. Looking forward to joining you again next week.

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 057: The Power of Automating Your Financial Plan


 

On Episode 057 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Tim Ulbrich gets practical to talk about why automation matters when it comes to achieving your financial goals and specific ways you can automate your own financial plan. We will hear from the YFP Community about different ways that they automate their financial plan.

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 057 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Not going to lie, fired up about this episode. When it comes to automating your financial plan, it’s so obvious, so effective, so easy to implement, but yet so many people are not optimizing this to achieve their own financial goals, and that would be myself included. I’ve made some recent changes to my own financial that I’m excited to share with you in this episode when it comes to automation. Whether it’s student loans, retirement, college savings, vacation, maybe it’s saving for a down payment on a home, setting goals and carving out money in the budget and automating those goals is powerful. And I know that I’m not alone that when I say that for some time, I was feeling that when you have multiple financial priorities that are swirling around, that can easily become overwhelming, and automation helps to put these goals into action and takes the stress out of wondering whether or not they’re actually going to become reality.

So let’s jump in as we’re going to talk about different ways of automating your financial plan. And as I was preparing for this episode, I couldn’t help but think back to Episode 008, Developing a Millionaire Mindset by YFP team member Tim Church, because when I think about automation, I think that’s a key piece of developing a millionaire mindset. For those of you that have not read the book, “I Will Teach You To Be Rich” by Ramit Sethi, I’ll link to it in the show notes. It’s just a great, quick, easy read, but one of the things he talks about in that book at great extent is this idea of automation and the power of automation and taking the decision-making out of the hands and taking some of the behavioral components where we tend to make mistakes and putting in processes to help to minimize those mistakes.

So before we dig into the weeds to talk step by step about exactly how to automate your own financial goals, let’s talk about why in the world you’d want to set up an automatic process for your finances in the first place. You know, the first thing that comes to mind — we’ve talked a lot about this on the podcast, throughout various episodes leading up to here now in Episode 057, and we’ve mentioned several times that so much of personal finance is behavioral decision-making. You know, I once heard about four or five years ago, about 80% of this whole topic of personal finance comes down to behavior and about 20% is really digging into the math and the numbers and the strategy. You know, as I’ve made more mistakes, had more successes along the way that on both sides of that, I would argue 80% may not be enough. That might actually be more like 90%.

And for me, when I think about automation, I think about out-of-sight, out-of-mind because I know at the end of the day, if all of that money is just sitting in my checking account and I haven’t automated it towards the goals that I’m trying to achieve, whether that would be getting out of credit card debt, whether that would be paying down student loans fast or retirement, college savings, vacation, home buying, repairs, whatever, I know that human nature and behavior is that I’m going to spend that money — I’m going to hope that something’s left over, but more often than not, nothing’s going to be left over, and I’m going to spend that money. And when I think about automating a financial plan, I think about intentionality. I think about paying yourself first and making sure you’re then really budgeting around the rest of it rather than hoping there’s something left over at the end of the month. So first off for me is that human behavior says that we’re better off taking the decisions out of our hand because we’re prone to making mistakes when it comes to finances. You know, one of the things that gets personal here for me is I think about my own retirement savings, I’m in the state teachers’ retirement system here in Ohio, so many of you know I work as a faculty member of Northeast Ohio Medical University College of Pharmacy, been here for about nine years, and in the state teachers’ retirement system, we essentially are forced to put in a percentage of our paycheck each and every month. And that number is actually I think now approaching 14% that we are forced, no decision in our hands, to put that money into retirement. We then also have an employer match, but as I think about where I am today, nine years later with my retirement assets, I think the only that is possible is because that decision was taken out of my hands. I cannot say that I would have had the discipline, that I would have prioritized putting 15+% of my paycheck each and every month into retirement, so I think that’s a good example as we talk about areas for automation, retirement is certainly one. But again, end of the day, if that money were in my checking account and that decision wasn’t made for me, I probably wouldn’t have achieved the success I have so far as it relates to retirement saving.

And so I think that’s a humbling moment to think that the only reason, the only reason my retirement is on track and ahead of progress is because that decision was put on automatic, because that decision was taken out of my hands. Now, we know that another reason automation is important, besides a behavioral decision processes associated with it, is that for many listening, whether you’re a student, if you’re a resident, maybe you’re somebody who’s transitioned out within the last five or 10 years, regardless of where you are in that spectrum, we know that you’re facing lots of different financial goals that you’re trying to juggle. You know, in Episode 048 we interviewed Dalton Fabian in the episode called Mo’ Money Mo’ Problems: Making the Financial Transition Into New Practitioner Life, and what stuck out to me about that episode with Dalton is he, like many others transitioning from student into new practitioner life, have all of these things that are coming at you at one time, student loans, emergency fund, retirement, down payment for a home, maybe kids’ college savings, lots of different things that are coming. And how do you strategically prioritize those and achieve those? And I think as we’ll talk about here in a minute, I’ll share some examples from those within our Facebook group, having a plan in place with a budget that’s executing those and then automating that plan each and every month is the key to success there.

So let me give you some quotes from those YFP members in our Facebook group, and this is what they had to say about automation in their own financial plan.

So Brianne from the YFP Facebook group said that “I automate as much as I possibly can, including savings, on the first of the month, all fixed bills and student loans as well. To me, that makes it easier to budget because I only ‘feel’ like I have whatever is left over rather than my whole paycheck.” I think there’s such wisdom there from the sense that when you pay yourself first, first of the month, you automate paying yourself towards your goals, all of a sudden, you get used to living on the rest rather than living up to your full income and hoping you can fund your goals after the fact.

YFP team member Tim Church says, “Love automating as much as possible — bills, everything, all bills, student loan payments, HSA contributions and TSP contributions.” That’s his retirement component with the VA. So when it comes to automation for Tim Church, he’s automating as much as possible.

Matt from the Facebook group says that, “I automate most of it but still need help for the leftover. I auto-deposit 529 college savings accounts every 15 days, one for each kid, auto-deduct 401k every check, have a separate target date fund that comes out once a month. I pay my bills as soon as I get them from the mailbox because I like to actually see the balances, which is the only reason they aren’t on autopay.” And I think that’s an interesting point, Matt, that maybe some may say, you know what, I like to not necessarily automate all of my bills — maybe you do, maybe you don’t — but for Matt, he looks at that and says, you know what, if I get my bill, whether it’s water, sewer, cell phone, whatever it be, that he likes to see the balance in the process of it to make sure that everything is accurate.

Brian says that “We automate 401k contributions and savings account for sinking funds.” We’ll talk about sinking funds a little bit upcoming in this episode. “However, we don’t currently automate 529 contributions or IRA contributions. Still not sure which approach is better, but I do find that not automating everything actually requires you to think about it every month as opposed to a set-it-and-forget-it mindset. I think there may be some benefit to that, depending on how you’re wired.” Building off what Matt said, Brian says, you know what, for some things, set-it-and-forget-it is great when you think about 401k contributions, 529, IRA contributions, but for some other things, maybe not so much if you like to have that reminder of exactly what you’re doing.

And Brandon, the last one from our YFP Facebook group, says so when we don’t see it, the importance for him of automation is that “When we don’t see it in the checking, then we don’t spend it.” And Jess and I have noticed the same exact thing. First day of the month comes, auto-withdraw to a separate savings account, different funds, I’ll talk about those here in a minute, boom. Whatever’s left over, that becomes our monthly spending in our budget. But we have already funded our goals because we know the reality that if it sits in our checking account, we’re going to end up spending it. So if it sits in our checking account, we’re going to end up spending it.

So let’s now move into where exactly to get started with this process. We’ve heard from those in the YFP Facebook group. And if you’re not yet a part of that community, you’re missing out — great conversations, come on over to the YFP Facebook group, we’d love to have you a part of that group and a part of the conversation.

So where do you get started? For me, it comes down to two major things: goal-setting and budgeting. Both of which we’ve talked about in the YFP podcast as well on the YFP blog, and if you’ve heard us speak at a live event, you know for us, goal-setting and budgeting are absolutely critical to having a solid financial plan. Now, let’s take a step — and I think goal-setting can be an overwhelming process, but just like you were taught in pharmacy school, when it comes to setting your financial goals, they have to specific. They have to be measurable. They have to be action-oriented. They have to be realistic. They have to be time-oriented. You’ve heard of SMART goals before, right? And they also, in our opinion, they have to have a “why” behind them. What is the motivation for why you’re going to achieve that goal? Now, you all know as you’re working with patients, maybe you’re working with a diabetic patient, trying to get them to make a lifestyle change, achieve an A1C goal, whatever you’re doing, it’s the same thing when we talk about our financial plan. We have to put behavioral pieces, we have to make conscious choices, and we have to have those motivations, specifics, that measurable component, the time-oriented piece, we’re going to have a higher likelihood of achieving that goal. So whether it’s helping a patient with their diabetes or helping yourself with your own financial plan, goal-setting is a critical part. And the other piece of this, which I’ll mention here in a minute, is that when you work on your monthly budget, your monthly budget is simply an execution of your goals.

So for those of you that are listening to this — and I know many of you are sitting here right now, thinking, I feel so overwhelmed with all of these different competing priorities that are out there. I’ve mentioned several of them already. We’ve talked about emergency funds before, we’ve talked about getting credit card paid off before, we’ve talked about making sure you have a solid retirement savings plan in place. What about your student loans and kids college? And the list goes on and on. And you have to first put all of those things on the table and say, OK, I have all of these goals, all of these competing priorities, which of these are the ones that I’m going to go after first? Maybe you’re somebody that says, you know, I’m going to go all in on this one goal, and then I’m going to move to the next one because I know that if I tried to focus on many different things, I tend to get overwhelmed and really just end up spinning my wheels. So some of you may say, you know what, I’ve got credit card debt, and I’m going to go all in on my credit card, knock that out, and then I’m going to move on to something else. Now, others of you listening may say, you know what, I think I can handle more than one goal at the same time, so now I need to look at the top two or three or four goals to make sure that I’m achieving these things in the right order. And I would reference you back to Episode 026, we talked about baby stepping into a financial plan, specifically around emergency funds and credit card debt as the two areas that you want to — more often than not — focus on first. So if you’re hearing this thinking about, I don’t even know where to get started, go back to Episode 026, Baby Stepping into a Financial Plan, I think that will help you get along the path to coming up with how you could prioritize these goals.

So you lay out all of the goals on your paper, and you start to prioritize them. And I literally like to put a number by them. So maybe it’s credit card debt, 1. Emergency fund, 2. Student loans, 3. Whatever the goals that you’re working on. Then you move into the budgeting process. Now, I’m not going to go into detail here on this episode about the budgeting process because we’ve chronicled it before on previous episodes. I’d point you — we have a great budgeting resource at YourFinancialPharmacist.com/budget. Again, that’s YourFinancialPharmacist.com/budget where we have a template, an Excel template, that will walk you through step-by-step how to create a zero-based budget to achieve those goals that we just discussed. I also would reference you to, we have a blog post out there at YourFinancialPharmacist.com, “The Five Steps to Creating Your Best Budget.” So both of those resources we’ll link to those in the show notes, I think will be a great starting point to make sure you can execute your goals through that monthly zero-based budgeting process. Now, if you take the time to sit down and do a zero-based budget and really work through this process, what you will come to at the end of that budgeting process is you’ll determine your total take-home pay, you’ll determine your necessary expenses, you’ll determine your discretionary or nice-to-have expenses, and then you’ll come up with a number that is determined to be your disposable income. Essentially, what amount of money do you have left over each and every month, each and every pay period, that you can allocate towards your financial goal. So if we did the goal-setting process and then we worked through the budgeting process, you may say, OK, at the end of the month, I’ve got $1,000 left over after I pay all my necessary and discretionary expenses. I’ve got $1,000 left over, and here are the three goals that I want to work on. Boom. That’s where the automation begins to happen. So if you were to say, you know what, I’ve got $1,000 left over, and I want to start doing two things. I want to pay off my credit card debt, and I want to build an emergency fund. Maybe you take that $1,000, auto-withdraw the first of the month $500 goes to your credit card bill as one example, $500 goes into a long-term savings account to save for an emergency fund. That decision is now out of your hands, you’ve identified your goals, you’ve set the budget, and now your goals are on automatic. And that provides an incredible amount of peace and confidence when it comes to your financial plan.

Sponsor: So two big pieces to get started here: setting those goals and then getting that budgeting piece in place so you know what that disposable income is, and you know exactly where you’re going to put that money. Now, once we have those two pieces in place, we can then begin to think about the actual processes for automation, and we’ll talk more specifically about where you can put the money in different areas when it comes to automating your financial plan.

I want to take a brief moment before we jump into the second part of the show and to highlight today’s sponsor of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast, which is Script Financial. Now, you’ve heard us talk about Script Financial before on the show. YFP team member Tim Baker, who’s also a certified fee-only financial planner is owner of Script Financial. Now, Script Financial comes with my highest recommendation. Jess and I use Tim Baker and his services through Script Financial, and I can advocate for the planning services that he provides and the value of fee-only financial planning advice, meaning that when I’m paying Tim for his services, I am paying him directly for his advice and to help Jess and I with our financial plan. I’m not paying him for commissions, I am not paying him for products or services that may ultimately cloud or bias the advice that he’s giving me. So Script Financial specifically works with pharmacy clients. So if you’re somebody who’s overwhelmed with student loans or maybe you’re confused about how to invest and adequately save for retirement, or maybe you’re frustrated with just the overall progress of your financial plan, I would highly recommend Tim Baker and the services that he’s offering over at Script Financial. You can learn more today by going over to ScriptFinancial.com. Again, that’s ScriptFinancial.com.

Tim Ulbrich: OK, welcome back. In the second half of this episode, we’re going to talk about the areas specifically that you can consider for automation, which builds upon the discussion we talked about in the first half of the episode of the goals that you’re setting. And then I will walk you through step-by-step exactly how I think you can set up your automation of your financial plan and more specifically, I’ll show you exactly what Jess and I are doing with our own financial plan when it comes to automation.

So let’s talk about the different areas that you can set up for automation. And lots of these came from personal experience, from Tim and Tim — I know that they do also, YFP team members Tim Baker and Tim Church, as well as what I’ve heard from other pharmacists and those within the YFP Facebook group. Now, one we already mentioned in the beginning comments from the YFP Facebook group, areas of automation of course would be your monthly bills. So this, for me, is more out of convenience than anything else, so I don’t look at automating my monthly bills as being a point of, say, strategy as I do that it’s one less thing that I need to work on in terms of writing a check, making sure that that’s all set and ready to go. And that’s automatically happening each and every month.

Now, to build on what Matt and Brian said in the earlier comments, I, too, am someone that does not automate all of my monthly bills. And the reason is when it comes to those bills that I know fluctuate — water, for example, could be cell phone usage if there’s potentially overage charges — any bill that I know may have variance based on usage, I like to see that and track that and to be able to identify any discrepancies that may occur. Now, if I have bills that I know are the same each and every month and that’s not necessarily going to change, then for me, automation on bills really becomes a point of convenience. So area No.1, of course, would be bills.

Area No. 2 is student loans. And one of the things that Brandon said in our Facebook group is that automation is a must when it comes to student loans if you’re going for the loan forgiveness program. There, he’s referring to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. That way, you are for sure making on-time payments. And Brandon, I think that’s great wisdom there because when it comes to Public Service Loan Forgiveness — and really, in my opinion, any student loan payment — you certainly do not want to have delayed payments for a series of reasons. One, if you’re in Public Service Loan Forgiveness, those then will not be qualifying payments. And then otherwise, you just don’t want delayed payments to be impacting your credit score, your credit rating in any significant way. So I think automation with student loans is great. That’s one where I’m thinking a little bit more about strategy, making sure that I have a plan, I’ve worked through my goals, I’ve worked through the budget, I’ve determined that this much each and every month, I can put toward my student loans. Boom. I’m putting that on automation, and I’m paying my loan servicing company on-time, right out of my paycheck, first thing before I hope that I have that money left over at the end of the month. The other thing I think that’s important to note with student loans and automation is that when it comes to refinancing your student loans, you’ll notice that the various quotes that you’ll get from the refinance lenders, those private companies, is they will typically give you a quote with the assumption that they’re giving you some discount to automate those payments, to set up the autopay on that. So if you do not automate those payments, then you may not get that quote that they’re advertising. So if you need more information on refinancing or have questions about what I just said there, head on over to YourFinancialPharmacist.com/refinance, we have a great page, great resources about where to get started with refinancing, who it’s for, who it’s not for, and if you’re ready to get started, companies that you can pull quotes from that we recommend and that our YFP community gets cash bonuses for.

So area No. 1 was bills, area No. 2 was student loans, area No. 3, for me, is college savings. So here, I’m thinking about 529 plans. And similar to retirement savings, which would be the fourth area, whether that’s 401k’s, 403b’s, Roth IRAs, whatever that would be, now, we’re really talking about automating the savings for the future. So you may look and say, OK, I’ve got three children. I’ve determined that I really want to start saving for kids’ college, and I’m going to start at $50 a month, $100 a month, $150 bucks a month. And you can set up a 529 plan where not only does it auto-withdraw the money each and every month, which then also gives you a deduction on your state income taxes, but it also then will auto-determine where your money’s going in terms of the allocation. So example, for my Ohio 529 plan for my kids, I have I think it’s $100-150 per month that goes toward each kid. And then from there, that $100 or $150 is being distributed in five different investing funds that I have set up automatically. So not only is the money going into the account, but then it’s automatically being invested in those accounts. When it comes to retirement savings, Brandon from the Facebook group says, “I have my retirement set to take out 15% with the employer matching 5%. And what we know from some of the studies that are out there is that the average automatic deferral rate for an employee is only about 6%. And we talked on previous episodes about probably needing closer to 15-20%, depending on your individual situation, needing 15-20% over the course of your career to achieve your long-term savings goals. So 6% is probably not going to cut it. And I think what Brandon’s doing with 15% automatic withdrawal, out-of-sight, out-of-mind, employer matching 5%, obviously then he’s getting closer to that 20% or is getting to that 20% goal. And I think this is an important one because you think about the evolution of retirement savings over time. What used to be more of a traditional pension model is now almost — for most listening — is probably 100% on your back in terms of the responsibility, whether it’s a 401k, a 403b, a Roth IRA, some combination thereof. We have to take the ownership and the work, and I think automation of retirement savings is a great one.

Now, the last one that I want to talk about, which I think is a really tangible for the listeners to get started today is setting up a series of what we call sinking funds. Now, these are established based on the set of goals that you have. So examples of sinking funds that I would throw out there could be an emergency fund, maybe it’s vacation, it could be setting up a sinking fund for purchasing a car or a car repair fund. It could be a gifts fun, so whether that’s birthday gifts throughout the year, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Christmas gifts, etc. It could be a sinking fund for a home down payment. Maybe it’s a separate sinking fund for home repairs. Maybe if you’re somebody who has significant medical expenses, you have a separate sinking fund for medical expenses. So what I’m trying to drive home here, the point with sinking funds, is that once you determine the areas and the priorities, instead of having all of this money in one lump sum in a checking or savings account, you start to separate out these funds into separate accounts, and you name them for specifically the goal that you’re trying to achieve: emergency fund, vacation, car, gifts, down payment, home repairs, medical expenses, etc. And what we know when it comes to behavioral finance is that once you name a fund something, you’re more likely to achieve the goal because it’s not in a general pot or pool of money that you lose track of in terms of where it’s going, and then obviously, you’re more likely to spend that money.

So what does this actually look like? And I mentioned before that Tim Baker, owner of Script Financial, helped Jess and I get this set up just a few months. We actually have several of these funds that are set up with an Ally, Ally.com, which is one example that you can use, many others you could do, even with your own banking institution. And so once we set a prioritized list of our goals with the dollar amounts, which, of course, came from the goal setting and the budgeting process, we then — after the budgeting process — we came up with and said, OK, each and every month, we have this total amount of discretionary, disposable income that we can assign to our goals. We then listed our goals out on paper and then based on that total dollar amount, we then said, OK, each and every month, we’re going to put x dollars toward giving, x dollars toward gifts, x dollars toward vacation, x dollars toward home maintenance. And so then what happens is each and every month on the first of the month, those dollar amounts are auto-withdrawn from our paycheck, and the rest of our income becomes what we spend for the rest of the month on groceries and all other expenses for the month out of our day-to-day checking.

So for me, there’s four basic steps here. Is No. 1, Step No. 1 is you have to have a list of prioritized goals with dollar amounts attached to them. No. 2 is you have to be able to know what that disposable income is that you have available each and every month so you can assign those dollar amounts to the goals that you’ve listed out. No. 3 is you then need to create and set up a long-term savings sinking funds account. So for us, what this looked like and it only took about 10-15 minutes for us to set this up is if I log into my Ally.com account, I have an interest checking account, which is basically the base account that we use where we need to spend money out of and then have a debit card if I need to use it. And then I have a series of separate sub-accounts. I have an emergency fund account, I have a giving account, I have a gifts account, a vacation account, and then we have a home maintenance account. And then Step No. 4 is you put those on auto-withdraw. So once you identify the list of goals with the dollar amounts, once you set up the separate sinking funds and you know exactly how much you’re going to put towards those, then you can set up the auto-withdraw so your paycheck into your checking account, once it hits your checking account, it’s an auto-withdrawal into your long-term sinking funds and those sinking accounts.

So that’s the process that we use to put our financial plan on automation, and as I began the episode and talked about why, for us, it’s about the intentionality. It’s about knowing that when it comes — when push comes to shove, if that money’s just sitting in our checking account, more likely than not going to spend it. So it puts our financial goals on automatic, and it allows us to be on the path towards achieving those goals each and every month.

One last point I would make here is that for me, the importance here of automation also comes to an important point of having accountability throughout this process, whether that’s a spouse or significant other, whether that’s a friend, whether that’s a financial planner, somebody that can keep you accountable each and every month, each and every quarter, whatever it be, to check in and say, Hey, we said these were the goals. What’s changed? What’s different? How is the progress going in terms of achieving those goals?

So I hope this episode has been hopefully a moment of inspiration, maybe even empowerment to say, think about your goals, what are those goals, how much do you want to put toward those goals each and every month, what’s the prioritization of those goals? And then setting up the sinking fund accounts to automate those goals each and every month.

So as always, thank you so much for joining us on today’s episode of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. We appreciate you listening each and every week, and as always, we would welcome any ideas that you have for future episodes. So you can shoot us an email at [email protected] or jump on over to the YFP Facebook group, and we would love to hear your ideas and input for future episodes of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. That’s for today’s episode. Have a great rest of your week.

Join the YFP Community!

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]