YFP 046: The 5 Big Mistakes Pharmacists Make With Their Student Loans


 

On Episode 46 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, YFP team members Tim Church, PharmD, BCACP, CDE and Tim Ulbrich, PharmD tackle the most common mistakes that pharmacists make with their student loans. Whether you are a student pharmacist or a practitioner in active repayment, this episode will help you avoid the common pitfalls surrounding student loan repayment.

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 046 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. Excited to be here alongside Tim Church to talk about common mistakes that pharmacists make with their student loans. So Tim Church, not that we would have any experience when it comes to student loan mistakes, right?

Tim Church: Oh, not at all. I did everything, executed it perfectly and right on the right path. No, actually, it was funny when I was thinking about this episode. And we talk about common mistakes that pharmacists make. Really, it’s the five mistakes that Tim Church made. I mean, we could have made that the name of it.

Tim Ulbrich: Seriously, it brings me back to when you and I were writing the “Seven Figure Pharmacist,” and we wrote all that student loan content and much of the other content based on the mistakes that we made. But I had, actually, the pleasure this weekend to go to Mercer University in Atlanta, Georgia, and talk with a group of their graduating students about personal finance and transitioning to new practitioner life. And as I was going through the section on student loans and had a chance to share from the mistakes that I’ve made and all the wisdom that you’ve shared and the YFP community has shared, all I could think was, man, I wish I would have had this information, right? When we graduated. Wouldn’t that have been nice?
Tim Church: That would have been great. There’s so many things I wish I could go back and do because I would have saved a ton of money in interest and just the amount I’m going to pay over the life of my loans.

Tim Ulbrich: And stress, right?

Tim Church: Yeah, definitely.

Tim Ulbrich: So where are you — quickly — where are you at in the journey of the payoff? So the Church household, where are you guys at?

Tim Church: So me personally, I have about $8,000 left. My wife, she’s got substantially more. But we’re looking at probably within a year, year and a half, we’ll knock it out.

Tim Ulbrich: So $8,000 left of how much? How much have you paid off on yours?

Tim Church: I think with capitalized interest, when I started residency and after the grace period ended, I think it was about at $189,000.

Tim Ulbrich: Wow, that’s incredible. That’s awesome. Great work.

Tim Church: Yeah, it’s a good feeling to kind of be at this point. It’s taken a lot of sacrifice and hard work just to get there.

Tim Ulbrich: So before we jump into common mistakes, and we’re going to walk through that Top 5 list, let’s just talk about current landscape. And we’re not going to go too far in detail here. I would reference listeners back to Episode 004 and 005. Episode 004, we talked about the landscape of student loans in pharmacy education. Episode 005, we had on Dr. Joey Mattingly to talk about the impact of rising student debt on a pharmacist’s income. But you know, we’re not trying to be gloom-and-doom here, we are optimists, both of us I think by nature, but the reality is new graduates are really facing an uphill battle, primarily due to rising debt levels. So Tim, kind of give us the really high level situation of what pharmacists are coming out with now and what they’re facing.

Tim Church: If we look at the most recent data from the AACP graduating survey, pharmacists are now coming out with an average $163,000. And actually, that number’s quite low. If you went to a private school, it’s actually much higher. If we go back a couple years to 2010, that figure was approximately $100,000. But one of the big problems is that if you look at pharmacists’ salary over those years, it’s not keeping pace with the average debt load that pharmacists are facing. And so this gap actually continues to widen. And so you and Joey Mattingly had talked about that before that you look at every new generation of pharmacists that’s coming out is they actually have less available income. So it’s really important, you have to a good strategy in place.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, I’m glad you mentioned the salary piece. Because I think obviously, the debt load gets a lot of attention — rightfully so — but one of the variables we’re always looking is, well, if salaries are keeping up with the debt load, not that that’s good that debts are still going up, but still, at least it’s accounting for that increase. But the reality that we see, as you mentioned, is salaries aren’t even keeping pace with inflation for the most part — oh, and by the way, you’ve got the interest rate component, with many students dealing with these unsubsidized loans with 6% interest rates, private loans that are even higher. So all of this to kind of give you the backdrop that we know it’s a problem, we know it’s increasing, and all the more reason that we have to be diligent in terms of those making that transition into new practitioner life to say, ‘What’s my game plan? What am I going to do to tackle these loans? And how can I avoid some of the common pitfalls and mistakes surrounding them?’ So Tim, let’s walk through five common mistakes that pharmacists make when it comes to student loans. No. 1 is not knowing all of the options that are out there. So just quickly, walk us through the options that are out there. And we’ve obviously talked about some of these on other episodes, but helping especially maybe those that are listening about to graduate or even those that have been out for a couple years and haven’t thought about this or even younger students who are trying to get ahead of this. What are the major options that are available to graduates when it comes to repayment of student loans?

Tim Church: Well, I think the first one and the most important one is you really want to look at are there any tuition reimbursement or repayment programs available where you’re currently working. There’s a lot of federal programs out there, such as the VA or the Indian Health Services and some of the military programs. And then a lot of states actually offer reimbursement programs. And those are essentially free money because you’re going to work for an employer for x amount of years. In exchange for that service, they’re going to help pay back some of your loans. So I think that’s really the first thing to look for. I know one of our friends, Alex Barker, he actually was able to get through the VA in his position something the Education Debt Reduction program. He was able to save a lot of money because the VA picked up a lot of the bill there. So I think those are the programs you want to look for first. And then if you’ve kind of exhausted that and say, ‘Hey, I’m not really eligible for that,’ it really comes down to two options. It’s forgiveness or non-forgiveness. And when we talk about forgiveness, really we’re talking about the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program in which you work for a government or a nonprofit 501c3 company, and essentially if you make qualifying payments over 10 years, you can have your loans forgiven tax-free. There’s also an option to get forgiveness through non-PSLF where you make income-driven payments for 20-25 years, and your loans are forgiven. Once you kind of go outside of that, it really comes down to do you keep your loans in the federal system and pay them off based on the term? Or on your term and pay them off at a pace that you want to accomplish that? Or do you refinance them out of the federal system and try to get a better interest rate?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I would reference your point about PSLF, I’d reference listeners back to Episode 018, where we talked about maximizing the benefits of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness, talked in a little bit more detail about what that program is. So just to recap what you had said there is first, you’re really looking for the tuition reimbursement repayment plans that are out there. So is there free money available? You gave the example of the Education Debt Reduction Plan. And then if not, you’re really looking at forgiveness or non-forgiveness. Within forgiveness, you’ve got the PSLF or non-PSLF forgiveness. And then with non-forgiveness, you’re either going to pay them off inside the federal system or you’re going to pursue a refinance. And we’re going to talk a little bit more about refinance as we go through these five options here. So Tim, as we were working on the course — and I think Tim Baker and I have talked about this to the listeners, but I don’t know if I’ve talked about it with you is that we’ve really laid you out there as the mastermind of this student loan course that we’re getting ready to launch. And we’ve certainly helped along the way, but you really have been the brains of getting this thing together. And No. 1 thing you were talking about not really knowing all the options. We spend a ton of time inside of the course walking through this. Would you say that’s fair?

Tim Church: Definitely. I mean, this is really the bulk of the material that we get into because it’s also going to determine how much you pay over the life of the loans.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, absolutely. And I think as I think about the big takeaways of that course, this is a big option is knowing, making sure you know all of the repayment options that are available to you and then making sure you can walk away with clarity to say, ‘This one repayment option is the best for my situation.’ And as we’ve been working through that course, what we have come up with, which I think is probably one of the biggest takeaways of the course, is what we’re referring to as the YFP Decision Table. Talk us through what that is and why that’s so powerful in terms of coming to the best decision for a payoff plan.

Tim Church: Well, I think one of the things that it does is first of all, it brings all of the options to the table. So it really lays out everything that you’re eligible for. And then once you’ve put those in place, actually do the math. So over the life of the loans, whether you’re refinancing through a specific term, whether you stay in the federal government, whether you’re going for forgiveness, is to really calculate over the life and figure out from a mathematical standpoint, what is going to be your best option? Now, as you and I talked about it, math is definitely important and a lot of times, the most important thing. But there’s a lot of other factors that go into that kind of decision. And I think that’s really a key component of what we break down in the course is how do you combine that math with all of the other factors that you’re facing?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, absolutely. And I hope if there’s students listening to this episode right now, even if you’re in your first or second or even third professional year, I hope you’re hearing that, hey, now is the time to really kind of learn what these options are, talk with your financial aid officer, begin to learn more about what is forgiveness? What is PSLF or non-PSLF? What are the income-driven plans? And for those already in active repayment, you know, it’s never too late to make sure you’re in the best repayment plan. And I think that’s really what we’re honing in on in a big way with the course. And I’m speaking here out of mistakes that I’ve made just wandering through the grace period without any intentionality, which really takes us to our second common mistake and the second thing we address is not being intentional. So the idea here that people kind of are passive and not having a plan. So talk to us, Tim, in terms of what you’re seeing with graduates and what you’re hearing with graduates about not being intentional. And what are some things that they could do to be intentional?

Tim Church: I think the thing to keep in mind is that if you have federal loans, you’re going to get dropped right into the standard repayment plan, which is a 10-year term. What’s interesting is that I think we pulled up that article from Credible, and they were estimating that pharmacists will take on average 14 years to pay off their loans. So keeping that in mind, it could be even extended further than the standard 10-year repayment plan. But what I tend to see is that whatever repayment plan kind of starts, whether that’s standard or maybe something less aggressive, either graduated or extended, is that people tend to stay in those repayment plans, and they’re just making the minimum payments over time. But the term itself is not, in my opinion, really a strategy. It’s just the default in terms of what you have to pay. But if you take that a step further and say, what is my game plan? Is it to pay the loans off faster than the term in order to save money in interest? Or do I have a low interest rate, and I’m trying to make sure that I’m putting enough in retirement, putting enough for a down payment on a house? There’s a lot of those variables that go into play. And so I think you have to really look beyond that term.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and as you’re talking here, Tim, it reminds me of you know, when I graduated — and I’ll humbly admit to the audience, I couldn’t tell you a single thing, not really much at all about my loans. I didn’t know if they were unsubsidized, subsidized. I probably didn’t even know what those terms meant, didn’t know the interest rates, didn’t know repayment plans. So I wandered into the standard 10-year period. I wandered through the grace period without really understanding what that meant for interest accruing. And one of the things I look at in hindsight is that I could have either refinanced or I could have probably done PSLF. And looking at my situation and kind of beliefs and wanting to get those paid off, I probably would have went with an aggressive refinance. But because I wasn’t intentional, I basically sat there for 10 years with most of my loans at 6.8%. And that hurts when I know I could have refinanced probably below 5%, and I think that just speaks as one example about the power of doing your homework and trying to make sure you can put a plan in place and take advantage of at least trying to minimize the interest you’re paying or for those that choose forgiveness, making sure you’re intentional about going after forgiveness as well.

Tim Church: Yeah, I mean, I think about that for my personal situation. Here I am, I’ve worked for the VA now for about seven years. And had I known about — No. 1, had I known about PSLF, I would have made the right moves at that time to figure out what I had to do to accomplish this because really, I’d be looking at three more years, and I’d have all my loans forgiven.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and remember when we were in Baltimore back in February, I think you and I after we both had the realization we could have done PSLF, we went back and did some of the calculations to say, hey, what if we would have actually lowered our AGI? What if we would have went all in on retirement savings? What would that have been? What did we come with? It was like a few hundred thousand dollars, right, was the swing?

Tim Church: Yeah, it wasn’t a small chunk of change.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, lesson learned, but that’s OK. That’s OK. Alright, so moving onto No. 3 here, we have choosing the wrong repayment plan. So I mean, we’ve kind of alluded to that a little bit already, but what — is there a wrong repayment plan here? Or what is the meaning behind this common mistake?

Tim Church: Well, I think definitely if you’re pursuing forgiveness, whether that’s through PSLF or non-PSLF that you have to be in the right repayment plan to make sure that you’re getting qualified payments, and you’re getting those to count. And a lot of people that haven’t been doing that, they’re actually a lot of the payments they’ve made over the years don’t actually count, and the clock has to start over. So I think that’s one area where it could be a mistake if you’re not in the right repayment plan. And then I think a big one is during residency. And again, this is another mistake I made. I actually put some of my loans in forbearance because I didn’t feel like I could make the payments, but in reality, if you use some of the income-driven repayment plans, even if you don’t make a payment, even if it’s $0 or a very small amount, there’s some really perks with using some of those plans to actually minimize the interest, depending on what your overall payoff strategy is.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think this goes and feeds nicely into what we talked about there, point No. 2 about being intentional because if you’re doing the math and you’re doing your homework and you’re learning about these plans, you’re more likely going to be opting into the right strategy. So you gave that example of PSLF, you have to be in a qualifying plan to ultimately obviously eventually have that money forgiven. So if you’re intentional and you’re doing your homework, you’re going to pay sure that happens. OK, No. 4, which I know you and I both talk about a lot between each other and we’ve talked about it on the podcast. And I would reference our listeners back to Episodes 029 and 030, which was all about refinancing student loans. So No. 4 is not considering refinancing. Now, we specifically put here considering because for some people, they shouldn’t refinance. But for many others, they should at least evaluate it. So talk to us about just briefly refinancing and why this is a common mistake that you see.

Tim Church: Well, when you refinance your loans, your main goal is to really get a lower interest rate. You’re trying to pay less money in interest over the course of the loan. I think the big thing is is that if you’re going to plan on staying in the federal loan system and pay off your loans because either you’re not eligible for forgiveness or you don’t want to be in debt for 20-25 years using non-PSLF forgiveness, you have to take a strong look at refinancing. And I kind of go back to your situation, Tim, where most of your loans were sitting at I think over 6% you said, but you probably could have been getting anywhere from 3-4% during that time. And you would have paid substantially less in interest. But the faster you make that move, the less you’re going to pay over time, obviously. I think one of the big things is there’s a lot of myths out there about refinancing. This may have been true a number of years ago, but a lot of people, they feel that they’re losing all of the protections of the federal system when they refinance. And it’s true. There are some things that you’re probably not going to have if you make that move. One of those is access to income-driven plans. So if you have a situation where your income’s not steady or you plan on changing jobs and you have some uncertainty, then yeah, that’s something that you probably don’t want to give up. The other thing is death and disability. So this is interesting because some companies offer that same protection. So if you die, your loans are forgiven in that event or if you become permanently disabled, so that’s same with the federal government. Others are not. So that’s certainly one thing you have to keep in mind. Obviously, one of the biggest ones is that if you’re currently pursuing PSLF or you plan to pursue PSLF or forgiveness, for that matter, you definitely don’t want to refinance because you disqualified yourself. But again, if you’re not going for any forgiveness program, then it’s probably going to be a great option again, going back to the interest that you’re going to pay.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I would point listeners back to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance. We’ve got a great page about refinance education, what to look for, what are must-haves before you sign up with a company, who should, who should not. And we’ve got a great calculator on that page. So if you’re thinking, how much would I actually save in a refinance after you get a couple quotes, we’ve got a tool on there that will help you figure that out, determine if it’s worth it, and so I would highly encourage you to check that out. And even thinking, Tim, back to the course that we’re building, I think that’s one of my favorite parts is we talked about the decision tables, it’s really helpful to see everything from PSLF all the way to a five-year refinance, which is very aggressive. And I think that’s what we’re trying to do is get people to see all of the options, weigh the pros and cons, look at the math, and then as you mentioned already, layer onto that math the emotional component and other factors that will ultimately determine the best payoff strategy. But refinance has to be at least considered in that mix, correct?

Tim Church: Definitely. I mean, I think it’s probably the single most powerful strategy for tackling your loans if you’re not going to pursue forgiveness because if you look at current interest rates in the federal loan system are 6% or higher, even now you can get interest rates, I’ve seen quotes in the 3’s to 4’s. Even that change by a couple percentages, depending on the balance of your loan, I mean, we’re talking $20,000 and up. I mean, it depends on your balance. I mean, the bigger your balance you have, the bigger the savings that you can get. And I know for me, I think I’ve calculated over time because I’ve actually refinanced my loans twice and was able to get a better interest rate each time, but I know my savings over that point of starting out with $180,000+, it’s probably been about $30,000-$40,000 in interest that I’ve saved.
Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think you’ve done that calculation before. I’ve seen it either on the website or one of the resources that if you take the average indebtedness of a pharmacist and you assume, you know, various interest rates that are normal with what’s in the market right now, the average pharmacist could probably be saving somewhere around $30,000. Now, obviously that’s highly dependent upon personal situation, interest rates, debt-to-income ratios, what rate they get on a refinance and so forth, how fast they want to pay them off or not. But I think the point being here is that it is for some people, it is not for other people, but it at least has to be a consideration and a part in evaluating. So again, yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance. And we also have a lot in the course about refinancing and making sure you’re considering it amongst other options. OK, No. 5, hopefully Dave Ramsey is not listening to this podcast. I’m pretty sure he doesn’t listen to our podcast. But No. 5 we have here is not taking advantage of employer match while paying off loans. So obviously, I’m giving Dave Ramsey a hard time. I like a lot of his content. But this is one that he would disagree with us on. So why are we adamant of the employer match, even in the midst of that time period of paying off loans?

Tim Church: Well, I think you really want to take advantage of that free money. And if that’s a tool that’s available to you, you’re really missing out if you’re not getting that free money each and every year and taking advantage of compound interest. I think one of the things with Dave Ramsey is that a lot of the people, they don’t have the same debt load as the average pharmacist, and so we’re looking at — we talked about that Credible study that the average pharmacist, they were talking about 14 years in debt. And obviously, that depends, and there’s a lot of factors involved with that. If you do absolutely nothing for retirement for over a decade or several years, you’re going to be way behind where you need to be if you’re trying to plan on retiring before the age of 90.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think I was having a discussion with a student at Mercer this weekend — and I know we talk a lot on this podcast about this balancing of debt versus investing. And I think it’s such a hard question for lots of reasons. And here, I think this is a no-brainer. You take the match is what we both I think philosophically believe in. But you know, then the question becomes, what beyond that? And to me, one of the variables is where are you in your trajectory of retirement savings? And how much you either have and what’s your timeline to retirement? So there’s a fair number of nontraditional pharmacy graduates that maybe it’s their second career, and their answer to that question looks very different than a 24-year-old graduate, right? So I think putting all those factors together and not just making this a black-and-white answer, but certainly I think the match is a no-brainer, although it seems like, Tim, would you agree — you know, I’m thinking of discussions in the Facebook group and others — it seems like most companies are still offering a match, but it seems there’s actually a decent amount of variety between companies, and it seems that that match component has actually gone down over the last few years.

Tim Church: Yeah, I don’t know. I think it varies so much because I feel like you guys in academia and hearing from my wife, you get these pretty awesome matches like 8-10% I’ve heard. So I think it just varies in terms of what company you work for. But I think you bring up a good point is that that number’s going to be variable, and then sort of beyond the match, that’s probably one of the most controversial topics in personal finance. And everyone has an opinion on that, and I think there can be a mathematical answer, but again, there’s so many different factors that play into that.

Tim Ulbrich: So is there any reason, Tim, you can think of why somebody wouldn’t take a match? So I’m thinking of situations like somebody who has lots of credit card debt or has no emergency fund. Like is there any situations where you could say, maybe it would be in their advantage to really focus on these other things? Or do you think pretty much across the board, it’s a good general rule of thumb?

Tim Church: I’d say probably for most people, it’s going to be a good idea. But like you said, if you have credit card debt at 14-15%, you’re probably better getting the return on knocking that out first before you start putting in towards the retirement. I think that for most people, it’s definitely a great idea. You want to take advantage of that free money. But if you’re swamped in credit card debt, and you’re having trouble even making your bills every month and putting food on the table, and you’re in some extreme situation, then yeah, maybe temporarily you don’t even put anything towards retirement until you can get to a point where you can actually breathe.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah. And I would add to that too, you know, because I think somebody might hear that and say, ‘Well, even if it’s credit card debt at 15% or 18% or whatever, like I’m getting 100% free money.’ And maybe Dave Ramsey would like this part, but I would add to this discussion is don’t forget about the behavioral components of this, right? So if I’m contributing let’s say 3% towards retirement because my employer is matching 3, even if I’m doing that, that’s on autopilot and I’m not necessarily taking a very active role in that process. If I’m intentionally taking money and paying down a credit card bill, and I’m seeing that reduction happen, that is a piece that I’m taking a very active role in. And there’s power and value in that process. So again, all the more reason that these aren’t necessarily black and white answers, but what we’re saying here in point No. 5 is that for most people listening that the employer match, even in the event of student loan debt, is probably going to be a good play. Alright, so there we have it. Five common mistakes that we see pharmacists making, many of them we have made ourselves. So we hope this has been insightful, and I would just point you back to this is a very small sampling of what we are going to be talking about in a lot of detail in our student loan course that we’re getting ready to release very soon. And as I mentioned, we have 14 lessons across three modules. It’s packed with lots of content taught by Tim Church, Tim Baker, myself, we’ve got a Facebook group that’s going to be exclusive to the people that are in the course, so lots of great information, all really designed to give you confidence in having a repayment strategy that is going to be best for your personal situation and getting clarity on that strategy. So as a final reminder, if you head on over to courses.yourfinancialpharmacist.com, if you use the coupon code LOANRX, that will be good until Friday, May 4. We’ve got 19 seats left in our beta testing group until Friday, May 4. At the time of this recording, 19 seats left, and we’ll take the remainder of those at first come, first served. Have a great rest of your week, everyone.

Join the YFP Community!

 

 

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 045: How to Determine Your Disability Insurance Needs


 

On Episode 45 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, YFP team member Tim Church and Certified Financial Planner Tim Baker discuss some of the key features of disability insurance and walk through how to get the right coverage.

PolicyGenius

Several reputable companies offer disability insurance but it can take a lot of time and energy to get multiple quotes. YFP has partnered with Policygenius, an online independent broker to help you quickly shop multiple companies for the coverage that’s right for you. They have a very user-friendly interface and their team will help you through the entire process from application to signing a policy. You can even get an estimate without entering your personal information https://www.policygenius.com/yourfinancialpharmacist

Episode Transcript

Tim Baker: What’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 045 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. I am taking the host seat today. And I’m joined by Tim Church, who hasn’t been on for quite a bit. Today, we’re going to be talking all about disability insurance. Last week in Episode 044, Tim Ulbrich walked down the path for him and his family, talking life insurance and term life insurance, more specifically. So this week, to kind of continue on the insurance theme, we’re bringing on Tim Church, and we’re going to talk all about disability insurance, what that picture looks like for him, how to basically price disability insurance and what that looks like, and hopefully you walk away from this episode with a little bit more confidence in the disability insurance arena. So Tim Church, welcome back to the podcast.

Tim Church: Thanks, Tim. Great to be back on as always. I thought you guys did an awesome job last week talking about life insurance. And I think that and disability insurance are probably some of the least sexiest personal finance topics, maybe just a step above taxes, but obviously, I think it’s something that’s important.

Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s funny because like when I meet with clients, you know, one of the things — and we’ve talked about this in terms of how I price working with clients, it’s about income and net worth. So you know, what I tell clients is when I give them recommendations, I’m trying to figure out, OK, what’s the best way to help them grow and protect their income and grow and protect their net worth while keeping their goals in mind. And the life insurance and the disability insurance are all about that. And it’s definitely — I know you guys talk about in the “Seven Figure Pharmacist,” it’s definitely a defensive posture because you’re basically trying to protect what you have. So it is super important, and I think it’s one of the more overlooked things that pharmacists, at least in my experience, will have in place with their financial plan. So we’re going to get into disability insurance and kind of unpack that whole issue. But before we jump into that, why don’t you tell everyone what’s been going on with you and what you’ve been up to since the last podcast?

Tim Church: Well, I’ve just been kind of hanging out here down in Florida, getting some nice weather, starting to warm up. But other than that, I’ve got three words: Student loan course. So basically, I’ve been knee-deep, trying to get everything ready for our beta group that’s going to be starting in a week or two here. And really, it’s just been a labor love and really excited to see it all come together. Looking back when we first started out the outline, I think I underestimated and think all of us did, all the moving pieces that were going to be required to get it up and running and how many Saturday morning marathon sessions that you and I would have. But basically, you know, it’s been fun. And I think it’s interesting how every time you and I talk, we somehow keep adding more and more content. But CEO Tim Ulbrich is basically putting the hammer down and saying, we’ve got to get to the finish line, which I think is a good play.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and when we had our last T3 conference kind of in Baltimore, this was one of the big points that we were working on is working through the course, and it’s always great to have you and Tim in Baltimore and working through this stuff. I think when we did that way back when, I don’t know if it was March or February or when it was, but we thought we were pretty close, and then we looked at it some more, and we’re kind of at the point where we’re shaving the ice away from this perfect statue, this ice statue. So yeah, I think for me, I just need to sit down and get my videos finalized. I feel like they’ve been there waiting to be recorded. So I’m anxious to get that done, and I think that will be done this week. But we still have some spots left for the beta group, so if you still want to get in on that, it’s 50% off, so you can go to courses.yourfinancialpharmacist.com and enter code LOANRX. So go to courses.yourfinancialpharmacist.com and enter code LOANRX, and that’s for 50% off. And what we’re really trying to get at here is is this course delivering everything that we say it will? And basically, what we believe that this course will do is for one of the major pains for pharmacists, 89% of pharmacists that graduate pharmacy school will have loans is really to provide some type of clarity with their loans in terms of inventory, what they actually owe, who they owe, inventory their feelings about the debt, and then come to a strategy that basically fits their situation and what — there’s a lot of information and sometimes misinformation out there in terms of the student loans and the forgiveness programs out there, and then really how to optimize your situation and get everything you can, either out of forgiveness or even a nonforgiveness strategy. So Tim, do you have anything else to add on student loans before we jump into disability?

Tim Church: No, I think you covered it pretty well. I mean, just excited to get it off the ground. I think it’s going to provide a lot of value to people.

Tim Baker: Yeah. So do I. OK, so let’s get into this. So I think one of the things that we probably should talk about first — and I think this is one thing that we often talk about with financial planning in general is why should we have disability insurance? So Tim, for your particular situation, you know, you look at your financial picture. What are the big reasons why you think disability insurance is important?

Tim Church: Well, I think what it comes down to simply is could I survive if I suddenly was unable to work? And whether that’s because I got in an accident or because of an illness. And at currently, basically it’s not going to happen. My wife and I are dependent on me bringing in an income right now. And she works as well, but it would be very tough, especially with still paying off her student loans and just to be able to live the lifestyle that we currently have. So I think that’s really the biggest thing when I think about disability insurance.

Tim Baker: Yeah. And I think for a lot of people, one of the things that we mentioned in the lead-up here was that for a lot of pharmacists and really, young professionals, it’s one of the things that is often overlooked. And I think part of it is is that feeling of invincibility, part of it is it just doesn’t make the cut when we talk about all the things that we have competing for our income. But it is really imperative that pharmacists have it in place. And like we say time and time again, the average pharmacist will make $9 million over the course of their career. $6 million of that will flow through their bank accounts. And you know, our listeners, Tim, you and Andrea, you guys spent a lot of money to get this degree, which affords you the ability to earn more than kind of the average American. So I think it’s best to protect that. And outside of kind of the time factor with a lot of my clients, their second biggest asset is their ability to earn. So I think a proper policy in place, whether it’s between the employer-provided or a supplemental disability policy, which we’ll get into, I think it’s imperative for this part of the equation. And just to give you guys some context, you know, life insurance is typically — I don’t want to say it’s the sexy part of insurance because I don’t know if there is a sexy part of insurance — but life insurance, typically when people think of insurance, I think, you know, and buying policies, they think of that because it’s, oh, I have a $1 million policy or a $500,000 policy. It resonates more with people. But disability, you know, disability insurance I think is as important, if not more, in the sense that you know, according to the Social Security Administration, 25% of today’s 20-year-olds will become disabled. And I think it’s for a period of at least three months before age 65. And we know that a lot of people out there don’t have the prerequisite emergency fund or things that they can do to survive that three months or even beyond. So again, it’s important to have that policy in place.

Tim Church: And I find, Tim, is that a lot of my friends and colleagues, they seem to be very underinsured in this area. And when I say that, I mean they basically either don’t have a policy or something that’s very minimal, and I think it kind of goes back to that feeling that you know, you may be young and healthy or that something really bad would have to happen, but what’s interesting is I actually personally know some pharmacists who became disabled and couldn’t work for over a year. And a couple of those were really freak accidents where they experienced some head trauma and basically, they had cognitive deficits and they weren’t able to work because of it. And I know another pharmacist, she actually had really bad rheumatoid arthritis. And that really put her in and out of work, and sometimes she was only able to work part-time. But these are actually real cases that I know of where I don’t know their situation, but essentially, they would have needed disability insurance unless they had some significant wealth already accumulated.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and it’s crazy — and I shared this story last week about a colleague working with clients that were widowed or widowered — I don’t know if that’s a word — but basically, they had life insurance in place, and thank goodness that they did because they had three young kids. But you know, this usually hits home when you know someone or you have real life experience. And it’s really not a question of if, it’s when for people to come into contact that are going to go through this type of thing. So you always think that it’s going to happen to someone else, and I think there’s a bias out there, and I should know what that bias is, but you always think it’s going to happen to someone else until it happens to you.

Tim Church: Overconfidence.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and maybe it is overconfidence. So I think it’s definitely important to kind of hear that and just take — like again, a lot of our listeners, you guys have worked so hard to get to a point where you can earn that six-figure income. And you want to protect it for the sake of your lifestyle and for your family, you want to make sure that you’re protecting that. And it really doesn’t take much in terms of effort to kind of get the protection that you need. So hopefully, this episode brings a little bit more clarity to that. And I know you guys brought it up in “Seven Figure Pharmacist” quite a bit. I think it’s hopefully something that, you know, maybe after the third or fourth time of us talking about it, it empowers our listeners to get that insurance in place.

Tim Church: Yeah, and I’m always curious as to the reasons why people don’t. And I think we talked about just that feeling of invincibility, especially if you’re young. But I think the cost also sometimes deters people. When you look at life insurance and some of the other insurance coverages, we’ll get into this, but disability insurance is a little bit more expensive than some of those. And so when you look at just the cost itself, you’re looking at that and saying, ‘Wow. Can I really afford that much extra?’ But then you have to look on the flipside is really can you afford not to have it?

Tim Baker: Yeah, and it should just be baked into your monthly budget, in a sense. And one of the things of life is that, you know, back in the day, you know, your employer used to cover it just like they covered a lot of other things, and it’s not necessarily the case anymore. So again, it’s very important to kind of take control of the situation and get the type of policy that is going to work for you. So what do you think, Tim? Do you think we should kind of break down the types of policies?

Tim Church: Yeah, let’s unpack that. I mean, one of the things that I’ve seen just in my own research and things that we got ready for “Seven Figure” is that disability insurance policies can be very complex. There’s a lot of extra features, add-ons, things like that. And I know when I applied for coverage before, it was like buying a car. You have your base model, and then there’s like 20 upgrades, features, things you can add. So Tim, can you kind of break down the two basic types of disability insurance?

Tim Baker: Yes. So the two broad types of disability insurance are going to be what’s called short-term disability and long-term disability. And I would say not to get caught up in the semantics of what short-term and what long-term is. It’s kind of a moving target for every carrier, every company out there. Essentially, what you want is a policy that covers you in the event of your disability. And we’re going to talk through some of the different aspects of that. Typically, you want a longer term disability policy in place that will last a period of years, if not until basically retirement age. But there are other policies out there that are more kind of stop gaps that a short-term policy would fill in for. So those are the two broad ones are short-term disability and long-term disability.

Tim Church: And wouldn’t you say, Tim, that when you’re looking at kind of that benefit period or the time that you would have the disability insurance coverage, it really kind of comes down as how long would you actually need those benefits in terms of you know, could you accumulate enough wealth by the age of 50, 55 and maybe not need it all the way until retirement? So you could break it down, if you wanted to, in terms of where you would expect to be retired or when you would actually need that income support. Is that a good way to look at it?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I mean, I think what I often say is that I would recommend just like we would recommend an emergency fund or life insurance policies or whatever, I’m going to recommend basically what the textbook suggests. So typically, the textbook would say, ‘Get a long-term disability policy that would last until your Medicare age,’ which would be like 65 — I think it’s 65 — until retirement. So typically, that would be where we would start with a client. And then from there, you know, you might look at that policy like, ‘Gees, Tim, that’s like really expensive. I don’t think I’m prepared for that.’ And that’s kind of when we start looking at some of these other variables that we’ll get into or these key features that we’ll get into that we can slide around to see, OK, what is more in line with your budget. But typically, the textbook would say, ‘Have a policy until retirement age.’

Tim Church: Gotcha. And then when we talk about how much coverage you actually need, when you break that down, so how do you usually walk through clients to talk about the actual needs?

Tim Baker: Yeah, so typically, you’re going to want roughly around 60% of your gross income. So that is before taxes are taken out. And typically, it’s quoted or it’s priced based on monthly amount. So if you make $10,000 per month, you’re going to want something that’s going to cover you for around $6,000. And the reason that that is is you know — and it depends on who is actually buying the insurance, whether it’s you or your employer. It depends on if your employer buys it, then the benefit comes to you taxed. If you buy it, so you’re buying a policy with after-tax dollars, the benefit comes to you as tax-free. But 60% is typically the number that you’re going to want to look at. But again, it’s the same thing with the coverage period. You might get to that point and you say, ‘Wow. 60% until I’m retired is going to cost me this much.’ And that may be where you say, ‘Well, I can probably get by with 50% or 40%,’ and it’s basically a conversation that I have with clients. Obviously, I want to push them to protect as much of their income as they can, but at the end of the day, it is a cash flow concern.

Tim Church: Yeah, and it comes down to also too what kind of lifestyle would you want to have if you become disabled? And do you need that amount? And I guess that’s probably where you can talk with your clients about determining maybe some more specific needs, client-to-client and just kind of asking, do you want to maintain your current lifestyle? Would you be OK if it was reduced a little bit?

Tim Baker: Right. Exactly. And then that’s kind of where you know, the more of the human side comes into it is if a disability event were to happen, what do you see yourself doing and that type of thing. And how do you see yourself living.

Tim Church: Yeah. So we talked about coverage amounts. So the percentage of your income that you’re actually getting a policy for, so that’s going to have a big impact on the cost of the policy. And then also how long those benefits that you would actually receive. And then the next thing that comes into play a lot is the elimination period. So basically, what’s the waiting period between the time that you put a claim in for your disability and you actually receiving benefits. And sometimes, I think that’s where it can be interesting to talk about do you need a short-term and a long-term disability policy? Or could you just have the long-term disability policy? And I guess that really comes down to is whatever that elimination period is that you choose, is do you have a good emergency fund to cover you in that gap or that window?

Tim Baker: Right. So the elimination period or the waiting period or you could think of this as like a deductible that you pay in time before your benefit gets to you should match pretty closely to what your emergency fund is. So if your emergency fund reserves is for three months, 90 days, which I think is typically best practice, especially for a dual-income earner, that’s probably where your elimination period can come out. But again, you can toggle this in a way that you can get policies that have elimination periods after 30 days or you can wait a whole year, and that basically makes the period or the premium a lot cheaper if you wait a year. But then you’ve got to ask yourself, if I become disabled, can I wait a whole year to get my benefit? And for a lot of people, it’s no, but it depends, again, on a case-by-case basis. I would say best practice is probably look at 90-day, so a three-month waiting period once you submit your claim and then price the policies from there.

Tim Church: One of the other things that typically comes up on policies for disability insurance is own occupation or gainful occupation. So can you talk a little bit about that, Tim?

Tim Baker: The big definitions — so these are basically definitions of disability. So your policy is going to have a definition. And the big ones out there are own occupation, which is basically the inability to engage in one’s own occupation, so like a pharmacist. And that’s typically the most expensive because it’s basically the most limited in terms of your ability to receive that or the most inclusive for your ability to receive that benefit. And then there’s something that’s called any occupation, typically referring to is basically if your policy is any occupation or any occ, you might hear, or own occ. Any occ is the inability to engage in any occupation. So this is if you’re a pharmacist, Tim, if you have a policy that is any occupation and you become disabled, but you can’t necessarily be a pharmacist. So maybe you have some, like you said, cognitive disability, but you can still be a greeter at WalMart, as an example, then your claim for your disability insurance would be denied because they could say based on the definition of disability, you can still hold gainful employment, but you just can’t do what you’ve been trained to do. So any occupation is one that is more liberal in terms of your durability to say whether you’re disabled or not. And to me, I would say this would be one that’s definitely kind of a nonnegotiable. I would want clients to make sure that you have an own occupation because think of all the things that you could theoretically do for work. And for you to be denied that benefit would be a tragedy, I think.

Tim Church: Yeah, and it kind of goes back to what we talked about. I mean, how many years of school and training do we go through in order to be able to generate that income? And so of course, you’ll want to protect that and that ability to make that salary.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and some of the other definitions out there that you might see would be like modified any occupation, which would basically be inability to engage in any reasonable occupation that one might be suited by education, experience and training. So that’s maybe kind of an in-betweener. And then the other one you would see is social security definition of disability, which is probably the most stringent. And they basically define that as a mental or physical impairment that prevents the worker from engaging in any substantial gainful employment. The social security definition of disability is the most stringent. So if you have a policy that follows that guideline, you’re definitely going to want something outside of that policy to cover yourself.

Tim Church: Before we continue with the rest of today’s episode, here’s a quick message from our sponsor.

Sponsor: As a pharmacist, you’re going to make millions of dollars over your working career, and you’ve worked hard to get where you are. Take a minute to answer this question: Would you be able to support yourself and your family if you were suddenly unable to work because of an accident or illness? Disability insurance provides you with money to cover your bills and expenses if you’re unable to work. Your employer may offer some coverage, but it may not be enough, and it may not follow you if you were to change jobs. That’s why it can be a good idea to have a private, long-term, disability insurance policy. We want to provide the YFP community with an easy, one-stop solution to help you get the coverage that you need. Therefore, we have partnered with PolicyGenius, America’s No. 1 independent, online insurance marketplace, so you can quickly get quotes from reputable companies rather than wasting time having to make phone calls and shop multiple websites online. You can get your estimate today by going to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance. That’s yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance.

Tim Baker: Now back to the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. So Tim Church, I know we’re talking lots about these different features. Why don’t we jump onto PolicyGenius — and actually, listeners, if you go to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/PolicyGenius, you can actually go through the process that I’m going to take Tim Church down. And just to kind of reiterate this, I talked about this with Tim Ulbrich in terms of the life insurance. You know, one of the reasons we like PolicyGenius is because when you get on there, you’re quickly seeing how clean their interface is. So a lot of these insurance companies that I worked with in the past, you know, their websites are difficult to navigate and just not great. And I guess I’m more of an Apple snob, so I like nice, clean interfaces. And they don’t disappoint in this regard. I think more importantly, you know, from being a fee-only guy, not really liking the commissions, their agents that you might interact with do not get paid a commission. They’re basically paid a salary, so not really incentivized you to put you in a policy that is going to be in your best interests and not yours. And then the other thing that I like is they’re more or less a broker. So they can go out to all of the best companies out there and price the insurance carriers and quote the insurance carriers from across, basically across the board. So you know, for these reasons — and I would say too is when I work with them for clients and I’m sure with our listeners, if you have a question — and the education centers there are great — but if you have a question about your policy or about the process, super eager to help and super responsive, even if you have existing policies, they’ll look at that and kind of give you some advice. So I’ve been nothing but impressed with them in terms of being a good partner for Script Financial and I know with Your Financial Pharmacist, I think they’ve taken care of some of our listeners out there, and we appreciate them and their place in the space of insurance. So Tim Church, are you ready to kind of hop on here and do this thing?

Tim Church: Yeah, let’s do this.

Tim Baker: OK. So again, you can go to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/PolicyGenius and basically, follow this. And Tim, the first page is going to basically take us to life insurance or disability insurance. So obviously, we’re going to go through disability insurance on this episode. So you are a male, what is your date of birth?

Tim Church: 08/14/1985

Tim Baker: You reside in the state of Florida.

Tim Church: The Sunshine State.

Tim Baker: Alright, so the next page is going to be talking about your occupation. So what’s your occupation, Tim? I forget.

Tim Church: Professional drug dealer.

Tim Baker: Alright, so pharmacist. You do work at least 30 hours this week in this occupation, which is unfortunate. How many years have you worked in this occupation?

Tim Church: So a little over seven.

Tim Baker: OK. And then highest level of education? So we have basically JD or MD or PhD.

Tim Church: We’ve got to get on them about that, about putting a PharmD selection, right?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I’ll write a strongly worded email. And then your individual income, so don’t income from a spouse or partner. So what’s that?

Tim Church: So base salary is about $125,000.

Tim Baker: OK, $125. And we’re going to assume no existing coverage. So let’s hit next here. OK. So basically, we’re going to be talking about selecting your monthly benefit. So the default here will default to 60%, which is basically the textbook recommendation. So if you pay the premium, which you will in this case, you’re going to get all of the benefits. So in your case, the recommended benefit or 60% is going to be $6,100 per month.

Tim Church: And that sounds pretty close to what actually my net take-home pay is. So that seems pretty reasonable or realistic of what I would need.

Tim Baker: Right. And that’s kind of the idea is to match that. Now, you know, listeners can’t see this, but on the page, basically it says for a 42-year-old male living in Florida, the monthly range, so this is kind of the first place where you’ll see kind of a quote, so that is $111-151. And the plan features, it says existing coverage of $0, benefit amount of $6,100, a waiting period of 90-days and the benefit period up to age 65. And then this is own occupation, residual disability coverage, which we’ll talk about, and then non-cancellable feature, which we’ll talk about. So this is kind of like the first page where you see more or less, it gives you an idea of where we’re going. So it asks the question, do you expect your income to increase significantly over the course of your career?

Tim Church: I hope so.

Tim Baker: So we’ll put yes. And the reason that we do this — and this is a good point maybe to discuss briefly about employer-provided disability insurance and then basically individually owned disability insurance, which is what we’re doing now. So if you were to answer yes to this question, basically they’ll run quotes with a future increase option, which allows you to increase your benefit amount when your income increases, regardless of any changes in your health status. So the example here is if Tim knows that “Seven Figure Pharmacist” is going to continue to sell, and you’re going to sell it to every pharmacy school out there, whatever the case is, and you’re making a lot of money, you want to make sure that your benefit matches kind of the income that you’re pulling in. So that option gives you the ability to buy more. Secondarily, if you have an employer-provided benefit, they’re going to pay you some type of benefit, which is going to be taxed because they pay the benefit of the premiums, but if you were to leave that job, and you go to another pharmacy job that doesn’t provide disability insurance, then the policy that we’re buying now will give you the option to basically buy more or a future increase option to kind of make up the gap. So basically, that supplemental policy that you would buy now becomes your main, your primary policy and will make up the gap in terms of what you need. So hopefully that makes sense to our listeners out there. So now we’re going to talk about the waiting period. So this is basically that time deductible. And this particular tool will default to 90 days. So policies have waiting period of anywhere from 60-365 days. So if it’s a 60-day waiting period, then that’s typically a higher premium because you’re getting your benefit quicker. If it’s 365 days, you’ll get your benefit a year out. And that’s typically makes the policy a lot more affordable. So Tim, what would you like in terms of your waiting period?

Tim Church: Given I have a pretty decent emergency fund, let’s go put that at 180 days.

Tim Baker: OK, so you’re going to move it out a little bit. OK, so then the benefit period, so basically this is how long the policy will pay you if you become disabled. So policies typically have benefit period of two, five, 10 or up to retirement age, which could be 65 or 67 for a lot of our listeners. Obviously, the longer the period, the higher the cost of the benefit. So what would be a good age for you, Tim?

Tim Church: So I think the default of 65, that’s a good place to start.

Tim Baker: OK, I agree. OK. So then this next page is basically wrapping it up. So it does include own occupation, so this is your occupation. It also asks you about a residual disability. So basically, these are riders or clauses in the disability, and what the residual disability asking you is basically saying, do you want to be paid for partial disabilities that could potentially cause loss of income but doesn’t necessarily prevent you from working completely. So typically, the default here is to say yes. And then the final question is do you want it to be non-cancellable, which basically means as long as you pay the premiums, the insurer can’t cancel the policy or change the premiums or change the benefits. So you basically lock into all aspects of your policy. So typically, you want that as a yes as well. So is that good, Tim?

Tim Church: Yeah, that sounds good. And I was wondering, Tim, if this is a good point to talk about that if you have coverage through your employer only, and let’s say you switch jobs and your new employer doesn’t cover that and you have to get your own policy, you’re probably going to also have a health evaluation. And if you’re not as healthy as you were when you had the previous policy, this could really have a huge impact on cost and your ability to even afford a policy like that. And so even like life insurance, this may be a point where it’s good to even have something outside of your employer, just so you can avoid having the reevaluation.

Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s a great point. So that particular rider, I think if you know that potentially could happen to you or you suspect that could happen to you, I think it’s good to have that in there, so that’s another great point. And actually, Tim, the next part of this just basically asks you some basic health details. So unfortunately for these policies, pre-existing conditions are not covered. So if you have something that could potentially disqualify you, you know, as an example, if you have arthritis and then you submit a claim for arthritis, that won’t be paid by the insurer. So that’s something to be aware of. So the next question, Tim, is going to basically ask you about some conditions like asthma and sleep apnea. I know you’re a healthy guy, so instead of kind of listing all these out, we’ll just skip through those. Is that cool?

Tim Church: Sounds good.

Tim Baker: OK. So now we basically get to the end here, and your quote for long-term disability coverage is going to basically be $115 and $155. You’ll receive a benefit of $6,100 a month up to age 65 after a waiting period of 180 days. And then, and this page, you basically can toggle your all those things that I just listed out, so if you say, ‘Hey, I can get by with $5,000,’ or ‘I want my waiting period to be 90 days,’ it’ll adjust that period. But from there, you basically will go out and put in kind of your name and your email and some contact information to go get actual rates from, you know, insurance carriers like MassMutual or Guardian or some of the other ones that are out there. The tool is great in terms of giving you an idea of where you’re at to get rate proposals and actually receive those and then move forward on your policy. So Tim, does that give you a sense of kind of the process forward for disability insurance?

Tim Church: It sure does. And I think one of the things to mention here, Tim, is that if you use PolicyGenius to get life insurance, you can actually get quotes from individual companies. But for disability insurance, it’s a little bit different because you’re going to get a range of what it could cost you. And basically, PolicyGenius looks and they partner with some of these companies, and they’re trying to find you the best deal. And that’s something that one of their agents will actually provide to you.

Tim Baker: Yeah, and basically, they explain that on the website of why is it a range instead of an actual price. And they’re going to look at all the different riders and things like residual disability and own occupation, and the proposals will try to get that back to you in terms of what the policy offers. So it’s a good point. You know, one thing that I do want to circle back on before closing up here for the day — one thing I do want to circle back on is you know, a lot of pharmacists out there do have disability policies, and you know, how does this all play into, you know, buying your own? So I would say in general, you typically, if you do have a long-term and a short-term care disability policy through your employer, I view that as a benefit. OK, so Tim Church, your quote comes out to between $115-155. Is that more or less what you expected when we started going through this process?

Tim Church: Yeah, I mean, that’s essentially pretty close to what I’m actually paying for my policy now. That gets me almost the exact same benefits, up to 60% of my income. So that’s pretty — at first, I will say, after I’ve gone through the process, it’s not very shocking. But initially, it was because it’s significantly more than life insurance that I pay for and some of my other insurances. So it’s definitely a lot more expensive than some of the other things out there.

Tim Baker: So I think another for listeners to be aware of is a lot of your employers will provide disability insurance. And typically, short-term disability insurance is you know, it’s kind of icing on the cake. Typically, we don’t advise clients to go out and buy a short-term disability policy. We’ll basically say, you know, to make sure you have a good emergency fund. From a long-term disability policy, if you do have long-term disability through your employer, know that the benefit is probably not going to be enough to kind of cover your needs. You know, also understand that it probably makes sense to buy a supplemental policy to your employer policy, so a supplemental insurance policy that’ll be maybe a reduced benefit or basically to give you some additional coverage in case you do leave your job or you want to have that future purchase option in there. But again, the reason that you get a supplemental policy is the benefit might be too small, the benefit period may be too short, or it’s not the right definition — so like any occupation versus own occupation, and you want to make sure you have own occupation in place. And again, you could lose your disability insurance if you switch jobs. So if you have the disability insurance in place that has that future options, that supplemental policy that you bought to kind of cover down on some of those shortages would then become your primary insurance policy, disability policy. So it makes sense to have that in place. So Tim Church, I think we explored disability fairly in-depth. I’m glad we were able to go through the PolicyGenius quote process to kind of give an idea of what that looks like for you. So thank for coming on the podcast, and hopefully our listeners get something out of this and at least get the wheels turning in terms of what they need from, you know, their ability to protect their income.

Tim Church: Definitely. Thanks, Tim. I think it’s so important and just, like I said, like we’ve been talking about, that you worked so hard to get to where you are and also you’ve got to think about yourself and your family and who’s dependent on that income just like life insurance. So at the end of the day, it can really make you feel pretty good to have that protection in place.

Join the YFP Community!

 

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 044: How to Determine Your Life Insurance Needs


 

On Episode 44 of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, Certified Financial Planner and YFP team member Tim Baker interviews YFP Founder Tim Ulbrich to evaluate his life insurance needs and whether or not his current coverage is adequate. To learn more about whether or not you need life insurance, the pros/cons of different types of life insurance policies, how to determine how much coverage you need and where to go to get a quote from a reputable independent broker, click here.

PolicyGenius

Several reputable companies offer life insurance but it can take a lot of time and energy to get multiple quotes. YFP has partnered with Policygenius, an online independent broker to help you quickly shop multiple companies for the coverage that’s right for you. They have a very user-friendly interface and their team will help you through the entire process from application to signing a policy. You can even get an estimate without entering your personal information here.

Mentioned on the Show

  1. YFP Life Insurance Resource Page
  2. PolicyGenius
  3. YFP Episode 010 – Is Whole Life Insurance a Good Investment Strategy for College Savings?
  4. YFP Episode 032 – Finding Your Why (Part 1) – 3 Life Planning Questions
  5. YFP Episode 033 – Finding Your Why (Part 2) – The Path to Success

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 044 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast, excited to be alongside Tim Baker where he’s going to be interviewing me to determine my life insurance needs. And if you’re thinking, what do I need? What are my life insurance needs? What should I be looking at? You can head over to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/life-insurance. We’ve got a whole educational page built out that we’re going to draw from that information and this podcast, but no need to be taking notes. You can head on over to that page and get all the information that you need to determine your own life insurance needs. Just as a preview to next week, Tim Baker’s going to be interviewing Tim Church in a similar format regarding disability insurance. So this week, we’re going to cover life insurance. Next week, we’re going to cover disability insurance. So I’m excited to do this two-part episode around insurance needs. So Tim Baker, are we ready to do this?

Tim Baker: Let’s do it.

Tim Ulbrich: So I’m actually excited. This is actually on the punch list for Jess and I to do, and I think it’s well known right now by the listenership that you are the financial planner for Jess and I, and we’re working down our list of things. In Episodes 032 and 033, you interviewed Jess and I all about finding our why, and we did a live recording of what you normally would do with a client. And we’re going to do that same thing here. One of the questions I asked you at the very beginning of us working together is, hey, I’m not sure I’ve got enough life insurance coverage. I really didn’t make this decision intentionally, and I need your help and guidance to help me figure out what we might need in addition to the coverage. So we’re going to a sneak peek live conversation, and whatever I learn here, we’re actually going to be taking back and implementing as part of my life insurance plan.


Tim Baker: Yeah, and I would say Tim, you’re probably ahead of the curve when it comes to most because when I bring up life insurance to clients, it’s one of those things where it’s like, eh, I don’t really want it. And it’s one of those things that you don’t really like to talk about your premature death or disability in terms of what we’re going to go through next week with Tim Church. But you know, it’s kind of in along the lines of estate planning. We’ve talked about that a little bit when we talked about legacy folder and having proper wills and power of attorneys. It’s just one of those things that’s just not that sexy compared to maybe investment and some of the other things. So you know, I think kudos to you in terms of having some coverage in place. And for a lot of people, it’s kind of on the back burner. And it really shouldn’t be, and I’ll preface this with — not to be doom and gloom, but I have a planner that I work with in my study group who recently lost a client. She was 38, had breast cancer, three kids, so fortunately for me, that hasn’t really happened to any of my clients, but it’s not really a question of if, it’s a question of when. It’s just one of those things, and I think me working with clients, it’s important to have a lot of these policies and documents in place because you don’t know what will happen. And the thing that you think will happen to someone else could very well happen to you. And not to be Debbie Downer, but I just think it’s important to get this on the radar of a lot of people to at least start to think about it and get that protection in place.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, absolutely. And we’re going to do a sneak peek into the Ulbrich household here, and I’m going to try to be as honest and vulnerable as possible. And I’ll share here in a little bit that you know, there was a period where I didn’t have coverage, and I needed it. So there’s really three things we want the listeners to walk away with today is to answer these three questions. One, do you need life insurance? We’ll talk about who does and who does not need it. Number two, you know, how much coverage do you need? And how do you determine that? And then ultimately, where can you go to begin purchasing a policy if needed from a reputable company that’s going to get you what you need? So ultimately, the question that we have here in front us is knowing I have some life insurance policy and protection in place, do I need additional coverage? And ultimately, how do we get into that number? But Tim Baker, before we do that, and before we jump in there, let’s just set the stage for what we’re talking about in terms of life insurance and knowing that some may be familiar with the different types of life insurance, what’s out there and ultimately, we’re going to be operating under the assumption of shopping for term life insurance. But just talk us through briefly the different types of life insurance that will set the stage.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so typically, the two types of — so just to talk about I guess life insurance as a whole. You typically have two broad types. You have what’s called term, which covers you for a period of time or a term, usually 10, 20, 30, 35 years. And it doesn’t cover your whole life, which is the comparison or the other type of policy that’s out there is the whole life policy. So the whole life policy basically is in force throughout your entire life, and it’s more of a robust type of insurance. So the term policy is usually the simplest and most affordable, and it’s probably best for probably 80-90% of people out there. It’s a straightforward, easy to understand, and it’s basically stripped down so, you know, it’s pure insurance. So there’s no savings component or maintenance fees or anything like that. And you essentially pay a monthly or annual premium, so that’s basically the cost to keep the policy in force over the course of that 10-year or that 30-year term or whatever that may be. And then if you die during that term, the person that you name as beneficiary will receive that death benefit. So if I have a 10-year term that covers me ‘til 2028, and I die, then the person that I name as beneficiary will get that million dollars or that half a million dollars. And then at the end of the term, the policy expires. So basically, nothing happens. The 10-year goes away, and in 2029, I’m not covered. And then to kind of compare that with the whole life policy is that you basically pay that premium, and part of that premium is paid for premium pays for the policy, the life insurance part of it, and then the other part of it goes into cash value, which is kind of a savings component. So it’s kind of a mix between an investment or a savings type vehicle and then insurance itself. It’s a little bit different, it’s a little bit more complicated, a little bit more sophisticated of a product. And I think for the majority of our listeners, Tim and I included, the term type of policy is where you’re going to want to be.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and we encourage you, head on back to Episode 010, which was the first Ask Tim & Tim question that we did around whole life insurance. And the question was actually around whether or not it’s a good investment strategy for college savings, but we use that episode to really break down the difference between term and whole life. And as Tim mentioned, and I would agree, for most of our listeners, we think term is the play. And for the whole life lovers that are out there, again, we said most, not all, so there’s some exceptions to that rule. But knowing our audience, a lot of people are in student loan debt, a lot of people have competing priorities, a lot of people may or may not actually be taking advantage of the other investment vehicles that they have in front of them and retirement plans and so forth, so we think for most listening in terms of playing, we’re going to use that as the assumption throughout the rest of the episode when we talk about my personal situation, what are some of the needs that you can ultimately use that as an example to compare and think about what your life insurance needs should be. So Tim Baker, I’m in the client seat, and we’re trying to sit down and figure out exactly how much life insurance policy I may need. So what do you want to know to get started?

 

Tim Baker: Yeah, so typically what I do in this scenario, just kind of to back up a little bit is clients will get an insurance/benefits presentation. So it goes through, and it kind of educates what the purpose of insurance is in general, and then kind of breaks down the differences between life insurance, disability, health, homeowners, renters, liability, auto, so we kind of do a nice broad picture of all the different types of insurance that you need. And typically, the big one, most of the attention will go towards the life insurance and then the disability insurance. Health insurance is a big one, usually in the fall with open enrollment, but that’s typically where we’ll kind of begin in terms of assessing current policies and then basically filling in the gaps with some additional individually owned policy, which is what we’re going to do today. So typically, Tim, what I would do with you is after going through the kind of the presentation, based on your current situation with life insurance, this is where you’re at. And this is probably where you need to be. And we kind of will sit down and talk through that calculation. So typically what I would do is I would just kind of reaffirm income and current protection. So I would say for you, Tim, your current income right now is $135, correct?

Tim Ulbrich: Yes, thereabouts. Yep.

Tim Baker: And then your current policy that you individually own, that you purchased, is about — the death benefit is $1 million, correct?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, so $1 million death, $1 million, 20-year term policy. I purchased that back in I want to say 2014. I should know that off the top of my head, but I don’t. The reason that I remember that date, actually, is because there was a point in time where Jess was at home, not working, and I know for sure we had my oldest, Sam. We may have also had my middle, Everett, and we had no term life insurance policy in place. So you know, I guess looking back at that now, that seems pretty high-risk. And one of the things I think we want the listeners to think about is you know, do I need a life insurance policy in place? And usually the two things I’m thinking about are does somebody depend upon your income? And might you have any student loans that would not be forgiven in the event of your death?

Tim Baker: Right.

Tim Ulbrich: And thankfully, that one we did not because they were all federal loans that would have been covered, but the answer to that first question was yes, absolutely. And I had no protection in place, essentially meaning if I would have passed away in that time period, you know, that would have been obviously a significant financial hardship on Jess, either forcing her back to work, we didn’t have a great emergency fund, so I think at that point, using this just as a learning moment for the listeners really to ask themselves those questions. And as we’ll dive in here in a minute, the cost of that coverage is not very expensive for what it ultimately provides for us. So to answer your question, yeah, million dollar policy, 20-year term, and we’re about 3-4 years into that term.

Tim Baker: OK. And then you are currently covered through NeoMed. What is it, 2x your base up to $100,000?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, so we have employer-sponsored coverage here that’s 2x salary, up to a max of $100,000. Yes.

Tim Baker: OK. So essentially, basically what we’ve gathered so far is that if you were to die today, you would have a policy or a benefit that would go to Jess of $1.1 million. So essentially, I think what we would say is we kind of set that to the side and put that number in the parking lot, and then kind of do a deeper dive into what your overall number would be. But I would say just as kind of an aside, you know, a lot of people will look at what is provided by their employer. It’s typically 1 or 2x, and you can buy — I’ve seen it where you can buy up to $1 million in coverage. But I would say, you know, as a general rule of thumb, to look at these employer-sponsored programs, these group life insurance programs, as really a perk and not necessarily a robust life insurance plan. So typically, Tim, your NeoMed policy isn’t portable. So if you ever were to leave NEOMED, you can’t take that $100,000 with you. The stats show that the average employee will leave their job within five years. So if you were to leave, if we were to assume that you’re five years older, you’re looking for additional coverage outside of your group policy, so you’re going to pay a little bit more money. Important things to kind of be aware of when you’re factoring your employer policy into your overall life insurance calculation. So from here, Tim, I would basically kind of go through and say, ‘Hey, these are the main ways that we can kind of come to your insurance calculation.’ So it can be as simple as the general rule of thumb is 10-12x your income. So in your case, if you’re making $135, that tells me that you should have a policy between $1.35 million and $1.62 million for using 12x income. So that typically is a very fast, easy and simple way. And typically, that’s pretty close to what I see with a lot of clients. Now with your case, with Jess being home full-time, the exercise of actually going through and calculating this either using a human life value method or a financial needs analysis method, which is two different methods that I use with clients, it’s probably worth doing. So why don’t we go through and I’ll ask you a few questions about the financial needs analysis and see if we can basically come to a number here and see where you land and see what your gap is. Sound fair?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, that’s actually good because I don’t think I shared this, but when I bought that policy three or four years ago, I literally put my finger up in the wind and said, ‘$1 million.’ I knew the general rule of thumb of 10-12x, I’ve heard 8-12x whatever, but I really had no rhyme or reason. And I didn’t even have much thought behind, well, is it 20-year? Is it 30-year? And I think that was why ultimately, I posed the question for Jess and I to you to say, ‘OK, here we are now, three kids, different life situation. Is there enough coverage here or not?’ So yeah, let’s walk through that.

Tim Baker: Before we continue with the rest of today’s episode, here’s a quick message from our sponsor.

Sponsor: Hey, guys. If your family or loved ones are dependent on you bringing home an income, you need term life insurance ASAP. This can be hard to think about, especially if you’re young and healthy. But you want to be prepared and protect those that are closest to you. YFP has partnered with PolicyGenius, America’s No. 1 independent, online insurance marketplace, where you can get quotes from multiple companies in just two minutes using their easy-to-use interface. Go to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance to get your free quotes today. That’s yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance.

Tim Baker: Now back to the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. And I would say to back up, one of the questions like do you need life insurance? Typically, the question is, does someone other than yourself depend on your income? Do you have dependents? That type of question is, yes, absolutely. The other one you said is, are there any debts that won’t be forgiven in the event of your death? So for a lot of people, it’s going to be your mortgage and then in some situations, if you do a private student loan refinance — a lot of the pharmacists out there that are going through this — if you’re not forgiven upon death and disability, then having disability and life insurance, the covered amount on that is going to be hugely, hugely important. So Tim, basically the financial needs analysis method — to nerd out a little bit — basically what this does is it examines all of your recurring expenses to dependent survivors and basically any unusual expenses that may result from your death. So things to consider would be marital status, role of spouses meaning who is basically working, who isn’t, the size of your family, and then basically your dependents’ or your spouse’s willingness and ability to work after you would die prematurely. So in this case, basically I look at mainly six variables here. So the first one being final expense. So I’ve seen a lot of different numbers out there in terms of if you were to die, what it would cost for someone to be buried, whether it’s $10,000, $25, $35, $50,000. So Tim, do you have an idea of what it would take in terms of funeral costs and those types of things?

Tim Ulbrich: I don’t. And you know, I think this is a good point of discussion. And as we are going to revisit some of the end-of-life stuff, you know, Jess and I have talked about means of being buried versus cremation, etc. I guess the question for me is what would it cost to be cremated and ashes spread over the Buffalo Bills stadium — no, I’m just kidding. But no, to answer your question, we haven’t. Is there a general ballpark that you use to…

Tim Baker: Yeah, I mean, Tim, the ballpark that I typically use is about $25,000. I mean, obviously, you can go a lot cheaper than that or a lot more expensive. But typically, if I look at clients and I ask the question, most of them look at me like I have three heads because it’s not something that we think about unless they maybe had a parent that died recently. So I typically would just pencil in $25,000 into that basically that space.

Tim Ulbrich: Let’s do that. Yeah.

Tim Baker: Now the second one is basically a readjustment period. So typically, the rule of thumb is a two-year readjustment period, which would be basically for Jess to basically say, ‘OK. What the heck just happened? How can I basically find a little bit of continuity for the boys and just figure things out?’ And that’s typically 1.5x salary. So this is typically what we’re going to do here is have a conversation of what is your wish, what is your thought process if you were to die, would this be something that Jess would go back into the workforce? Or would you want her to stay home? Or what does that look like?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, we actually had this discussion, which makes for a really somber Friday night at home. But yeah, we’ve talked through this. So she’s staying at home with the boys right now, we’re doing homeschooling with our three boys, and we’d want to continue that for the foreseeable future. So I think our thought would be to establish this coverage need with the assumption that she would not go back to work. And ideally, really, be able to do it in a way that she would never have to. But certainly, we could look at the numbers and readjust that. So would that change, then, that time period? So you mentioned a two-year adjustment. Is that under the assumption that somebody is going to go back to work after a certain time period?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think so. I mean, that’s typically what it was for. And sometimes, it might be for additional training, it might just be trying to figure out daycare or other childcare needs. But it’s basically a buffer for life to kind of resume some type of normalcy.

Tim Ulbrich: OK.

Tim Baker: So if we assume just for the practical exercise of this that 1.5x salary, we’ll call it $202,500, we’ll pencil that in because at the end here, we’re going to talk about kind of a lifetime income and what that would look like for Jess. The second part here, the third number here, is basically dependency incomes. So what are the household and childcare needs? So for this, if Jess is not going back to work, then this would really be $0 or close to $0 unless there would be things like babysitter or you know, maybe — I know she’s doing homeschool, maybe the kind of like “after-school” type needs where summer camps and that type of thing. So again, there’s a little bit of play here in terms of what you actually should put here and plan for. So if you were to look at this number in terms of the dependency period of income, knowing that Sam is 6, Everett is 5, and Levi is 3?

Tim Ulbrich: He’s 3, yep. He just turned 3.

Tim Baker: Knowing that where they’re at in terms of their schooling and all that, what would you assume is a good number for household and childcare needs?

Tim Ulbrich: So let me talk this out loud because I’m not sure I know off the top of my head. My current thought would be basically, as you mentioned, childcare needs would be I would assume $0 because she would be at home. Obviously, there could be some buffer there, but then that presents an income need, so replacing my current income, obviously. So what we know to be true is about of the income, about $5,000 of that would be true expenses per month. And my thought would be is that income would run up until the point that she could draw from retirement savings, which would be 59.5. So I don’t know if I’m answering your question, but that’s kind of the way that I’ve thought about it is that she would basically need that income with the assumption of no childcare expenses, but income for day-to-day expenses outside of childcare all the way up until the point of when retirement funds could be drawn.

Tim Baker: Yeah, absolutely. So it’s basically we’re trying to figure out how to slice it. So obviously, the big questions here are going to be, what is the household and childcare needs with Jess basically not working? And then what is the lifetime income pre-retirement? And we could also look at it post-retirement. If we assume for dependency period of income with the boys with Jess being home, I’m going to just do round numbers here in terms of what you may need. So I’m going to put $50,000 just over the course of the boys being home until they’re 18. Another, an easier number here — and then we’ll shift back to the lifetime income — is what is your outstanding mortgage liability?
Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, so our outstanding mortgage is $140.

Tim Baker: OK. And then, I know you and Jess are very interested in making sure that the boys have funds set aside for education, basically an education fund. Would that be something that you would want to bake into the retirement — or not the retirement, the insurance calculation?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, we’re kind of earmarking — actually, another thing I think maybe we should do an episode on that too once we get to that point — we’ve estimated at currently our goal is to shoot for about $100,000 per kid, so $300,000 total for college.

Tim Baker: And then really the big one here is looking at your lifetime income and basically trying to replace that. So if we assume very roughly that you’re going to be working for another 30 years, and then we multiply that by 5, and again, this is not assuming inflation or anything like that, that’s basically $4 million. 30 years times $135,000 is $4 million. So the idea here is basically to provide a lifetime income for both pre-retirement and retirement and try to figure out what that best number is best suited at.

Tim Ulbrich: Now let me ask you a question on that real quick. So I’m thinking that you know, knowing the life insurance benefit would be tax-free — so if I had a $2 million policy, for example, and I were to die, Jess would get $2 million tax-free versus obviously, my current income is taxable. So how you do reconcile those differences? Do you look at them as a wash knowing that you’re not accounting for inflation? Or how do you…

Tim Baker: I think typically, what I would do is I would take that number and just basically do a time-value-money calculation. So basically, say, ‘OK. If we were to get $1 million and presently and invest that over a period of time, would that provide her the $135,000 per year that she would need in recourse?’ So basically at the end of that 30-year period, that amount of the insurance calculation would be basically exhausted. So for simplicity’s sake, Tim, I’m just going to put $1 million in there.

Tim Ulbrich: So just to talk through that a little bit more, I think if I’m understanding you correctly, you’re basically saying that the listeners need to account for that that $1 million, a portion of it you would invest because you’re not going to spend it right away? And that some of that would be growing over the term.

Tim Baker: Exactly. Exactly. So that basically makes up the gap between the $1 million and the $4 million. And obviously, listeners are probably thinking, this is really, really rough math. And it is. So typically, when we break this down, we’re going to go through each of these line items and kind of make sure we have a clear, not just math, a clear number of what this looks like. So when we basically account for, you know, a $25,000 final expense, $202,500 in a two-year readjustment period, which is debatable if we need that depending on lifetime income, if we also say another $50,000 for dependency — so this would be for household and childcare needs, so I’m thinking like summer camps and things like that, babysitting, outside mortgage liability —

Tim Ulbrich: Is that per year, or one time were you thinking with that?

Tim Baker: I’m just doing a one-time lump sum.

Tim Ulbrich: Yep. Got it. Ok.

Tim Baker: So obviously, if you have a spouse that is working more, that number would be close, probably closer to the $1 million, and the lifetime income would be probably a little bit less.

Tim Ulbrich: So we’re switching that here.

Tim Baker: Right. And then you have the outstanding mortgage liability of $140,000, the education fund at $300,000 and then lifetime income, we’re saying approximately $1 million. That puts your financial needs analysis amount at $1.7 million, essentially, which is pretty close because I typically will tell pharmacists that they need probably right around that $1.5 to $2 million on the high end of things. So you’re right in there. Now, if we can do it really quickly, this is a lot faster of an analysis is basically the human life value. So basically, it takes your annual earnings, it discounts your own consumption and taxes and things like that. So if we look at your annual earnings at $135,000, do you know your effective tax rate, Tim? I know we just filed taxes. Is it like 20-25%?

Tim Ulbrich: So no, when it’s all said and done, it’s at 15.

Tim Baker: That’s really good.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, going down to 10 next year, by the way. I’m excited about that.

Tim Baker: Yeah. So your annual taxes are $20,250. Personal consumption rate, I’m going to estimate is basically this is — we’re going to assume that the cost of your monthly expenses are going to go down 10%, basically, essentially if you aren’t there. So that discounts it to another $11,475. So your Family Share of Earning, it’s called the FSE is $103,275. So if we assume that you’re going to work until 65, what’s your current age?

Tim Ulbrich: 34.

Tim Baker: So that means you have a work life expectancy of 31 years. If we assume a 3% increase in expectation salary, that basically means that you have a future value need of $5.1 million. If we discount that back to present value, and we assume an inflation rate of 3%, that basically says that you need a policy of $2 million.

Tim Ulbrich: So those are all pretty close. I mean, you did the general rule of thumb, that was $1.35-$1.6ish, then we got close to $1.7 in the second example where we went through the individual expenses. And then you got up to $2, so somewhere between $1.5 and $2 approximately.

Tim Baker: Yeah. And obviously, I don’t want — I really don’t want listeners to kind of get into the weeds, and it’s hard to kind of pick this over radio or over just audio. But the first analysis, you can really slice it thin and probably in your case, it’s worth going through that, but essentially, if you’re looking at, ‘Hey, I need insurance. And I’m not working with me, Tim Baker or a financial advisor,’ just say, ‘I make $125,000. Multiple that by we’ll say 10. Boom, $1.25 million.’ And then call it a day. So I don’t want people to get overly paralysis by analysis. Just keep it simple and then if we have to revisit or if you go back to it, you can always buy another half a million dollar policy or whatever that is. But I would say do what you did, and put your thumb in the air and say, ‘OK, I probably need about $1 million.’ And then we can always — what we’re going to do probably in the next stage here is go and use a company like PolicyGenius and start quoting what your gap is. So if we assume, Tim, that you need another $900,000, if we assume $1.1, then we’ll go to PolicyGenius and basically get a quote and fill the gap of where you’re lacking in terms of your life insurance.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, I really agree with your thought process because I think it’s so easy — and I almost felt, even just some of that paralysis of, you know, you kind of open up, you do a Google search, you start getting policies, and I was trying to keep it pretty simple, and I started a 20-year, $1 million policy. And even that can feel just overwhelming of where do I start? Am I getting ripped off? Am I not? What’s a good policy? And I think that paralysis by analysis is real. So if you’re listening, and you’ve determined, yes, somebody depends upon my income or we need to have a debt that’s taken care of in the event of my death, I would agree. Stick your hand in the water, get started, and then I think there is some value, depending on how detailed you want to get, to really going down and answering the question, What am I actually trying to do with this policy in the event of my death? And I know for Jess and I, I think there’s some peace of mind to know that you and I and with her are going to go back and actually dig into each one of these categories and come up with a final number so that we know in the event of my death, here’s exactly what we’re planning to do with that money. And I think that goes back to maybe even just a little bit of what’s your financial personality? And how much of this detail do you need or not need or does a spouse need or not need? To know whether or not you really need to get in the weeds of this. So Tim, if we determine — again, we’ll go back with specifics obviously with Jess and I — but let’s assume that we need another $900,000. Talk me through, then, the strategy of getting a quote, finding a policy. And you mentioned PolicyGenius, which is a broker, an independent broker that we really like. And the reason I’m curious about that is because the mistake I made back in buying that initial policy is I started doing a Google search, and I started entering all my information, and sure enough, within 24 hours, I’m getting all these phone calls, and I’m not sure about what’s good, what’s not good. What is the advantage of an independent broker of a company like a PolicyGenius?

Tim Baker: Yeah, so I like PolicyGenius because they kind of understand the fee-only model, for one thing. So back before I started Script Financial, I could actually sell life and health insurance, believe it or not. So I could go through the same exercise that we just went through, Tim, and say, ‘OK, we need $900,000. Let me go out and get a quote for you and basically help you write the policy,’ and then I would get a commission on basically on that policy. And obviously, term life insurance, he pays you one level of commission. And whole life pays you a little bit better. So the life insurance agents out there are incentivized to put you in a whole life policy, which is one of the problems. But essentially, what PolicyGenius does is that their agents basically work on salary, so the commissions that the policy yields goes to PolicyGenius, the entity and not necessarily the people that you are talking to. So I like that because they’re not incentivized really individually to put you in a policy that is not in your best interest. I also like it because the website is really clean and easy to use and basically because they can go out as a broker, they can go out into the market and find the best policies and the best rates instead of just using one carrier where you’re not going to get a whole lot of choice and a whole lot of basically comparison to other what’s out there. You can go to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance and it’ll direct you right to PolicyGenius. And within a few minutes, you can go and generate quotes that won’t trigger a lot of those emails, Tim, that you received and kind of gives you an idea of where your quote’s going to come in at. So just kind of to give you a general rule of thumb, the average — for a 30-year-old that’s purchasing a $500,000 term policy, on average, they’re going to pay about $30 a month. So that’s pretty affordable, compared to what we spend our money on. So you know, if you’re looking at that $1.5 million policy, you know, that’s under $100 bucks that you’re going to be covered for. So just kind of give you a litmus test of where you’re at. Now, if you are a whole life believer, you’re going to pay probably 4x that.

Tim Ulbrich: If not more.

Tim Baker: If not more for that whole life policy. And that’s not to say that the whole life policy is bad, but again, I think it is kind of a forced savings, and that savings can be pretty conservative. And it allows — what it sometimes does is it will drive down the amount of insurance. So Tim, if I quote you a $900,000 whole life policy, you might look at that premium that you have to pay, and say, ‘Man, maybe I only get $250,000 policy,’ and that really is deficient in terms of what you actually need. So like I said, we like PolicyGenius. I work with them for clients because they’re super knowledgeable, so I have some clients that will come in the door with a lot of crappy policies that we need to examine and potentially replace. So they’re super helpful and very knowledgeable of the space and they take care of my clients, and I know they’ll take care of YFP listeners as well.

Tim Ulbrich: So again, that’s yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance. That will take you right to the PolicyGenius page that we’ve partnered with. So just as a point of reference, you mentioned some dollars there. When I bought the 20-year, $1 million term policy, it’s $38 a month. So essentially, I’m paying $38 a month for 20 years to get that protection. That’s really the definition of the 20-year term policy, which brings up the question — and one piece I want to wrap up on here is talk us through, just for a minute, the different variables that go into play when it comes to the price of that policy. So obviously, we’ve alluded to one in terms of age. And you mentioned earlier that as somebody gets older, obviously the likelihood of death becomes greater, so the policy becomes more expensive. What other factors go into play in terms of policies so people can think about where they might land in terms of their cost of coverage?

Tim Baker: Yeah, so definitely age and health history. So your sex, usually I think females are a little bit more expensive because they’ll live longer. Smoking status, so if you use tobacco or smokeless tobacco. Your driving record can come into play, including any suspensions and things like that. Unfortunately, something that you can’t control is family history. So if you have a case of uncles or parents dying prematurely, that’s going to affect your policy. So conditions like heart disease and diabetes. And this is really one of the advantages of the employer term policy, since it’s a group term, it’s usually a guaranteed policy so that you don’t have to go through the medical exam. And these individual policies that you will purchase yourself so you have to go through this. So obviously your age, your health history, the family history, your coverage amount — obviously, the more coverage and the more term will have a big impact on your overall premium. And then also lifestyle. So if you have risky hobbies, they’ll ask you if you bungee jump or scuba dive or things like that could potentially increase your premium a little bit. And you want to be open and forthright about how you live your life. It’ll affect the premium some, but you know, not terribly. And you know, insurance companies will cut you a break if you decide the entire annual premium all at once. They’ll be a little bit more expensive if you spread it out over the course of the year or so. I have some clients that they basically have a sinking fund that’s just covered for their insurance. So they put in their $100 a month or whatever, and then they pay out the $1,200 I think is what their current policies are and then they rinse and repeat that. And that saves them some money in the long run. So yeah, that’s basically some of the factors that they’ll look at when they’re quoting out some of your premiums and you know, you should be aware of those factors.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, I think many of the listeners are going to be hearing this and saying, ‘OK, I know I need a policy. I need to take action.’ And that’s, I think, one of our main goals if you’ve been following us at YFP for awhile is to help people build a strong financial foundation, whether it’s emergency funds, insurance protection, debt repayment plans, making sure you’re building a solid base. And obviously, this topic and this area is a good one in making sure you’re educated as you’re out there shopping. And we’ve talked about some things that you should be looking for. The last thing I want to mention, Tim, just to make sure we’re wrapping up this conversation here and people are thinking about their whole personal situation is that don’t forget any coverage for a spouse or significant other as well. And I know that’s one thing I’d overlooked is that you know, naively, I thought, well, Jess is at home with the boys, not necessarily earning an income. Why would I need life insurance? And obviously, the piece I forgot, which was naive, is what would be all the expenses that would come to be in the event of her death. Well, childcare, right? Additional expenses. So we actually went out and got a policy on her, a smaller amount, but making sure you’re accounting for some of those spouse or significant other considerations as well.

Tim Baker: Yeah, super important to figure that out. And I think in your case, I think, you know, when we interviewed you, you guys would want to move closer to family that would help you, obviously, raise the boys. But there’s still going to be an expense there that we’re going to need to cover down on in the event that something were to happen to Jess. So this is where it kind of gets a little bit tricky and having a planner kind of walk you through and ask those tough questions and try to figure out what does this look like? And by the way, what is the plan in the event that something happens in terms of how do we invest that? Or how do we appropriately plan for that? That’s kind of the next level of things. You know, obviously, coming into that windfall is going to be important to, again, provide some normalcy to life, but you know, you have to be smart with that sum of money and what to do with it. So yeah, lots of moving pieces and especially with kids and a mortgage and you know, one or two incomes, it’s important to kind of see how all those pieces fit together.

Tim Ulbrich: So as we wrap up here, let me just remind the listeners that if you want some more information about different types of life insurance, the pros and cons to those policies that out there, how to determine how much coverage you need like we’ve talked about on this episode and where to get a quote from a reputable broker, head on over to our educational page all about life insurance, which is yourfinancialpharmacist.com/life-insurance. And again, if you’re ready to go out there and start shopping for policies, you can head on over directly to the PolicyGenius page that we’ve partnered with, which is at yourfinancialpharmacist.com/insurance. So Tim Baker, again, good stuff and looking forward to the episode next week. You’re going to talk with Tim Church about disability coverage.

Tim Baker: Thanks, Tim.

Join the YFP Community!

 

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 043: Ask Tim & Tim Theme Hour (Investing 101)


 

On this Ask Tim & Tim episode of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, we take three YFP community member questions about investing. We discuss investment terminology, considerations for choosing investments, where non-retirement accounts come into play and the pros/cons of target date funds.

If you have a question you would like to have featured on the show, shoot us an e-mail at [email protected]

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up, everybody? Welcome to Episode 043 of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. We’re excited to be here with you doing another “Ask Tim & Tim” episode this week. So if you missed last week’s episode, make sure to go back and check it out as we feature two listener questions on student loans. As a reminder, if you have a question you’d like to have featured on the show, shoot us an email at [email protected]. Before we jump into today’s listener’s questions, I want to mention that just this past weekend, we announced that we are looking for 50 beta testers to jump into our YFP online student loan course that we’re getting ready to launch here in a couple months. Now, for the first 50 that sign up, we’re going to be offering the course at half price, so it’s going to be $179 instead of $349 when it will be fully launched early this summer. And you can head on over to courses.yourfinancialpharmacist.com, again that’s courses.yourfinancialpharmacist.com. And if you use the coupon code LOANRX, that will get you 50% off for the first 50 that sign up to be a beta tester. So again, make sure you head on over there quick. We’re going to take the first 50 that come, then we’re going to close it. We’re going to get feedback from that group, make final adjustments, and then we’re going to be launching that course later in June. So again, courses.yourfinancialpharmacist.com, coupon code LOANRX. So Tim Baker, investing. I think we maybe is this the first time we’re actually digging in to talk about investing? I know we get a lot of people that say, ‘Hey, you guys need to be talking about investing a little bit more.’

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think so. We’re very heavy on the loan, or the student loan side. And it’s funny, you talk about us launching the course or at least the beta test group, and those spots are going fast so it’s kind of interesting to see that there’s obviously an interest there, but I think equally in the investment side of things, there’s a lot of interest and I think there’s a lot of people that are confused about how to start and where to begin, and that’s encouraging too because I think we’re looking outside of the world of student loans, and I think it’s something that we need to do. And I think we’re going to be more focused on the investment stuff going forward too.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, I think we’ve been hesitant on some level, not because of course we know people are interested in it, but I think one of our concerns especially knowing lots of people are with student loans and trying to build a solid foundation is that is there a concern, are people looking at this topic of investing in a silo. And so I think that’s a good preface to just our conversation as we talk about the investing questions that came in to remind our listeners, hey, to take a step back, that investing is one part of the financial plan and to figure out exactly where it fits in for your own plan. Alright, well let’s jump in with our first listener question on investing, which comes from Latonia from sunny Los Angeles.

Latonia: Hi, Tim and Tim. This is Latonia Lou (?) from sunny Los Angeles, California. I have a couple questions for you today. The first being what strategies do you have for investments in stocks, bonds and real estate? And secondly, what do you recommend for choosing different types of investment options? And what funds do you recommend for retirement and the 401k?

Tim Ulbrich: Thank you, Latonia for submitting your question. We really appreciate it. And I love your question because I think while it’s rather broad, I think it gives us a good launching point to just talk broadly about investments almost an Investing 101, talk over some terminology. And I think here what’s interesting is I hear Latonia’s question is to me, there’s almost a question behind the question. So Tim Baker, before we jump into answering her question and talking more specifically about the terminology and 401ks and Roth IRAs and asset allocation and all that stuff, what are some of the other factors that you want somebody to be thinking about when it comes to their financial situation before they talk goals related to investing?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think to get back to your point, Tim, of looking at investing in a silo, I think ultimately, before you really dip your toe into the investment waters, you’re going to want really to focus on a few things. One is what does your debt situation look like, particularly the consumer debt. And we talk about this in Episode 026 of baby stepping into your financial plan, the two things to focus on first. What does your consumer debt look like? And also, what’s your emergency fund look like? And I think that’s why we’re a little bit hesitant is we don’t want people to wade down to the waters of investing without really having that sound foundation in place. If you start building a house without the foundation, it’s going to crumble. So ultimately, you want a good emergency fund to have funds available if something hits the fan. And then you want to make sure that your debt situation is in check. And I think like we mentioned last time, a lot of people draw the line of when to invest differently. So some people want to get through their student loans as quickly as possible before they really take a serious step toward investing. Other people have a little bit of a different mentality, so I think having an inventory of that, in a sense, is smart too. With that said, you know, there’s a few types of investing that is worth taking note of is, you know, if you have a retirement plan that offers a match, more often than not, you want to take advantage of that because that’s essentially free money or 100% return on your investment. Anything you put in, you’ll get 100% return. So that’s one thing to consider. But I think also just kind of an overarching, you know, question to ask is what is your appetite for risk? And for a lot of people, that’s really difficult to quantify. And for a lot of people, especially young people that have kind of come to the market maybe in a time of, you know, recession or market volatility, that we as kind of a generation are scared to wade into the waters of investment. And that really shouldn’t be that way, so what I see with a lot of clients is a little bit of a hesitancy to take intelligent risk and put your money into the market. So I know that’s kind of a very big picture look at things, but I think those would be some questions to ask yourself and like I said, easier said than done, right?

Tim Ulbrich: Absolutely. And I think before we jump into Latonia’s question specifically about choosing different types of investment options, to me this is a good place to just provide that reminder of we have to ultimately know what goal we’re shooting for and why we’re shooting for that goal. And I think that’s going to become evident as we begin this discussion because as we get into terminology and we talk matches and asset allocation and tax advantage, vehicles, 401ks, 403bs, Roths, etc. is that I think it can easily become somewhat overwhelming, especially when you consider with all the other priorities that somebody’s working on. And you’ve heard us talk before on this podcast about having a why behind what you’re doing, whether that’s saving for the future or whether that’s paying off debt, and I think that’s critical here because ultimately, we have to know why are we even doing this in the first place? Why are we putting away 10, 15, 20% potentially of our income towards retirement? Why are we choosing asset allocation models and trying to figure out how we can best invest for the future and keep fees down? So I think that purpose and vision of what we’re trying to do, and I would also reference listeners back to the very beginning of the podcast, Episodes 002 and 003, “Why Every Pharmacist Should be a Millionaire,” where you interviewed me, Tim, and we kind of walked through the what is a nest egg calculation. How do you get to that number? And ultimately again, before we talk about what you’re doing this month or next month, ultimately trying to figure out exactly what are we trying to achieve in the future?

Tim Baker: Yeah, definitely.

Tim Ulbrich: Alright, so let me ask the somewhat naive and I guess beginner question about why do we even need to invest in the first place? You know, we’re going to talk about risk and fees and potential for losing money and all of these things, why do we even need to go there to begin with?

Tim Baker: Yeah. I think it’s important to understand that you face major roadblocks when you’re trying to accumulate wealth and build that nest egg that you mentioned. And the two big ones are taxes and the inflation. So if you, what I often tell clients, if you take a dollar and put that under your mattress, so kind of like a savings account that doesn’t offer any type of interest rate, if you put that under your mattress with average inflation, if you wait 25 years and take that dollar out from underneath your mattress, it’s going to be worth about $.46. So that inflation essentially chops your purchasing power in half. So what investing does is allows you to really kind of get ahead of that curve and allow things like capital appreciation and dividends and that whole thing that we talk about on the ugly side of debt, the interest on top of interest, we kind of turn the tables, and we allow that to work in our advantage. And that’s basically what investing is. The other thing I mentioned is taxes. Obviously, no such thing as a free lunch, so the government wants their piece of the pie. So really, your investments are in that arena. So we have to do some tax planning to basically be able to grow your net worth in a way that is most efficient and where you’re paying Uncle Sam the least amount of money as possible. So again, investment is a major player in that space. So for people that say, ‘Hey, I’d rather just sit money in a savings account and let it go and not really have to worry about the investment piece’ — and I don’t see that a whole lot, but I do see some very, very conservative approach to investing — you’re really going to damage your ability to build that nest egg of $2.5 or $3 or $4 million or whatever the amount is, which for many pharmacists out there, that’s where they’re going to need to be in terms of their retirement savings. So the investment piece is hypercritical to make sure that you’re taking advantage of the compounding interest, the capital appreciations, the dividends and all that.

Tim Ulbrich: So once we establish that investing is in part essential to us achieving our financial goals, then the question becomes how do we invest? Where do we put that money to start to achieve those returns that ultimately are going to combat against the issues you mentioned around inflation and taxes? So I think that gets to the basics of the different investment vehicles, which obviously, there’s more than these four. But I think the four that are our audience should really be thinking about at this point: cash, cash equivalent, bonds, stocks and real estate, as Latonia mentioned in her question. So cash and cash equivalents, Tim, how would you broadly define — obviously, we all know what cash is, but I think it’s that term “cash equivalents” that often gets people hung up.

Tim Baker: Yeah, that could be things like different, not mutual funds, money market funds, that type of thing. You’ll want something that is highly that you can get to, in some cases it could be things like commercial paper, these are things that aren’t necessarily near and dear to what a typical individual investor would have. But typically when I explain cash and cash equivalents, it’s cash what everybody and then kind of like a money market fund, which is not necessarily cash. It’s a little bit less liquid, but that’s kind of what I want clients to understand in that regard.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, so I think cash and cash equivalents as low-risk, it’s liquid, it’s accessible, obviously at varying degrees. But also with that low risk, you’re probably not going to see much, if any, upside. And I think all of us are probably feeling that right now in some of our savings account with typical banks, which then takes us up one level, so I think of a bond. So bonds, you know, is I think about a bond, I think about a bond as a debt investment. So I have fond memories actually of my great-great-grandmother buying me EE bonds every Christmas, they’d be hanging on the tree. But it’s a debt investment, so whether it’s the federal government, whether it’s a local government, whether it’s a corporation that ultimately is trying to raise money, it’s a debt investment that you take on. And in return for investing in that, you’re guaranteed a certain interest rate or return on your money. And obviously, there’s different time periods, five, 10, 15, 20, 25 years, and historically, what have you seen, Tim, in terms of rates of return and risk levels when you think of bonds?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I mean, they’re kind of all over the place. So I guess it depends on the type of bonds. Most people when they think of bonds, they think of like government bonds. So on the federal side of things, you have things like bills, which are more shorter term, notes, which are T-notes, which are a little bit longer term, and then treasury bonds, which are the longer term bonds. So again, typically with interest rates, interest rates pay a pivotal part. Typically, when interest rates go up, the values of bonds go down and vice versa. So the bonds and the fixed income market, which is another way to say bonds, have struggled of late just because interest rates have been down. But just like stocks, you can have different types of bonds out there. So if YFP was a publicly traded company, and we had stocks, we could also issue a bond offering. So we could say, ‘Hey, listeners, we’re trying to raise money. Here’s a YFP bond, and with a principal of $1,000, but we agree to pay you 4% semi-annually, twice a year on that particular bond.’ So bonds can be very diverse. And you see companies issue bonds, municipalities issue bonds, and everyone has kind of different application that goes along with it. But bonds in a portfolio are typically, they’re cousins to stocks or equities, but they’re typically viewed as a safer approach to investing. So to give you an example, for young people, a typical split in terms of a bond-to-stock ratio might be 80% stocks, 20% bonds. When I’m helping manage my parents’ money, it’s kind of inverted. It’s 20% stocks, 80% bonds, and really the idea behind that is the capital preservation. So bonds are viewed as less risky and less chance for that basically your investment to go to 0. Stocks are more of a wild card where you enjoy more of capital appreciation and dividends, but the dividends aren’t necessarily fixed like an interest payment. So it’s kind of all over the board. I know I’m jumping a little bit into stocks, but I think they’re easier to explain them in tandem. So you know, in the bond market, it kind of depends on terms of return, what you’re looking for, but you’ll get an interest rate that’ll basically provide you income to the portfolio — or when I say income, it’s cash — whereas stocks are more a dividend and capital appreciation play.

Tim Ulbrich: And actually, this is great timing. So last week, you’re sitting down with Jess and I and looking at our overall asset allocation, which is what you were just referring to in terms of distribution between stocks and bonds, and obviously even within those, you get into different funds and so forth. But talk us through, and this in part answers Latonia’s question, talk us through how somebody determines that or in working with a planner determines that. You kind of identify that Jess and I were on full throttle, I think 97% or something equities and really not much at all in the bond market. And we were leaning more towards 90-10ish type of mix. What were some of the factors that were driving you towards that evaluation and getting us to think of different things?

Tim Baker: So typically, what I will do is I will give clients kind of a risk tolerance questionnaire that asks them, I don’t know, eight questions or so. And what that basically does is it spins off this is where your balance should be. So I think for you, Tim, you were 90% in stocks or equities and 10% in bonds or fixed income or cash or cash equivalents. So a 90-10 split. So then my job is to kind of look at it and say, ‘OK, if you were’ — and again, this is talking a very general sense, but if you were a 65-year-old person approaching retirement, and you were a 90-10 split, I would probably would say, that’s a little bit aggressive because what we don’t want to happen is something that happened, what happened in 2008, 2009 where your investments are all tied to the stock market, and then you wake up and you lose 40% of your portfolio. So what I’m basically surveying is your kind of where you’re at in your career, your appetite for risk, and I generally will suggest either staying or sliding a little bit to the left in terms of being more conservative or a little bit to the right in terms of being more aggressive. So there’s a little bit of a science, but a little bit of a kind of an art to it as well. And essentially, what I do is in your guys’ situation, you guys have both your own investments that I’m helping you manage at TD Ameritrade, which is where I custodian, but then you also have, Tim, you have your 401a at the university and a 403b, which have different investments that go into it. So basically, my job is to basically give you a model of that 90-10 split in your Roth IRA that you have at TD Ameritrade and then give you a 90-10 model with the 403b and the 401a. And as you know, when we were kind of going back and forth in the 403b, the little bit of — I don’t want to say sketchy situation — but I kind of went through your prospectuses and things like that, and it was even confusing to me about how the funds are charging and all that kind of stuff, which is a little bit of a different question. But it’s a little bit of art and science together.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and for the listeners to know, he’s being gentle. And it’s humbling for me to admit this, but basically, what we concluded was the 403b that I have is trash. I mean, what did we find on the fee standpoint? That’s insane. Not only was it the number, but then it was even the language within the prospectus. We couldn’t even fully identify where those were coming from and the total amount, right?

Tim Baker: Yeah, it was one of those things where in the disclosures, they say fee about 40 times. And they’re just compounding fees. But the problem is the fees for the funds didn’t match the fees in the prospectus. So, which means basically that there might be other fees that they’re putting into the — yeah, I don’t know. And I think ultimately, we concluded that there’s a number for the 403b that you can call an advisor, so you might call them up and give them the business because — and the problem is like I do this for a living. So if it confuses me, it certainly is going to confuse a pharmacist that basically looks at this maybe an hour a year or two hours a year or once in their life to set it up. So that’s my frustration, that’s kind of like when I approach clients or when I approach any type of like paperwork or agreement, I want brevity and I want basically in plain English because a lot of this stuff is not, and to me, it does nothing but confuses the consumer, and that’s a problem. So getting back to Latonia’s question, ultimately — and I typically will put in cash and cash equivalents and bonds. So like for Tim, if you’re a 90% split, we might have 8% in bonds and 2% in cash, and then 90% in stocks. The real estate item is a different piece. So like I think if you listen to the podcast, we’re all big fans of real estate. You can buy real estate obviously and kind of be your own landlord and do it that way, but you can also buy what’s called a REIT, you can buy a publicly traded REIT, so that’s a Real Estate Investment Trust, which basically pulls together lots of different types of investment property, and then you basically buy shares of that trust. So it’s a way to expose your portfolio to real estate. So typically, my portfolios will have some of that. But again, if you buy an index fund or a S&P 500 index fund, and that’s kind of the next level of investments, a lot of those will have real estate exposure in there. So you know, in terms of the three investment classes, I would say for me, I put bonds and cash equivalents together, and then stocks and those are the two big ones. And then you can slice it as finely as — like I said before we were talking on mic, it could be real estate, it could be merged markets, it could be international. Some people have commodities or a gold allocation. So you can get as complex, but you know, typically you want to keep it simple and go from there.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and they way I look at real estate, and we could talk about this on a lot of other episodes, and I’m not — this is not advice, and I know people will disagree or agree — is that Jess and I are itching to get real estate started, but we’re also looking to other things, saying we need to have these things in place first, and then we’re going to jump into real estate. So I think the timing is key, and for me, obviously we talked about the importance of an employer match and probably getting towards even beyond that and maybe evaluating real estate. So just to go back through those quickly, we talked about cash, cash equivalents, bonds, stocks or what are also known as equities, which essentially is ownership in a company. If you buy stocks in Apple or in Uber or whatever, you actually own a piece of that company. And then you mentioned real estate as well. So we’ve established that investing is important to outpace inflation and to beat taxes. We talked about vehicles by which you can begin to think about how to do that, and we briefly dabbled into asset allocation. Now the question is, where do you begin? Where do you get these things? So obviously you can buy bonds and stocks, etc. in an open market, but most pharmacists are probably going to be thinking, OK, I’m going to start within a 401k or a 403b or Roth IRA or Roth 401k but essentially those being the taxed advantage savings account in which you are then choosing the investments in bonds or stocks or other mutual funds, etc. So Tim Baker, just give us the 30-second kind of high level 401k, 403b, Roth IRA, what they are and how they’re different.

Tim Baker: Right. So I always like to do visuals. And you know this, Tim, because I use like the cat gif every time I explain, you know, investments because basically the inception that goes on here, to kind of reiterate what you’re saying, is you have a vessel, if you will, so that basically is the 401k, the 403b, the Roth or whatever, and inside that cup, we’ll call it a cup, you basically have — and for most people, it’s mutual funds. So it could be a stock mutual fund or a bond mutual fund. And inside of that mutual fund are all the different stocks that you hear about, so Apple and Google and Tesla. And then inside the bond mutual fund, you have all of the bonds like a Detroit bond or a Facebook bond or whatever.

Tim Ulbrich: Hopefully not Facebook.

Tim Baker: Yeah, yeah, exactly. So just think about that in terms of the different layers. So to kind of go all the way back to that original cup that we were talking about, the 401k, 403b, those are generally qualified plans that are provided by your employer. Generally, they’re used to incentivize or attract talent. And the 401k, 403b were originally meant to kind of supplement the pension. So a lot of people are saying, ‘What’s a pension?’ My dad worked for the same company for 40 years. He had basically a pension, and that was the golden handcuffs that basically forced him to stay at his job for that long. And it was basically based on his earnings and the amount of years that he worked on. So when the 401k came around, the company said, ‘Well, let’s ditch the pension and move with that.’ So typically, the 401k company will hire a Fidelity, a Vanguard, a Transmerica or whatever, and they’ll say, ‘Hey, we want you to custody our 401k.’ And then employees basically get individual accounts, so they have their own statements, pick their own investments, generally there’s a match, so the employer will say, ‘Hey, if you put in 5%, we’ll put in 5% matched,’ or whatever the case is. But the offer inside of that 401k or that 403b is typically limited. So you might have 10 or 12 or 15 investments inside of that tax advantage account. So anytime you see Roth in front of any of these types of accounts, an IRA, a 401k, a 403b, anytime you see Roth, you want to think after tax, after-tax money. If it doesn’t have Roth in front of it, it’s typically pre-tax money. So what that means is if you put — typically, now, you can put up to $18,500 of your own dollars into a 401k every year. So say you make $100,000 and say for that year, you put in $10,000. What the government basically taxes you all things else being equal is not $100,000, it’s $90,000. So that money basically flows into your account pre-tax. Now what happens when you distribute that in retirement, when it comes out, it basically is taxed upon distribution. So it either has to be taxed going in or taxed going out. So if you have a Roth 401k, it’s taxed going in, so you make $100,000, you put $10,000 into your Roth 401k, so what the government taxes you on is $100,000 of your income, so you don’t get any type of deduction, but when you go to retire, that Roth 401k, when you distribute that, basically it comes out tax-free. So it’s already been taxed going in, so it doesn’t get taxed going out. And that’s the case with the Roth IRA versus the traditional IRA and all that kind of stuff. So again, sp the big difference is between the 401k and the 403b versus the IRAs, the 401k, 403b are employer-provided or employer-managed. The IRAs, the Individual Retirement Accounts, they’re individually managed by you, and that’s basically the main difference.

Tim Ulbrich: That’s good stuff, and I’m glad we broke that down because a lot of times, I’ll talk with pharmacists, and they’ll say, ‘Hey, I’m putting away whatever, 5% of my income, and my employer’s matching the same into say a 401k or a 403b or a Roth 401k or a Roth 403b.’ But then often that conversation stops there. So I think your point of the vessel, the cup, however you want to look at it, is critical that that’s the vehicle, but then within there, you’re then digging into the asset allocation and actually choosing the investments. And while I think you and I are both certainly in the camp of keeping things simple, there’s some basic things you have to know about strategies of asset allocation and how to keep those fees down, etc. that’s going to have a big impact over 30 or 40 years worth of saving. So Latonia, great question. Thank you for submitting it that we can start this conversation. Obviously, we’re going to have lots more content coming in the future around investing. And I think for me, Tim, this really highlights one of the benefits of a financial planner. And I think back to Episodes 015, 016 and 017 where we broke down exactly what those benefits could be, what you should look for. But investing is only one part of a financial plan, but even within that plan, here we’re talking about looking at how do you minimize your fees and how do you determine the asset allocation models? How do you think about strategy of Roth versus 401k, 403b and the timing of that? And what about the distribution side of things, when you finally get there? And again, investing only one piece of it. But I think a really good financial planner can help you unwind some of that and hopefully take some of the confusion off of your mind there. So let’s take a minute to break to hear from today’s sponsor, and then we’re going to jump in with two more listener questions related to investing.

Sponsor: Hello, Tim Baker here. You know me as team member of Your Financial Pharmacist, co-host of the podcast and one-third of the Tim trifecta. But I am also the founder and owner of Script Financial, a fee-only — that means I’m a fiduciary — financial planning firm dedicated to helping pharmacists achieve financial freedom. We work with pharmacists all over the country every day who look at their financial situation and just don’t know where to start. Why is that? They say, ‘Tim, should I focus on this mountain of student loans? Or should I invest? I think I want to buy a home, but I’m not sure how to prioritize that goal or what that process looks like. I know I need insurance, but I’m confused how much or what kind and paralysis. Blue screen of death.’ There’s a better way. So let’s imagine — actually, first let’s queue the motivational piano music. OK good. Let’s imagine — and you can close your eyes as long as you’re not driving or running on the treadmill, and kudos to those that are doing the ladder — but let’s imagine you have clarity over your goals and how you should prioritize them, you know that this Tim has your back when it comes to your exact student loan strategy or how and where to invest, how much and what kinds of insurance that you need, maybe you’re confused about how much tax to withhold — we file taxes now too — and all the things financial. If you like that script that we’re writing for you — that’s a terrible pun, but let’s go with it — if yes, go to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/scriptfinancial and book a free consult to take that first step towards financial freedom.

Tim Ulbrich: And now back to today’s episode of the Your Financial Pharmacist podcast.

Tim Ulbrich: Alright, let’s jump into our second listener question, which comes from Laura from Pennsylvania.

Laura: Hi, Tim and Tim. It’s Laura from Pennsylvania. Can you talk to us a little bit about non-retirement investments? About six years ago, my husband and I started putting money aside in a Scottrade account. Every few months, we pick and choose a few stocks to buy. But I’m wondering, are there other things we can be doing with this money?

Tim Ulbrich: Thank you, Laura, for taking time to submit your question. We appreciate it. And we’re excited. I think it’s a great follow-up from the one that Latonia submitted where we talked a lot about some of the tax advantage savings accounts, 401k, 403b’s, Roth IRAs, etc. Here, we’re really talking about non-retirement accounts. So you mentioned you and your husband putting money aside in a Scottrade account and trying to then determine where you want to invest that money. So Tim Baker, talk us through — what Laura here is referring to is a non-tax advantage retirement account, so essentially putting money into an account in what I often refer to as the open market. So what are some of the places where somebody might do that? And then even some of the implications tax-wise that people need to be in tune with.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so typically, you know, what we usually call this is an individual, or if it’s with her husband, a joint account. You can also call it a brokerage account. So these are typically names for accounts that are the non-retirement, the IRA type of accounts. So typically, these types of accounts, you really want to drill down to what the why is of this account. So when you set up a brokerage account like this, you know, it’s typically because you’ve either maxed out your $18,500 into your Roth, and you’re maxing out into your 401k, your 403b, or you’re maxing out your IRAs, and basically, this is kind of the spillover into the next investment arena. That’s typically where you see it. Another place that you’ll see individuals do this is when I sit down and go through kind of the find-your-why and essentially, what I’m trying to extract is what are the goals or what are the buckets that we need to basically set up and fill over the next 10, 20 or 30 years? And basically have a plan in place for that. So typically, there’s a lot of short-term goals out there like an emergency fund or I need a sinking fund for travel because I want to go see the orca whales, Tim. Or maybe I need a cat fund or a puppy fund, so you should have a cat fund, Tim. I’m going to have a puppy fund, right?

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah.

Tim Baker: Or a gift fund, we talked about that at the end of last year, where people see spikes in spending, and it’s not necessarily accounted for, so maybe there’s a gift/holiday fund. So typically, I see that, which are kind of more of a near-term, I’m going to spend that within the next 12 months, to the other opposite side of the spectrum, which is retirement. Another place that a brokerage account might fall is, hey, Tim, I know that I want to buy a house in five years, four years, whatever the timeline is. So how do I go about properly saving for that? So typically, what I advise clients is if it gets over a certain amount of time, and we don’t just want to put it in a high-yield savings account, maybe it makes sense to then build out a conservative allocation or a moderate allocation to basically use the market to get a little bit more returns. That’s kind of the in-between, kind of the middle ground of saving for or investing for a goal. There is no tax advantage here at all. So you’re basically funding it with after-tax money, and when it comes out, you basically are taxed on your gain. So there’s long-term capital gains, which are basically any gains that you’ve realized after a year. And those have more preferred tax treatment. And then you have short-term capital gains, and this is basically where you’re buying Facebook one day and then selling it the next day, and it all kind of happens under that year time frame. And typically, those are taxed more aggressively than the long term. What the government wants you to do is basically invest, so invest in a company, invest for the long term, so they penalize people that are kind of moving in and out of investments, by the way, the tax it. So that’s one thing to be considered aware of, and there’s different strategies that you can use in terms of your fixed income or wash sales or tax loss harvesting, which is a little bit kind of probably out of the scope of answering this on the podcast, but those are kind of some of the things to be aware of when you’re investing outside of the retirement-type accounts.

Tim Ulbrich: So Tim, the other thing as I hear Laura’s question just quickly, that as somebody myself who just loves the passive investing approach, and I hear the notion of single stock picking, that makes me a little bit nervous. So just talk for a minute about some of the behavioral biases and some of the things to look out for when people might be getting into the area of single stock picking.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so you know, in terms of behavioral bias, the big thing is confidence buys. So if you’re one of those people that said, ‘Hey, I invested in GM way back in the day or when Ford hit the bottom,’ and then basically you bought it at $4 or whatever it was, and now it’s trading where it is now, you basically create this false sense that you’re the next Warren Buffett. And you know, people that do this for a living, professional money managers, mutual funds, myself included, can’t pick stocks. You can’t pick stocks on a consistent basis in a way that is where you’re not spending a ton of money on information or trading or whatever. So I think that’s the big thing is confidence buys. But I often say that your portfolio should be mostly, if not 100% of it, low-cost index funds. For some people — and I work with some clients that they have an itch to scratch, so they’re like, what do you think about Tesla? Or what do you think about this company? I’m like, I don’t pick stocks. But I can give you my opinion in terms of where it’s trading and where I think it might go. But to me, that should be limited — if you do it at all, it should be limited to 5%, maybe 10% of your portfolio because it is, you’re basically gambling. Most people, all people, they don’t know if the stock’s going up or down, left or right of any particular stock. And the problem with picking individual stocks is you’re basically putting your eggs all in one basket. If you pick an index fund, so people are like, well, what the heck’s an index fund? If you pick an index fund, you’re basically buying the market. So it’s — and an S&P 500 index fund is basically all of them, you own stock in all of the companies on the S&P 500. You can buy an index fund for, a bond index fund, you can buy an index fund for different sectors or things like that. So I would say, be cautious when you’re doing individual stocks. You can look like a genius, but over the course of investing career, it’s very spotty at best, even for people that do it for a living.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I think a good point there, looking like a genius, remember is you hear stories from other people, usually you’re hearing the good ones and not necessarily the bad ones, right? So I tell people all the time I bought Ford at less than $2 a share. I don’t tell them about buying Circuit City penny stock, which who would go to a Circuit City anymore? Right? What a joke.

Tim Baker: Right, exactly.

Tim Ulbrich: Alright, let’s jump into our third and final listener question of the episode, which is focused on investing, and that comes from Wes in North Carolina.

Wes: Hey, Tim and Tim. This is Wes Hartman from Durham, North Carolina. I had a question for you guys regarding investing. There seems to be a lot of different options out there to invest in, but is it even worth me trying to beat the target date funds?

Tim Ulbrich: Thank you, Wes, for submitting your question. Great one as we follow up on the first two related to investing. So here, we’re talking target date funds. And essentially, I think the way I interpret Wes’ question is it worth messing with trying to pick all these different asset allocations so much in stocks and bonds, etc., or should I just pick a target date fund? Would it be easier? So Tim Baker, why don’t we first just break down exactly what a target date fund is.

Tim Baker: So typically, a target date fund, and usually if you have auto-enrollment in your 401k or 403b, which I am a proponent of — so basically, what auto-enroll is you start with your employer, and they automatically put you at deferring 3 or 4 or 5% of your income into your 401k without you having to do anything. So typically, in that case, they’ll put you into a target date fund, basically probably would be based on your age. So you might have a target date fund for 2050 or 2055 or 2045, depending on your age. And what the target date fund essentially just takes a mix of other funds and it builds out an allocation for you that says, OK, if we’re going to retire in 2055, it might be a 90-10 split that we talked about with Tim early on. So it might be aggressive allocation that says, retirement’s a far way off, let’s basically build the allocation out in mostly stocks, equities, and a little bit of bonds. And as the portfolio, so as we passed through 2018 and now it’s 2025, maybe it’s 80-20. 2035, maybe it’s 70-30, and so on and so forth. So it becomes over time, more and more conservative. So for the individual investor, man, you’re looking at it like, man that’s great. That’s exactly what I would want — basically, someone else to do all the work for me. There’s some pros and cons to that. Typically, the advantage is if you have no idea what you’re doing, that’s probably the best thing to do is basically, get started, get the money into the retirement account. And if they don’t pick it for you, it’s your choice, just pick the target fund and call it a day. Probably the big disadvantage are of target funds is they typically are more conservative than I guess what I would normally advise. And it’s also hard to really determine if you’re going to retire at the time you said you’re going to retire. So for me, if I were to say I was going to retire in 2050, it might be 2060 or 2065 by the time that actually happens. I’ve said I’m going to live to at least age 100, so in that case, like that decade or whatever, I’ve lost out a lot of my portfolio’s earning potential because I went conservative too fast. The other thing is that in some cases, the target date funds can be more expensive and not perform as well as maybe some of the other funds that are provided for you. So there’s obviously a cost to basically that kind of turnkey strategy that depends on the actual investment plan that you’re in. And not all of these are created equal. I work with some clients that have amazing 401k’s and amazing 403b’s, and then I work with some others that are really bad and really — maybe the follow-up question is, how do you know if it’s good or bad? And typically, the first thing that I look at is expense ratio. So in my opinion, a 401k or a 403b, along with target date funds, which many of them have now, should also offer an index fund and a total market index fund, an S&P 500 index fund, that basically says, hey, I can buy the entire market and basically you buy the entire bond market and then call it a day. So if you compare, if you have one of those 401k’s that has that available to you, typically, that’s a little bit of a cheaper option. And you know, with a little bit of tweaking or a once-a-year checkin, you could probably do as good or better compared to the target date funds. So those are typically, that’s typically my advice on target date — they’re not bad. They’re not bad, but they’re probably — dependent on the plan — there’s probably some meat left on the bone in terms of what you can do with your funds.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I’m thinking even just Wes, I know you’ve been engaged in the YFP Facebook group and kind of following your questions, I can tell you like to nerd out on this stuff, which is awesome. And so my gut says probably for you, you’re going to probably look at some of those fees and performance and etc. and say, ‘You know what, I think I can do better. I can get the fees lower, I can get the performance better. I don’t mind rebalancing and checking my portfolio, etc.’ But I think to your point, Tim, that for many people, and I’m even thinking of the conversation that was flying around this weekend on the Facebook group, there seem to be a lot of feelings of, I just don’t know where to get started. And I think for many people, this could be a great place to start, especially if you know, you know what, I’m putting money in my 401k, but from there, I’m overwhelmed, and I’m not ready at this point in time to take action. I think it’s a great place potentially for somebody to get going but probably not ideal, in my opinion. I mean, I think for some people, it could be an option that they’re pursuing. I am thinking, though, of a handful of pharmacists I’ve talked to that open up their portfolio and they don’t realize that they’ve had a bunch of their money in their 401k just sitting in cash and cash equivalents because they haven’t allocated money. And obviously, there’s an opportunity cost of doing that. So I think for some, a great place to start, but for others when you consider, you know, is it too conservative? Does it match your goals? Does it match your risk profile? What’s the fees? What’s the performance? It may or may not be the best option to move forward. The other thing I think worth highlighting here, Tim, is that what I understand of target funds, the philosophy behind them is that they’re designed to be selected in a way that they’re potentially the only savings vehicle. It’s determining that different breakdown of stocks and bonds and etc. And so if somebody has other investments, in a Roth, in CDs, in real estate, etc., it may be throwing off, obviously, that intended asset allocation. And I think, again, working with somebody or taking a step back to say, ‘What’s the overall goal? And across all of my investments, where am I at? What am I trying to achieve?’

Tim Baker: Yeah, and it becomes more difficult when you’re trying to manage it at a global level, you know, between your own individual investments and then what’s in your employer investments and then by the way, let’s take into account your spouse’s investments. So it can get a little bit complex. But I think ultimately, the one word that I would describe for investing that kind of plays into all these questions is just simplicity. If you can keep it simple, that’s typically the best route to go. In my industry, typically, the more complex it is, generally the more laden it is with fees and the worth it is to the consumer. So there’s some people that look at index funds that are boring — and investing should be boring. The sexier it is, and the more bells and whistles it is, it’s smart beta and alpha and all this other stuff that we try to dress up investing, typically, the worse off the consumer is. So keep it simple, try to come up with an allocation, and I think one of the questions we had here on the notes that we probably didn’t answer, I think I answered it kind of in passing is you know, what tools do you use to kind of figure out how to do risk profiles. So I basically give a risk questionnaire, but it’s based on Vanguard’s risk questionnaire. So if you Google, and maybe we’ll put a link to it on the website, but if you basically Google Vanguard and risk tolerance or risk questionnaire, it outlines basically what your equity to fixed income number should be. So get that number and look at your 401k and if there is an index fund or a bond fund, basically you could slot it into those two things and call it a day or go the target route. Again, this is not investment advice because obviously I don’t know the individual listeners and all the things that are kind of going into effect with you know, goals and debt and all that kind of stuff, but for simplicity’s sakes, that’s basically how I would approach it.

Tim Ulbrich: Well, good stuff, as always. And I know this was one of our longer episodes, but I think long overdue that we dove into some of this information related to investing. So thank you again to Latonia, to Laura, to Wes, we appreciate you taking the time to submit your question to be featured on this Ask Tim & Tim episode of the podcast. And as a small thank you, we’re going to be sending them a personal favorite, a super comfy YFP T-shirt in the mail this week. And as a reminder, if you have a question that you’d like to have featured on the show, just shoot us an email over at [email protected].

Join the YFP Community!

 

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]

YFP 042: Ask Tim & Tim Theme Hour (Student Loans)


 

On this Ask Tim & Tim episode of the Your Financial Pharmacist Podcast, we take two YFP community member questions about student loans. We discuss strategies for managing student loans during residency and how soon to refinance or consolidate student loans after graduation.

If you have a question you would like to have featured on the show, shoot us an e-mail at [email protected]

Mentioned on the Show

Episode Transcript

Tim Ulbrich: Hey, what’s up everybody? Welcome to Episode 042 of Your Financial Pharmacist podcast. We’re excited to be doing two back-to-back “Ask Tim & Tim” episodes. And between this week and next week’s episode, we’re going to be featuring four listener questions: two this week about student loans and two next week about investing. As a reminder, if you have a question that you want to have featured on the show, shoot us an email at [email protected] and as a small thank you, we’re going to give you a super comfy YFP T-shirt. So Tim Baker, before we jump in to talk about student loans and get to these two questions, which are two really good questions, we need to share some awesome news with the YFP community. Last night, Derek Schwartz, if you remember our guest from Episode 014, 2014 graduate from ONU, Ohio Northern University, currently works with the Kroger Company in Cincinnati — last week, he made his final student loan payment. Three years, four months, paid off $192,000. So just an incredible story.

Tim Baker: Incredible.

Tim Ulbrich: And I still remember that episode and how fun that was.

Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s incredible. It’s amazing what you can do in a short amount of time. You know, I think for a lot of our listeners and a lot of clients I work with, they look at that six figures worth of debt, and they think it’s unsurmountable. And you know, this is another great example of someone that’s putting in the work and elbow grease to get through it. So kudos to Derek. Yeah, I’m just interested to see where he goes from here.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, Derek, congratulations. We’re obviously pumped for you, we appreciate you coming on the show and what you did in Episode 014, and we’re excited to see what you do with this lifestyle post-student loan debt. And I’m sure the YFP community’s going to be following that journey as well, so thanks for sharing that good news with us. So Tim Baker, we are here again obviously talking student loans. We’ve talked about this many times on the podcast. But I think it highlights we know how how important this topic is for our listeners that are struggling, obviously, with unprecedented amounts of student loans that they’re coming out with upon graduation. And I think this is a good chance — we’ve highlighted, mentioned, a couple times that, hey, we have a student loan course that’s going to be coming early this summer. And we’re actually getting ready to launch that course with a small group of about 50 beta testers. And for those of you that are interested in learning more about that course, potentially becoming a beta tester, you can head on over to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/studentloans. And Tim, do you just want to give them kind of a quick sneak peek preview into exactly what they’re going to get from that course?

Tim Baker: Yeah, I think the idea behind the course is to really answer a lot of these questions that we get about student loans, so I think there’s a lot of just such haziness about how to even take the first bit of the apple. So really what we’re going to talk about in this course is how do you inventory and just get a proper picture of what you owe and then really how do you assess all the strategies, whether it’s a forgiveness strategy and the PSLF program or maybe a non-PSLF forgiveness strategy, and then really how to optimize that. So when you walk away from the course, the idea is for you to know very precisely ‘This is my student loan strategy. I can walk confidently with it.’ And you know, kind of go down the road of a Derek Schwartz or not. You know, if your move is forgiveness and just be confident in that approach.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, we’re super excited about this. It’s been a labor of love with me, you and Tim Church has really taken a lead on a lot of this. And he’s just crushed it. And what I love about the course is I think what we’re hearing from the community members is that there’s so much uncertainty, there’s so much confusion, there’s so much stress around these student loans; ‘I don’t know what to do, I feel like I’m somewhat paralyzed.’ And I think what we’re going to be able to provide in this course is walking away with clarity of, ‘This is the repayment plan, strategy, the best option for your personal situation.’ So again, if you want to learn more what it means to become a beta tester, head on over to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/studentloans, and we’ll get some more information into your hands. Alright, let’s jump into our first listener question that comes from Bethany in Greenville, North Carolina.

Bethany: Hey, Tim and Tim. This is Bethany from Greenville, North Carolina. I had a question about consolidating and refinancing my student loans. How soon after graduation can I do this? And is there a limit to how many times I can refinance? Thanks.

Tim Ulbrich: Alright, thank you, Bethany, for taking the time to submit your question. We appreciate it. It’s a good one. Lots of people wondering about refinancing and consolidation. And obviously, I think your question’s specifically when to do it and is there a time limit to do it is certainly a good one that many others are probably wondering as well. Before we jump into answering, let me just reference listeners back to Episodes 029 and 030, where we talk about refinancing student loans in a lot of detail. And we’re going to hit some of the key points here in addition to answering Bethany’s question directly. So Tim Baker, I guess probably first since she mentioned both refinancing and consolidation, give us the quick breakdown of the difference between those two.

Tim Baker: Yeah, it’s a great question. And sometimes these are used synonymously, and that’s a misconception. I think the difference, you know, so define consolidation. Basically, when you consolidate your loans, you are taking two or more of your federal loans, and you’re making them one. And what happens is is that the loan that is consolidated takes the weighted average of your interest rate. So the example that I give is if you have $100,000 at 5% and then you have another $100,000 at 7%, when you consolidate those two loans into one, you’ll have $200,000 at 6%. So it just takes the weight. So it doesn’t really help you in terms of like you know, getting a better term or better interest rate. Most people do this for convenience sake, or even more importantly than that, they’ll consolidate their loans, so say like a Stafford loan to open up some of these income-driven plans. The income-driven plans would be things like pay-as-you-earn, revised pay-as-you-earn, ICR and IBR. Refinance, on the other side of this, is really when you go out into the marketplace, and you work with companies like SoFi or Earnest or CommonBond or LendKey, so these are some of the private student loan companies that we like. And you go out, and you submit your income and your credit, and they basically come back and say, ‘OK, right now, you’re paying 6%. If you refinance down to a five-year plan or a ten-year plan, we can get you down to 5% or whatever.’ So you’re basically going out into the marketplace to get a better rate. Now, the big thing with this to be aware of is that you are moving from the federal, the rec loans, to the private sector, which is important to know. But those are really the big difference. Consolidation is more of a convenience play/opening up more of the federal repayment plans, the income-driven ones. Refinance is where you’re throwing up the deuces to the federal system and saying, ‘Hey, I’m going to take a look at the private side and see what I can get there.’

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and I know Bethany’s question directly being how soon after graduation can I refinance is a good one because I know it seems like students, residents, new practitioners are more aware of refinance options, I think because of the higher interest rates that are out there on some of the federal loans right now, but also probably these companies doing a little bit better job on the marketing side of things as well. So what exactly are the requirements? I mean, how soon can somebody refinance after graduation? And I’m guessing there’s a technical answer to that question, but then maybe there’s also the reality of them being able to qualify for a loan.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so dependent on what strategy you choose — and again, we talked about the two overarching strategies that are out there are forgiveness and the basically nonforgiveness — dependent upon what you choose, is going to really define your timeline. So as an example, if you are looking at the PSLF, and you have a variety of loans, which most borrowers, most clients that I work will have a plethora of loans out there, you’re going to want to consolidate and get your loans into a loan that can get into one of the income-driven repayment plans and start paying or go into repayment as quickly as possible because the idea is to pay, you know, your 120 payments over those 10 years as quickly as possible. So once you graduate and you’re in the grace period, you want to look to get into the active repayment as quickly as possible. Refinance, on the other side, so this is typically where you’re not looking at the public student loan forgiveness program or any forgiveness program. Refinance is probably going to happen a little bit after that because what these private loan companies are going to want to see is income — so obviously, if you are — they want to see a history of income and maybe a history of repayment, so they want to see maybe a couple months of you actively repaying your loan in the federal system for you to get the best rate. Some of these refi companies will honor things like grace periods and that type of thing. But typically in the private refinance, you’re going to have a little bit more of a runway than you would if you’re going through consolidation and public student loan forgiveness.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, so I think technically the answer is yes, you can apply as soon as you want after graduation or if somebody’s in residency, but the caveat being it may be difficult to qualify because ultimately, they’re going to want to see probably a track record of payments being made. And also as you think about getting a competitive interest rate, obviously that’s in part determined based on a debt-to-income ratio. So unless there’s a situation where maybe somebody’s coming out as a student, and they have a spouse who aren’t working or a higher income-earning spouse and they can qualify, yes, you can apply, but ultimately, it may be difficult to get those loans over time. What about the limit? Is there any limit to how many times somebody can refinance?

Tim Baker: There isn’t. And, you know, there are some clients that I’ve worked with that have kind of hacked this a little bit. So they will either go out to each of the refi companies that we like and do a deal that way, or you can refi again and then refi again and then refi again all of your loans. So there’s really no limit to that. It will affect your credit score, you know, if you continuously refi because you’re basically doing a hard check on your credit when you go through the refinance program, but there really is no limit. And it’s kind of the same thing if you think about people that are homeowners out there. You can refi your home as many times as you want. Now, you’re going to be paying closing costs and things that aren’t necessarily present in the student loan refi arena, but the idea here is there are companies out there that understand that we have I think $1.3 trillion in student loan debt out there, and there’s interest payments to be had, so they’re going to compete, even actually offer those cash bonuses, so it’s nice for the consumer to be able to look at the landscape and say, ‘OK. Let me choose the best rate available and maybe get a bonus as I’m doing it.’

Tim Ulbrich: So you can hack the system Tim Church-style, right? And do a multiple refinance?

Tim Baker: Exactly.

Tim Ulbrich: I think he probably knows the rates to a T, the most competitive rate that’s out there, he’s got it nailed.

Tim Baker: He’s a machine.

Tim Ulbrich: He is a machine. And I think that’s the play is like, obviously, you want to consider the impact on credit. Just getting rate quotes will not impact your credit, but obviously, going through the process and ultimately refinancing with a company will impact your credit, so I think that’s a good point to be made. But ultimately, you can do it multiple times. Obviously, these companies do offer cash bonuses, so you want to weigh the benefits of that. And obviously, for some people, depending on maybe you were in residency and you decided to refi or shortly after school and your debt-to-income ratio didn’t look great — fast forward two years, rates may have changed, debt-to-income ratio looks difference, obviously, you’re a more competitive applicant in that process. I think it’s also worth here maybe for a minute just talking about what some of our community members may see in a refi is ultimately, these companies will typically throw in front of you a fixed interest rate, which doesn’t change for the life of the loan. So let’s say that’s 3%, 3.5%, 4%, whatever. That’s 4% for the time period that you’ve agreed upon: five years, seven years, 10 years. Or you’ll see a variable rate and actually even some hybrid rates that are out there now. And a variable rate meaning that can change during the life of the loan. So what advice do you have for people in terms of thinking about is a fixed rate the better play? Is a variable rate? What are some of those factors that should be considered?


Tim Baker: I think the big thing is basically the time horizon of the loan. So obviously, the longer that goes out — seven, 10, 15, 20 years — the more risk that you have, you know, interest rate risk. We are in a rising interest rate environment, meaning interest rates are probably going to go up since I guess the Great Recession, we’ve been stuck in lower interest rates, and they’re now finally starting to climb, which is good for savers, but not necessarily great for borrowers. So I think when you’re weighing the variable versus the fixed interest rate, obviously fixed, the information that you have there is known, so you know exactly what you’re going to pay over the course of the term. The variable interest rate, it might be tied to some type of index that will be adjusted annually to some type of index. If it is, it’s a three- or five-year or whatever, if you know that you can pay them off confidently, you might go for the variable just to kind of as that short-term play because you know you’re going to pay them off, so someone like a Derek Schwartz out there. If it’s going to be longer term, to me, if I was counseling a client, I would meet that with a little bit of pause, knowing that probably the rates are going to go through the roof. So it’s one of those things where you take a risk of getting a better interest rate in the near term, but you know, those particular rates could be jacked up, especially if the time horizon of the loan goes out further. So, you know, it’s not necessarily a bad thing to do, but you mentioned the hybrid loan. So the hybrid rates are kind of where you — if people understand what an adjustable rate mortgage is and arm, you basically, it’ll be fixed, the rate will be fixed for a set period of time and then it will adjust annually after that. So that’s another little bit of a hybrid model that will give you some fixed interest and then variable. So you could look at that particular solution to get a lower rate as well.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, absolutely. I agree on your input on the variable rate and evaluating that against the fixed. Other things I would throw out there would be looking at what’s your emergency fund situation? Know you have some extra cash if needed. What’s your appetite for that payment potentially changing? Do you have wiggle room or not in your budget? So if you look at your budget right now, and you’re looking at a fixed rate and that payment and say, ‘I’ve really got no room to squeeze out an additional,’ then obviously, that variable rate could be tricky. The other thing I would say is do the math. And we’ve got a great calculator if you go to yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance, that’s our page where we have all of our resources associate with refinance on there. You can run the math. So do the math and see, OK, best case scenario, the low end of the variable rate, if this were to stay as is — which to your point, in a short repayment period may be a good play — how much would I be saving against a fixed rate? And is that potential savings worth some of the unknown in the variables that you mentioned?

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think looking at that dollar sign, you’re basically saying is $10,000 or x amount, is that worth the risk of, you know — and I think to quantify that in some regard can be very powerful.

Tim Ulbrich: So one of the things I want to end on here is if you go to our page, again yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance, we’ve got lots of educational resources that will help you out. But there’s some things that we fundamentally believe you should look for in a refinance company. And the good news is as these have become more popular, I think we’re seeing a lot more consistency in the market amongst some of these big players — SoFi, Earnest, CommonBond, LendKey, etc. The things that were looking at are, there should be no origination fee. So in fact, many companies are actually going to give you a cash bonus. But at minimum, you shouldn’t be paying anything to get this loan started. No. 2 is there should be no prepayment penalty. So if you take on a 10-year refi, and you want to get this done in five or seven because you got some extra cash or some additional money, you want to get it done faster, you should have the ability to do that without any penalties for making extra payments. Many of these companies are also going to offer you a lower interest rate with autopay. So if you can do that, of course take advantage of it. And one of the ones we’re always trying to hit home and we think is really important that you evaluate is ensuring that it has protection and a forgiveness clause in the event of a death or long-term disability. So if you only have federal loans, that protection is there for you. If you refinance with a private company, that can be dependent upon the company. And so you want to make sure 1, does the company offer that protection that those loans would be forgiven in the event of a death or permanent disability. And if not, do you have the insurance protection in place, whether that be from a life insurance policy, a disability insurance policy, to cover that in the event that it would occur? And then obviously, you’re going to see some nuances and differences between these companies about types of repayment options that they’ll give you. But ultimately, again, on that page yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance, you’ll see all of that information, you’ll see a guide that we have available, and we have links there where you can also click out and get some quotes with companies in a very short period of time. And we’ve got some really competitive cash bonus offers if refinance is the right play for you.

Tim Ulbrich: Alright, let’s take a quick break and hear a minute from our sponsor, and then we’re going to jump into the second listener question focused on student loans.

Sponsor: Student loans are a big problem for pharmacists. With many graduates facing interest rates above 6%, it can be hard to get traction and make progress. If you’re not pursuing the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program, and you don’t need income-based repayments, refinancing can be a great move and could save you thousands of dollars in interest. Check out our refinance page at yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance where you can calculate your savings and check your rate with one of our partner companies that are offering exclusive cash bonuses to the YFP community of up to $450. That’s yourfinancialpharmacist.com/refinance to find out your savings today.

Tim Ulbrich: OK, let’s jump into our second listener question, which comes from Nate in Ohio.

Nate: Hey, Tim and Tim, this is Nate from Akron, Ohio. My question is, what is the best way for me to start managing my student loan debt during residency? And early in the career, what is the most appropriate balance as far as investing and managing student loan? I appreciate any input you have. Thank you.

Tim Ulbrich: Nate, thank you so much for taking the time to submit your question. We appreciate you’ve got a good one, actually two questions here around the best way to start managing student loan debt during residency, a question we get a lot, and the second question, which might be the most common question we get: What’s the most appropriate balance as far as investing and managing student loan debt? So your first one, what’s the best way to start managing student loan debt during residency. I think it’s a great question. You look at the average resident salary out there, obviously dependent upon geographic location, somewhere between $40,000 and $50,000. But we have an average indebtedness now of graduates of about $160,000. So that’s a common thought, and a question that comes out is can I afford residency training? Obviously, what are the financial implications of that? And if I’m in residency training, what do I do about these student loans? So Tim Baker, as you hear that question, obviously you work with a lot of clients that are residents as well. What are you thinking in terms of strategies around paying off student loans during residency training?

Tim Baker: I mean, I think it follows — and I think Nate, this would be a good chance to maybe look at the beta group test for the student loan course — I think that the very first thing, whether you’re a resident or not, is really to look at the inventory. And I break this down in terms of an inventory of what you actually owe and who you owe it to and then also kind of an inventory of your feelings toward those loans. So a lot of people, you know, unless we ask ourselves the questions, how do you feel about these student loans? If it’s like, ‘I feel OK about them, I know they’re going to be around for awhile,’ versus ‘Tim, I can’t sleep at night. I get anxiety.’ And these are things clients tell me about their loans, that’s really going to dictate, I think, how you approach them. I think in residency, the beautiful thing about residency, especially dependent on the approach you take in terms of your strategy, whether that’s, again, the forgiveness play or the non-forgiveness play, is that you can do some damage in residency for both strategies. So to me, the best way to start is to do the inventory. And basically what dictates that is going to be really two things. It’s going to be your NSLDS, basically your report, which basically is an inventory of all your federal loans, and then also your credit report, which is going to basically outline all of your private loans. So I think once you kind of inventory your thoughts and feelings toward the loans and then actually the amount you owe and the interest rate you’re paying, I think that is going to be the first basically jumpoff point to kind of begin the process of saying, ‘OK, how do I begin to, you know, peel this thing back and figure out the best way forward?’

Tim Ulbrich: So once you do your inventory of your loans and you assess your feelings, to me, the question then becomes, are you pursuing Public Service Loan Forgiveness or not?

Tim Baker: Yes.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think that’s a critical question. Nate, your question around residency — what we know about residency training and pharmacy is that about 90 percent of all residencies are in a hospital, health system setting. And of the hospital health systems that are out there, about 80 percent are considered not for-profit institutions, which obviously would be qualifying organizations for residency. So Tim, why is that question of PSLF or no PSLF so important when you think about strategies of attacking student loans or not in residency?

Tim Baker: Yeah, and I think again, one of the things that is not necessarily, you know, completely laid out in front of you is the information about your forthcoming career. And what I mean by that is, you know, if you do a residency, and you work for a 501c3 nonprofit, which is basically what qualifies an institution to be part of the PSLF program, you’re not necessarily sure that you’re going to be, you know, if you’re a PGY1, if you’re going to be nine years in the public service or a PGY2, if you have another eight years in public service. But if you’re pretty confident that you are going to be in the public student loan forgiveness program, and you’re going to be in one of those 501c3, you should start basically your repayment as soon as possible because the way that your repayment is calculated is going to be based on the previous year’s income. So if you’re a PGY1, how much did you make in your P4 year? Probably not much. So that means your payment is going to be close to zero, but you still get qualified payments toward your 10 years. And the same thing when you are a PGY2, it’s going to look back at your PGY1 year and basically look at your income. And your payments are going to increase, but not in terms of what you would normally make as a pharmacist. So there are ways to really optimize your situation to get through really the first third of the PSLF program if you’re in a two-year residency program and you’re working for a nonprofit. So that’s super to note because I think the default in the federal system is if you have a grace period or a deferment period or whatever it is, most people take it because they think it’s in their best interest. Like, ‘Oh, the government is offering this.’ It’s the same thing with some of these repayment plans, which a lot of these federal repayment plans are actually garbage. And that’s one of the things that we talk about in the course is we give you a little bit of shortcut of the ones to look for. But just because the government says, ‘Hey, you know, take these grace periods or these deferment periods,’ doesn’t mean that you should. It’s not necessarily in your best interest. And on the flip side of this, if you look at it from a non-forgiveness play, you know, if you’re a resident, you’re probably not going to want to go into the private refinance sector because it’s going to look at basically your principal and your interest rate, and you might not be able to afford those payments, especially if you’re looking at an average indebtedness of $160,000. That payment’s going to be in the $1,800 range in a standard 10-year plan. So for residents making $40,000 or $50,000, it’s probably not going to be the best move. So, you know, this is kind of where you have a bridge strategy where you’re looking at the income-driven, you know, similar to what you would do in the forgiveness strategy where you would just do an income-driven plan and then when you have more information, you can either pivot and, you know, stay in the federal system or pivot out and refinance at that higher income level.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, just to reiterate what you said early on in that response is remember that just because you’re in deferment — or even if you’re making an income-driven plan, depending on that calculation — it’s likely that your loan balance is growing. And I cannot emphasize enough to not just react to the payment that’s put in front of you without thinking about what your overall strategy is. So what do I mean here is obviously, many if not all of your pharmacy student loans are unsubsidized, accruing interest while you’re in school, through any grace periods. But then even if you go into an income-driven repayment plan, because of what Tim mentioned and how they’re looking back into your P4 year to calculate that payment, that payment — depending on your total debt load — probably isn’t going to even cover the interest that’s accruing each month. So I think to the point that was made, if you’re not pursuing Public Service Loan Forgiveness, what can you do to try to at least keep that total balance at bay so when you get out of residency, you can then really start to attack those loans without that loan balance growing during residency training. So I’ve personally seen way too many situations — and obviously, some of them are not preventable because of whatever variables — but too many situations of somebody graduating at $180,000, $190,000, finishing two years of residency, and all of a sudden, that balance is $210,000 or $220,000 because it’s grown over that two-year period.

Tim Baker: And I, you know, have a story with a client I’m working with. She had about I think $75,000 in debt. And that’s what she thought she had. But over the course of all these deferments and periods that she’s taken advantage of, you know, air quotes “taken advantage of,” you know, when I actually did the inventory for her, it was upwards of like $90,000, $95,000. And she was shocked because she’s like, ‘Well I only thought I had $70,000.’ The problem is that the interest has grown, and then kind of a gut punch on top of that is when she basically goes into repayment, now that $95,000, that interest that was capitalized is now going to be interest on top of interest. And that’s kind of a difficult thing to swallow, especially for some people that they look back at their situation and they say, ‘Oh man, I probably could have paid down some of that interest. Or I could have been more mindful of my loans when I was in this period of flux.’ So yeah, super important to be aware of and not just to take kind of the programs or the different status of your loans as they go through, don’t take those just at face value.

Tim Ulbrich: So for those of you that are listening that are either current students or residents or those that may qualify or think you qualify potentially for PSLF, if you’re looking to learn more, Episode 018, we talk about maximizing the benefits of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, so we’ll link to that in the show notes. Tim, what are you hearing on the latest and greatest with PSLF? It seems like it’s actually been somewhat quiet for awhile and then there was news that came out last week about some action as people are actually starting to seek that forgiveness.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so the latest news is that was put out is that Congress has authorized or basically earmarked $350 million to borrowers out there that thought they were enrolled, properly enrolled in the PSLF program but then were probably, that were actually in the wrong repayment system. So it’s kind of a two-step process to get into the PSLF program. So this is encouraging, I think, to me because as much as the Department of Education has fumbled this whole program since it was initiated in the Bush administration back in 2007, this is one of the first I think steps where you actually see money set aside, and this sounds like it’s oops money for that, you know, subset of people that raised their hand and said, ‘Hey, I want to be in the PSLF program,’ and thought that they were in it but just didn’t do the, I guess the logistic step properly where they needed to move from a standard or an extended standard into an income-driven plan. So to me, it’s somewhat encouraging. And some of the chatter that I’ve seen is that the $350 million might not be enough, and I guess it depends on who actually that $350 is for, but we’re starting to hear more chatter about people that are actually being forgiven. So the stats that I heard was that 13,000 people applied for forgiveness since you could in October of 2017, only 1,000 was expected to actually be forgiven or be qualified because of some of these errors in the program. So that’s a 7.7% rate, which to me that means that we’re failing in terms of this program. But it sounds like this particular earmark spending will capture some of those people that thought they were in the proper repayment plan but weren’t. So that’s good news.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, and one of the things that gets me so fired up about the course that we’re working on is that we really spend a lot of time and detail helping those going through it decide is PSLF the right move or not. If so, what’s a strategy to maximize this? And then really getting into the nitty-gritty of what are the numbers? What do the numbers look like? And if I’m going to assume this risk, what’s the potential upside? So again, those that might be interested in learning more, helping us with beta testing, yourfinancialpharmacist.com/studentloans. So Tim, the million-dollar question, which is Nate’s second half of his question, what’s the most appropriate balance as far as investing and managing student loan debt? And here, obviously it’s also in the context of residency. So what are the factors that somebody needs to consider knowing this answer is highly dependent upon the individual in terms of how might I balance student loan debt versus investing for the future?

Tim Baker: It’s such a great question. I think it’s one of the questions that we get asked the most. And you know, the stock answer that I give is it depends, which is kind of the worst answer to a question ever. And I think one of the things that, you know, in Episode 026, we talk about baby stepping into your financial plan, the two things to focus on first. And really, the two things that I focus on when I look at a client’s financial picture is what does their consumer debt look like, so credit card debt, and what’s their emergency fund. So the student loan piece is a completely different animal, and I think dependent on the strategy that you take I think is going to dictate when you get into the investment world. And there’s lot of different opinions out there of when to invest and when not to invest and how do you do that with student loans. So some of the factors that I would look at in terms of should I be investing or not is what does your debt situation look like. So if you have credit card debt, which a lot of pharmacists will take on credit card debt as they go through school, I see that more and more, if you have credit card debt, go ahead and fold up your investment policy statement, your investment plan and stick that in your back pocket until that is completely paid off. I think the other thing that we have to be mindful of is just what is your attitude towards the student loan debt. So if your attitude is, ‘Man, I need to get out from underneath this as quickly as possible,’ or if you take kind of a Dave Ramsey approach to debt, and you think that most debt outside of the mortgage debt is bad, then you probably are not going to want to invest anytime soon. The other thing is just like interest rates. So if you’re fortunate enough to have loans that your interest rates are super, super, super low, and you’re kind of, ‘Eh, I can deal with the debt,’ then maybe wading into the waters of investing is more important. And I guess I say this all in the context of, you know, also your employer, what they offer in terms of retirement. You’re probably, nine times out of 10 — and this isn’t investment advice — but nine times out of 10, you’re going to want to probably at least put into your 401k or your 403b what your employer is matching because that’s basically a 100% return on your money. So if they match 4%, you probably want to put 4% of income in there. And that’s typically a general rule of thumb. Some other things to be aware of is — I’m trying to think. So one of the stories that I recently saw too is that — I don’t know if you saw this, Tim — is about 20% of students are using parts of their student loan money to buy bitcoin.

Tim Ulbrich: Yes, oh gosh.

Tim Baker: I would probably say that this is not a smart thing to do.

Tim Ulbrich: The crypto lovers are going to send us hate mail, by the way.

Tim Baker: Yeah, so. But yeah, if you were a client of mine, I would probably advise against that. Not because I don’t like cryptocurrency. I think that there is some longevity there, but I don’t think it’s necessarily looked at as a good investment in terms of using money that you’re 6 or 7% on to then put that there.

Tim Ulbrich: I think what all the things you’re saying is why the answer is depends. And to me, this is why it gets me fired up a little bit when a debate’s going on within a Facebook group or something about this topic because for everyone, the answer is different. I mean, there’s so many factors you just outlined: interest rates, philosophy or feelings toward debt, you know, in terms of what options, do I have a match, do I not have a match. Other ones I’m thinking about are what’s your horizon and timeline for saving? So if you’re a nontraditional student, and maybe you’re coming out, starting your career at 40, this answer might be different than somebody who’s graduating at 24. Are you pursuing loan forgiveness or not? If you’re going Tim Church-style, and you’re throwing massive student loan payments on a short period of say a five-year refi, and you can get your rate down to 3.5 or even less, that might differ than if you’re not doing that. So so many variables that come into play, and I think this also speaks to me the power of working with a really good planner that can help ask all these questions and help determine the answers to these. And we didn’t even talk about I guess your tolerance toward risk as being another one here.

Tim Baker: Yeah.

Tim Ulbrich: You know, and it can really help you wade through, you and/or a significant other to come up with a definitive answer to this question, to come up with a plan that can help you work through this and can feel confident in that plan going forward.

Tim Baker: And I think one thing that you kind of, that maybe we didn’t hit on completely is — and I think we’re seeing this now — is if I look at my student loans, and I’m paying 6%, but then I look at what the market has done over the last year, and I’m like, well, it’s up whatever, 15%. You know, isn’t it a no-brainer just to basically pay the least amount on my loans and then go into the market and get my 15%? And it’s not necessarily — I guess the rebuttal of that is it could easily be down 15%, the market could be down 15% next year. So it is a cyclical thing, and you know, right now, people are saying invest because it’s a no-brainer. But then, you know, if we go through kind of another dip in the market, that’s not necessarily a no-brainer. So the no-brainer in terms of what are the facts that I know is that if you pay off — your loans, they’re going to charge you like clockwork 6% every year. So that’s a given. But when you go into the investment market, you do take risks. So you’re not necessarily going to get that elevated return that you think you’re going to get. So although you can make a case that over the long-term, the market is going to take care of you, and it’s going to return 10%, that is true. If you’re looking at your student loans, that’s not necessarily a no-brainer that you’re going to get the return that you’re looking at in terms of the market.

Tim Ulbrich: And I think where this debate gets a little bit interesting is with some of the refi rates we’re seeing out there with people that are getting, that have top credit, that have a really good income-to-debt ratio and that are willing to pay it off in a really aggressive period, you’re getting rates down that low. Still, it depends, is the answer. But obviously, that becomes a little bit different discussion depending on their personal situation. ‘

Tim Baker: But usually if you get rates that low, it means that your $1,800 payment is now — what does Tim Church pay? $3,800 or $4,800? So there’s probably not a lot of money left over to actually go into the market and invest.

Tim Ulbrich: Great point.

Tim Baker: I think his thought, and I think we see this with a lot of millionaire pharmacists that we’ve interviewed is, you know, if you can train yourself to have the behavior to make massive payments towards your debt, you probably can do the same thing towards your investments. So any of that opportunity cost or any of that lost time that you invested, you can probably make up fairly quickly. And again, it just depends on your situation, your appetite for risk and all that. So it’s definitely a murky picture.

Tim Ulbrich: Yeah, don’t forget your timeline, right? So if you’re going to knock these out in three years, that’s a much different situation than if you’re waiting to invest because you’re going to pay them off over 10. So obviously that timeline and compound interest and time that could be lost is a critical factor as well. So Tim, great stuff as always. Thank you again to Nate and Bethany for submitting a question to be featured on this “Ask Tim & Tim” episode of the podcast. And as a small thank you, we’re going to be sending them a super comfy YFP T-shirt. And again, if you have a question you’d like to have featured on the show, make sure you shoot us an email at [email protected]. And we hope you’ll join us again next week as we feature two questions on investing.

Join the YFP Community!

 

Recent Posts

[pt_view id=”f651872qnv”]